My Tech Blog

Thoughts on Maximizing Profit, Maximizing ROI

Last number less than this number

System leads to A > B, then system that leads to A
System leads to B > A, then system that leads to B
Factors that factor into A and B
Not guarantees that same factors will factor into A and B
A = C+D+E
B = C+F+G
Knowns and Unknowns, C could factor into A and B differently
A could equal 5C and B could equal 0.5C
B could equal 10C and A could equal 0.25C

Different people can use investments to different amounts
One math lesson, might be more value into one person Art lesson might be more value into another person
Idea that one less is more value than the other not always easy or wise system
One artist that inspires 50 doctors, or 51 doctors that quit early?
Unwise to discount encouragement and discouragement into systems

Raising Volume, Quantity does not always lead to higher profit

Kind of like Encouragement, 20 Nice comments might be valued less than a few amazing ones

Encouragement is a Non Null Time Cost, robbed of all time is not encouraging

Giant open outdoor picture or drone shot, or words of encouragement, one always better than the other?

Allowed to get away with being High Discouragement in, is High Discouragement in

Oppressive systems words of encouragement fall short of what they could be

Potential NAFA NAVI

Simple Charming Details with Massive Encompassing Scale that transports us to a new world and journey?

Positive Reaffirming Details are always better than Compare and Contrast for effective delivery of Message? 90% of all people value that > than 10%?

Corrupt Leadership of SSI and UBI Out > Long Term No Support in for Country? Have to stick it to 2020 to 2024 for the good of the world? Not sure children of this time period, people of this time period really appreciate current leader….

Democrats Epic in Negate Support to a permanently disabled party of higher value in, less corrupt party system in permanently out the better, Republicans aren’t really delivering support either, not sure what to do when all leadership fails like a crooked 3 dollar bill full of Ginger haters

Permanent Associations of Political Parties to Shit Storms not all value in for Long Term Unrepairable Label Promoters Out, problem is that has given non ideal cloud cover for leadership to profit from in non ideal ways, non ideal ways that has lead to deaths NFA, to reduced Ginger Support Not Always Full Appreciated

Long Term Ginger Support Out, kind of eating shit in

Bad Output Should Not Be Filtered into Input

Listen, Apologize, I think it important to send a message, Thank because I don’t have to say this, and not sure we should give solve to the people that have left the support out eat shit in by design

Democrats and Republicans to shitty output, Green Party and reduced toilet paper on par with what was given in Jail seems more ideal for government systems that turn up fails and support out time and time again, not very merciful turning off support, leadership should teach better lessons

Protectors of Freedom of Speech and valued pursuers of ideals to help save the world from Evils Not Always Fully Appreciated -> what politicians could have been labeled as

Ginger Hating Toilet Paper Thieves seems more apt

Time Period of the Wrong Not Always Fully Appreciated

Potential for Strengthening Arguments Past Safe NFA-NFR

Potential for Better Sold as More Optimal Not Actually More Optimal?

Said with no emotional element, message fully heard and appreciated?

Callused cold, emotionless not always perceived as more loving, rightly so and wrongly so

Proof is incentivized to be non emotional, non reactionary, responsive

Responsive that is still warm not always easy to get right

Concern and motivation for positive, still providing for our own personal dreams and motivations, and protecting without bias to not always a simple system

If we could say without any bias, would that be more value in?

Thought others don’t value our joy at all to all value in?

If we show any bias they will attach us to a guillotine and cut the rope?

Trust someone with no bias?

The man lives or dies, the facts are A+B+C

Not the most effective of arguments, acknowledging there is bias in the system by design is not always fully appreciated, likely to not always fully be appreciated

Getting people to be biased in the right ways is not always a value in system, left out is not always a value in system

Two bottles of soda in a fridge, open the fridge door and can’t decide, society will judge me dependent on the choice Not Always Fully Appreciated

Society likes Contrast -> Coke registered as Republican Cocaine, Not Fully Appreciated the way the system rolls at times

Sprite -> Green Party no toilet paper in?

Contrast creates real problems for decision making in, no bias creates real problems for decision making in, not all bias is good, does not equal all choices is bad

Judgement is in by design and used in inappropriate ways to control and oppress

System goes through all the work to make messages and fails to allow and a lot room for biases built in

Easy to be biased, easy to be unfair about judging people for bias, easy to be biased about bias, not always bad to be biased about bias, bias has lead to deaths and losses in the system not fully appreciated and turned up over time, reprocessed and reamplified overtime

Arguments are valuable for saving life or losing life

Win a trial > lose a trial, does not always work out in all ideal ways for the one that loses the trial

Competition In By Design leads to trophies, salaries

Trophies, Salaries does not always lead to accurate level of support

TS-DNAL2-AccLoS

Win the trial but lose the war?

Can effectively prove point might lead to more thinks should defend point

Directing others path is not always value in

Doctor or Architect? No Hospitals, Hospital with bad Fire Codes always better?

Shelter and Operating Rooms leads to better ability for Doctors to deliver effectively, sick people to healthy leads to more funding for keeping food on Architects tables

Lawyers and Artists left to eat out of dumpsters? Possibly a better way?

Arguments as No Lose likely sell better but are more unrealistic

Unrealistic Idealism can lead to won elections that can but does not always lead to better ability to deliver for people

Promises built on idealism can lead to suboptimal support for parties not always fully predicted

Green Power Less War > Keeping SSI Working and Gingers Alive

Pet Project Promises Earmarks in Bills > actually delivering support

Toilet Paper for DC > Texan’s Ability to Purchase Bottle of Waters -> to a less fully appreciated system by Gingers with gasoline level fire

Less Water for Texans, Less Water for Gingers -> turned up overtime potentially via mislabels and hatred of Bush after 9/11 overswing

Burning to death in a collapsing building likely had large impact on leadership, trying to increase education and that happened under watch to likely need to overcompensate in not fully appreciated ways with a big Evil In By Design puzzle piece God has left in over time

Easy to think Evil In By Design doesn’t effect our decision making, and Bias is required to make decisions

Strengthening Arguments can lead to non ideals with bias

Bias required, Bias can be raised in Non Ideal Ways that are unexpected and not always fully appreciated

Lawyer to family members (nation viewed as family worth personally protecting) dying

Words, Arguments to less adequate remedies for problems is not always value in

Tendency for world governments to think, words have been inadequate more actions like sanctions, war, intervention is always more value in than peace and moving forward

Making peace is a non null cost, but not all want to actually take the burden of peacemaking, some deaths some problems in society are view as less important than the greater amount of deaths caused by Evil In By Design with High Potential for Overswing and inability to predict the future

Gasoline poured on half of your body, and lit on fire

Scars we can’t fully appreciate always on display for the world to see

Likely effects all decision making, Vanilla Sky, Tyrant

Easy to judge if it happened to me I would do it different, if it happened to me I would have had the strength to do it different

Bias raised in Non Ideal Ways does not always factor into Leadership in Ideal Ways

Systems are strengthened for leadership, Flex is sometimes viewed as less valuable than power. Underfunded teachers flexible vs Teachers need raised 2+2=4 Matters to system in Not Always Fully Appreciated Ways

Potential for people taught 2+2 = something else than 4, potential to cause real problems in the system, if 4 equals guilty on the document, data consistency problems are not always fully respected

Down chain does not always equal something wasn’t switched further up the chain

A -> B -> C -> D -> E

A = 7

E will show A = 7?

