Anger is a bit of a combinational system, Unexpected Traffic Delays Added Anger++, Cut Off Treated Unfairly Anger++, Cut Off Again After Cut Off Before Past Unfair and Future Unfair Anger++
什么时候愤怒更容易引起问题？ 在短时间内无法完成多项任务的组合系统
When Anger more likely to cause a problem? Combinational Systems where multiple things don’t go our way in a short period of time
愤怒有一段冷静期
Anger has a bit of a cool off period
中断次数，每小时测试次数很重要
Number of Interrupts, Tests per Hour Matter
受到不公平对待或被认为受到不公平对待对系统中当前的愤怒很重要
Treated Unfairly or Perceived as Treated Unfairly matters to current Anger in the System
光顾可能会导致被视为受到不公平对待，找到一种方法来更好地理解愤怒管理的高价值
Patronizing can lead to Perceived as Treated Unfairly, finding a way to comprehend in a better light, High Value In for Anger Management
People are not always trying to be Patronizing, People are not always trying not to be Patronizing, Evil In By Design has the potential to turn up Patronizing Communication in others Non Ideally, Comprehending that others were not trained to speak in a Respectful Way can be High Value In for less anger into the system
男性，尤其是支持有限的男性，会觉得他们需要建立领导支配地位
Men, especially men that have their support limited, can feel like they need to establish leadership dominance dynamic
Power Dynamics 可以通过支持网络在默认情况下通过 Reaction over Response 被捆绑在所有这些中？
Power Dynamics can be turned up Non Ideally by Support Networks get tied up in all that by default via Reaction over Response?
并非所有试图与您争论或让您与他们争论的人都没有受到竞争的非理想方式的鼓励，竞争可能会占用您的时间
Not all people that are trying to argue with you or get you to argue with them haven’t been encouraged in Non Ideal ways by Competition that might be trying to take your time
必须证明，必须辩护，默认出现在社会上并不等于购买总是一个好主意
Have to prove, have to defend point, is turned up in society by default does not equal it is always a good idea to buy into
总是围绕着死亡 死亡的可能性会导致听起来老茧和冷酷，更合乎逻辑和不那么温暖会导致愤怒放大
Always around Death Potential for Death can lead to sounding callused and cold, more logical and less warm can lead to anger amplified
Death and Dark Humor can be turned up as a joke when your around it enough, when your reminded of the potential enough. Doctors that are good at their jobs might see deaths more than they would like, able to be a warm communicator is likely not always ideal.
No Tears No Rage for the Injustices in the System? If that is what you have to deal with everyday, is it all value in to value Life so Highly? Life valued so Highly always leads to less deaths, life more truly lived?
重要的是要记住，听幽默和可爱可能会导致注入词汇，注入词汇可能并不总是适合所有情况
Important to remember that listening to humor and cute can lead to words infused, vocabulary infused that might not always be ideal for all situations
可爱和有趣可以更温暖的沟通，可以导致在严肃的情况下感觉不那么温暖
Cute and Funny can be more Warm communication, can lead to perception of less Warm in situations where it is important to be serious
Humor is Power, Power is Not Always used wisely, Power is Not Always fully comprehended, Able to make in Rain does not always equal should make it Rain
能让葬礼爆笑成声？ 真的需要这样的系统吗？
Can make the funeral bust into laughter? Really needed to happen that way systems?
没有葬礼？ 故事中有一个葬礼，对于讲故事和训练很重要。
There was no funeral? There was a funeral in the story, important for storytelling and training.
System is turning up non ideal associations that could lead to my early funeral
头韵和双关语总是都是增值的？ 杰森日本可能是纳粹的想法？
Alliteration and Puns are Always All Value Added? Jason Japan might be what a Nazi might think?
对家庭有用的事情不能在非理想时代以非理想方式基于不一致的不准确信息被家人发现？
Things that are useful to a family can’t be turned up by family in Non Ideal Ways at Non Ideal Times based on Non Consistent Inaccurate Information?
