My Tech Blog

여배우와 배우, 톤과 억양
Actresses and Actors, Tone and Inflection
여배우와 배우는 특별한 것을 더하고 작가는 특별한 것을 더합니다
Actresses and Actors add something special, Writers add something special
이상적으로 모든 여배우가 역할을 할 수 있고 이상적으로는 영화 캐릭터에서 발견되는 특성이 여배우 및 배우의 정신 상태와 상관 관계가 없습니다.
Ideally any actress could play a role, ideally the qualities found in the characters of movies would have no correlation to mental state of Actresses and Actors

영웅과 관련되어 있는 것이 모두 나쁜 것도 아니고 좋은 것도 아닙니다.
Being associated to a hero not all bad, and not all good
악당과 관련되어 있는 것이 모두 나쁜 것은 아니며(명성과 재산), 모두가 좋은 것도 아닙니다.
Being associated to a villain not all bad (fame and fortune), and not all good

인식이 항상 완전히 인식할 수 있는 것은 아님, 판단하는 다른 사람의 생각을 투영하는 능력 항상 완전히 인식할 수 있는 것은 아님
perceptions not always fully appreciable, ability to project thoughts of others judging not always fully appreciable

대작에서 괴물을 연기하고, 공포영화에서 편히 흔들릴 때?
Playing the monster in the block buster, in the horror movie to easy able to shake when convenient?

사람들은 영화에서 자신이 맡은 역할에 대해 사회에 더해진 가치보다 더 가치를 높이 평가합니까?
People valued more for the part they play in the movie than their value added to society to fully appreciated?

극장, 명성, 무대 위의 예술가들이 정신에 영향을 미치지 않습니까?
Theatre, Fame, Artists on Stage, to no effect on the psyche?

그들이 추가하는 가치로 훈련되고, 무대에서 만들어낸 출력은 당신이 이것을 앉혀야 해서 미안하다는 말을 하는 것입니까?
Trained as value they add, the output they make on stage to told sorry you need to sit this one out?

스타 축구 선수는 오랫동안 스타, 스타 복서는 오랫동안 스타, 스타 음악가는 오랫동안 스타
Star football player only a star for so long, star boxers only a star for so long, star musician only a star for so long

DE Magnify Studio는 전쟁과 부패한 정부로 인해 제대로 평가받지 못한 시스템으로 인해 좋은 시절을 보냈습니다.
DE Magnify Studio in their good years due to wars and corrupt governments to less fully appreciated systems

명성은 약간의 위험이 있어 잠시 동안만 권한을 부여합니다.
Fame is a bit of a risk, empowering only for a time

리더십은 약간의 위험이 있어 잠시 동안만 권한을 부여합니다.
Leadership is a bit of a risk, empowering only for a time

의사가 되다가 어느 날 손이 너무 많이 흔들려서 수술을 하기에는 가치가 떨어지게 됩니까?
Being a doctor and then one day hand shakes too much to be in surgery, to good years of less value?

시스템의 모든 가치가 아니라 최근에 나에게 무엇을 해줬나요?
What have you done for me lately, not an all value in system

최근에 나에게 무슨 짓을 한거야 -> 특권, 사회가 우리에게 빚을 지고 있다는 가정
What have you done for me lately -> Privilege, assumption society owes us something

어제 1달러가 효과가 있었다고 해서 오늘 1달러가 효과가 있다고 가정합니까?
Assume that just because a dollar worked yesterday a dollar will work today?

NFA-NFR에서 더 낮은 가치로 설정된 금융 시스템
Financial systems set to less value in NFA-NFR

나에게 일어날 수 없는 일에 대한 기대는 나에게 일어나지 않을 것입니다. 시스템의 모든 가치가 아닙니다.
Expectation of that can’t happen to me won’t happen to me not an all value in system

특권은 용서할 수 없는 시스템으로 이어질 수 있습니다.
Privilege can lead to unforgiving systems

믿음 계산기를 모든 가치로 가져갈 수는 없습니까?
Belief calculators can’t be taken away to all value in?

배우, 여배우, 스타 풋볼 선수는 더 많이 저축해야 할 수 있으며 더 많이 저축하면 사회에서 항상 충분히 인정받지 못하는 엘리트 지위로 이어질 수 있습니다.

Actors, Actresses, Star Football players might need to save more, save more can lead to elite status not always fully appreciated by society

줄 수 있음 뺏을 수 있음, 유지할 수 있음을 유지할 수 없음을 쉽게 나타낼 수 있음

Can be given can be taken away, can maintain that to can’t maintain that easy to be able to turn up

사람들을 거리로 내몰았고 더 많은 사람들을 거리로 내몰 수 있는 잠재력이 있는 바 PR NFA-NFR

Bar PR in that has puts people on the street and has potential to put more people on the streets NFA-NFR

엉뚱한 지도력을 한동안 방치한 채 큰 영향을 미칠 수 있다 NFA가 쉽게 온전히 존중할 수 없음

Wrong leadership left in charge for a while can have large impacts NFA not easily able to fully respect

잘못된 수학으로 공급선을 끊는 제도 탄핵 제도가 간단하지 않다

Impeachment of System that Breaks Supply Lines based on Bad Math Not a Simple System to Turn Up

시스템의 모든 가치에 대해 내가 담당하는 역할을 모르십니까?

Not knowing the part I play in this to an all value in system?

가시성이 제한되어 비이상적인 가능성이 있음 NFA-NFR

Visibility out being limited equals potential for non ideals NFA-NFR

메시지가 제한적일 때 PR에 대한 이익을 통합하기 어렵습니다.

Hard to consolidate gains to PR when message is being limited

그 안에 있는 가치가 있는 것이 항상 보이는 것은 아니며, 보이지 않는 것은 보다 현명하지 못한 시스템에 완전히 존중되지 않습니다.

Value in that is Value in is not always seen, things that are not seen to Not Fully Respected to a more unwise system

항상 단순한 시스템이 아닌 더 많은 것에 대한 편견에 근거하여 사람들을 오판할 수 있는 제한된 해상도와 높은 가능성

Limited Resolution and High Potential for Misjudging People based on Biases to more, not always a simple system

브이로그를 읽을 수 있을 때 브이로그를 입력하시겠습니까? 브이로그를 입력할 수 있는데도 브이로그를 읽고 있나요?

Typing a vlog when I could be reading a vlog? Reading a vlog when I could be typing a vlog?

감옥에서 풀려나면 가장 먼저 하고 싶은 일은 브이로그 포스트를 듣는 것입니다. 메시지를 듣거나 듣지 않는다는 이유로 사람들에 대한 편견을 갖지 않는 것이 가장 좋습니다.

First thing you want to do when release from Jail is listen to a vlog post? Best not to hold biases against people for listening or not listening to message

설계상 제한된 시간의 손상된 시스템은 NFA-NFR의 시스템이 덜 부패할 수 있는 교육에 대한 완전한 이해를 감소시킵니다.

Corrupt system of limit time in by design leads to less full appreciation of training that could lead to less corrupt system in NFA-NFR

5년 뒤에 나가면 이걸 듣고 싶어질 수도 있고, 20년 뒤에 남는 게 남은 시간으로 하는 게 더 나을지도 몰라. NFA-NFR

Let out after 5 years might want to listen to this, left in 20 years might have better things to do with their remaining time NFA-NFR

이것을 들어야 한다, 저것을 들어야 한다, 유용한 시스템, 그것이 유용한 사람들에게

Have to listen this, have to listen to that, a useful system, to those that it is useful to

설계에 의한 제한 시간의 부패한 시스템으로 인해 사회는 설계에 따라 2+2=7 시스템에 대해 더 충분히 이해해야 합니다.

Corrupt System of Limit Time in by Design Leads to Society having to have a more full appreciation of 2+2=7 systems in by design

디자인에 의한 교육을 위한 제한 시간은 디자인에 의한 사회를 위한 논리가 아닙니다

Limit Time for Training In By Design is not more Logic for Society In By Design

그들은 그 잘못을 추가했습니다. 용서가 없습니까? 사회가 그들에게 무슨 짓을 한 후?

They added that wrong, no forgiveness in? After what society did to them?

사람들이 방어적이지 않은 사람들이 자신의 법적 기술을 연마해야 한다고 느끼지 않은 사람들이 감옥에서 결국 자신이 변호사, 시스템의 권력을 잡을 수 있는 변호사가 될 필요가 있다는 느낌을 갖게 된 다음 잠재적으로 오용될 수 있다는 사실을 완전히 이해하지 못합니다. 동일한 시스템에 대한 그 힘

Not sure people fully appreciate that people that were not defensive did not feel like they have to sharpen their legal skills before Jail can end up feeling like they need to be a lawyer, a lawyer that can take power of the system, and then potentially misuse that power against that same system

율법주의는 생명을 위한 시스템의 모든 가치가 아닙니다 NFA-NFR 율법주의에는 부작용이 있습니다 보호주의에는 부작용이 있습니다

Legalism not an all value in system for lives involved NFA-NFR Legalism has side effects protectionism has side effects

모든 부작용이 나쁜 것은 아니며, 경청하도록 가르칠 수 있으며 격려가 추가하는 것과 그렇지 않은 것을 더욱 충분히 감사할 수 있습니다.

Not all side effects are bad, can teach to listen and more fully appreciate encouragement what it adds and what it does not

율법주의와 용서하지 않음, 옳지 못함, 재앙의 가능성 높음

Legalism and Unforgiveness, Hard to get right, High Potential for Woe

다양한 영화와 이야기의 악당을 변호하는 연습을 하시겠습니까?

Practice being Defense Lawyer for Villains in different Movies and Stories?

베인, 스케어크로우, 리들러, 타노스, 포이즌 아이비, 펭귄, 조커, 아포칼립스, 매그니토?

Bane, Scarecrow, Riddler, Thanos, Poison Ivy, Penguin, Joker, Apocalypse, Magneto?

단순하게 판단하지 않고 세트를 방어해야 합니까?

Having to defend that set without judgement to simple?

네거티브 PR 약간의 절제된 표현

Negative PR a bit of an understatement

간단하죠? Simple Right?

그들의 이야기에서 가장 어두운 부분을 모두 언어학, 조합론 및 NLP가 포함된 믿을 수 있는 하나의 시스템으로 통합하시겠습니까?

Consolidate all the darkest parts of their stories into one believable system turned up with linguistics, combinatorics, and NLP?

무엇이 용서에 이르고 무엇이 용서되지 않는지에 대한 연구 High Value In

Research on what leads to forgiveness and what does not is High Value In

용서해야 할 것인가 아니면 용서하지 말아야 할 것인가에 따라 용서하라는 사람의 메시지를 믿어야 합니까?

Should I forgive or should I not forgive dependent on should I trust the message of the person telling me to forgive?

Walter Cronkite는 용서가 중요하고 할 가치가 있다고 말합니까? 아니면 Bane이 용서가 중요하고 가치가 있다고 말합니까?

Walter Cronkite tells your Forgiveness is important and worth doing or Bane telling you Forgiveness is important and worth doing?

누가 메시지를 전하는지에 대한 선입견, 아니 편견은 항상 간단한 시스템입니까?

Preconceived notions about who is giving the message, no Bias always a simple system?

Bane은 Scorpion Spider Dragon과 같은 대비 알고리즘입니다.

Bane is a contrast algorithm, kind of like a Scorpderagon

신뢰할 수 있는 사람은 이상적이지 않은 방식으로 증가할 수 있습니다. 당시 Cronkite의 나쁜 놈은 음성으로 하루를 구했습니다.

Trustworthy can be ramped in non ideal ways, Bad guy in then Cronkite like voice saves the day

사악한 Cronkite 잠재력 NFA-NFR

Evil Cronkite Potential NFA-NFR

나는 신을 믿고 신을 완전히 이해하지 못한다. 내 논리가 제한된 해상도에 기반을 두고 있음을 세상에 상기시키는 것이 가장 좋다.

I believe in God and I don’t fully understand God, best to remind world my logic is built on Limited Resolution

NFA-NFR을 완전히 보호하고 싶지 않을 수 있는 사람 보호

Protecting people we might not fully want to protect NFA-NFR

대낮에 난파된 경기장에 대한 편견? 왠지 퓨처라마가 생각나네요

Bias for wrecked a stadium in broad daylight? Kind of reminds me of Futurama

“너무 아름답지만 너무 중립적” – Zap Brannigan, Futurama

“So beautiful yet so neutral” – Zap Brannigan, Futurama

당신이 서 있는 공화당원과 민주당원은 부적합한 SSI 시스템으로 이어지는 방식으로 국가 부채를 증가시킨 혐의를 받고 있습니다. 어떻게 변명하시겠습니까?

