Not All Content gets Attention it Deserves, if I watch a video 2 minutes through that is 10 minutes and I liked what I saw in first 2 minutes is it wrong to like the video? Might be something non ideal further in the video I don’t know about, on the other hand not encouraging is not all value in
Liking a video 1/5 complete is a risk, a risk that something monstrous isn’t 9/10ths the way in
Last Frame of Doom Potential, 1000 Page bill one sentence that is earth shattering somewhere in the mix?
There are likely some things in the Google Tech Iceberg I would prefer not to see, and had the people that made them had more oversight they might have been able to make better content or risk mitigate content better
People that divest commenting on right and wrong to all value in?
I don’t have time to listen to all songs, might be a perfect song that I might never listen to that might get me out of Jail
Angelic support, I don’t have to see the support for it to add value, wise to have gratitude for some unseen in by design by all parties
Foster an appreciation for what we aren’t forced to see all value out?
A cat in a box with some cesium, I don’t have to see the cat for people to know I want it to live
Imagine a Man Goes Into a Club
He loses his wallet
Then 30 minutes later he finds his wallet, but someone has added child pornography to it, when an onlooker sees the child pornography they report it to child protective services
Evidence can be planted, Evidence Presented does Not Equal Evidence Presented will be Judged in a Righteous Manner
What Evidence is allowed in a case matters for a reason, Jury not poisoned by bias matters for a reason
Potential for the misrepresentation to be turned up in non ideal ways, find the people that judge the falsely accused then falsely accuse them systems?
Lessons can be taught in non ideal ways that compound on themselves non ideally
Putting the Ginger Cat right next to the Ginger, Trust the Vlog Owner?
He was Green, 5’7 and Ran away with my Time
With Descriptive Writing Practice He had Orange Haired that Burned Like fire with Giant Green Floppy Ears while wearing a nap sack color tank top.
Concept Art can be Very High Value In, 70% and then Supercomputers turn up the precision?
Auto Tuned not always perfect value in does not equal not vastly improved Canvas at times
Memorizing is useful, Limiting Relevance is useful, Memorize 5000 numbers that can’t be useful, or memorize Pi 3.141592? Memorize 100 decimal places of pi could be useful, or is 3.14 more value in for Precise enough systems? 100 decimal places increases probability for errors
Lighter Processing Requirements is not always value out
Paint a football field or just a 7 by 11 sheet of paper?
Light Less Heavy can be Bigger Picture Thinking at Times
People thought close to Perfect is Not Adequate Lift
Potential for 2+3 or 1+4 = 5, two different systems that might work better for people for different reasons
This works for me that doesn’t systems possible
Might be a faster way to solve the problem does not always equal I am fully enabled to use the faster method to solve the problem
Like a calculator on hand vs not on hand
Problem always solved with optimal system and in optimal amount of time seems unwise
Jail inmate that can add 2+2 = 4 to get you out of Jail, no calculator does not equal can’t be effective
Never know when a calculator might not be on hand
Math can Solve Problems, Does Not Always Solve Problems, Does Not Equal being able to Add is Not Useful at Times
Easy to throw out a great system that has potential for flaws in by design
Knowing heights can help with Compare and Contrast, Similar Objects, The light post stood tall as if two 18 wheelers were stacked like a double decker bus
Humans can’t comprehend but still think it wise to judge, necessary to judge leads to wise to judge, wise to judge is not all value in
If I am driving down the road I make decisions based on A and B, if a small nail is on the road or if I have non ideally taken care of maintenance, potential for unknowns to factor into things in Not Always Fully Appreciated Ways
A and B factors into driving does not equal C and D always factor into Driving Ideally, Humans Judge based on A+B systems and are forced to claim answer when system is actually A+B+C+D+ManyOtherUnknowns
Not judging A+B could lead to driving off the road, Necessary to judge
Judging A+B as optimal without factoring in C+D+ManyOtherUnknowns would be wise, choice necessary is not always choice optimal
Required to judge leads to feeling of judgement that worked was optimal, judgment worked leads to feeling judgment is always optimal
A+B leads to answer C, Therefor follows only logically that C will always result from A+B systems and D+E+ManyOtherUnknowns are Irrelevant, judgement required leads to thought wise to judge A+B more relevant than D+E+ManyOtherUnknowns
Humans Jump from Required Logical to Wise Always, Useful Always
A wreck happens, easy to factor out things like nails on the road that factor in in non ideal ways
Obfuscate out the relevant as irrelevant leads to potential for people judged in corrupt way -> how to protect others from my own judgement like that a bit of a harder system to master
One solution might be Judgement in Short Term Required does Not Necessitate Judgement in Long Term Optimal
Not being able to make a choice can deadlock and limit system in non ideal ways
A person out of Jail or in Jail, trial hanging in the error for 5 years might rob the system of resources in non ideal ways, out of Jail workable, in Jail might be more workable to out of Jail resolution faster, 3 months in Jail might beat 5 years in heavy stressful legal battle so to speak
Like a coin flip that was left in the air for 5 years?
Will it land, when will it land, will it ever land?
Useful for getting people to divest from Legal Process, tie up the system for 20 years you got time for that? Call their bluff?
My Tech Blog 