What if B sets A to = 4

2+2 = 4 simple as that?

Document said 2+2 = 7 (Might have been flagging something for higher up the chain), might be a way to test data consistency, will well meaning employees modify reports or will they deliver the image shown at the ground level directly

Tested Data Consistency in can be incentivized and disincentivized for good reason

Just because that 2+2 = 7 was left in tact, does not mean the rest of the report was necessarily left in tact, that it would not have been changed at the last second through non ideals in the systems like health problems or neural links (early stage cybernetics maybe not always fully appreciated in leadership)

Expectation of Knowns in a World Full of Technology and a Lot of Reason to Hide things is Not All Value In

People required to operate on knowns to strengthen support that leads to a higher quality of life, operating on knowns does not always lead to optimal support for all parties

The idea is power to prove argument beats the alternative, does not equal there is no potential for that power to be used in non ideal ways by bad actors

Evil In By Design, Need to be Right, Need to be Right to solidify support lines is not all value in to decision making

Alternative not all value in either, 7 people to feed, 2+2 = quota for week, tell them we will be able to provide? Unrealistic expectations of support in is not always value in for decision making, not making decision based on numbers and logic? God will provide no need to go to market, not an all value in for respect system

5 % Gas Left as Norm leads to Higher Quality Output? Too Comfortable leads to razor thin margins that fail in suboptimal ways at suboptimal times?

Teaches a lesson that giving is not always fully respected or appreciated by man, God likely has better memory of the numbers

Too Comfortable set to a system worth valuing out is not always value in

And it can be amplitatory

Uncomfortable for me useful to get results seen as Kosher, can lead to uncomfortable for others useful to get results

UncIBD -> a useful system for turning me up -> a useful system for turning them up -> a system that can turn it up in NAFA ways NAFR ways

Peace to War -> Comfortable to Uncomfortable is useful -> Getting comfortable with uncomfortable not an all value in system

War to Peace -> Uncomfortable Ginger Support Lines In By Design to never able to fuck over Ginger support lines again as a High Value In System

Governments allowed to remain in power while deoptimizing Ginger support -> to less valuable systems long term

People that truly want to make peace, don’t turn off my support

The problem with the system, the competition, can win leads to think should win

The problem with the system, knowing when to speak up not always simple

Strong rebuke to leadership -> likely have heard quite a few of those

Predicting wrong -> people have a tendency to that

Imagine mediating Imperfect Parents Talking in the Past about the Advice they would give their children

Easy to think they had visibility of the events of today way back then

Not sure what that is called

Updated overtime leads to Hubris that others were more updated had more information they did not have back then

Is there a word for that?

Discrepancy in Training that is Magnified over Time in Non Ideal Ways for Judgmental People, for people required to be Judgmental deliver on limited resolution?

Future has more information, rearview is 2020, rearview is thought to be 2020

Non ideal Linguistics modifications overtime, non ideal memory, unlikely to be able to fully remember how we were all trained at earlier dates

Easy to say training was non ideal, based on knowns we have while limiting visibility to unknowns that are in by design

Words can be condensed does not always equal words should be condensed

Life is a Limited Time Limited Memory Limited Resolution System that is Not Always Fully Appreciated and Not Always Fully Respected -> Life is but a Vapor

vs

Easy to say training was non ideal, based on knowns we have while limiting visibility to unknowns that are in by design

Life-LTLM-LRS

Easy to training was non ideal while limiting access to unknowns (unknowns that are magnified over time in non ideal ways)

Proof that is valuable to our argument is in by design

Proof that is less valuable to our argument is not always fully pondered, conjectured, theorized, implicated, associated, assumed, derived

Proof Valuable > Conjecture that Could Save Lives Not Always Fully Appreciated

Life can’t be summed up in concise one liners? “Since when” – Van Wilder

Life tendency to deliver on limited resolution proof valued greater than observation

Time is limited Observation takes time -> Observation a Not Always Fully Appreciated System that can be High Value In

TLim-ObsNNTCs-ObsNAFASys-TCB-HVI

Observation can lead to more information does not always lead to more information, potential for more unknowns in mind opened to new learning not all value out, computers have sensors for a reason

Expectation of Observation to always deliver perfect resolution more than not ideal

Leveraged Observation not always value in

Scientists with a guy with a gun standing over their shoulder when they look through the microscope, someone dies if no discovery?

Scientists know how to get oxygen does not equal scientist are always to be trusted

Scientist know how to mitigate does not equal scientist do not need oxygen, nor is it wise to leverage observation in non ideal ways

Demand for non ideal support lines can lead to non ideal support lines not fully appreciated

Requirement for delivery does not always lead to non biased delivery

Req2Delv-DNAL2-NBD

TLim-ObsNNTCs-ObsNAFASys-TCB-HVI-Req2Delv-DNAL2-NBD

Time Limited Observation Takes Time, Observation is Not Always a Fully Appreciated System that can be High Value In, Important to remind people though, Required to Deliver does not always lead to Non Biased Delivery, Non Biased Delivery is Not Always Value In

Time Variation in Results Delivered Not Always Fully Appreciated

NNTCsL2VarsNAFA

NNTCsL2VarsNAFA-TLim-ObsNNTCs-ObsNAFASys-TCB-HVI-Req2Delv-DNAL2-NBD-IBD

Non Null Time Costs Lead to Variables Not Always Fully Appreciated

Time Limited In By Design

Observation Requires Non Null Time Costs

Observation is Not Always a Fully Appreciated System that can be and has proven to be High Value In -> Cancer Research vs No Cancer Research, Looking in Microscope or Starting Wars? People Need Challenges, Including Scientists

Required to Deliver Does Not Always Lead to Non Biased Deliver In By Design

Shitty No Delivers In By Design currently expect better from the past would be an unwise assumption, high likelihood to limit the future in not fully respected ways

God that gets away with Snake In By Design

I fundamentally do not like the way God has run this planet

Is law really any value in when all inputs have been iffed?