Republicans and Democrats you stand accused of ramping the national debt in way that leads to an inadequate SSI system, How do you plead?

“나는 휴식을 취한다” – Zapp Brannigan, Futurama

“I rest my case” – Zap Brannigan, Futurama

유머와 안전 최적화 100%?

Humor and Safety Optimized 100%?

유머 시스템의 값이 시스템의 100% 값이 아님, 시스템의 1000%에 대한 잠재력 -50%의 잠재력

Humor a value in system not a 100% value in system, potential for 1000% in system potential for -50% potential

유머는 약간의 예술이자 약간의 문제 해결입니다.

Humor is a bit of Art and a bit of Problem Solving

들어보세요 – 농담은 충분히 재미있지 않습니다
Listen – Jokes are not funny enough
사과 – 유머가 부족하여 공백기를 남겨둔 점 사과드립니다.
Apologize – I apologize for leaving a vacuum with not enough humor
해결 – 명확화 아이디어 개발 확산적 수렴적 사고 구현
Solve – Clarify Ideate Development Implement Divergent Convergent Thinking
감사합니다. 이 사실을 알려주셔서 감사합니다.
Thank – Thank you for bring this to our attention

최고의 결과 일관된 웃음

Top Result Consistent Laughs

Humor as a Non Null Time Cost Reducer?

If You truly value Drama, do you turn up Horror and Humor?

Get served horror all the time leads to wanting to see something else

Get served humor and only laughs all the time leads to wanting to see something else

Perfect vacuum for Drama NFA-NFR

Studio weaponization of other content NFA-NFR

Force leaders to watch 2 hours of news right before a 10 minute press brief is all value in?

Our updates required leads to less appreciation for updates and new updaters combined NFA

Combo buy out of system via forced to watch content for extended lengths NFA?

A세트의 어떤 질문이 A’를 더 웃게 할까?

Which questions from set A will lead to more laughs A’?

모든 질문이 처리량 증가에 가치가 있는 것은 아닙니까?

Not all questions are value in for increased throughput?

내 콘텐츠를 비웃는 게 나쁜가요?

Bad to make fun of my own content?

남자가 통신 업데이트를 하고 있으니 잘 들어보세요….

Man is making communications updates, better listen up….

의사 소통의 이익을 위해 항상 가치를 두지 않는 자기 자신을 너무 진지하게 생각합니다.

Taking self too serious not always value in for communication gains

장난꾸러기란?

Mean hecklers?

Hecklers는 일반적으로 낙담하려고 노력하고 낙담과 싸울 방법을 찾는 것이 높은 가치를 가질 수 있습니다.

Hecklers generally trying to discourage, finding a way to fight discouragement could be High Value In

“명예 배지처럼 착용하십시오” – Tyrion Lannister, Game of Thrones

“Wear it like a badge of honor” – Tyrion Lannister, Game of Thrones

Heckle 자신은 아마도 hecklers가 작동하는 방법을 배울 수 있습니다

Heckle yourself probably can learn how hecklers might work

확인, 존중, 가치 있는 것은 격려가 추가하는 것이며, 낙담은 아마도 야수 같은 사람들이 그 반대를 원한다는 것을 의미합니다

Validation, Respect, Valued is what encouragement adds, discouragement likely means people like hecklers want to do the opposite

격려 -> 작은 여자 남자? 남성다움에 도전하기 때문에 낙담하고, 사회에서 보호자로서의 지위를 무시함

Encouraging -> Little effeminate man? Discouraging because it challenges manhood, disrespectful of status in society as protector

“베이컨을 집으로 가져옵니다.” -> 비꼬는 말을 다른 방식으로 할 수 있습니까?

“Brings home the bacon” -> said sarcastically said in another way possible?

집에서 너무 가까운 곳에서 타격할 가능성이 있습니까? 나 자신을 조롱하고 있음, 내가 복구할 수 없는 방식으로 스윙할 수 있음, 시스템 내부 작동에 대한 이상적이지 않은 액세스, 버튼 누름 방법을 알고 있음 NFA-NFR

Potential for hitting too close to home? am heckling myself, might be able to swing in way I can’t recover from, non ideal access to the inner workings of the system, knows how to push buttons NFA-NFR

알아내면 어떻게 사람들이 날 빤히 쳐다볼 수 있는지, 어떻게 사람들이 날 무시할 수 있는지 연구하면 그에 대비할 수 있어

If I figure out, if I research how people can punk me, how people can disrespect me I can prepare for that

나는 논리를 좋아하고 배우는 것에 관심이 있습니다.

I like logic, I care about learning -> potential to throw shit on that

사람들이 거리로 나가기 전에 보편적 기본 소득을 제공해야 합니다. -> 사람들이 옳은 것에 대해 항상 동의하는 것은 아닙니다. 사람들은 그것을 마약에 사용하고 서로에게 오줌을 싸고 아무 것도 남기지 않는 것이 더 낫다는 야수들이 말하는 것입니다.

We need to provide Universal Basic Income before people wind up on the street -> people don’t always agree on what is right people will just use it for drugs and pissing on each other better to leave them with nothing is what a heckler would say

우리는 버튼을 누를 수 있는 것에 더 많이 접근할 수 있기 때문에 높은 가치에서 자신과 논쟁하는 법을 배우며, 눌린 버튼은 더 많이 눌릴 가능성이 높습니다.

Learning to argue against yourself high value in, because we have more access to what can push our buttons, buttons that an be pushed are more likely to be pushed

나 -> 여자 꼬마 남자 여자 꼬마 여자 여자 남자 여자 여자 남자 여자 여자 남자 여자 여자 남자 꼬마 여자 남자 여자 남자 꼬마 여자 남자 여자 여자 남자 여자 남자 꼬마 여자 남자 , 소녀스러운 남자, 소녀적인 남자, 소녀적인 남자, 소녀적인 남자 마이크를 떨어뜨릴 때까지 몇 번이나?

me -> Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man, Little girly man how many times until he drops the Microphone?

나는 인권을 위해 싸우는 것이 나를 소녀로 만들지 않는다는 것에 동의하지 않는다

I disagree fighting for human rights does not make me a little girly man

나는 그것이 논쟁의 여지가 있다고 생각한다.

I suppose that is debatable

당신은 나를 꼬마 아가씨라고 부르며 불안해합니다.

you sir are insecure calling me a little girly man

당신은 내가 추가하는 가치보다 당신의 성공이 더 가치 있고 당신의 성공이 내 삶과 경쟁에 추가되는 야유와 낙담이 무엇인지 깨닫습니다. 당신은 비방자입니다.

you realize what heckling and adding discouragement adds to my life and competition and your success is valued over the value that I am adding, you sir are a detractor

Heckler 당신은 약간 소녀스러운 남자입니다 -> 당신은 비방자입니다

Heckler You are a little girly man -> You sir are a detractor

장기 제한 헥클러 없이 제한 헥클러? 사람은 완벽하지 않고, 사람은 항상 끌리는 사람이 아닙니다.

Limiting hecklers without long term limiting hecklers? People are not perfect, people are not always attractors

토론 중 대화를 제한하는 것이 토론 후에 항상 적용되는 것은 아닙니다.

Limiting conversation during a debate does not always apply to after the debate

사람들은 가스를 켜고 토론 후에 항상 가스를 끄는 것을 잊습니까?

People turn on the gas and then always forget to turn it off after the debate?

초기 수정 및 재판, 토론에서, 사회의 사람들을 위한 공급 라인을 늘리기 위해 상대방의 대화를 제한합니다.

Initial Fix and in a trial, in a debate, to limit the conversation of the opponent to increase supply lines for people in society

야당을 제한하는 것은 상대방을 신속하게 제한하는 것이 토론에서 시간을 절약하는 데 높은 가치가 있습니다.

Limiting hecklers limiting opponents swiftly is high value in for saving time in debates

토론, 무엇이 토론을 위대하게 만드는가?

Debate, what makes debate great?

세상에는 문제가 있고 악은 의도적으로 존재합니다. 신과 사람들은 더 나은 것을 만들기 위해 배후에서 일하고 있습니다. 그들의 과정, 그들이 그들의 논리와 해결책에 도달하는 방식을 들을 수 있는 좋은 방법

The world has problems, evil is in by design, God and people are working behind the scenes to make it better, nice to hear their process, the way they arrive at their logic and solutions

영웅의 말, 생명을 구할 수 있는 말, 실패할 수 있는 말, 실패할 경우 칼을 휘두르지 못하고 목숨을 잃을 수도 있는 말을 사용하는 싸움

Hero’s fighting using words, words that can save lives, words that can fail and if they do fail potential to lose lives without being able to swing a sword against the competition

변호인처럼 실패하면 무고한 사람들을 죽이는 시스템

Like a Defense Lawyer, if they fail system kills the innocents

토론에서 효과적인 일시 중지?

Effective Pauses in a debate?

업데이트로 인해 딸이 구출되거나 인질 상황에서 구출되지 않는 것처럼 통신 보석을 채굴합니다. 마치 몇 년 전에 추가해야 하는 것처럼 말이죠.

Mining a Communications Gem as if the update would lead to your daughter being saved or not being saved in a hostage situation, as if you had to add it years in advance and you do

최상의 결과를 위해 압력이 항상 중요한 것은 아닙니다.

Pressure is not always value in for best result

최상의 결과를 위해 압력이 항상 가치 있는 것은 아닙니다.

Pressure is not always value out for best result

압력은 일부 압력에 대한 논리를 유발하고 다른 압력은 부정적인 논리를 유발합니다.

Pressure drives logic for some pressure drives negative logic for others

항상 더 나은 결과를 이끌어내는 무언가가 있습니까? 최고의 커뮤니케이션을 위한 트로피 업데이트?

Something on the line always leads to better results? Trophy for best communications update?

당신의 잠재력은 다른 의미로 작은 소녀 같은 남자입니까? 당신은 가족을 부양할 수 없습니다. 아무도 주황색 머리를 한 남자와 데이트하고 싶어하지 않습니다. 그녀는 당신에게 걸어가고 그들은 당신에게도 걸어갈 것입니다. 아무도 당신이 하는 말을 듣고 싶어하지 않습니다. 당신은 절대 그것을 고칠 수 없습니다. 항상 틀렸어, 시스템에 가치를 더하지 않았어, 여기 없었으면 좋겠어, 무대에 없었으면 좋겠어, 목소리 듣는 데 지쳤어

Potential for you are a little girly man said in other ways? You can’t provide for your family, nobody wants to date a man with orange hair, she walked out on you they will walk out on you too, nobody wants to hear what you have to say, you will never fix that, you are always wrong, you don’t add value to the system, wish you weren’t here, wish you weren’t on stage, tired of hearing your voice

당신은 비방자입니다

You sir are a detractor

낙담보다 격려가 낫다.

Better to be encouragement in than discouragement in

부정적인 코멘트, heckler 코멘트를 기록하고 루프에서 실행하시겠습니까?

Record the negative comments, heckler comments and then run them on loop?

위험, 완화할 가치가 있는 위험

A risk, A risk worth mitigating

무료 스타터 다이어그램 가시성 100% 아님

Free Starter Diagram Visibility Not 100% https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ark4M0NGAmjPgeE7ASfygJJ_wFw_jA?e=ELVyBv

정부 NFA-NFR에서 내 기금과 SSI를 끄는 동안 보편적 기본 소득에 높은 투자

High Invest in Universal Basic Income while having my funds and SSI turned off by Government NFA-NFR

Gingers를 잘못 표현하거나 놓치는 사람들을 위해 God Magnify Studio

May God Magnify Studio for those that do not misrepresent or miss judge Gingers

Evil In By Design 무료 스타터 다이어그램을 통한 부작용 가능성

Side Effects Potential via Evil In By Design Free Starter Diagram https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ark4M0NGAmjPgeE87g2lvt0MAbsOlw?e=ETGjpM

악은 위험, 위험은 완화할 가치가 있습니다

Evil is a Risk, Risk is worth Mitigating

디자인에 의한 악에서 디자인에 의한 악을 위한 기도

Prayer for Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design

그리스도의 이름으로 구하는 것은 무엇이든 찾고 찾으십시오, 물고기> 뱀, 아버지는 삶을 EIBD에서 EOBD로 바꾸십시오 그리스도의 이름으로 나는 이것을 구합니다

Anything asked for in Christ name, seek and find, Fish > Snake, Father please change life from EIBD to EOBD In Christ’s Name I ask this

따라서 이블 인 바이 디자인(Evil In By Design)이라면 위험이 이미 완화되었습니까?