家庭利用并非所有的增值潜力来发现已知的弱点
Families leveraged Not All Value Added potential for turning up the known weaknesses
该隐和亚伯之间的竞争？ 不能根据不准确的信息在非理想时间以非理想方式出现吗？
Competition between Cain and Abel? Couldn’t be turned up in Non Ideal Ways at Non Ideal Times based upon Inaccurate Information?
Jason Lace 上来阻止 Case 上？ 押韵和头韵总是增加价值？
Jason Lace on to prevent the Case on? Rhyming and Alliteration always adds value?
Caring about people giving Grace leads to strong or weak? Lead to my supply line and water bottles disabled equals ideal lesson for the future? Time for God to step up and fix
给予宽恕和宽恕会导致不被欣赏，领导者应该被抛弃
Giving grace and forgiveness leads to under appreciated, Leaders that turn that up should be thrown out on their ass
作为非理想判断放大器的领导力给我们上了一课，有限的解决方案是连续多年限制生命所必需的
Leadership as a Non Ideal Judgment Amplifier teaches a lesson, limited resolution is all that is necessary to limit lives for years on end
基督复活后的教会和上帝目前正在提供次优的支持，而不是提供祈祷得到回应的感觉
Church and God post Christ resurrection is currently delivering suboptimal support not delivering feeling of prayers answered
If the system doesn’t prosecute those that unfairly attack the defense attorneys corruption is likely to take root
Things dreamt plus memory upon waking up leads to trying to think through the dream based upon associations and memories from life. Potential for Non Ideals to be turned up in Non Ideal and Ideal Ways.
Democrats claim ground on Blue and then Deliver No Real Water
Can’t provide functional support lines kick them to the curve sooner rather than later
Direct prayers that with potential to effect Senate floor in Real Time?
May God enable better peacemaking for Senators that enable my supply lines and enable less grace in by design for Senators that are limiting, allowing my supply lines to be limited
If Salvador Mendoza will enable my supply lines may he be confirmed, and if not may he not be confirmed
People controlling my supply lines possibly trying to leverage the Senate vicariously?
Maybe I am just a lever, might look into the people limiting my supply lines
20 year prison terms for those that changed my record, sad to see people thrown in jail for that
Maybe there will be enough Math Teachers? 15 to 50 years? Just a little orbit in the numbers? Less Appreciated when the shoe is on the other foot? Why would that be?
I am not a tool for controlling elections, people limiting don’t likely fully appreciate that
Possible a double leverage, leveraged leveraging me
Leveraged Party A (unseen Enemy) leverages me Party B to have an effect on Senate Election C
What factors into A’s decision making, who is involved? Hold A responsible for leveraging B when A has guns to their head? Need to find the people holding the guns to A’s head.
Pirates controlling A likely to serve lengthy prison terms if they do not stop
Pirates P controlled by Support Line Limiters O?
A way to make peace where people don’t wind up in Jail for 20 year terms and a way to make peace where they do, enabling my supply lines immediately less likely to wind up in 20 year terms, ideally all the support line limiters would immediately change to support line enablers
I know my SSI has been limited, Power is failing to deliver, who is responsible how far the leverage chain is, unknown
Trying to control a senate hearing likely pretty stiff penalties, I might change course immediately
People limiting me don’t fully appreciate I am the one trying to keep people out of Jail, limiting my support might leave you in Jail longer
NSA allowed to control Senate Elections?
Free Starter Image
Someone is limiting the SSI, NASA and all these Supercomputers just sitting back?
CEOs No Visibility? CEOs allowing elections to be leveraged, let them keep their companies?