Reality is veiled, potentially always veiled

Results value iffed

Wise to keep all the irons in the same fire? Spearmint is nice, Black and White printable nice too

Risk mitigation through multiple system design with fail over redundancy? Where we can add value to fail over and where we can’t?

Not all people might buy into same diagrams, more obtainable without buy in cost not always value in not always value out

Valuing others for what we think they add not all value in, because they can add value in ways we might not be able to comprehend

Reading Comprehension Not Guaranteed, Comprehension Not Guaranteed, Worth Reinforcing

Valuing others for what we think they add not all value in, because they can add value in ways we might not be able to comprehend, easy to discount value we can’t readily see or understand

Reading Comprehension Not Guaranteed, Comprehension Not Guaranteed, Worth Reinforcing

They didn’t add value to that? I would not be so sure, given surveillance systems that watch in the classrooms at times

Early investors so to speak, helping maximize profits while not being paid or fully represented

Not respected value in for protection, military, and training systems misrepresented is not fully appreciated

Surveillance data as not a value in system for all not fully appreciated not fully respected

CEOs get big paychecks while my company fails to an all value in system?

Competition profits some in society, a pivot point

Pivots that are useful get value added, pivots that are less useful are useful for a time

Easy to be value out in a competitive system, easy to allow value out in a competitive system

Value in stability and consistency for a system that values it out for me?

The sun as a Giant Time Diamond?

Time is a resource, Power

More like a star or more like comet we have to mine?

A Dyson Swarm like system for preventing Negative Non Null Time Costs and Promoting Positive Non Null Time Costs?

Light and not too complex time management, too complex not always more value in

What would we do with all that extra time? More time management that exponentially increases power and usefulness of time?

Life with time for time management and for other things, likely high value in

A valuable resource if valued too highly loses its intrinsic value

A bit of an odd property

metal valuable, metal is useful, metal valued too highly is not all value in, sleeping on a metal bed with no food not all value in

Stopping death penalty via corrupt systems, that has potential to lead to sleeping on a metal bed with no food, Non Null Investment Costs Required

Saving Gingers years in advance Non Null Investment Cost

Having Orange Hair is a Natural Hazard, like floods, earthquakes, and tsunamis

Not all value in to have to reiterate the protection measures

“Can help make communities more safe and secure” – 10 things you should know about disaster risk reduction | Humanitarian Practice Network | YouTube

Parents having to stand with a sandcastle bucket in front of a tidal wave of oppression because people have orange hair to all value in?

Bad supply lines tidal wave of oppression and insufficient underfunded support magnified by that tidal wave of oppression

Potential for upsold as hogs stage, potential for upsold to wants to steal stage

Leverage in is not all value in, is not all value in in all expected ways

Have to try twice as hard to be heard, punished for being heard

Incentivized against ourselves in not fully appreciated ways

Not valued respected to more not always a simple system

Discouragement has potential to lead to more discouragement, competition has potential to lead to discouragement, sometimes real issues need to be acknowledged to prevent hubris in the system, disincentivized by a system that underfunds the system with discouragement in by design

Listening logically, without bias to a system that personally effects us to an all value in system? Too close to the issue to effectively encourage not always fully appreciated?

Have to look in the mirror everyday, not really an issue we can effectively unsubscribe from. Can’t unsubscribe and potential for too much bias, other systems like that?

Listening to Gingers to the same system? Can’t unsubscribe and potential for bias because we have heard the same thing before?

Oppressed Gingers that feel less supported via the mirror, what could that mean to psychological thought processes short term and long term

Forced to reduce discouragement in, unable to always effectively value in or out competition versus support in by design with the Free Market

Every failure, every loss, a bit of a reminder, system is a bit value out by design

People not perfect, likely should be reminded to Gingers double

Theoretical Ideal results do not always lead to Ideal Results in practical application

Non Ideal Ginger deaths in potentially less fully appreciated, system makes things hard, have to fight twice as hard then lose to a technicality?

A Ginger life, valuable with Evil In By Design built into the system

A God that seems to fail to deliver on more than one occasion

Could magnify anti ginger oppression like the Dyson Sphere to Time Management, maybe for the people that fail to respect not blocking my support lines

Non Null Time Delays as a Reinforceable System is Not All Value In

System of wrecks shit with children misused in by design

System of logic weaponized like divorce

CEO’s turning up discrimination, support vs don’t support?

Making me uncomfortable as a value in system reiterated over time to a more fully appreciated why that should not be done systems?

Drag coefficients?

Improved drag coefficients inline with the level of drag coefficients added to my life?

Free Starter Image https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ark4M0NGAmjPgeFBQx9O1kVc5CVfBw?e=EpHFhO Uncomfortable as Legal System NAVI

Early sign off jade, accepting defeat without accepting defeat
Realization that this life might not deliver, prep for next life to high value in NFA-NFR
What is not possible in this version of the story, might be possible in the next version
Years of time travel strapped to a bar stool
Possible, and NAFA?

Wake up one day, and find out we can’t wake up? Just a bad dream till the end of time?

Reset to a value out system, on top of being reset to a value out system NFA

Single Discouragement via Idling Costs Fully Appreciated?

Free Angel Art https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ark4M0NGAmjPgeFDa1VTecMSkxgBjQ?e=DeMQkC

Grace，Flex 高价值，因为不一致的数据和激励的培训不等于设计完美的逻辑

Grace, Flex High Value In 일관되지 않은 데이터와 인센티브가 부여된 교육은 논리적으로 완벽하지 않기 때문에 설계상 완벽함

Grace, Flex High Value In because Inconsistent Data and Training Incentivized Does Not Equal Logic Perfect In By Design

Not Always Ideal Full Speed Ahead

Not Enough Forgiveness In To System High Value Out Not Fully Appreciated Not Fully Respected