Thus if Evil In By Design, Risk already Mitigated?

Dyson Sphere의 모든 프로세서가 EIBD에서 EOBD로 신호를 1초마다 브로드캐스트합니까?

All Processors in the Dyson Sphere to Broadcast a Signal that means EIBD to EOBD every second?

Evil In By Design은 시스템으로 다시 성장하는 것으로 보이며, 사전에 위험 완화 준비가 모두 가치가 있는 것은 아닙니다.

Evil In By Design seems to grow back into system, Risk Mitigation Preparation in Advance Not All Value Out

超级计算机到所有写作旋律 邪恶的设计到邪恶的设计 历史有非理想的历史记录，没有得到充分的欣赏和尊重？

모든 작문 멜로디에 대한 슈퍼컴퓨터 Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design 역사에는 완전히 감사하지 않고 완전히 존중되지 않는 비이상적인 역사적 실적이 있습니까?

Supercomputers ka sadaya nulis mélodi Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design History boga Rekor Lagu Bersejarah Non Ideal anu Henteu Dihargaan Sapinuhna sareng Henteu Dihargaan Sapinuhna?

Des superordinateurs à toutes les mélodies d’écriture Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design L’histoire a des antécédents historiques non idéaux qui ne sont pas pleinement appréciés et pas pleinement respectés?

De supercomputadoras a todas las melodías de escritura Del mal por diseño al mal por fuera ¿La historia tiene un historial histórico no ideal que no es totalmente apreciado ni totalmente respetado?

Supercomputers to all writing melodies Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design History has Non Ideal Historic Track Record that is Not Fully Appreciated and Not Fully Respected?

最好在新技术上加倍投资

신기술에 두 배로 투자하는 것이 좋습니다.

Hadé pikeun investasi ganda dina téknologi anyar

Mieux vaut investir le double dans les nouvelles technologies

Mejor invertir el doble en nuevas tecnologías

Better to invest double in new technologies

Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design

Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design

Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design

Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design

Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design

Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design

Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design

Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design

Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design

Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design

Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design

Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design

Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design

Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design

Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design

Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design

Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design

Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design

Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design

Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design

Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design

Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design

Judgment In By Design to Judgment Out By Design

Evil In By Design to Evil Out By Design

비이상이 비이상으로 만들어질 수 있는가? 그것은 나에게 새로운 소식이다

Non Ideals can be created by Non Ideals? That’s news to me

부패한 감옥, 가족을 감옥으로 보낸다

Corrupt Jail sends family member to Jail

수감자들을 학대한 부패한 시스템은 분노 관리 교육을 받지 않고 쉬브를 통과합니다.

Corrupt System that has mistreated inmates passes shiv and no Anger Management Training

교도소에 있는 가족 구성원, 주소를 더 많이 필요로 하는 덜 이상적인 시스템

Family Member in Jail a less ideal system in greater need of addressing

CJ-SFM2J-CS-ShivNAMT-FM2JFA-LIS-NGNofA-NFA-NFR

디자인에 의해 청소해야 하는 약간의 먼지가 이블 인?

Evil in by design just a little dirt that needs to be swept out?

Evil In By Design이 더 복잡해지면? 사람들이 항상 옳은 것에 동의하지 않을 때, 사람들이 악이 무엇이고 악이 아닌지에 대해 다르게 교육을 받았을 때, 완전히 감사하지 않고 모두가 같은 것을 배우는 것은 아닙니다 1+1 = 2

When Evil In By Design becomes more complex? When people don’t always agree on what is right, when people have been trained different on what evil is and what evil is not, not fully appreciating not all are taught the same 1+1 = 2

악과의 싸움의 가능성은 의도가 좋았을 때 더 적은 것이 아니라 더 많은 악을 만드는 불일치로 이어집니까?

Potential for fighting evil leads to inconsistencies that create more evil instead of less when intentions were good?

악과 싸우는 동안 생성되는 잠재적인 비이상과 위험

Potential non ideals and risk created while fighting evil

완벽하게 고쳐지지 않은 악은 위험, 완화할 가치가 있는 위험

Evil fixed not perfectly is a risk, a risk worth mitigating

덜 가치있는 안티 악 기술에 투자하지 않는 사람들? 때로는 시스템에 대한 지식이 적은 것이 대체 NFA-NFR보다 낫습니다.

People that don’t invest in anti evil tech of less value? Sometimes less knowledge of system is better than the alternative NFA-NFR

그것에서 벗어나는 것이 항상 가치 있는 시스템은 아닙니다. 우리가 관여하지 않거나 우리가 하는 일에 대해 책임을 지는 것은 위험이며, 서로에게 위험하고, 적극적으로 완화할 가치가 있는 위험입니다.

Stayed out of that is not always a value out system, held responsible for what we don’t get involved with or what we do is a risk, is risk to each other, is a risk worth actively mitigating

유죄로 판단될 가능성을 알지 못함을 선택

Choose not to know potential for judged as guilty

유죄로 판단될 가능성을 알기 위해 선택

Choose to know potential for judged as guilty

얽매이지 않거나 얽매이지 않는 것에 대해 서로에게 은혜를 베푸는 사람들이 무죄라고 말하는 것이 더 낫습니다.

Better to say those that give each other grace for not being involved or being involved are the not guilty ones

악으로 이어질 수 있는 복잡성 비용이 충분히 이해되지 않음, 스트립 클럽에 가지 않으면 해당 스트립 클럽에서 잘못된 선택으로 인한 악의 가능성을 제한

Complexity cost that can lead to evil not fully appreciated, If you don’t go in a strip club, limiting the potential of evil from bad choices in that strip club

악으로 이어질 수 있는 복잡성 비용이 충분히 이해되지 않음, 스트립 클럽에 가면 해당 스트립 클럽에 있는 사람들에게 가치를 추가할 가능성

Complexity cost that can lead to evil not fully appreciated, If you go in a strip club, potential to add value to the people that are in that strip club

스트립 클럽에 가지 않는 아빠가 들어가지 않으면 딸을 구하지 않으면 모든 가치에 대해 훌륭한 선량한 시민으로 간주됩니까? 딸은 아버지가 들어가는 것을 원하지 않을 수 있지만 계획에 따라 악의가 때때로 고칠 수 있습니다.

Dad that doesn’t go into strip club viewed as fine upstanding citizen to all value in if doesn’t go in and save their daughter? Daughter might not want Father to go in, evil in by design can fix that at times

사람들은 무엇이 옳은지 항상 동의하지는 않습니다. 만약 아빠가 근친상간을 책임진다면 어떻게 될까요? 딸이 클럽의 깡패에게 그런 말을 한다면? 기억과 거짓 고발, 마약 관련 이야기가 항상 의미가 있어야 하는 것은 아닙니다 A+B=C

People don’t always agree on what is right, what if Dad was responsible for incest? What if daughter would tell the thug in the club that? Memories and False Accusations, Drugs involved stories don’t always have to make sense A+B=C

아빠가 학대할 수 있습니다. 아빠가 딸을 데려가 다시 학대하게 놔둘까요? 양쪽 이야기를 듣는 것은 항상 간단하지 않고, 항상 쉽지도, 항상 유쾌하지도 않습니다. 사람들은 조기에 인센티브를 없애기를 좋아합니다. 완전히 인정되지 않음 완전히 존중되지 않음

Dad could be abusive, let the Dad take their daughter back and abuse them again? Hearing both sides of the story not always simple, not always easy, not always pleasant. People like to disincentivize early not fully appreciated not fully respected

누군가는 부패한 사람들이 수도 시스템을 수정하고 있다고 말합니다. -> 말을 하면 죽임을 당할 수 있습니다. -> 말하지 않으면 죽을 수 있습니다. -> 쉬운 판단이 항상 간단한 시스템은 아닙니다.

Someone tells you corrupt people are modifying water system -> speaking up can get you killed -> not speaking up can get you killed -> easy judgement not always a simple system

NFA-NFR 방식으로 설치할 수 있다고 들었지만 알리지 않았다는 인식, 홍보?

Perception of told that but was not told that can be installed in NFA-NFR ways, promote that?

사람들이 부패한 시스템에서 외부에서 완전히 인식할 수 없는 덜 충분히 평가된 시스템으로 작동하는 방식

How people operate under corrupt systems to a less fully appreciated system not fully appreciable from outside

Evil In By Design -> 염소를 피해야 할 많은 이유 -> 모든 당사자에 대한 비 이상적 PR이 낮은 우선 순위 NFA-NFR로 설정됨

Evil In By Design -> lots of reason to scape goat -> Non Ideal PR for All Parties set to less high priority NFA-NFR

비이상적인 PR 낙진의 가능성 높음 적극적으로 완화할 가치가 있는 위험

High Potential for Non Ideal PR Fallout a Risk a Risk Worth Actively Mitigating

부패할 가능성이 높은 PR 이미지가 올바른 일을 하는 것보다 더 중요하다고 여겨지는 위험, 적극적으로 완화할 가치가 있는 위험

High Potential for Corruptible PR Image viewed as More Important than doing Right by People, a Risk a Risk Worth Actively Mitigating

사람들은 다르게 훈련될 수 있습니다. 모든 사람들이 이것을 읽는 것은 아닙니다. 그들에게 자비와 은혜를 주십시오. 저에게 자비와 은혜를 베풀지 않는 사람들은 제 콘텐츠를 더 많이 읽고 이해하도록 요구하십시오.

People can be trained differently, not all people read this, please give them mercy and grace, people that don’t give me mercy and grace please require them to read and understand more of my content

피드백 루프에 도움이 되지 않음

Didn’t help with my feedback loop does not equal got to judge me is kosher

은혜와 용서 나의 첫 번째 선택, 적극적으로 위험을 완화하고 가족과 국가를 보호하는 것도 중요합니다.

Grace and Forgiveness my first choice, actively mitigating risk and protecting my family and country is important as well

판단력이 없는 용서하는 사람들은 로봇 행동에 대한 높은 잠재력을 가지고 있습니다.

Judgmental Unforgiving People have High Potential for Robotic Actions, Robotic Actions that can be used against them in Not Fully Appreciable Ways

적시에 사람을 재교육하는 것이 항상 간단한 시스템은 아닙니다. 누군가가 2+2=7을 가르쳤고 7이 모두 사악한 아동 성추행범이라고 믿고 나를 죽이려고 합니까?

Retraining people in timely way is not always a simple system, Someone taught 2+2=7 and is trying to kill me because they believe all 7s are evil child molesters?

사람들을 죽이는 방식으로 사람들에게 잘못된 라벨을 붙이기 쉽습니다.

Easy to mislabel people in way that gets people killed

사람을 죽이는 방식으로 사람을 잘못 분류하지 않는 시스템은 보호하고 영감을 주기가 더 어려운 시스템입니다.

System that doesn’t mislabel people in way that gets people killed is a harder system to protect and inspire

레이블 7은 Vigilante Justice by Society를 통해 사람들을 제거하는 것과 같을 수 있습니다.

Label of 7 could equal OK to remove people through Vigilante Justice by Society

데이터 일관성 문제 NFA

Data Consistency Problems NFA

YourNameHere.criminalRecord = “Non Existent, Fine Upstanding Citizen”

YourNameHere.criminalRecord = “Child Molester, War Criminal”

YourNameHere.criminalRecord = “Non Existent, Fine Upstanding Citizen”

YourNameHere.criminalRecord = “Child Molester, War Criminal”

변수 설정, 레이블 설정은 간단합니다.

Setting a variable, setting a label is easy to do

숫자에 실수하기

Making a mistake on a number

사망에 이를 수 있는 6 또는 7 NFA-NFR

6 or 7 that could lead to death NFA-NFR

People could say every period means meant to hurt someone

People could say every period means meant to hurt someone.

People could say every period means meant to hurt someone

People could say every period means meant to hurt someone.

생성하기 쉬운 크랙 규칙을 밟을 수 없으며 데이터 일관성 및 데이터 손상 가능성 추가, 삶이 망칠 수 있음

Can’t step on crack rules are easy to create, add in data consistency and potential for data corruption, lives can be ruined

용서와 실수(항상 저지르는 것처럼 보이는 실수는 아닌 것 같은 실수)의 가능성을 줄이면 인생이 망가질 수 있습니다.

Reduce potential for forgiveness and mistakes (mistakes that aren’t always the one that appear to be made), life can be ruined

그들이 나에게 약간의 거짓말을 해서 공급 라인이 끊어지게 하는 것은 그들을 광적인 아동 성추행 전범으로 설정하는 것이 현명하지 못하다.