May God increase reading comprehension for those that support Teachers, may God bring the SEC to the door steps and bad numbers to the books of those that limit Math Teachers In By Design
Acts of God that Magnify why Support Out is Not Value In? People that limit good numbers being amplified, memories some are of value some are not of value
May God increase memory and processing for those that enable better supply lines
Limiting Math Teachers set to not my problem reamplified to my problem could give people a greater appreciation for the problem
Those that invest in corrupting numbers support, get the non existent water bottle when 2 water bottles + 2 water bottles does not equal 5 served?
Playing around with my families water bottles set to humorous, not fully appreciated
People don’t fully appreciate that leverage has downstream effects
Threatened via leveraged has the potential to amplify threatened via leverage
USA Military Claimed to have Zero Impact on Elections Not All Value Added, Tanks, M16s, Apaches a lot of power on the subconscious not always full appreciated
Leverage and contrast just claimed to have no effect equals has no effect?
Logical incongruities, claim fair unbiased while being deeply biased
CIA, NSA, Homeland, and Competition, Evil In By Design, just a few reminders False Allegations aren’t always fully vetted attached to Razor Blade like systems in by design?
Basing systemic choice on Justice a little less valued system when the ones writing the law are leveraged by the system they control
Amazing Glorious Defenders of Justice takes back seat to Sharks In By Design?
Amazing Glorious Defenders of Justice don’t grow on trees, maybe they need to be fostered and encouraged, multiple wars and lost children likely not the most ideal amplifier for Justice In By Design
Planes into the Two Towers, Evil In By Design, does not equal Zero Effect on Future, Less Corruption In By Design Long Term
Moments in History where people are hurt, do not always lead to less people hurt in the future
Peace as a value out system, Not Advisable
The World and Retributive Action, Retribution Retributive Action Seen as Justified Justifiable is Not All Value Added
World of Rushes to Judgment and Installs Supply Line Limiters is Not All Value Added
If you are going to install sanctions on anyone, and I am not saying you should, better to quadruple check you got the numbers the math right because high potential for any inconsistencies to be magnified 1000 fold.
Sanctions lead to back against wall to more thinking
Sanctions can be installed by psychopaths, Psychopaths need not know they are psychopaths to be psychopaths
Limit my water bottles in by design those responsible losing their minds might not be all value out for getting them out of office
Limiting Water Bottles In By Design High Potential to be Upsold to Maria Psycho
Don’t Judge to a Testable System, Not All Value Added, Need to Reinforce Don’t Judge via Iffy Tests?
Need to make sure they are not a traitor test while the ball is on the 10 yard line?
Team loses the game because team decided loyalty testing was more valuable than actually doing the work to get the ball over the 10 yard line?
Testing past critical point can lead to losses inability to effectively process at critical times
It is important to limit the message of those promoting corrupt limit the message
Too much Talky Not Enough Enabled Support
People that send me 1000 Nixon Pic like Support Out get to enjoy 1000 Nixon Pic like Support Out? Not sure that really turns down the amount of Dick Pics in the world
Making peace requires Divestment without Reinvestment
On the other hand Not Punishing hasn’t really been paying the bills
May God increase Blessings for those that are turning up my financial support and shining light on those limiting me, may He swiftly decrease message output for all those limiting me and change their hearts, when they learn they cannot limit my support as they have been doing please allow for reconciliation
Enemy of less limiting In By Design will lead to More Magnified Blessings for All
Enemy likely to turn down their own support, love them by not rebuking their actions? Their actions might be motivated by leverage of others does not equal their actions are purely altruistic
Hold back some of the inspiration they have delivered to my life from being enabled for their life?
Strength short term does not equal strength long term
May God amplify the people behind who is support out for my family, clarified for the world likely to be very high value in for future of Shiny Blue Marble
Bad Data used to control me has potential to lead to reduced support for those installing the Bad Data
Turning up friendly fire is Not Fully Appreciated
这些天全国解决问题的吞吐量有点狗屎
National Problem Solving Throughput kind of shit these days
CEO 是吞吐量限制者 CEO 减少对按设计的支持？
CEOs are Throughput Limiters CEOs to Less Support In By Design?