Necessary NFA

Potential for Words get in the way
Listening Non Null Investment Cost, knowledge we aren’t listening fully Non Null Cost
Potential for Spoil the Deal (Potential for the Deal needing to be spoiled)
Bias for not spoiled deal, not all altruistic
Easy to divest from limited resolution further, limited resolution logic
Potential for this to create issues in our own brain
Not follow self into excessive logic because no worthwhile
Follow self too much into excessive logic that winds up lacking due to limited resolution, missing puzzle pieces?
Questions that add value, logic that adds value vs the alternative
Does this path lead to more joy or less joy, is more joy or less joy of more value?
Concise, getting to the heart of the argument
Ramp up not all bad, extra conversation not all bad to forgiveness
Getting to the heart of an issue in time saving way can lead to more potential for other conversations that have ramp up and ramp down potentials
Able to get out of way quickly can lead to more potential for others, Not Always Fully Appreciate Not Always Fully Respected
If He were my God, and He is, I would likely value that, He likely values people that stand back from the stage to help others up there
Time and attention with audiences are limited, easy to overpower a system to less enjoyment for all
Summaries exist for a reason, pass around 20 variables or use one variable name for the array
20 NNTCs vs 1 NNTCs
One word that can save 20, years of pain NFA-NFR
No, can be a value in Not Fully Appreciated
Knowing there can be a No, and fully respecting the No, knowing whether the No is a No or a Not yet, Hard to get?
Persistence valued, people known to be inconsistent not persistent, no persistence, no ability to deal with our shit, let them in the door?
Persistence as expectation can be turned up in NAFA ways, meant a No for good not always appreciated as No for good
No for good -> idea people’s mind can’t be changed, not always wise to turn up
Fire -> No I am staying -> not try and argue inspire in maybe NAFA ways?

Potential to turn up Not Always Fully Appreciated problem solving built into system, likely not fully respected by all

Quite a bit of post inspired by an Instagram Post by Dwyn897

Slow Reading is a Risk, a Risk worth Mitigating

Easy to grow older and lose appreciation for fact the basics, the training of the basics can be improved dramatically

Potential for upsell to fire NFA-NFR

F DB GE Motors? -> Mnemonics IBD are not always PR IBD

Face DBGE

Top Line is the South Coast Georgia is Above The Line

Bottom Line E

Top Line F – GA above the line

FACE in in the spaces, NASA likes to save FACE IBD?

Non Ideals create Non Ideals, forgiveness more for people that share the gems NFA-NFR, Potential to add some bodies NFA-NFR? Not Respected Not Fully Not Respected Potential leads to Potential for Ruined Families and Deaths that could have been prevented?

Life is but a vapor, turn that up by turning up non ideals?

I had enough before

Non Ideals leads to less God of No Delivers In?

World full of supercomputers and misery is what the system serves?

Wasting valuable Ginger time, every second

Just registers as 7 on PSI, broken gauge she’ll hold to an all appreciated system?

Systems that register too high not always value in for less cried wolf

Two assumptions

1. Where we spend our time matters (levers, small changes big differences)
2. Knowing where to spend our time next is not always a simple choice

History Not Settled Approach as Not All Value In
Could go to the past and fix things, to want to go to past and fix things
Could go to past and fix things, to would be able to fix things if reset to technologies of that time period?
Virtual systems that could make us feel the pain of medieval battles first hand?
Not sure I like that idea
I would have done history better to a not all value in system

Sympathy movie forward to more ideal system

以错误的方式提高认识 潜在的 NFA NFR

잘못된 방식으로 인지도가 높아짐 잠재적인 NFA NFR

Awareness Raised in the wrong way potential NFA NFR

不能总是有效地提供理解课程 NFA-NFR

이해의 교훈을 항상 효과적으로 전달할 수는 없음 NFA-NFR

Can’t always effectively deliver lesson of comprehension NFA-NFR

说得轻点，说谎被外星人绑架，说实话（虚拟系统和喂药）让人以为被外星人绑架

외계인에게 납치된 거짓말은 가볍게 말할 수 있고 사실이라고 할 수 있다(가상 시스템과 마약을 먹인다) 외계인이 납치했다고 생각하게 만든

Could be said lightly, lying that was abducted by aliens, could be said in truth (virtual system and fed drugs) made to think was abducted by aliens

并非所有事物都可以训练或有效训练，有些人知道他们无法轻易传达或无法及时传达的事物，并且有可能被滥用 NFA-NFR

모든 것이 훈련되거나 효과적으로 훈련될 수 있는 것은 아닙니다. 어떤 사람들은 쉽게 전달할 수 없거나 적시에 쉽게 전달할 수 없는 것에 대한 지식과 남용 가능성이 있는 잠재력을 가지고 있습니다. NFA-NFR

Not all things can be trained, or trained effectively, some people have knowledge of somethings they can’t easily convey, or easily convey in a timely manner and the potential in that has potential for abuse NFA-NFR

领导和父母可以用作不理想的云层，这可能导致不理想的不被充分理解

리더십과 부모는 이상적이지 않은 클라우드 커버로 사용할 수 있으며, 이는 비이상적으로 충분히 평가되지 않을 수 있습니다.

Leadership and Parents can use as non ideal cloud cover which can lead to non ideals less fully appreciated

领导只是不想训练那个，需要努力和工作来训练那个 NFA-NFR

리더십은 그것을 훈련하기를 원하지 않으며, NFA-NFR을 훈련시키기 위해 노력하고 노력해야 합니다.

Leadership just doesn’t want to train that, takes effort and work to train that NFA-NFR

理想情况下，不应允许坐在天堂的基督在他被钉十字架时不在身边的人身上撒尿

하늘에 앉으신 그리스도는 십자가에 못 박히실 때 주위에 없었던 사람에게 오줌을 싸는 것이 이상적으로 허용되어서는 안 됩니다.

Christ that sits in heaven should ideally not be allowed to piss on someone that wasn’t around when He was crucified

无限的力量和基督没有固定在不太理想的系统上，Church 没有向不太理想的系统解释这一点

무한한 능력과 그리스도는 덜 이상적인 시스템에 고착하지 않고 뒤로 물러나 교회는 덜 이상적인 시스템에 그것을 설명하지 않습니다

Infinite Power and Christ sits back without fixing to less ideal system, Church doesn’t explain that to less ideal system

教会只是说不能有效地解释吗？ 完全合乎逻辑的答案和完全缺乏答案

교회는 단지 그것을 효과적으로 설명할 수 없다고 말합니까? 완벽하게 논리적인 답변과 완벽하게 부족한 답변

Church just says can’t explain that effectively? Perfectly logical answer and perfectly lacking answer

寻找，你会找到吗？ 如果您寻找鱼 > 蛇怎么办？ 这些天在闪亮的蓝色大理石上没有空间吗？

찾으면 찾을 수 있습니까? 물고기 > 뱀을 찾는다면? 요즘 Shiny Blue Marble에 그런 공간이 없습니까?

Seek and you will find? What if you seek Fish > Snake? No room for that on Shiny Blue Marble these days?