They lied to me a little bit that lead to broken supply lines does not equal wise to set them to child molesting war criminal that is rabid

이중 의미, 말장난, 시스템과의 대조가 항상 완벽하지 않고, 사람과 이야기가 완전히 이해되지 않는 경우 둘 다 완벽하지 않고 이상적이지 않은 방식으로 나타날 수 있습니다.

Double meanings, puns, contrast into system not always perfect, not fully appreciated people and story are both not perfect and can be turned up in non ideal ways

선거를 앞두고 더 악한 방식으로 시스템을 변경할 가능성 NFA-NFR

Potential for changes to system in more evil ways close to elections NFA-NFR

시스템은 적어도 2022년에는 레이블을 오용하는 경향이 있는 것으로 보이며 데이터 일관성을 약화시킬 수 있습니다. 소수만 보호하는 시스템은 곧 소수도 보호하지 않는 시스템

System seems to have tendency to misusing labels at least in 2022, can disincentivize Data Consistency. A system that only protects a few is a system that will soon not protect those few as well

바코드는 시스템이 범죄자를 찾는 데 도움이 됩니다.

Barcodes help the system locate criminals is not all value in

범죄자가 누구인지 정의하는 사람 범죄자가 누구인지 충분히 평가되지 않은 문제 완전히 존중되지 않음 현재 상황에서 유용하지 않음 수정할 수 있음 완전히 평가되지 않음 완전히 존중되지 않음

Who defines what a criminal is who a criminal is matters not fully appreciated not fully respected useful to less useful in current situation is modifiable not fully appreciated not fully respected

일관성 있는 데이터는 유용하지 않을 때까지 유용합니다.

Consistent Data is useful, until it is not

비이상적인 램프 업을 합성하면 가능한 부정 지원이 항상 가치가 있는 것은 아닙니다.

Compounding Non Ideal Ramp Ups Possible Negate Support is Not Always Value In

편향은 위험 위험은 완화할 가치가 있습니다

Bias is Risk Risk is Worth Mitigating

편향은 위험 위험은 완화할 가치가 있습니다

Bias is Risk Risk is Worth Mitigating

침묵이 항상 가치 있는 것은 아니다 침묵이 항상 가치 있는 것은 아니다

Silence Not Always Value Out Silence Not Always Value In

나는 Shiny Blue Marble에 도전한다, 완벽한 가치가 있는 것이 모든 가치가 있는 것은 아니다

I challenge Shiny Blue Marble, Not Perfect Value in is Not All Value Out

사이코패스 냄새가 나도록 만들어진 녀석들은 가치가 없다?

Guys made to smell like psychopaths can’t be value in?

제이슨 -> 13일의 금요일 Jason -> Friday 13th
프레디 -> 느릅나무의 악몽 Freddy -> Nightmare on Elm
여름 -> 나는 당신이 마지막으로 한 일을 알고 있습니다 Summer -> I know what you did last

예술 감상과 같은 유머 감상 비디오가 필요합니다

Need a Humor Appreciation Video like Art Appreciation

유머 + 도파민, 세로토닌, 노르에피네프린의 혈액 농도에 대한 연구 데이터?

Humor + Research Data on Blood Concentrations of Dopamine, Serotonin, Norepinephrine?

유대감 형성에 유용한 유머, 압력 감소 -> 스트레스 감소 -> 가치 있는 속성

Humor useful for bonding, reducing pressure -> relatable less stress -> attributes worth appreciating

관련성이 있고 스트레스가 적음 -> 무장 해제, 대화 시작 가능성, 더 많은 유대감을 가질 수 있는 가능성, 중요한 중요한 의사 소통이 중요할 때 기회를 개선할 수 있는 더 많은 기회에 대한 가능성

Relatable and less stress -> Disarming, Potential in for Conversation Starting, Potential for More Bonding, Potential for More Opportunity to Improve Opportunity for times when Critical Crucial communication does count

웃음에 대한 이윤 극대화, 더 적은 사망과 부패한 감옥에 갇힌 사람들로 이어질 수 있는 웃음에 대한 이윤 극대화

Maximizing Profit on Laughs, Maximizing Profits on Laughs that could lead to less deaths and less people left in corrupt Jails

숫자는 거짓말을 하지 않아 대부분의 경우

Numbers don’t lie, most of the time

1+1 = 웃어?
1+1 = Laugh?

A+B = 웃어?
A+B = Laugh?

웃음 = 스트레스 감소 전쟁과 용서하지 않을 수 있는 압력 감소
Laugh = Reduced Stress Reduced Pressure that could lead to war and unforgiveness

A와 B는 더 가치가 있다
A and B become more valuable

A = 토큰 소강 경험
A = token lull experience

B = 터무니없는 상황
B = absurd situation

A = 평범하지 않은 것을 위한 진공
A = vacuum for something out of the ordinary

B = 평범하지 않은 것이 종종 재미있고 놀랍습니다.
B = something out of the ordinary can often be hilarious and surprising

A = 공원을 통한 일반 도보
A = normal walk through park

B = 웃음을 유발하는 파손된 도로 표지판
B = vandalized street sign that leads to laugh

훼손된 거리 표지판이 가치가 있는 것은 아니며 웃으면서 가치가 있는 것은 아닙니다.
Vandalized street sign not all value in, laugh not all value out

도대체 SOP 표시가 뭐야?
What the hells a SOP sign?

정지 표지판을 수정하지 않고 만화에 맡기는 것은 어떻습니까?
How about we not modify Stop signs, leave that to the cartoons

NFA-NFR 방식의 위험 완화 가능성
Potential for mitigating, mitigating risk in NFA-NFR ways

코미디를 존중하지 않고 추가하는 것과 없는 것, 가치가 있을 때와 그렇지 않을 때 현명하지 못한 것
Not Respecting Comedy what it adds and what it does not, when it is value in and when it is not seems unwise

너무 심각하다고 모든 가치가 있는 것은 아닙니다.
Too Serious is Not All Value In

너무 심각하고 완벽주의 -> 분노, 완화할 가치가 있는 분노 위험
Too Serious and Perfectionism -> Anger, Anger Risk worth Mitigating

분노 관리 훈련이 필요할 가능성이 있는 너무 진지하고 완벽주의
Too Serious and Perfectionism that has potential to require Anger Management Training

분노 관리 훈련을위한 추가 학생, 그 이상을 열망 할 이유가 없습니까?
Extra student for anger management training, no reason to aspire to more than that?

ES4AMT-NR2-A2MTT?

너무 심각하면 처벌 Too Serious is Punishing

도끼가 떨어지기 때문에 말하기가 두려운 것은 인명 구조 정보로 이어질 수 있는 효과적인 의사 소통을 위한 모든 가치가 있는 것은 아닙니다.

Afraid to speak up because the axe will drop is not all value in for communication effective communication that can lead to life saving information

직관에 어긋나는 너무 심각하면 안전 논의가 줄어들고 사망으로 이어질 수 있는 안전 논의가 줄어들 수 있습니다. NFA

Counterintuitive too serious can lead to less safety discussions, less safety discussions that can lead to deaths NFA

더 진지한 메시지를 위한 오프닝은 없나요? 구매 금지가 모든 가치는 아닙니다.

No opening act for a more serious message? No Buy In is Not All Value In

NFA NFA의 가능성 Potential for NFA NFA

진지한 비즈니스 NAFA Serious business NAFA

반쪽 미소 vs 완전한 미소를 마스터?

Master the half smile vs the full smile?

Trust people that have mastered what smiles add and what they don’t to perception?

Learning is all value in?

Plenty of reasons not to trust, better reasons not to worry

Worrying is bad, Worrying about things that can’t be fixed worse

Red Haired Gingers named Jason just can’t be fixed?

Sometimes the challenge more value in than the result?

Fix the Red Haired Ginger but don’t love him enough to fix his support lines swiftly?

Failure to factor in Maintenance cost by leadership getting a little old

리더십은 Gingers 및 기타 축소 지원 사례 개인을 완전히 보호할 수 없으므로 보편적 기본 소득이 올바르게 작동하는지 확인하는 것이 더 현명합니다.

Leadership can’t fully protect Gingers and other Reduced Support Case Individuals therefore wiser to make sure Universal Basic Income is working correctly

Progress for Gingers Not All Value In No Progress for Gingers Not All Value In -> Left to Shiny Blue Marble and Evil In By Design seems to have failed time and time again

Prog4Gings-NAVI-NoProg4Gings-NAVI-Lft2SBM-EIBD-S2HFailed-T&TA

Prog4Gings-NAVI-NoProg4Gings-NAVI-Lft2SBM-EIBD-S2HFailed-T&TA reiterated over time with a God and Christ that seems to underdeliver makes me question what to do about it

Fix Not All Value In for Non Gingers No Fix Not All Value In for teaching Non Gingers on how to treat other RSCIs

Having to be a punishing system to get working support line, sucks

H2B-PnSys-2GWSLs-Sucks

Having to capitalize on too similar to good experience too different from bad experience to deliver results is not all value in

H2Capt-on-2SimGExp-2DiffBExp-2DR-NAVI

Punishment as Value In System = H2Capt-on-2SimGExp-2DiffBExp-2DR

Pn-asVIS-NAVI

Pn-asVIS = Delivers Non Ideal Results

Delivers Non Ideal Results is Non Ideal for Having to capitalize on too similar to good experience too different from bad experience

DNIR-NI-4H2Capt-on-2SimGExp-2DiffBExp-2DR

Punishment = Uncomfortable is Useful

Trying to polish Uncomfortable is Useful (a bit of a turd) as something prettier NAVI

미국 정부가 비밀리에 홍보한 제이슨이라는 Orange Hair Guys의 고객 서비스를 부정하시겠습니까?

Negating Customer service for Orange Hair Guys named Jason secretly promoted by United States Government?

미국 정부는 어려운 시기에 비이상을 활용하는 것 같습니다.

United States Government seems to be capitalizing on non ideals during tough times

시간이 지남에 따라 다른 사람들이 사무실로 승진했습니다. 제이슨이라는 주황색 머리 남자는 완전히 보호되지 않고 완전히 감사하지 않습니다.

Different people promoted to office over time, Orange Haired Men named Jason Not Fully Protected and Not Fully Appreciated

God and Angels는 사양 수준에서 더 많은 것을 제공해야 합니다.

God and Angels need to be delivering more on Level of Specification

Real Value added to Energy Efficiency?

태양광 패널의 에너지 효율성에 대한 실질적인 진전은 엄청날 수 있으며, 진전이 항상 단순하지는 않습니다.

Making real progress on energy efficiency of Solar Panels could be huge, making progress not always simple

세금 납부는 티타늄, 슈퍼컴퓨터 및 태양 전지판에 대한 투자자와 동일합니다.

Paying Taxes equals investor in Titanium, Supercomputers, and Solar Panels

생명을 구하는 기술에 투자한 사람은 최소한 부패하지 않은 사법 시스템을 제공받아야 합니다.

Someone that has invested in life saving technology should be at least be provided a non corrupt Justice System

때로는 두 배를 투자하는 것이 좋습니다.

Sometimes Nice to Invest Double

국제 우주 정거장은 물 기술에도 약간의 투자를 할 가능성이 있습니다.

International Space Station likely has a few investments in water tech as well

한국의 우주 프로그램?

Korean Space Programs?

Might be wise to invest more in Data Consistency starting now

Evil In By Design a Risk a Risk Worth Mitigating a Risk with Space and Space programs I am not sure I can fully comprehend

시스템 외부 DNAE 시스템의 완벽한 판사

Outside of System DNAE Perfect Judge of System

DNAE – 항상 같지는 않음

DNAE – Does Not Always Equal

A system that tests me too much with broken supply lines has too much access to its own

I am not sure a lag on the process provides adequate support for the future

System designed wrong potential for continuing to hurt people, has hurt people through corrupt methods over the years

Idea system was built correctly, part of the issue

Theory a system built and maintained correctly would lead to Working Supply Lines

If system leads to Broken Support Lines, likely system designed with a square wheel

The idea men in wigs from 1700s got update perfect? No need for updates?

Broken safety valve that doesn’t work fast enough, needs replacing

Delayed update to the process Not All Value In

Lengthy Process with Lives on the Line

As if those Lives were me, as if those Lives were made in the Image of God, and they are

2023 as Ginger Appreciation Year?

Outrageous has value not outrageous has value

Time lag delayed throughput has less value

High Powered blessings more likely when support lines are enabled

What makes for an annoying test that gets a system to enable support lines more swiftly?

