Fee to less fair not always claimed from ideal grounds. I want to be treated nice, given a good deal, even though I have failed to remove all oppression from the system, amplify perfectly? True.
My writings are less than ideal for children? Yes. I comment on War, Peace, Defense Law, and Systemic problems and I comment in a harsh way at times to try and combat systemic oppression. I feel like those burdens are ideal for children, or the words required to convince adults are always ideally sound for children? No.
I have desired to provide learning tools at times on my vlog, potentially art like flowers that might be useful for encouraging children. With everything happening in the World plus cybersecurity problems things get convoluted in less-than-ideal ways. Keeping adult content distinctly separate from children is hard to get right, and safeguards that are in place one day might not be in place another.
Practically has potential to be made harder, put into question more in tough times is likely not fully appreciated by anyone until they experience tough times. Calling things out might inspire less than ideal desire to make others experience tough times as well. If someone learns questionable content exists, they might report it to authorities, yet authorities or other groups in public settings might not be required to address it adequately, in a timely manner, or in a way that doesn’t lead to greater problems down the line. Systems like Computer Systems and Networks have potential for being able to be rigged to fail in a way that could lead to blackmail or extortion, charged with crimes people perpetrating might not always even comprehend are possible.
I am not extorting anyone, yet the word extort has multiple meanings
EXTORT Definition & Usage Examples | Dictionary.com
inspire to divulge is a synonym for extort?
2nd definition, not law “to compel (something) of a person or thing:” – dictionary.com
First definition, by that definition police confiscating property is obtaining via force (say police with a gun taking property not intimidating?). Not sure I want to say people protecting the public safety and good are extorting property.
1st definition part a, law “to wrest or wring (money, information, etc.) from a person by violence, intimidation, or abuse of authority; obtain by force, torture, threat, or the like.” – dictionary.com
Uses word Or not And crucial in computer science, potentially crucial there as well – that said I am not a lawyer, police officer, politician, doctor, or united nations member.
One person could say another is extorting someone meaning second definition, and another person could perceive and comprehend it is as one of the meanings in the first definition.
Allot of difference between obtain by force and torture, threat
Which definition used likely sometimes up to debate, likely in non-ideal ways
Easy to set myself to ideal know, yet my perception is based upon a system that is less than ideal – language. Again though, not a lawyer, police officer, politician, doctor, or united nations member.
Fee wind woe? When fees wind woe?
I am USA Citizen, with Caucasian skin and Previously Orange hair (not that orange anymore). I like sounding profound like Buddhist monks even though I am a Christian, rhyming sometimes feels profound. Style is both nice and has potential for representation that is not ideally accurate or potential for all bias out – I don’t want increased Asian discrimination because I write in ways to try to tailor experience or enjoy working out like Kickboxing.
I also am trying to defend people from societal oppression yet I am not a lawyer, defending people might not feel like all attacks out. The one being defended might require calling out actions in other parties or systems, and it is important to defend those that are the target of defenses. In the action of defending PartyA from PartyB, defending is likely to amplify less than ideally at times thus PartyB might need defense from PartyA or PartyC at a later time.
I am not a lawyer yet I feel like commenting and giving feedback on laws and the current system is crucial to a better future? Yes. Chose not to be a lawyer could be set to doesn’t understand can’t help. Maybe I or my words won’t always be the best to help does not equate to I don’t care. I care in the right levels adequate levels could be called into question, perception and comprehension of problems that actually exist get obfuscated. I have degrees in Computer Engineering and Math, I can say that values get set less than ideally at times by both machine and operator error, and sometimes even programmer error, negate 100% bugs out.
If I see a report that says 2 people have watched a safety video. And I just see that they both have clicked play, does not equal both have watched all the way to the end. Even if both have watched to the end, I can’t say they have adequately comprehended the videos, or if there wasn’t music or other things going on in the room at the same time. Data that looks solid, data that is acted upon has potential for amplifying less than ideally at least in the kind of companies I have worked with. Amplifies sufficiently for 90% of the population does not equate to always amplifies sufficiently for 10% of the population. More funding and more resolution might work far better in certain use cases.
Encouragement factors into Throughput that can save lives and knowledge of that amplifies less than ideally. Encouragement is worth turning up though has potential for done in the wrong ways at times that could lead to hubris. Encouragement has potential for harder territory. That said Never Say Die!