家庭没有理由不合理地要求教会回答吗？ 启示录有一点不同的背景“看哪，我让所有东西都焕然一新”

가족들이 교회에 무리하게 답을 요구할 이유가 없습니까? 계시록은 약간 다른 문맥을 취합니다. “보라 내가 만물을 새롭게 하노라”

No reason for families to unreasonably demand answers from the Church? Revelation takes a bit of a different context “Behold I make all things new”

우리에게 상처를 주는 사람들, 우리를 때리는 사람들은 NFA-NFR 방식으로 가상화될 수 있습니다.

The people that hurt us, the people that punch us, can be virtualized in NFA-NFR ways -> means the logic that is used to derive punishment, retribution, time towards something is not all value in

从虚假的鬼魂那里得到正义，糟糕的领导层出现了对现实的恶魔再现？

거짓 유령, 나쁜 리더십에 의해 나타난 현실의 악마 표현에서 정의를 얻으십니까?

Get justice from false ghosts, demon representations of reality turned up by bad leadership?

并不是所有的牌都被打到有价值的 NFA-NFR 之前，上帝和基督似乎交付不足，似乎可以在非理想时间打开以不公平地获利，有些可能一开始就没有正确训练

모든 카드가 가치 있는 NFA-NFR이 될 때까지 사용되는 것은 아니며 God과 Christ가 제대로 전달되지 않는 것처럼 보입니다. 이상적이지 않은 시간에 켜서 일부는 부당하게 이익을 얻을 수 있고 일부는 처음부터 올바르게 훈련되지 않았을 가능성이 있는 것 같습니다.

Not all cards are played until they are valuable NFA-NFR, and God and Christ seem to be underdelivering, seems like that can be turned on at non ideal times to profit some unfairly, some that are likely not trained correctly in the first place

从雕像反弹的光并不总是对应于虚拟表现

조각상에서 반사되는 빛이 항상 가상 표현과 일치하는 것은 아닙니다.

Light that bounces off statues does not always correspond to the virtual representation

家庭成员的虚拟代表可能以非理想方式出现

가족 구성원의 가상 표현은 이상적이지 않은 방식으로 판단될 수 있습니다.

Virtual representation of family member can be iffed in non ideal ways

个性化的恐怖电影由云计算机出现，并直接注入我们的大脑，并注入我们应该信任的系统？

개인화된 공포 영화는 클라우드 컴퓨터에 의해 나타나며 우리가 신뢰할 수 있는 시스템에 뇌에 직접 주입됩니까?

Personalized horror movies turned up by cloud computers and injected directly in our brains to a system we should trust to act upon?

过去，在超级计算机之前，正义可能已经获得

정의는 슈퍼 컴퓨터 이전에 과거에 얻을 수 있었을 것입니다.

Justice might have been obtainable in the past, before super computers

当芯片和控制论可以在大脑中实现并作为秘密知识保存时，数字就是看起来从系统反弹的数字光

칩과 사이버네틱스가 두뇌에 구현되어 비밀 지식으로 유지될 때 숫자는 시스템에서 반사되는 것처럼 보이는 숫자 라이트입니다.

When chips and cybernetics can be implemented in brains and then held as secret knowledge, figures are figures lights appearing to bounce off systems

Rigged Reality leads to suboptimal support Globally NFA-NFR Not sure it really matters always

通过反手手段关闭国防支持的腐败政府？ 系统外价值

백핸드 방식으로 국방 지원을 중단하는 부패한 정부? 시스템 외부의 가치

Corrupt Governments that turn off defense support via backhanded methods? Value Out of System

系统外可记录的可操作价值

시스템 외부에서 문서화할 수 있는 실행 가능한 가치

Documentable Actionable Value Out of System

为国家债务投资回报的税金或支付辩护律师费用的税金

국가 부채에 대한 투자 수익 또는 국방 변호사 비용 지불에 대한 세금 달러 요트 In By Design

Tax Dollars to Return on Investment for National Debt or Tax Dollars to Paying for Defense Attorneys Yachts In By Design

欣赏姜的贡献不会长在树上

생강에 대한 감사는 나무에서 자라지 않습니다

Appreciating Gingers Contributions Doesn’t Grow on Trees

减少竞争对提高认识有多大价值？ 可能无限

인지도를 높이는 데 덜 경쟁이 얼마나 가치가 있습니까? 무한 가능성

How much is less competition worth to Raising Awareness? Likely Infinite

贡献 没有得到充分的赞赏 没有得到尊重 更少的打磨

기여가 완전히 감사하지 않음 존중되지 않음 덜 샌딩됨

Contributions Not Fully Appreciated Not Respected Less Sanded

姜老师 艺术家的贡献 不被尊重 不被尊重导致真正的变化，价值超出系统，就像船上的泄漏

Ginger Teacher Artists에 대한 기여는 존중되지 않음 실제 변화로 이어지는 방식으로 존중되지 않음

Contributions for Ginger Teacher Artists Not Respected Not Respected in Way that Leads to Real Change, Value Out of System, like a leak in the ship

减少支持的损坏系统对数据一致性的价值，NAVI

지원을 줄이는 부패한 시스템에 의한 데이터 일관성의 가치, NAVI

Value out of Data Consistency by Corrupt System that reduces Support, NAVI

监狱里的人，把这块拼图的一部分归咎于他们的投资没有得到充分的重视，没有得到社会的充分尊重

감옥에 있는 사람들은 이 퍼즐 조각의 일부를 사회에서 완전히 인정하지 않은 투자에 기인합니다.

People in Jails, attribute a bit of this puzzle piece to their investments that are not fully appreciated not fully respected by society

奖励拼图对整个社会更有价值，非空投资成本

사회 전체를 위한 더 가치 있는 퍼즐 조각, Null이 아닌 투자 비용

Prize Puzzle Piece to More Valuable for All of Society, a Non Null Investment Cost

有据可查的证据 从 2021 年 10 月到 2022 年 6 月，辩方已被腐败地限制，等于全世界监狱中的人们一直以来的价值不公平

문서화 가능한 증거 The Defense는 2021년 10월부터 2022년 6월까지 부패하게 제한되었으며, 전 세계 감옥에 있는 사람들에게 항상 동일하게 시스템에서 부당한 가치가 있었습니다.