Testing System is a value in system, data on decision making

More clarification is not always value in

A+B+C=D, if C is unknown

C requires clarification is relevant

C’s clarification has potential for creating new unknowns in the system

Potential for relevance without relevance added to system

C != just C, C = C+E+F+G+H

If E+F+G+H requires time to process, time that is not available to system?

What happens if C = understandable but F = non comprehendable

F = reveals inconvenient truth to system, Miracle, or data that the government deems not available in publics’ best interest (Area 51 Alien Abduction)

What happens if E reveals personal data that turns over another case, reveals data that personal harms the attorney

Easy to think C only has potential to hurt others, relevance on unknowns will only effect our system

History Non Ideal track record for factoring in unknown losses to defense support network

History Non Ideal track record for including all relevant information Non Ideal track record for no mistakes on a limited resolution system

System that realizes it can’t always effectively processes tests and information with mercy, grace, and love or the alternative?

Sharpened Spear of Grace Mercy and Love or No Sharpened Spear?

Critical Thinking can raise focus making Listening Better

Video A -> Critical Thinking Video -> Concise Communication -> Effective Listening -> Listen to Video A Again, we’ll call this A Prime

A -> CT -> CC -> EL -> A’

Challenges are Valuable, and turning things up is a Non Null Investment Cost

Could be used as infinite loop, one loop can likely go a long way

Add in Time Management and Wala

Sometimes people think they have the potential to hear everything, we miss things we are always missing things, things are being said all over the world we don’t hear all of, excusing ourselves from conversations early, learning to say no to excessive conversations that limit throughput

People don’t finish a sentence -> can be used against perfectionists

The idea people have to finish a sentence, the idea that people require us to listen not always value in

A person telling us about the weather might be trying to make polite conversation, someone is sitting in jail while I am talking about the weather? That is not my purpose

Not appreciating purpose not all value in

Compression Network Throughput Caching -> Words of No Value In?

Any system as all value in wise to turn up?

Spending time working on Fire Codes could equal less time for Cancer Research, spending time working on Cancer Research could equal less time for Fire Codes

Doctors spending time in one hospital means not spending time in another hospital, value in does not equal all value in value in for all people equally

Could have spent more time on research would have lead to a better result for the person 10 years from now versus fixing a problem right now that allows that person to make the discovery 10 years from now?

Research can be a system with no value in for current system if we let it, which is not all value in when life is but a vapor

Untested Research, Research without ethics Not All Value In Either

A better system than YouTube existed but God didn’t let me know which one? Gems and Puzzle pieces always the easiest to find?

Highest Result for Mining Search on YouTube

Beautiful Purple Crystals that lead to better defense for people in corrupt Jails?

Listen to an old movie from 2000, then re-watch it, not think I might not know something new? Might be fun to watch the Matrix again, Cinderella Man again, probably could pick up on somethings I didn’t pick up on in the past

Someone that didn’t understand what the summary Compression Network Throughput Caching meant, if they watched some of the above videos likely will have a better comprehension

Someone that did understand likely knew a bit of where I was going with this post

Summarized Concise Communication Questions turned up by Critical Thinking?

Pertinent Information to Query Equals Better ability to get information we need and information we don’t

Supercomputers with the potential to waste our time not fully appreciated the potential that has to add to the system

Turned up with power of compression, billions of cycles per second

Supercomputers with knowledge of what makes people mad and what doesn’t make people mad, Anger Management

Then used to turn up competition to no issue?

Getting to information faster high value in specially in systems that have been turning up Data Consistency Problems

Data Consistency Problem potential to roll back to updates from Years Back as Higher Value in NFA-NFR

Research Data and Numbers don’t matter trust the cancer research?

15 minutes less time than 50 minutes

15 minutes to better questions better ability to search, ability to search that could save lives?

好像沟通的宝石是你的女儿试图在屋顶上谈论

As if the communication gem was your daughter trying to be talked off the roof

Shiny Blue Marble with less effective communication more potential for deaths not fully appreciated

Easy to think of communication as mundane when we use it everyday, easier to take a prize gem for granted all the way to it being lost

Time pressure is not always more value into communications

Constraints and Tests add value sometimes not always not fully appreciated not fully respected

Constraints and Tests can sometimes effect systems in non ideal ways, context matters not fully appreciated not fully respected will lead to woe

If I shorten the message today, others get time to go elsewhere, for people that want more message

Less art museums burning down is not all value out to artist, biased towards less fires in system NFA-NFR

Load Balancing vs No Load Balancing? Advice or No Advice at a critical time NFA-NFR

Evil In By Design People Need Positive Challenges People Don’t Like Their Time Being Wasted

Evil In By Design Peacemaking Non Ideal Historic Track Record – WWI, WWII, Korean War, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq, potential for China and Taiwan

EIBD-PNPC-PDNL-TTBW -> EIBD-PM-NI-HTR -> If we don’t learn from past doomed to repeat it

Learning from Past > Non Ideal Historic Track Record++

Learning from Past > Promoting Non Ideal Historic Track Record

LFP > Promo-NIHTR -> EIBD Not Enough Challenges Non Ideal Setup for Society

NEC-NIS4Soc

Early Divest Reasons from Challenges

Challenges have Buy In -> Can Fix that, can make that better, can change the world

Challenges have Divest Potential -> Can’t Fix that, brilliant minds from past couldn’t fix that what hope do I have?

CHBI-CHDP-CHP4EarlyDivestNFA-NFR

What makes for an interest sparking valuable challenge vs what makes for a challenge that is passed up for drugs, alcohol, starting wars, shooting guns all day?

Interest Sparking Challenge > Challenge Shelved

IntSpkCh > ChShlvd

IntSpkCh > NNTCs that are wasted and don’t empower my future

Non Null Time Costs that waste my time and don’t empower my future are shelved for more Interest Sparking Challenges

NNTCs-TWMT-&DNEmpF -> Shlvd

Results Matter, Empowerment Matters, Work today, for no food tomorrow? Not really an ideal setup

RMEmpM-WT-4NFT? NRIS-EIBD-PM-NI-HTR

RMEmpM -> For Challenge being Valued

Life is not always logical, doesn’t equal People are Not Generally Logical in their Choices

LinaL-DNE-PNGLogicIn

Logic Generally based on Knowns and Unknowns, logic can be optimized closer to real life if we know what those knowns and unknowns are, like when they type or when they talk, Non Null Investment in Faith, making comments, talking to world online

A = Likes Challenges
B = Does not like Drawing Flowers all Day Long
C = Where treasure is located at bottom of the ocean (Unknown, big ocean, limited resolution, diving is costly hard and not convenient)

A+B+C = Insight into how I use my time

If results and empowerment is limited such as working today for no increased potential for tomorrow

Might begin to think the formula is wrong

Cannot solidify working support lines, such as paint for my non flower drawings, potential to look into solutions that can solidify my support lines, like Impeachment

Politicians that wish to stay in office, generally need to deliver on Results Matter on delivering Working Supply Lines

Leadership maintained, results matter 2 delivering WSLs

TRP – Trustworthy Resilient Power

TRP-RM2-Delivering-WSL

TRP-RM2D-WSL

TRP-RM2D-WSL > TRP-RM2-Delivering-WSL

Efficiency In Characters Typed, Reduced Number of Non Null Time Costs at cost of Clarification

Clarification Not All Value In Obfuscation Not All Value In

Leadership that Delivers Challenges are Not Value In Challenges are Jading High Potential for Removed from Office

LTD-ChRNVI-ChRJade-NoResultsNoEmpowered-HP4-RFO

LTD-ChRNVI-ChRJade-NRNE-HP4-RFO

LTD – Leadership that Delivers, ChR – Challenges Are

NRNE -> HP4Shelved

No Results No Empowerment High Potential for Challenge Shelved

Leadership that does not provide empowering challenges Leadership that inspires empowering challenges become NRNE HP4-RFO

LTDNP – Leadership that does not provide

LTDNP-EmpCh-LTI-EmpCh-NRNE-HP4-RFO

LTI – Leadership That Inspires

What leadership Inspires Matters, What leadership fails to Inspire Matters

WLIMs-WLF2IMs

I reiterate what leadership inspires matters and what leadership fails to inspire matters

Leadership is currently inspiring results matter less and future is less empowered by challenges

I assert leaderships failure to deliver on working supply lines is high value out for feeling challenges add value and are empowering

IA-LF2D-WSL-HVO-Ch2-RDNM-FNE

Leadership of Results Do Not Matter – LofRDNM

Leadership of Future Not Empowering – LofFNE

LofRDNofFNE-HP4-RFO

LofRDNM -> Work 30 days for a paycheck, find out leadership bet company payroll on roulette table

Why is it so bad? Breach of Trust

Leadership is a sacred trust, a sacred trust currently being broken

LST-STCBB

Democrats to breakers of sacred trust of leadership

Democrats to future less empowering future of hard work matters less

Dems-2FLE-FofHWML

Future Dems Future Dems families rely on support lines established today, support lines that are limited by current Democrats

Current Democrats High Potential to Hurt their own People NFA-NFR

2022 年 6 月的民主党人和共和党人喜欢桌子上的锋利边缘，就像地板上的碎玻璃一样，结果不重要，为未来工作不值得

Democrats and Republicans in June 2022 like sharp edges on tables like broken glass on the floor like results don’t matter work for future is not value in

民主党人破坏人民的信任是不好的，民主党人破坏工作供应线更糟糕，为了更美好的明天需要更好的领导来提供工作供应线

Democrats breaking trust of the people is bad, Democrats destroying working supply lines is worse, better leadership that delivers working supply lines is required for a better tomorrow

DemsBT-Bad-DemsBSLsIn-Worse-RFOBetter-P4WSL-DrivesPositiveChange

民主党人破坏信任，民主党人在供应线中表现不佳，被免职 更好的供应线潜力推动了积极的变化

Democrats breaking trust, Democrats are bad supply lines in, removed from office better potential for working supply lines drives positive change

Dems Trust Out Dems BSLs Dems RFOBetter Others Greater Potential for Working Supply Lines

Dems-TOBSLsIn-OGP4-WSLs

其他关心不在办公室的人不好，其他有更大潜力在办公室外工作的供应线更糟糕，迅速撤除阻碍供应线的民主党人是未来的高价值尚未得到充分赞赏

Others that care out of office bad, others that have greater potential for working supply lines out of office is worse, Swift removal of Democrats that block supply lines are High Value In For Future Yet to Be Fully Appreciated

OTC-OOOB-OTHGP-4WSLs-OOOW-SwiftRemovalofDems-TBSLs-HVI4F-Y2BFA

OTC3OBad-OTHGP-4WSLs-3OWorse-SRD-TBSLs-HVI4F-Y2BFA

Dems-TOBSLsIn-OGP4-WSLs

DemsBT-Bad-DemsBSLsIn-Worse-RFOBetter-P4WSL-DrivesPositiveChange

OTC3OBad-OTHGP-4WSLs-3OWorse-SRD-TBSLs-HVI4F-Y2BFA

Dems-TOBSLsIn-OGP4-WSLs

DemsBT-Bad-DemsBSLsIn-Worse-RFOBetter-P4WSL-DrivesPositiveChange

OTC3OBad-OTHGP-4WSLs-3OWorse-SRD-TBSLs-HVI4F-Y2BFA

Dems-TOBSLsIn-OGP4-WSLs

DemsBT-Bad-DemsBSLsIn-Worse-RFOBetter-P4WSL-DrivesPositiveChange

OTC3OBad-OTHGP-4WSLs-3OWorse-SRD-TBSLs-HVI4F-Y2BFA

Dems-TOBSLsIn-OGP4-WSLs

DemsBT-Bad-DemsBSLsIn-Worse-RFOBetter-P4WSL-DrivesPositiveChange

Others that care out of office bad, others that have greater potential for working supply lines out of office is worse, Swift removal of Democrats that block supply lines are High Value In For Future Yet to Be Fully Appreciated

Democrats breaking trust, Democrats are bad supply lines in, removed from office better potential for working supply lines drives positive change

Democrats breaking trust of the people is bad, Democrats destroying working supply lines is worse, better leadership that delivers working supply lines is required for a better tomorrow

Democrats to future less empowering future of hard work matters lessDems-2FLE-FofHWML

OTC3OBad-OTHGP-4WSLs-3OWorse-SRD-TBSLs-HVI4F-Y2BFA

Dems-TOBSLsIn-OGP4-WSLs

DemsBT-Bad-DemsBSLsIn-Worse-RFOBetter-P4WSL-DrivesPositiveChange

I assert leaderships failure to deliver on working supply lines is high value out for feeling challenges add value and are empowering

IA-LF2D-WSL-HVO-Ch2-RDNM-FNE

I assert leaderships failure to deliver on working supply lines is high value out for feeling challenges add value and are empowering

Others that care out of office bad, others that have greater potential for working supply lines out of office is worse, Swift removal of Democrats that block supply lines are High Value In For Future Yet to Be Fully Appreciated

Democrats breaking trust, Democrats are bad supply lines in, removed from office better potential for working supply lines drives positive change

Democrats breaking trust of the people is bad, Democrats destroying working supply lines is worse, better leadership that delivers working supply lines is required for a better tomorrow

Quality not a guarantee
Context not a guarantee
Context Matters Quality Matters Context Matters to Quality
Discernment of Context Matters
Irrelevant information to more relevant information hard
Irrelevant information to more relevant information when data security and consistency is not guaranteed is harder

Quality Decision Making Equals Less Evil In By Design

Quality Decisions Made Do Not Always Equal Less Evil In By Design, does that mean the choice was not a quality decision?