实用、实用、在实践中创造价值
Functional, Practical, Value Creation in Practice
对领导的反馈至关重要，反馈 – 允许在限制我的水瓶的同时保持权力的领导应该从权力中移除，就这么简单
Feedback for Leadership is Critical, Feedback – Leadership Allowed to Remain in Power while Limiting my Water Bottles should be removed from power, simple as that
更好的未来批判性思维不会长在树上
Better Future Critical Thinking Doesn’t Grow on Trees
我们将向您追加销售水瓶强盗
We going to upsell you to the Water Bottle Bandits
当前的内容不能解决问题不等于完美的想法是不可能的
Current Content is Not Solving the Problem does Not Equal The Perfect Idea is Impossible
Proxies on Top of Proxies? Effective Message Output Limiting of the Evil In By Design Competition? Think they can get away with canning me with out putting a lid on them?
Leaders that want to be more effective enable water bottles, those that do not, they might be more useful in another field, repurposed in more usable way not all value out, important to be flexible
SSI 出局？ 有点让人感觉领导者没有坚持着陆
SSI Out? Kind of gives feeling of Leader didn’t stick their landing
开始认为人们的名字和双关语在设计中可能不够有趣
Starting to think maybe not enough fun with peoples names and Puns In By Design
那不是问题吗？
That is not the problem?
激发所有限制我支持的人的笑声？
Inspire Laughed Off Stage for all those that are limiting my support?
如何激发台下的笑声？ 将他们演讲中的潜在词汇与不良联想联系起来？
How to inspire laughed off stage? Attach potential words in their speech to bad associations?
压迫性的力量被视为不能被限制，是不够的 对社会的信仰 看到腐败取代他们的位置感到高兴
Oppressive Power seen as can’t be limited, is not enough Faith in Societies Joy in seeing corrupt put in their place
不是性的不良联想，创意约束
Bad associations that are not sexual, Creative Constraints
如果消息限制不是性的，则更难停止消息限制
If the message limiting isn’t sexual, harder to stop the message limiting
优秀的正直评论只是被重新设计为有价值的设计？ 只是我们正在寻找的东西不能被放大吗？
Fine upstanding comments just repurposed to value out in by design? Just not what we are looking for can be amped?
封面都是错的，只是表达不够清楚
Cover is all wrong, the words just not articulate enough
赞美导致独特的特殊价值，创造从他人那里买断的消息，需要提高工厂的运转率，发挥作用，尝试并失败是真的
Compliments lead to Unique Special Valued, creating buy out from others message, need to turn up run of the mill, played out, tried and failed true
谁控制被认为是无聊没有被充分欣赏
Who controls perceived as Boring Not Fully Appreciated
如果您的消息禁用对我关心的人的支持，那么您的内容可能会显示几页
If your message disables support for people I care about, then your content can show a few pages back
听听拖延永远不会解决这个问题的民主党人？ 磨坊的一种
Listen to Democrats of Procrastinate Never Fix that? Kind of Run of the Mill
民主党人在禁用水瓶时发信息，有点容易忘记，不值得一提
Democrats message while disabling water bottles, kind of forgettable, not worth noting
设计中的脱水观众等于民主党有效的权力弹性，有点希望更多，也许他们只是从未欣赏过反馈过程
Dehydrated Audience in by design equals Democrats Effective Power Resiliency, kind of was hoping for a bit more, maybe they just never appreciated the Feedback process
快速改变创意约束的能力可能具有很高的价值，灵活性胜过不交付的脆弱领导
Ability to Work with Creative Constraints changed swiftly can be high value in, Flexibility beats brittle leadership of doesn’t deliver
民主党未能兑现的 10 件事？
10 Things Democrats Fail to Deliver on?
Biden? who’s that?