Documentable Proof The Defense has been Corruptly Limited from October 2021 to June 2022, equals all the time for people in Jails World Wide has been unfair value out of system

好像偏见在系统之外没有价值

바이어스가 시스템에서 가치가 없는 것처럼

As if Bias was No Value Out of System

Finding a way to massage data correctly? Not all data is readily available to be used

A = Puzzle Piece -> YouTube Video, Diagram, WordPress Post

B = Time, People, Systems required to turn data into a more wieldy usable system

Requires A+B to get C, also a reminder unknowns D,E,F,G exist

A to Actionable Value in for Shiny Blue Marble and people on the International Space Station and other Space systems

A lot of people that provide pieces A, a lot of people that are designed to move A to C

A and B to valued in Non Corrupt Reproducible Way Not Always a Simple System and leaves some in society with less optimal hands at the end of the day

D,E,F,G to properly accounted for likely unable to factor into system equals requirement for Flex and Grace within the system

Not sure how the formulas translate to other languages

世界翻译系统的价值？ 当我们不懂语言时很简单？

세계 번역 시스템의 가치? 우리가 언어를 모를 때 간단합니까?

Value into World Translation Systems? Simple when we don’t know the languages?

一名员工<五名员工，厨房里的厨师越多越好吗？

직원 1명 < 직원 5명, 주방에 요리사가 많을수록 항상 더 낫습니까?

One employee < five employees, more cooks in the kitchen always better?

如果系统支持我，将可以更快速地访问此处的免费艺术品

시스템이 저를 지원했다면 여기에서 무료 아트워크에 더 빠르게 액세스할 수 있었을 것입니다.

If system was supporting me, there would be more swift access to Free Artwork Here

提供更快的质量内容 NAASS

더 빠른 품질의 콘텐츠 NAASS 켜기

Turning Up Faster Quality Content NAASS

提醒人们数字以不可完全预测的方式对未来有价值？

사람들의 숫자가 완전히 예측할 수 없는 방식으로 미래에 가치가 있음을 상기시키십니까?

Reminding People Numbers are Valuable to Future in Not Fully Predictable Ways?

Critical Oversight Not Seen as Value In Unwise

更好地希望这些研究团队接受基础数学教学，疼痛量表 0 到 10、7 = 4？

그 연구팀이 기본 수학, 고통 척도 0에서 10, 7 = 4에서 가르치기를 바라는 것이 더 낫습니까?

Better hope those Research Teams are taught in basic math, Pain scale 0 to 10, 7 = 4?

容易搞错 NFA-NFR

간단하게 잘못된 NFA-NFR을 얻기 쉽습니다.

Easy to get simple wrong NFA-NFR

在我的信息上获得一点范围蔓延，比如突出别人的拼图，突出别人的拼图并不总能带来最佳支持，更好地需要一个更简单的系统

다른 사람의 퍼즐 조각을 강조 표시하거나 다른 사람의 퍼즐 조각을 강조 표시하는 것과 같이 내 메시지에서 약간의 범위를 얻는 것이 더 간단한 시스템에 대한 더 나은 요구 사항에 대한 최적의 지원으로 항상 이어지는 것은 아닙니다.

Gaining a bit of scope creep on my message, like to highlight others’ puzzle pieces, highlighting others puzzle pieces doesn’t always lead to optimal support to better needs to be a more simple system

我可能不知道它的一半

아마 절반도 모를거야

I likely don’t know the half of it

如果外面的能见度那么差，那么大扫除地毯下的东西的动机

외부 가시성이 좋지 않은 경우 양탄자 아래 물건을 쓸어 버리는 것에 대한 큰 인센티브

Large incentive for sweeping things under the rug, if the outside visibility is that bad

“there are people in the world who think only about themselves. They don’t care what happens to other people so long as they get what they want. They put other people down to make themselves feel important” – A Promised Land, Page 6

Turning off Gingers SSI and UBI to a reiterated unwise system

快速成型玻璃半空到半满玻璃

Rapid Prototyping 유리 반 비어 있는 유리 반 가득 찬

Rapid Prototyping Glass Half Empty to Glass Half Full

快速原型制作冲动购买宽恕和和平，仿佛 45 岁的罪是 70% 的学生

Rapid Prototyping Impulse 용서와 화평을 사세요, Sin of 45가 70% 학생인 것처럼

Rapid Prototyping Impulse Buy Forgiveness and Peacemaking, as if Sin of 45 was a 70% student

快速原型制作冲动购买宽恕和和平，就好像 45 的罪是 70% 的学生听道歉解决感谢澄清想法开发实施发散收敛组合批判性思维

Rapid Prototyping Impulse 용서와 평화 만들기, Sin of 45가 70% 학생인 것처럼 듣기 사과 사과 해결 감사 명확화 아이디어 개발 구현 확산 수렴 조합 비판적 사고

Rapid Prototyping Impulse Buy Forgiveness and Peacemaking, as if Sin of 45 was a 70% student Listen Apologize Solve Thank Clarify Ideate Develop Implement Divergent Convergent Combinatorial Critical Thinking

Being Single tendency to support couples and married, easy to forget there are other single people out there that need support as well, overcompensation potential NFA, tendency for overcompensation not similar to me NFA-NFR

Turning up diversity without turning down love for self to a simple system?

Society does not always close the gap a bit of an understatement

Diversity hard to get right

People are not perfect underswing punished in not always ideal ways

Overcompensation the result, overcompensation leads to not always enough

Trying to fix the worlds’ problems we miss the one that could have meant the world?

Public Relations as Not a Hero to Hero before or after 10PM?

Commenting on story is personable and relatable can be misused in non ideal ways, story about guilt is personal and relatable having killed a man is not (figured worth clarifying, specially with the PR storms lately)

Like stating my picture of an Axe Murdering Corrupt System is Relatable

误读的可能性是公关风险，公关风险值得积极缓解

오판 가능성은 PR 위험, 적극적으로 완화할 가치가 있는 PR 위험입니다.

Potential for Misread is PR Risk, PR Risk Worth Actively Mitigating

不懂英文，只看到血淋淋的画面可能无法完全理解上下文

영어를 이해하지 못함

Doesn’t understand English, Just sees bloody picture might not appreciate the context fully

世界领导人可能会看到一些我看不到的腐败系统可以设置的陷阱 -> 知道世界领导人可以通过 NFA-NFR 方式获得价值和价值

세계 지도자들은 아마도 내가 볼 수 없는 부패한 시스템이 설치할 수 있는 몇 가지 함정을 보게 될 것입니다.

World leaders probably see a few traps that corrupt systems can install that I can’t see -> knowing world leaders can be value in and value out in NFA-NFR ways

将死刑视为斧头谋杀，即将从闪亮的蓝色大理石中移除更多令人惊叹的人，这会改变人们的看法

사형을 Shiny Blue Marble에서 더 놀라운 사람들을 제거하려는 도끼 살인으로 봅니다. 일종의 인식이 바뀝니다.