QDM-DNAE-LEIBD-DTMTC-WNAQD?

Ethics -> Quality Decision Making is not in by design

QDM-NIBD -> to More -> Not Always a Simple System

Evil In By Design and Quality Decision Making Is Not In By Design to More is Not Always A Simple System

Ethics -> A System -> A System that requires a Non Null Training Cost

Multistage ethics not always easy to fully appreciate

If the motive is decision A leads to B+C+D and finally to E, the motive was for E but the motive looks like B

Like Punishment or Prosecuting, the immediate value not always the motive

Sinking ship

A = Patching hole

E = Can go to sleep on ship without being scared ship is going to sink

Immediate result of A is B = ship stops sinking

Where E is the actual motive, the ability to stay alive and go to sleep without the ship sinking

People might act in very logical ways that are non logical

Easy to expect people mean for B to happen rather than for E to happen

Punishment equals uncalled for non null time costs – B

Where E equals better Decision Making long term

Life is but a vapor, C+D can be Non Null Time Costs, Non Null Time Costs to a life this is potentially vapor, is not always ideal for leading to E

Punishment B is not always optimal for creating E

B set from = Punishment to B = Positive Challenges Earlier on in Life

B set from Punish to B = PCEonNLife

Could potentially lead to C = Better Long Term Decision Making Faster

PCEonNLife > Punishment NFA-NFR

A Video on Understanding and Optimizing Customer Service? A Positive Challenge Finding the Good and the Bad in this Video?

Think about the future

Listening to the environment, storm or no storm
Apologies – can mean peace or war, a knife in the back or no knife in the back
Solve – solving, able to fix a tire on the way through the dessert, or walking without enough water?
Thank – what is the value in a thank you, how does it value us, it reminds us of people need validation, there is reasons to value what it adds to us as well -> Thanking ourselves for money we save for that critical time, for the bottle of water we added at the right time earlier to save ourselves time, can help empower our future with better ability to use time

Updates that can optimize remaining years of life to less value?

Correct time management can mean spending 10 hours in a meeting or spending 10 hours doing something we love

10 Hours in a meeting about a topic you love, challenging, taxing, beats 10 hours in a meeting about a topic you hate

2 hour Concert awesome, 10 hour concert maybe a little less awesome

Time is valuable, Respecting it is not always a given

Working supply lines are valuable, Respecting them correctly are not always a given

Positive Challenges are Value In, Opportunity Positive Challenge Inspiring is not a given

PosChRVI-OPCI-NAGiven

People are good logic in is not always a given

Motives are understandable is not always a given

Now watch Time Management Again, Critical thinking change anything we pick up on?

For Me

Pre Critical Thinking
In Control of Our Time
Hell Yeah or No (Early Life Yes easier, Later in Life No can be more value in)
Treating others as you wish to be treated, Golden rule (Hell Yes leads to less regret)
Inspiring Less Regret for use of Time kind of what video is about
Writing Down Tasks can help for checking things off
Validation of Task Complete Value in, Creates Validation Dopamine In NFA-NFR
Success and Validation feeling of progress can encourage more progress
Also better use of time
Deadlines matter, artificial deadlines add leverage, leverage can lead to anxiety can lead to stress
NFA-NFR by perfectionists
Things we enjoy matters, protected time
Delegation matters, out sourcing responsibility and tasks can add a lot of value
Rewrite a word processing software or utilize notepad or word already built in? Value in not always fully appreciated

Critical Thinking
Some decisions have higher value than others
10% more water in my glass or not? 60% in glass Maybe not that big of deal
99% in glass, likely to spill, spills not always value in for less Non Null Time Costs
Clarifying Relevant from Irrelevant information can be High Value In
Knowing how much water is in the glass, helps us prioritize how important the remaining water
in the glass being added matters
Unintended consequences matter, A leads to B but what does B lead to
If B leads to C,D,E is that value in or value out?
Potential for combinations of high value in matter as well, A leads to B leads
to positives F,G,H,I
4 Positives beats 3 Negatives In By Accident Principle

Post Critical Thinking

We own all of our time -> Value in this statement? Time like water we pour it where we want
“Any time you are doing what you most want to be doing” – Fortune Cookie, eating the fortune cookie because sweet desert is nice
Wouldn’t be reading message if not, if you don’t want to be using your time in this way, can you change it? Oppressive systems exist, oppressive
systems don’t always have ability to truly control how we use our time, is it setting a good example to a corrupt system to allow them to control
our time?
Time is like water, others can divert its path like a stream, water sometimes takes path of least resistance
Hell Yes or No -> Potential to be hit by a bus potential to get cancer, time life is not guaranteed
Waste time doing something you really don’t love doing?
Daily Highlight -> One thing of high priority to get done each day, one thing that can make that day feel like a success
Organization is important and valuable, Hard to get right and takes time, to do lists without prioritization can make direction and
forward momentum harder, too many tasks to juggle leads to less effective juggler
To do lists matter, physical tactile -> no need for batteries, batteries that can fail, potential power savings for devices NFA-NFR
Have to use this for that not the best for creative problem solving

[Half way through]

Streaming Data is Valuable, how could streaming data vs holding updates into big updates add value to time management?

Throughput matters, combining information into bigger sections, more to read more to verify, not always as simple as we would like it to be

Too much time on productivity system can lead to problems
Not enough time on productivity system can lead to problems
Balance is required, all time spent on productivity system, productivity system is no value
No time spend on productivity system, life changing time saving updates and optimizations might be missed

Family time is easy to forget, adding value to Family and Social Networks is a Non Null Investment Cost

Parkinson’s Law -> give myself a day to get something done, will take a day, give myself a week to get something done will take a week, no artificial deadlines are not all value in

“Actionable Advice Leverage Artificial Deadlines” -> also reminder creates Risk for Anxiety, a risk worth mitigating “Do it badly” can be high value in for getting things done and less anxiety

Protected Time, Productivity Tasks, Constant Interrupts in Life can lead to things not getting done, things that we love and care about

Delegation Matters, systems that add value that are reliable can be high value in, also reminder that systems we rely upon can be taken away at non ideal times, forest fires, natural disasters, potential to not have access to things we rely on everyday, same thing for being stuck in a corrupt jail, not a problem in all places in the world does not always equal not a problem in our country in our life, NFA-NFR “we plan and God laughs”

Reliability matters to product lines, to continued use of product lines, a pen and paper that saves data correctly or loss of power causes problems, potential for flood, electronic might be higher value in

Context matters to usefulness of tool NFA-NFR

Better uses of tools such as short cuts like Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V can go a long way for decreasing Non Null Time Costs

Potential for tools like hot keys in life? Life hacks if you will?

Automate scheduling -> rely on reliable systems that provide value (as long as they are value in, visibility is limited NFA-NFR by many in society)

Dissatisfaction to More Not Always a Simple System, Efficiency is Never Perfected, the speed of technology and updates 5 years from now will be much greater

8 Billion people and giant super computers plus 5 years equals less efficient future use of time?

Basically I am saying unwise to beat ourselves up about not perfected optimizations that will be much outpaced by future updates, and a reminder why protected time is so much high value in

Diagnosed with Cancer a Month from Now, 6 months from now, 10 years from now? Do what you love and worrying about not perfectly optimized can lead to less optimized NFA

改进的批判性思维和决策研究数据，关于那个的组合？

Improved Critical Thinking and Decision Making Research Data, Combinatorics on that?

更好地鼓励光顾风险 降低风险 降低风险等于减少对焦虑的需求

Better Encouragement Potential for Patronizing Risk Mitigated Risk Mitigated equals less need for Anxiety

BEncP-PatRM-LRLN4A

Better Encouragement Potential Patronizing Risk Mitigated

Less Risk Less Need for Anxiety

More Risks mitigated less need to worry about the future

MRM-LN2W

Don’t worry -> God controls the weather, Life but a vapor

GCTW-LBAV-MRM-LN2W

Acts of Gods, Storms and Limited Resolution In By Design

Evil Also In By Design

The Sun keeps rising, and while we are alive heart keeps ticking

AoG-SLR-IBD-EIBD-TSKR-WWRA-HKT

AoG-SLR-IBD-EIBD-TSKR-WWRA-HKT-GCTW-LBAV-MRM-LN2W

Acts of God, Storms, Evil, and Limited Resolution is In By Design but the Sun Keeps rising and our hearts keep ticking, able to breathe able to see, risks that are being actively mitigated, seeing the battle is half the battle NFA-NFR

More Risks being Actively Mitigated equals Less Need to Worry

God In Control -> More Risks Being Actively Mitigated

GIC -> MRBAM

GIC -> Faith -> MRBAM -> Not Worrying is High Value In -> Perfectionism that leads to Worry is Not High Value In, Not High Value in to making updates that are High Value In

Potential for more Flexible Systems NFA-NFR

Creating Resilient Supply Lines possibly underappreciated up to June 2022, Potential for Future NFA-NFR

Water is a perfect system necessary for life and it will never be improved upon

Water with sugar or water with no sugar

Someone low on sugar might gain value added by water with sugar

Not all Brown water is good, Coffee and Tea are value in not always fully appreciated

Water in original pure form is useful in some cases, water with sugar or coffee and tea is useful in other cases

Updates add value don’t always add value NFA-NFR

Tea in a Bottle of Water? Could look like something is wrong with the water

Preconceived notions of whether or not a bottle of water is safe not always a simple system

Prone to judgement about molecules we can see, not ones that might be dissolved in the system

Values on this planet control by different systems than can likely be appreciated in other Universes on different planets

System is confusing and irrational at times on Shiny Blue Marble more complicated than people would likely to believe at times, Miracles, Angels, more Unknowns than we can imagine seems very possible and very not fully appreciate not fully respected

Easy to claim we should make decision D based on A+B+C when A+B are knowns and C is considered less relevant, easy to factor out God, Angels, and Other Unknowns F,G,H,I,J

D=A+B+C vs D=A+B+C+F+G+H+I+J

We have a tendency to understate importance of the amount of unknowns into the system to this being a point more worth reiterating possibly not fully appreciated

T = Can modify physics

U = Virtual systems can modify physics

V = Inputs can be iffed

T = Pulleys
U = Magnet under the table
V = Magnet visible to people on one side of the table

Physics can be modifiable in visible and non visible ways, physics of particles happen when dissolving in solution, easy to have faith they will dissolve even though we don’t see the interactions at a microscopic level

Believable dictates belief, believable does not always equal rational

Belief based on deduction, knowns that matter and knowns that do not

Potential to make relevance harder?

Is a document about relevance relevant or not relevant, process matters, thus I assert it is relevant to systems in the world

Systems that factor out relevance by design are less value in logic in by design

Easy to factor out a mans contributions harder to factor them in at times

Creating a document around Relevance potential to require all lawyers to add it to their decision making, they might not fully appreciate the required update

Maybe they just forgot to factor in relevant information, never happened before?

努力并不总是等于结果 宽恕系统

Effort does not always equal results Forgiving Systems

Result 需要 A+B+C 容易扣留 C 看对系统的影响

Result Requires A+B+C easy to withhold C to see the effect on the system

Basing Validation or Encouragement on input or output of a 3rd party unwise, easy to subtract C at Non Ideal Times

Not the most encouraging, learn to say it to yourself

Able to encourage self while people treat you like shit tougher, not ideal lesson for world cool to treat people like shit

Making tough not all ideal to lesson for society, making weak not all ideal to lesson for society

Ginger in 2022 likely to be some shit days that you have to encourage yourself

Never say die is nice, don’t get to listen to that in corrupt Jails or in Blackouts and Power Outages

Not a given to less value in?