民主党不能扩大不完美的人
Democrats of can’t amplify people not perfect
不能重视即兴表演的民主党人
Democrats of can’t value improv
民主党人构建思想，而不是愚蠢，然后就设计成一张 3 美元的钞票就腐败了？
Democrats structure thoughts, not dumb, then just corrupt as a 3 dollar bill in by design?
民主党人不珍惜时间，如果他们这样做了，他们不会关闭我的支持
Democrats don’t value time, if they did they wouldn’t turn off my support
民主党人不欣赏不同，必须成为优秀的小蓝鸟
Democrats don’t appreciate different, got to be good little blue bird
民主党人冲动购买无聊并且不期望剥离，似乎不明智
Democrats impulse buy boring and don’t expect divests, seems unwise
民主党人故意放大不尊重，提醒领导正在教我们的孩子
Democrats of amplify disrespect in by design, reminder leadership is teaching our children
Democrats of amplify gratitude out by design, take water bottles from public and expect the public to be more amplifying of gratitude? More amplifying of Time Wasting more likely
民主党人不能在曲线球中投入价值，在掠夺群众的同时，没有灵感的播放内容不是理想的附加值
Democrats of can’t throw value in curveballs, uninspired played out content while robbing the masses not ideal value added
Disabling water bottles for my family, High High Level of Disrespect for My Family, CEOs allowing, High High High Level of Disrespect for My Family, CEOs as Middle Management with crappy CEO at the top?
将所有财富 500 强的现任 CEO 的职业生涯与现任领导人联系起来？
Tie the careers of current CEOs of all the fortune 500 to the current leader?
危及我的家庭生活，你的职业生涯风险不大
Endangering my families life, risk to your careers is less of a concern
在现任领导人把你的船拿下来之前，可能会更好地操纵救生艇
Might be better to man the life boats before current leader takes your ship down with it
水瓶土匪在历史上旁注，让一些真正的领导者来做这份工作
Water bottle bandits to side note in history, let some real leaders do the job
民主党人喜欢需要稀释的强酸
Democrats like a strong acid you need to dilute
Democrats like not having a Chemical Shower in the Lab
Democrats like not having a High Voltage Sign on a Transformer
Math Out by Design? Leave people in Corrupt Jails based on that?
As if it was your Time being limited
需要带头切除关塔那摩的癌症并非所有增值
Required to take leadership to excise the Cancer that is Guantanamo Not All Value Added
People say torture is wrong, then torture gets relabeled, things and situations sold to water boarding and simulating drowning, kind of like sex no big deal?
毫无疑问，这是未来的定时炸弹，约翰麦凯恩和前总统奥巴马一致认为
Make no mistake it is a time bomb for the future, John McCain and Former President Obama agreed
MLK Jr，里根，然后飞机进入塔楼，然后通过设计向大众推销，并没有提供理想的感觉
MLK Jr, Reagan, then planes into the towers, then torture in by design upsold to the masses, does not deliver ideal feeling of got a good deal
强迫一个来自德克萨斯州的支持不足的橙色头发男子说这并不完全理想
Forcing an under supported orange haired man from Texas to call this out not all ideal
过去应该在我出生那年的 1983 年之前真正解决了这个问题
Past should have really fixed this problem before 1983 the year I was born
Leads to idea problem solving short term and long term is a bit questionable in by design, questionable problem solving equals need for less grace in by design or more grace in by design?
人们只是不知道他们是姜支持出来的？
People just don’t know they are Ginger support out?
水图与锈图？
Water Diagrams vs Rust Diagrams?