View the death penalty as an Axe Murder about to remove more amazing people from Shiny Blue Marble, kind of changes the perception

作为拼图的贡献超级计算机和世界人民可以帮助我们世世代代为人类和文明造福

퍼즐 조각으로서의 공헌 슈퍼컴퓨터와 세계의 사람들은 대대로 인류와 문명의 선익을 위해 우리를 도울 수 있습니다.

Contributions as Puzzle Pieces Supercomputers and People of the World can help us turn up for the good of mankind and civilization for generations upon generations

投资保持势头，为教师和艺术家提供食物高价值

교사와 예술가를 위한 음식을 계속해서 유지하는 모멘텀을 유지하는 데 투자합니다.

Investing in maintaining momentum that keeps food on table for Teachers and Artists High Value In

SSI 和普遍基本收入使德克萨斯州的姜艺术家教师不及格，因此可能会有更多的压迫和不充分的补救措施

SSI와 유니버설 기본 소득은 텍사스의 생강 예술가 교사에게 실패하고 있으므로 더 많은 억압과 부적절한 구제 가능성이 있음

SSI and Universal Basic Income is failing Ginger Artist Teachers from Texas, therefore possibility for More Oppression and Inadequate Remedies Likely

阻止救生建议迅速到达用户的知识产权法也是对系统的高价值输出，因此创建了一个既尊重所有贡献又提供足够救生建议的系统已证明加班时间不足

인명구조 조언이 이용자에게 신속하게 전달되지 않도록 하는 지적재산권법 역시 시스템에 대한 고부가가치(High Value Out to system)이므로 모든 기여를 존중하고 적절한 인명구조 조언을 제공하는 시스템을 만드는 것은 시간외 근무가 부적절하다는 것이 입증되었습니다.

Intellectual Property Law that prevents life saving advice from getting to users swiftly is also High Value Out to system, thus creating a system that both respects all contributions and provides adequate life saving advice has proven inadequate overtime

一个新系统的潜力，可能由超级计算机启用，使人们能够从他们添加到方程中的拼图中保持动力

사람들이 방정식에 추가한 퍼즐 조각에서 추진력을 유지할 수 있도록 하는 슈퍼컴퓨터로 가능한 새로운 시스템의 가능성

Potential for a new system, possibly enabled by supercomputers that allow people to maintain momentum from puzzle pieces they have added to equation

失败的艺术家教会和因腐败的知识产权法而失败的美国政府已证明不足以实现和平和允许创新的适当解决方案

실패한 예술가의 교회와 부패한 지식재산법을 통한 실패자들의 미국 정부는 혁신을 허용하는 평화와 적절한 해결에 부적합한 것으로 입증되었습니다.

Church of fails artist and United States Government of fails people through corrupt IP Law has proven inadequate for peace and proper resolution that allows for innovation

系统保护一些而不是其他一些不可长期维护

장기간 유지가 불가능한 일부는 보호하고 나머지는 보호하지 않는 시스템

System of protects some and not others not maintainable long term

Anger to less
Anxiety to less
Humor to more
Creativity to more
Linguistics and Communications to more
Basics lessons refined on Math HVI in for self HVI in for others win win
Story Telling
What constitutes a story worth telling?
A sentence
Why is a sentence valuable?
It conveys important information
Sentences to Hero of the Story?
Do we tell ourself stories?
What is in the plan for a day?
Listen, Learn, Create, Produce, Enjoy
Increasing what we enjoy a non null investment cost
Easy to get caught up in the yeses of life
Yes that needs to be done, yes this needs to be done
Easy to forget we might add more value to something we enjoy
Emotionally Invested is not all bad
Emotionally Invested like falling in love
Sentences like a Super Model? Curvely Shapely?
What is great about a short sentence?
Fast Information.
What is great about a long sentence?
More Information more story, more potential for words not always fully appreciated, that less is more.
And less is not always more.
No story, no ramp up, no characters to be invested in, items of the day just integers, bits to flip 0 to 1.
Can a binary be flipped in a loving way? A light switch vs no light? Binaries are just binaries, just another task to complete?
Empowered to not empowered, PR that can be fixed to PR that can’t be fixed IBD through corrupt systems
A story, a few more bits than binary states. Potential for distinct states, potential for limited resolution, forests that have never
truly been explored.
Can sentences be sad, happy, strong, weak, epic, or small?
Sad – The man worked his whole life put in years of inspiring work and then was diagnosed with terminal cancer.
Happy – Elated the team jumped for joy, the research was finished and the cure was found.
Strong – The leader made an example of the man for the entire world to see.
Weak – The leader thought they should dilly dally a bit before talking about the subject.
Epic – The flare rolled from the star with plasma that painted the night sky with shimmering light in ways one could only dream of seeing.
Small – The kitten opened to the door outside was left awe struck to move forward or to refrain.
No potential for a sequel, what is the fun in that?

Consistent working brief cases for Defense Attorneys in Corrupt System, not consistent working brief cases for Prosecution?

Corrupt System changes a lot

Art work better when

A+B+C and all A+B+C are unknowns?

Or better when

A=this B=that C=?

Artwork that is open to interpretation more variation more variance not always bad, more variation is not always good

缩小我句子上的差距，不确定这到底是什么意思

Closing the gap on my sentences, not sure exactly what that means

改进是可能的，必须批评自己不是所有的价值都不是所有的价值

Improvement is possible, have to critique myself not all value out not all value in

没有重复使用不好，没有放大的潜力更糟，更新激发了希望和快乐

재사용 불가, 확대 가능성 악화, 업데이트가 희망과 기쁨을 불러일으키지 않음

No reuse bad, no potential for magnification worse, updates inspire hope and joy

Sounding like Military not sounding like Military is Not All Value In for Life

High Potential for Discrepancy in who deserved to win

Coveted Orange haired individuals do not grow on trees regardless of what the public might like to believe

No visits from the military to help me turn up my communication skills? To an all value in system, to an all value out system?

Military families with potential for Favorites not viewed highly Combinatorics with Ginger and Short

Null Cost Nuclear Stockpiles effects on Criminal Justice System?

Nuclear Subs, reactor meltdown potential, good for all the fish on Coral Reef?