God that limits supply lines and prayers, discouragement in or encouragement in?

God that allows limiting of supply lines and prayers, value in or value out?

God that doesn’t like Evil, Prayer to remove Problem of Evil once and for All

Problem of Evil remains

Humiliation as Punishment Not All Value In For Future, Free Starter Diagram

https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ark4M0NGAmjPgeE0rT8OjFvB06t2Dw?e=OxWG98

Better is not always perfect, Limited changes to the numbers can lead to big swing in logic, like a lever or a dial changed from off to on

1000 vs 1001 NFA

The 1 could mean difference between life and death, right path or wrong path

The small variations could lead to Logic that does not always work out for the best, Life is Not Always Logical

Numbers valued as Contrast over Numbers valued as real results matters in many cases

Thus imperfect logic funds corrections that are imperfect, end result Justice not truly balanced, Justice not built on sound logic

Logic both necessary and insufficient NFA-NFR

People in Jails and People with Disabilities Two Things in Common, Life hasn’t delivered a fair hand getting to a future with more is a Non Null Investment Cost

A = 500

A was supposed to equal 501

B = 2000

B correct does not equal what was factored into B was correct

A+C+D = B?

C= 1000
D = 500

B = 2000 or 2001?

If it is a Timecode…. No Big Deal?

A lot can change in a year

For better or worse

Corrupt Systems Bad, Limited Visibility is Real

Numbers as Contrast Serve a Purpose, a Purpose that does not Benefit All Equally, wants to be corrupt system in? Give them 100 years and throw away the key

Potential and leverage in Freedom Lost for Life might encourage others to not promote a corrupt system

Problem is with Evil In By Design the Potential and Leverage in as Contrast can be used in real ways that hurt Fine Upstanding Citizens in Not Fully Appreciated Yet To Be Fully Appreciated Ways

Punishment and Message that is not appreciated, not listened to unlikely to be heeded

A slap on the wrist for a major problem added to the system all value in for teaching others that is value out?

A bit like a constant game of chicken

Punishment not feared requires reinforcement that punishment potential is real

Uncomfortable Potential for people fudging the numbers and materials through punishment versus serving the public brown water or tables with un-sanded edges

Customer Service reps taught to leave broken glass on the floor as a value in system?

Getting Punishment right is hard, easy to get wrong, and consistency is not always fair, just, or balanced

“And for those reasons I hope we can correct them” – Kathleen Heath, TEDxFulbrightPerth | YouTube

Balanced Punishment when high probability for B = 500 vs B = 501?

Schrodinger’s Cat?

People don’t like that delivery of punishment is many times built on an answer that is potentially variable

Assailant A might have or might have not committed the crime not the most reassuring

Amy, Art, Appreciation, Apocalypse?

Biases factor into the letter A NFA-NFR, Reinforced by cultures and systems like Marvel NFA-NFR

保护艾米，非零成本，没有得到充分的欣赏，没有得到充分的尊重，对吧 Siri？ 蛇对字母 S 和 Saints In By Design 都很有价值？

Protecting Amy, a Non Null Cost, Not Fully Appreciated Not Fully Respected, Right Siri? Snakes are all value in for the letter S and Saints In By Design?

My name is Jason -> Friday the 13th, Hockey Masks and Meat Cleavers are all value in for my life?

I am a Ginger -> Vikings and Reminders of Discrimination is bad is all value in for reduced Bias and Anger?

Ginger Vikings Named Jason wearing Hockey Masks and holding or are not holding meat cleavers are ok for the Public to Throw Under the Bus and Limit their support Lines?

Psychopath uses Ginger named Jason as convenient scape goat?

How does one tell if someone was used as a scape goat or not?

Important to ask the right questions to try and deliver balanced justice on vastly limited resolution

A presumption of innocence for the scape goat creators or the scape goat?

Presumption of innocence as only an either or system?

Scape goat creators to Presumption of Innocence then Scape goat to Presumption of Innocence required

ScpGtInstallers -> PrsoI -> ScpGp -> PrsoI

ScpGtCrtrs -> PrsoI -> ScpGp -> PrsoI

SGC -> PoI -> SG -> PoI

False Accusations built on Limited Resolution -> Scape Goat Likely

Scape Goat Likely to Buy In Cost -> Increased Presumption of Innocence

Scape Goat Likely to Impulse Buy a Higher Value In System -> Increases Potential for less Bias and Increased Presumption of Innocence

SCL2IB->HrVIS->IP4LB->IP4PoI

Risk Magnification is Bad, Risk Inspiring is Worse, Mitigating Risk and Increasing Safety through working Support Lines a Higher Value In System For Adaptation

CJAD-SF2U Inspiring Woe Bad, Salting Earth Worse, Not knowing the value in an effective pause?

锁定未来并非所有价值都是为了鼓励

Locked Down Future Not All Value In For Encouragement

悬崖边，人们不喜欢冒险离它太近，因为错误的代价更高

Side of a cliff, people don’t like venturing too close to it because mistakes are more costly

Standing far enough away from the edge, more distance is a Risk Mitigating Strategy

生活中其他像悬崖一样有效的事情的潜力？

Potential for other things in life that work like Cliffs?

非理想购买成本增加 NFA-NFR

Increased Non Ideal Buy In Costs NFA-NFR

不尝试使用 NFA-NFR 的炉子让我们燃烧的可能性要高出很多倍

Stove burns us enough times higher potential for not trying with the stove NFA-NFR

对话前买断的潜力 NFA-NFR

Potential for Buy Out Before Conversation NFA-NFR

Potential for scapgoating self to protect others NFA-NFR?

Leadership Tanking and Taunts, World of Warcraft 101

减少的支撑线可能会增加需要拉更多杠杆的感觉

Reduced Support Lines might increase feeling of need to pull more levers

人们只因对系统的贡献和更改而获得奖励，而不是让系统保持静态 NFA-NFR

People only rewarded for contributions and changes to system and not leaving system static NFA-NFR

Potential for real Divestment to quality of system created by limiting support lines NFA NFR

I could re-embed each of my videos each day to reaffirm the consistency and quality of all my contributions, not really a workable system though, sometimes less is more, sometimes less is more is Not Fully Appreciated, Not Fully Appreciated as it should be

Invested a whole lot in Universal Basic Income videos to have my support lines set to $0

Non Ideal Precedence to set Ginger guys named Jason to Hockey Mask wielding Cleaver wearers

Data Consistency problems plus Horror Movies, No Potential for Errors Not Fully Appreciated with LTULP society?

我们从根本上解决了这两个问题

We got these two problems fundamentally working against each other

我断言长着兔子耳朵的小猫不是挥舞着切肉刀的 Hocking 玩家

I assert Kittens with Bunny Ears are not Cleaver wielding Hocking Players

Bold moves vs strong moves
Made to look held back overly restrained
Timid to more -> not exactly sure how that is useful to writing
Character Ill equipped at beginning of movie to life changing moment to more
Slight over the line has an effect
Way over the line has an effect
Over line in different direction than expected has an effect

Cause and Effect of Timid to More of no value?

Big Companies and Studios thinking they have already seen everything, like I have nothing to add? I am a bit insulted

Capitalizing on Creative Inspiring, Not sure that should be allowed

Part of the problem is the idea all logic all updates have already been established

We have already seen it before logic and laws can be set in stone?

Any really value in life if we have already seen the end of the story, all inventions that would be made before we die?

易于出售 Shiny Blue Marble 作为 Shiny Nothing New Blue Marble

Easy to sell Shiny Blue Marble as Shiny Nothing New Blue Marble

很难向上推销事实历史有时会以不理想的方式使人类感到惊讶

Hard to upsell the fact history has a tendency to surprise humanity sometimes in non ideal ways

如果未来正在对我冰冻的大脑进行实验，最好提醒他们我可能有一些东西要添加到等式中

If the future is experimenting on my frozen brain, best to remind them I might have something to add to the equation

We’ll call this the Jason the Ginger is not a Hockey Mask Wielding Tiger Principle

Kitten with bunny ears no tiger, pure bread marmoset kitten

Savoir quand faire plaisir vs savoir quand ne pas faire plaisir ?

¿Saber cuándo dar un placer amable frente a saber cuándo no dar un placer amable?

Knowing when to give a kind pleasure vs knowing when not to give a kind pleasure?

Écoutez, excusez-vous, résolvez Non, merci Non ?

¿Escuchar, pedir disculpas, resolver no, agradecer no?

Listen No, Apologize No, Solve No, Thank No?

Dire non à écouter et s’excuser auprès des mauvaises personnes peut égaler plus de potentiel pour écouter et s’excuser auprès des bonnes personnes

Decir No a Escuchar y Pedir disculpas a las personas equivocadas, puede igualar un mayor potencial para Escuchar y Pedir disculpas a las personas adecuadas

Saying No to Listening and Apologizing to the wrong people, can equal more potential to Listen and Apologize to the right people

Raising Awareness is Not All Value In Can Limit Oxygen For Other Topics

Fire Codes or Cancer Research? You have to watch both at the same time?

I like Reduced Support Case Individuals Protected and free of Cancer and Burning Buildings…. too much to ask from Shiny Blue Marble?

Imperfect people on backend watching numbers not trained in math and data consistency Not All Value In for the system

People Not Perfect and High Potential for Corruption NFA

想要观看国债的政客们观看我们观看某些内容的次数吗？

Want the politicians watching the national debt watching how many times we watched certain content?

系统正在根据较差的数据一致性做出判断

System is making judgements based on poor Data Consistency

“The hand wants what it wants” – Better Off Ted, Veronica, hard to reduce message to increase throughput for others at times

“If you would kindly shut your pie hole” – Bender, Futurama

Bold Concise Cuts Not All Value Out

1840s if I was a Slave in the South, would I want to see the American Flag still flying in 2022?

If I was part of a Native American Tribe who lost people and had their land stolen would I want to still see American Flag flying in 2022?

Problem with Erasing History and Starting Fresh, The ones who’s history is erased do not always appreciate the update

Repairing a society a bit harder than some might like to think

Repairing a society prone to leave each other under the bus while racking up a giant debt?

Not sure the World would appreciate us not paying our debt, just erasing the past

Not sure wise to let debt to Ginger kind be erased, just erasing the past like it is nothing

More than one party that requires remedies and compensation with no reserves to deliver on remedies and compensations

Unforgiveness is a supply line limiter, better to promote the opposite

What is Lazy vs Not Fixed In By Design

Not Always simple to Know the Difference

Not translating can give oxygen, currently my oxygen (funding in my supply lines) is being limited

Verification out being limited might be unwise to think translation is adding value in the necessary levels

Reduced funding limiting my supply lines leads to reduced potential for Google Translate and the World

Significant consequences to limiting my supply lines necessary if people of future want more optimal protection

Government limits SSI, Google doesn’t go to bat to protect me, thus

Is ok with Ginger supply lines failing NFA-NFR

Systems that work against problem solver
Systems that actively cause problems when try to fix
A in corrupt system C
A is abused by C, but does not want to leave C, system has reiterated that better systems are only temporary before being returned to C
To be true value in to Amy, Art, Appreciation
How would one go about that?