所有人可能不会以相同的方式感知颜色，营销数据可能有很多信息，红色包装 vs 蓝色包装 vs 透明包装
All People might not perceive colors the same way, marketing data probably has a lot of information, Red Package vs Blue Package vs Clear Package
橙色包装中的所有内容？ 家得宝并不是所有的橙子都超值
Everything in an Orange Package? Home Depot Not All Value Out for Orange
Ryobi Green 也很火 Ryobi Green Pretty Hot Too
我是他们的 Jigsaws 的忠实粉丝，高功率似乎有时感觉更安全、更敏捷
I am a big fan of their Jigsaws, high power that seems to feel safer and more agile at times
The Audience is the Future, I am part of the Audience for my own message something to consider, we might have our message and words replayed to us at a later time in ideal or non ideal ways
如果我在观众席中，并且我是，我希望默认情况下放入水瓶，默认情况下使用浴室
If I were in the Audience, and I am, I would want water bottles in by default, access to bathrooms in by default
更容易不评论观众需要理解和信息支持这一事实
Easier to not comment on the fact Audience needs Support for Comprehension and Message to Sparkle
被视为一维的利润并不是所有的附加值，利润是金钱还是利润是增加了有效的信息输出？
Profit seen as one dimensional is not all value added, Profit is Money or Profit is Increased Effective Message Output?
If I could be payed $1000 less this year and that would enable someone living over dying, would I agree? If my salary was $20,000, $40,000, $50,000, $80,000, or $100,000?
有人活着只是为了被闪亮的蓝色大理石折磨吗？ 世界和时间并不总是增值的
Someone living just to be tortured by Shiny Blue Marble? The World and Time is Not Always Value Added
通过设计排除我自己的贪婪、竞争和邪恶是不明智的，人们并不完美，我并不完美，承认任何更少都是不明智的
Factoring out my own Greed, Competition, and Evil In By Design would be Unwise, People are Not Perfect, I am Not Perfect, Acknowledging any less would be Unwise
Truth, Peace, and Life is Not Always Valued, Numbers that lead to Uncomfortable Realization are Not Always Fully Appreciated because they turn Comfortable to Uncomfortable
稍微改变初始条件？ 生活在树林里，年收入 1000 美元，捐出 19000 美元来拯救生命？
Change the initial conditions a little? Live in woods off $1000 a year and give $19000 to saving life?
Something easy to forget, even if I give $19000, there is no guarantee it will be used for good, that others would give $19000 as well to help me while I am in the woods.
Thus if I give $19000 to a system that takes and uses that in a corrupt way to oppress people in Non Ideal ways, am I actually amplifying or hurting the system? Convenience and Greed factors into Decision Making, not wanting to look at the numbers factors into Decision Making.
社会中有些人给予，以积极的方式帮助彼此放大，以更理想的方式帮助放大和平与恩典。 理想的方式并不总是容易理解或容易从 Evil In By Design 中提取出来。
The are some in society that give, that help amplify each other in positive ways, help amplify peace and grace in more ideal ways. Ideal Ways are not always easy to comprehend or easy to extract from Evil In By Design.
Now imagine I just give $19000 and go in the woods. 365 Days of Words that could be used to amplify set to a tree that falls in the woods that nobody hears? $19000 or Words, which one is more likely to lead to life and grace amplified? Money is not always Less Drugs, Drinking and Driving, Driving Off Cliffs Amplified.
Money, Effective Message Output, Encouragement, and Inspiration are four dimensions, four dimensions that aren’t Math, Learning, Teaching, Hope, Validation, Respect, Etc…. Humans seen as only having to Maximize Profit in One Dimension, or Two Dimensions seems unwise. A bit of a False Dichotomy.
All things factor into Good and Bad, Right and Wrong does not fully amplify complexity in a correct way. All things factor into Good and Bad, Right and Wrong does give a clarifying view at times, as we all have to make decisions based upon limited resolution.
War is Bad, Peace is Good -> Simple, Reusable, Important -> yet time and time again the world goes to War knowing this, thus is the statement “War is Bad, Peace is Good” sufficiently complex for the problem set?