Where I fall into the picture Null Costed a Bit, power in a Delay

Research studies on how children in military families adapt to society? Wasn’t traveling all the time, might have appreciated some benefits others in society might not have

Shaking impression of unfairly benefiting not always a simple system, specially in system a free market designed on competition a system that unfairly benefits the winning teams

Kind of scares me to think turning up communication skills can lead to someone walking free years in advance or not

People that can mitigate situations more able to escape the webs of societies Evil In By Design is not always value in for those in Jail that weren’t trained properly

Compound it with some non ideals can make the setup an unpleasant experience for all parties involved

Life is but a Vapor, People that are favorited and trained by society get access to freedom others only dream of, Risking adding someone to the system to help train inmates likely high value in, putting people in Jail to make that happen no guarantee they will make it out alive, no guarantee they won’t die on intake process

Plans that add value to a corrupt system, are sometimes risky, risky in NFA-NFR ways

Narrative Control is power, a powerful tool leaders like to use, leaders know how to turn up communications if they want to

Thus if leadership is not encouraging you to turn up communications updates, probably high potential leadership might have a part for you in the story, a part you can’t always full appreciate

Close to 40 year old men watching Cartoons In By Design?

Underestimating cute, fun, amazing artwork for controlling things, unwise

Energy Efficiency turned up by solar panels, could potentially create infinite energy

Infinite for our practical purposes, not to mention combos like cheaper Ramen Noodles costs that lead to more food more chemical energy, and more updates to solar panel efficiency via the system

Hypothesis scientists that are supported and fed have higher potential to learn swiftly to make updates swiftly

Scientists sitting on beach with super models are higher value in for NASA?

Hard to think I will break the big problems like Compression or Energy Efficiency

很难有时值得做，结合超级计算机和量子计算机+阅读器也许可以以未知的方式增加一些价值

때로는 할 가치가 있는 어려운 일, 슈퍼 컴퓨터와 양자 컴퓨터를 결합한 독자는 알려지지 않은 방식으로 가치를 추가할 수 있습니다.

Hard sometimes worth doing, combine in super computers and quantum computers + readers might be able to add some value in unknown ways

教人们把铅笔和纸放在身边，平板电脑和智能手机的节能潜力以及有时更高价值的数据一致性

사람들에게 연필과 종이를 가까이 구매하도록 가르치고 태블릿과 스마트폰의 절전 가능성과 때때로 더 높은 가치를 지닌 데이터 일관성을 가르칩니다.

Teaching people to keep pencil and paper close buy, potential for tablet and smart phone power savings as well as data consistency that is higher value in at times

视频内容的潜力可以将我的脑力提高 10 倍吗？

내 두뇌 능력을 10배 높일 수 있는 비디오 콘텐츠의 가능성은?

Potential for video content that could increase my brain power 10 fold?

教自己教自己是高价值的，这个老师的欣赏是高价值的，值得做对的事情

스스로 가르치기 위해 자신을 가르치는 것은 높은 가치가 있습니다. 이 교사 감사는 가치가 높은 가치입니다.

Teaching yourself to Teach yourself is High Value In, thus Teacher Appreciation is High Value In, something worth getting right

Wise to figure out how to appreciate, encourage, and validate self, Society not big into adding that value to Gingers it seems

Lessons and Evil In By Design from Orange Haired Individuals a Less Fully Appreciated System

Given someone with a PHD for basic mathematics class?

Potential for Overtrained Know it Alls to steal the show in NFA-NFR ways?

PHDs that don’t appreciate other parts of the chain, unlikely to be High Value In

Not check the research numbers while sitting on the beach? Don’t mind if I do?

我不知道该怎么做

디자인에 대해 무엇을해야할지 모르겠습니다.

I don’t know what to do about that in by design

老师破坏了人们的美好时光作为系统的价值？

사람들의 즐거운 시간을 시스템의 가치로 망치는 교사?

Teachers wrecking people’s good time as a value in system?

Time is valuable don’t feel like you have to read along, I started a research ethics video would like to finish one

Part Trap Part Inspiration Not Ideal Setup

Iffy Reality and Artists to Less Fully Appreciated Not Fully Appreciated

Life can be made to be like Plato’s Cave

Life as a contrast algorithm, Evil in by design Numbers seem to matter less in NFA-NFR ways

Escaping a maze? Get out the door then find out still in a bigger maze? Theon Greyjoy? Non ideals from Game of Thrones

Potential for being turned into a mouse in a maze NFA-NFR

Physics and Reality can be iffed in Not Fully Appreciated ways

Miracles can be made to seem possible, like magic tricks or Hollywood that includes you in the movie, like an Oculus Rift that is directly linked to your brain

Vanilla sky-ish, Matrix-ish, can factor into systems that are not Vanilla sky-ish or Matrix-ish

More than one way to generate inputs iffed outputs iffed

Iffy and Rapid Creative Problem Solving Prototypes In By Design? Incentive for War to Turn up Technology, Evil In By Design NFA-NFR?

Peacemaking High Value In Healthy Competition Blocked Not All Value In For Future, Corrupt people blocking healthy competition higher potential for competition that is Not Fully Appreciated Not Fully Respected

I believe in somethings that not all might fully believe

Potential for reality to be Iffed by the Devil and to be Iffed by God

Devil using an illusive magic trick to get us to jump off a cliff thinking we can fly? Potential in that

God sending a dream that gives us the miracle inspiration for a cure? I believe there is possibility for that. Dream sent by God yet my life seems to remain imperfect? Human and Inspired by Divine not always ideal setup for trust into the system

If someone healed you instantly, when you were sick for years -> think it is God or think it is the Devil initially?

Easy to think we would have judged better than others in society, knowing the end of the story does not always lead to more accurate judgement of characters in the story

Judgmental people crucified Christ after He healed them, easy to say later people that didn’t believe in his healing wanted him dead

Not trusting a system does not always equal want people dead

Might not trust a strip club, does not equal I want it to burn down

Valuing in systems we don’t fully understand can’t fully comprehend not always a simple system, peacemaking a non null cost, knowledge into system, a non null cost a non null cost that does not always work out best for all parties involved

God loves us and wants us to be successful? If I had infinite power, why not send the cure for cancer upfront?

圣灵在应该像治疗癌症一样，但不是吗？

성신 인은 암 치료제와 같아야하지만 그렇지 않습니까?

Holy Ghost In Should Be Like Cure for Cancer In, but it is not?

Vlog 海报在享受海滩之外需要额外的工作以降低系统价值？

Vlog 포스터 시스템에서 덜 가치 있는 해변을 즐기는 것 외에 추가 작업이 필요하십니까?

Vlog Posters Needed Extra work outside of enjoying beaches to a less value in system?

也许我只是错误地使用了圣灵？ 无限力量无限画笔的高潜力

제가 성신을 잘못 사용하고 있는 것은 아닐까요? 무한한 힘 무한 페인트 브러시의 높은 잠재력

Maybe I am just using the Holy Ghost wrong? High Potential for that Infinite Power Infinite Paint Brush