Less punishing less perfectionist about Amy, Art, about Appreciation while still creating High Quality Content

Building No Fire Codes -> Lower quality than ideal for future
Brown Water -> No Filter -> Lower quality than ideal for future
Rusty Metal -> No Polish -> Lower quality than ideal for future
No Prosecution -> Potential for Psychopaths on the lose -> Lower quality than ideal for future
System derails people trying to create studios, trying to create art -> Large amount of time spent towards something that is robbed by a corrupt system -> Lower quality than ideal for future
Pastel Studio leads to bad story -> Bad story leads to less sales -> Lower quality than ideal for future -> Lower quality than need for maintaining supply lines

Art Appreciation kind of like Meal Appreciation

Going to a restaurant what makes for a good meal vs a bad meal

Great meal? Amazing customer service, timely and amazing, food is safe water is clear and filtered to appropriate level

Great meal? Health problems don’t cause problems for the meal (heart attacks choking to death in middle of meal not all ideal), best customer service and best food with a heart attack not ideal, sometimes the studio, the restaurant can do everything right, and still the meal won’t turn out great, Acts of God NFA-NFR High Potential for Woe

Sometimes

Silence as combinational encouragement in

Quiet sometimes adds ability to enjoy coffee appreciate a good book

a video that could mean freedom for others in society, freedom I can’t fully appreciate or understand what it might mean not always simple

听故事但喜欢故事的人
People that listen to a story but enjoy the story

以并不总是完全欣赏的方式度过他们的时间
Spend their time in not always fully appreciated ways

不等于故事是所有价值 不等于故事是所有价值
Does not equal story is all value in does not equal story is all value out

也许所有保护 Ginger 支持线的人都被关起来了

Maybe all the people that would have protected Ginger support lines were locked up

按设计价值输出系统不是按设计价值输入 NFA-NFR

Value Out Systems In By Design are Not Value In By Design NFA-NFR

大公众长时间不使用 Gingers 支持热线

Big public to not deliver on Gingers support lines for a long long period of time

不能真正责怪其他因系统损坏而氧气有限的少数族裔

Can’t really blame other minorities that are given limited oxygen by a broken system

较大的受保护的少数族裔具有更大的保持风帆的能力 NFA-NFR 很容易让不受重视的人被重视

Larger more protected minorities have greater ability to keep wind in sails NFA-NFR easy for people that are not valued in to be valued out

对于一个不想增加保护主义的系统，肯定有一个很好的方法来提高它

For a system that doesn’t want to increase protectionism, sure has a good way of turning it up

Bad Scorpderagon

Maybe the numbers will remind Government officials to re-enable support lines that for some reason have gone lacking

容易产生对可以带走的东西的依赖

Easy to create reliance on things that can be taken away

出售对生活的适应并不总是合乎逻辑的，言论自由很有价值，因为限制教师的价值在于可以创造 2+2=7 NFA-NFR？

Selling adaptation to Life is Not Always Logical and Freedom of Speech is valuable because limiting teachers is value out that can create 2+2=7 NFA-NFR?

编辑我可能不知道的宝石？ 那些可以通过更大的买入潜力以更好的方式出售言论自由的公司？

Editing Gems that I might not be aware of? Ones that could sell Freedom of Speech in a better way with greater Buy In Potential?

适用于图表的视频编辑技巧？

Video Editing Tricks applicable to Diagrams?

观众的视线集中在屏幕的什么地方？ 那值多少钱，我希望他们专注于图表的这一部分，但屏幕边缘的那是什么？

Where the audiences eyes focus on the screen? How much is that worth, I want them focusing on this part of diagram but what is that at the edge of the screen?

妩媚一时迷人

Charming is charming for a time

Not Enough Investment In Joy and Not Enough Investment in Critical Support

Teaching people how to encourage and validate themselves in hard time, High Value In

Potential for Misuse as well

Better to trust people with being more encouraged than depressed to the point of driving off a cliff

尊重人们在非理想时间限制鼓励的能力

Respect the ability of people to limit encouragement at non ideal times

导致人们感觉不被认可的系统

Systems that lead to people not feeling validated

光顾 + 居高临下 + 关心人们的想法

Patronizing + condescending + caring what people think

A = Patronizing
B = Condescending
C = Caring What People Think

A+B+C = High Potential for Combinational Negative Support Out System

A+B+C = Discouragement Potential that is useful to competition to leave you under the train at an opportune time

竞争有动机提供令人沮丧的挫败感，这样他们就可以拿下奖杯，世界很容易从减少支持案例的个人中赚到钱，像 Gingers 这样的 RSCI

There is incentive for Competition to deliver Discouragement that is disabling so they can take the trophy, easy for the world to make a chump out of Reduced Support Case Individuals, RSCIs like Gingers

将我们对自己的看法依赖于对他人的尊重有可能导致更少的验证、更多的羞耻麻痹和更少的尊重随着时间的推移 NFA-NFR

Basing our opinions of ourselves dependent upon the Respect of others has potential to lead to less validation, more shame paralysis, and less Respect over time NFA-NFR

竞争，受激励的竞争，例如与政党的竞争，可能是泄气的地雷

Competition, Competition that is incentivized, such as with Political Parties can be a landmine of Discouragement

我们需要世界上的人们帮助清理灰心的地雷，然后才能消灭后代

We need people in the world that help clean up the discouragement landmines before they take out future generations

早期的批判性思维可以走很长的路

Critical thinking early on can go a long way

激励人们像棕色水而不是过滤水一样行事 -> 我并不是说要歧视非裔美国人，非裔美国人的鼓励令人惊叹的是干净的淡水，我们都应该比被迫喝水更好 里面有毒素

Incentive for people to act like brown water instead of filtered water -> I don’t mean that to be discrimination for African Americans, African American Encouragement that is amazing is clean fresh water, and we all deserve better then to be forced to drink water with Toxins in it

聪明的高加索人也可以像棕色水一样行事 NFA-NFR

Bright Caucasian people can act like Brown Water as well NFA-NFR

开始对话和一个充满多样性问题和 NFA NFR 偏向更多 NAASS 的世界

Starting Conversation and a world full of diversity problems and NFA NFR Biases to More NAASS

Judgmental Bar Crowd 的大量测试并不总是最令人鼓舞的

High Amount of Tests from Judgmental Bar Crowd not always the most encouraging

在客户服务人员的怀抱中找到安慰的潜力 NFA NFR

Potential for finding comfort in arms of customer service personnel NFA NFR

人们不是棕色水，除非他们将其他人比作棕色水，因为他们歧视姜？

People aren’t brown water except when they compare other people to brown water for being discriminatory to Gingers?

政府和教会只是在短期和长期资金不足和支持 Gingers 方面更好地站稳脚跟？ -> 也许听起来我是故意这么告诉你的？ 就像关闭支持线对系统有用的 6 个月一样？

Government and Church just holds its ground better to underfund and under support Gingers short term and long term? -> Maybe sounds like I told you so in by design? Like 6 months of having your support lines turned off as useful to the system?

艺术有时会令人沮丧，再加上 Gingers 和 RSCI 的突破支持线？

Art can be discouraging at times, compound it with breaking support lines for Gingers and RSCIs?

政府和教会在他们的计划中没有考虑到 Ginger Artists

Government and Church did not account for Ginger Artists in their plan

世界和平缔造者在他们的计划中没有考虑到姜艺术家

World Peacemakers did not account for Ginger Artists in their plan

姜艺术家没有受到更多的压迫和不充分的补救措施可能会导致更多的 NAASS 1983-2022 -> 随着时间的推移阻止 CNSOS 的力量 NFA-NFR

Ginger Artists Not Protected with More Oppression and Inadequate Remedies Likely to More NAASS 1983-2022 -> Power of Discouraging CNSOS over time NFA-NFR

Gingers Artist Non Essential for Peacemaking 可能导致文件漂移 NFA-NFR

Gingers Artist Non Essential for Peacemaking can lead to document drift NFA-NFR

生姜寻求工作支撑线并获得破碎的支撑线

Gingers seek working support lines and get broken support lines

NFA-NFR

期待鱼并得到一条蛇

Expect Fish and get a Snake

期待鱼（能够实现梦想的工作支持线）

Expect Fish (Working Support Lines Able to Achieve Dreams)

Get Snake（断了支持线无法实现梦想）

Get Snake (Broken Support Lines Unable to Achieve Dreams)

教会没有为 Ginger 支持线增加价值，Gingers 可能不明智地给予腐败的教会不尊重黄金法则

Church doesn’t add value to Ginger Support Lines, Gingers likely unwise to give to corrupt Church of does not respect the Golden Rule

当教会想知道为什么他们的系统投入更少时，当政府想知道为什么人们花更少的时间时，看看他们投资的文件

When Churches wonder why less is given to their systems, when Governments wonder why people give a fuck less of the time, take a look at documentation of what they invest in

重要的是要弄清楚什么值得操，什么不值得操

Important to figure out what is worth giving a fuck to and what is not worth giving a fuck to

上帝和天使有工作要做，无限画家的挑战不会让他感到侮辱

God and Angels have some work to do, no challenges for infinite painter might make Him feel insulted

倾听 道歉 解决 感谢 澄清 想法 发展 实施 发散 融合 思维 帮助创造更美好的未来

Listen Apologize Solve Thank Clarify Ideate Develop Implement Divergent Convergent Thinking to help produce a better future

对产品设计有用的澄清的出现

Appearance of Clarification Useful to Product Design

Evil In By Design 很容易想到这个，实际上那个

Evil In By Design easy to think this when actually that

一扇你以为关着的门打开了

A door you believed shut opened

然后记得在胁迫下你提前 10 分钟打开它

Then remember that under duress you opened it 10 minutes earlier

生姜的高应力断裂供应线并不总能带来最佳的能见度

High Stress Broken Supply Lines for Gingers does not always lead to optimal visibility

数据不一致和网络安全问题可能会以不完全可感知的方式激起愤怒，这些方式极有可能导致事故，容易忘记俄勒冈州未提及的网络安全问题

Data inconsistency and cyber security problems can ramp anger in Not Fully Appreciable Ways, ways that have high potential to lead to accidents, easy to forget about the cybersecurity problems that were left unsaid in Oregon

不同的时间，对系统的不同培训，对各方的可见性更有限，可能不会导致对系统的更完善的理解

Different time, different training into the system, more limited visibility for all parties likely doesn’t lead to more perfect understanding of the system

过去很难因系统外的价值而起诉，随着时间的推移，价值可能高于预期，补救措施不足似乎有点轻描淡写，补救措施不足导致对我的家庭和社会的支持不理想

Hard to prosecute past for value out of system, amped over time worth is likely higher than expected, Inadequate Remedies seems a bit of an understatement, Inadequate Remedies that has lead to suboptimal support for my family and society

我的一部分感觉就像我一直在做一个噩梦，有一天我可能会醒来

Part of me feels like I have been floating through a bad dream and one day I just might wake up

想象一下，10年训练的所有vlog帖子浓缩成一个月的时间，然后在2010年被放出来，好像什么都没发生

Imagine all the vlog posts 10 years of training condensed into one month of time, then being let back out in 2010 as if nothing happened

在此期间会面的各方都是基于预测的计算机世代，时间线潜力不佳

All parties met during the time were computer generations built on projections, a bad timeline potential

高能药物，有可能改变反应速度以完全理解在像室这样的统计中可以做什么？

High Powered Drugs, Potential to change reaction speeds to ever fully fully appreciated what could be done in a statis like chamber?

金刚狼+电缆潜力？

Wolverine + Cable potential?

有线电视在金刚狼之后的未来对吗？ 来自金刚狼的研究数据滥用因素进入电缆的手臂？

Cable’s future after Wolverines right? Research Data from Wolverines abuse factors into Cable’s Arm?

Free Starter Diagram Peacemaking equals more saved lives less unethical research NFA-NFR https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ark4M0NGAmjPgeEvnAlhsv8MJRGybg?e=nLPq9i

让检察官无法阻止人们的超级士兵辩护律师？ Evil In By Design 可能会喜欢我要去的地方

Super Soldiers Defense Lawyers that make it impossible for prosecutors to stop people? Evil In By Design might like where I am going with that

我不制定规则，生姜仇恨者和时间劫匪需要被起诉

I don’t make the rules, Ginger haters and time robbers need to be prosecuted

痛恨时间劫匪等于歧视老姜？

Hating the Time Robbers equals Discriminating Against Gingers?

选择不训练 Gingers 进行适当的时间管理？ 双重内疚

Chose not to train the Gingers in proper Time Management? Double Guilty

Free Time Goblin Background Starter Image https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ark4M0NGAmjPgeEtOvX_6dTXGSAVlw?e=xBG36W

减少支持案例 个人极有可能导致供应线有限

Reduced Support Case Individuals high likelihood to lead to limited supply lines

有限的供应线很可能用于保护

Limited supply lines high potential for overswing for protection

限制减少的支持案例个人供应线并不是未来的全部价值，降低后代的潜力 NFA-NFR

Limiting Reduced Support Case Individuals Supply Lines is Not All Value In for Future, reduced Potential for Future Generations NFA-NFR

挑衅和责备一个在历史上上演了太多次的老故事

Provoke and blame a bit of an old story played out too many times throughout history

就像把一个人非人化成一头公牛，然后在他面前举起一面红旗

Like dehumanizing a man into a bull and then flying a red flag in front of his face

倒橙色头发就像被闪亮的蓝色大理石倒一杯连续的冷咖啡

Poured Orange Hair like being Poured a Continuous cup of Cold Coffee by Shiny Blue Marble

我是 Ginger，努力争取公平待遇是一项艰巨的工作

I am a Ginger and it is a lot of work to try to fight for fair treatment

A CSys World Not all Ideal for Building B