有时必须以另一种方式放大信息，这可能更有用，也可能不更有用
Sometimes message has to be amplified in another way, that might or might not be more useful
免费入门图片 Free Starter Image
只是一条可爱的小龙，他不会伤害任何人
Just a cute little dragon he’s not going to hurt anyone
Reminder to Audience I want them healthy, energized, empowered and I don’t want to judge them based on limited resolution High Value In
Reminder to Audience I value their Feedback Upfront, High Value In
建立相关性有时需要时间，时间损失并不总是得到充分重视，时间损失并不总是得到充分重视并不总是增值
Establishing Relevance sometimes takes Time, Time Losses are Not Always Fully Appreciated, Upsold to Time Losses is Not Always Fully Appreciated is Not Always Value Added
Grace and Appreciation for updates, Encouraging Words can amplify more than reminders people are not perfect, are stuck in a body that is slowly deteriorating and that is not always fully supported by friends, family, and the world
Observation skills seen as given, unable to be amplified unwise, Empowered Reader and Audience member that can more fully appreciate the story or one that is limited without enough Imagination in by default?
Discouragement is “Bad as Can Be” – Jenny Music
But there is Hope! Never Say Die!
A little Less Investment in Guillotines In By Design
Easy to think when something bad happens, important to reiterate progress was based on limited support, also wise to remember why support was limited was not always without reason
更高的武装可能会以理想或非理想的方式改变事物，基于如果不是所有增值的理论
A higher standing arming might change things in ideal or non ideal ways, theorizing based upon ifs not all value added
Money towards a Jet does not equal money towards a tank, Money towards a Tank does not equal money towards a jet, Money towards a Nuke equals money towards neither, useful and deterrence set to easy to optimize seems unwise
一个足球或多个足球的足球比赛？ 有保质期的足球？
Football game with one football or many footballs? Footballs with a shelf life?
1 Silo potential for Captured, 1000 Silos a lot of Maintenance possibly Not Fully Appreciated, Extra costs are not always value added long term, Short Term seen as only consequence Not All Value Added
Extra Wars Not All Value Added for Infrastructure Maintenance including Maintenance required for Nukes
Not to even mention the value out for Research and Research Ethics
Active Listening is Not a Given, All Parts of Messages Heard is Not a Given, Reducing Argument into a reinforceable system that is worded in more than one way can be high value in
最重要的是，“对自己的自己是真实的”，从一个逻辑谬误较少的地方开始，更有可能提供较少的逻辑谬误
This above all, “to thine own self be true”, starting from a place of less logical fallacies more likely to deliver less logical fallacies
对论点的“是”不是系统中的所有值
Yes to an argument is Not an All Value In System
争论需要时间，就像分布式系统一样，如果你一开始就不做的话，那么它可能会带来更高的价值
Arguments Require Time, like Distributed Systems if you can get away with not making one in the first place, potential for higher value in
动摇别人的信心，你不能真正支持的可能性是所有的附加值？
Potential for shaking another persons confidence that you can’t truly support is all value added?
Light and Breezy 可以更鼓舞人心，更有可能真正说服人们对没人愿意听到的激烈争论
Light and Breezy can be more Encouraging, more likely to actually convince people over heavy arguments nobody wants to hear
每个人都想整天待在法庭上的想法是不明智的，总是保持警惕总是要降低风险并不是一个真正令人鼓舞的系统
The idea everyone wants to be in a court room all day would be unwise, always on guard always have to mitigate risk is not really an encouraging system
Legalism and Law does not always deliver on Trust Worthy advocate over need to limit visibility from corrupt people that might misuse data to throw me in Jail
辩论教室或法庭，您觉得哪一个更有可能进行真正的讨论？ 盔甲上还是空中剑？
Debate classroom or a court room, which one would you feel more likely to be open to having a real discussion? Armor on or Swords in the Air?
