Less than ideal Capacity to Delete – Don’t See a wand

See a wand has potential to be turned up, send a message, don’t like what sent delete it, might lead to less than full appreciation for fact once something is sent, revoking it, revoking its actions and perceptions are not always ideally possible

Seeing Prayer or Technology as a magic wand that always delivers is both turned up and has potential for delivering less than ideally. Backspace to no backspace, Eraser to no eraser seems less than ideal. People are iffed on the value constantly, can backspace in this scenario can’t back space in that scenario. Publish revoke not quite same as not typing something first place, and typing with surveillance a bit like publish without desire to publish.

Words can be walked back not always as valuable as words not delivered in the first place. Less practice walking back words not always more ideal future communication established. Failures that factor into gains not always immediately seen as win, or should be desired to be seen as ideal wins. Delay of words not guaranteed to be higher value added in all situations. Left in place might be seen as norm, too hard difficult to change might equal acceptance of lack of change does not equal that is always ideally desirable.

I think I am right to think I am wrong based upon more data has precedent for turned up in inconvenient ways. Should factor something in does not always equate to ideal desire to factor something in. Assessment and Judgment have potential for changing in inconvenient ways does not equate to zero-time costs, capacity to give sufficient time to address matters not guaranteed – thus a reminder Don’t Judge and Assessment not always valuable seems wise to mention. Previous decisions have potential for biasing perception and comprehension – system seems pretty solid, question its previous deliveries?

Never know when Bias will show its ugly head in own motivations, decisions, deliveries, and previous deliveries. Cost more for me to factor in feels less than ideal? Negate Bias Amps at Ideal Times or in Ideal Ways. Valuation that protects me better has potential for turned up commonly and there are many reason to do so does not equate to always ideal value established. If I am trying to argue something, to prove my reasoning I might be valuing my reason as potentially higher value than what will amplify best for others – direction chosen that factors into valuation seen as ideally chosen seems to be a bit much to claim. For instance I could be listening to news reports instead of writing this document, which might change the direction of desired input entirely.

Pardons Pretty Exciting News

I wanted him impeached, if I got my way pardons might have gone through. I like seeing less people stuck in jail and getting to live their lives again. Always getting my way not ideal.