争论压力不是所有的时间都添加到系统中不是所有的系统和平
Argument Stress is Not All Time Added to System is Not All Peace to System
人们很多时候在争论时不考虑是否应该争论。 人们倾向于通过竞争来取胜，而不首先考虑是否应该获胜
People many times make arguments without considering whether they should make an argument. People tendency to want to win via competition without first thinking about whether they should win
颁奖典礼比赛带着女孩走开？
Trophy ceremony competition walks away with the girl?
带着斯坦利杯在溜冰场上再滑一次，然后发现你的妻子要离开你了吗？
Just one more skate around the rink with the Stanley cup then find out your wife is leaving you?
The literal version of this is useful, a less literal version, married to the idea is a similar not exact system that is useful
有值得结婚的理由，杀人是错的，有不值得结婚的理由，不能在视频上画戒指来炒作
There are arguments worth being married to, killing people is wrong, there are arguments not worth being married to, rings can’t be painted on videos in ways to stir up shit
If people were required to be married to their arguments, how might that change things? People might stop buying into arguments they never wanted to be in in the first place
嫁给争论，你提出的信息，不适合宽恕和恩典
Married to the argument, message you present, not ideal for forgiveness and grace
未与争论结婚，并非所有理想的尽职调查都能获得更好的数字和更好的论据
Not Married to the argument, not all ideal due diligence for better numbers and better arguments
我试图传达的想法是，提出论点的投资成本并不总是得到充分重视，并且可能是维护成本并不总是增值
The idea I am trying to convey is that making an argument has an investment cost that is not always fully appreciated and possibly a maintenance cost that is not always value added
维护，需要解释，并不总是增值
Upkeep, Required to Explain, Not Always Value Added
Arguments are kind of like Slave to Process, starting a Video, it becomes more difficult to want to stop the Video before the end of the Video, buy in cost leads to greater buy out cost that is Not Always Fully Appreciated
进入争论比迅速摆脱争论更容易
Easier to get into an argument, than it is to swiftly get out of one
质量选择需要以实际的方式选择战斗
Quality Choices requires choosing Battles in a Practical Way
No Encouragement Heavy Arguments Brittle Weak, Won’t Fly
自我增强的高能量，为您会购买的系统创建购买
Self Reinforcing High Energy, Create Buy In for a System you would buy into
If I have 5 minutes to tell a story better to give 20 details or 3 key details that are useful?
Same words, argument said in same way can be less value in than rewording
Arguing with people can lead to beating the point in without actually generating agreement
If I say the phrase
2+2 = 4 because 1+1+1+1 = 4
2+2 = 4 because 1+1+1+1 = 4
2+2 = 4 because 1+1+1+1 = 4
2+2 = 4 because 1+1+1+1 = 4
Reiterated in same way can be considered disrespectful
If we say things in one way and they are not comprehended, saying it in the same way again is entirely encouragement added to system?
Sometimes getting people to invest in Math requires something that is not so boring value added, can’t appreciate why Math is cool more divests likely
人们并不总是完全理解相似的不精确系统中的力量，例如可以导致对生存所必需的系统的更多理解的词桥
People don’t always full appreciate the Power in Similar Not Exact Systems, such as bridge of words that can lead to more appreciation for systems that are necessary for survival
词在逻辑上加起来就是句子，更好的句子导致更好的故事
Words Logically Add Up to Sentences, Better Sentences Lead to Better Stories
更充分地认识基本粒子可以走很长的路
Elementary Particles More Fully Appreciated can go a long way
被惩罚的人被强迫感到无聊的人被视为有趣而不是无聊？
People being punished people forced to be bored seen as Interesting instead of as Boring?
惩罚和战争在痛苦放大系统中被破坏的供应线被视为有趣吗？
Punishing and War seen as interesting over broken supply lines out misery amplifying system?
过去，对许多政党来说，为和平而战似乎是个好主意
War over peace buy in likely seemed like a good idea for many parties in the past
领导层被高价收购，因为他们没有足够的钱进行长期投资？
Leadership gets upsold to buy in that they don’t have the money to fully invest in over the long term?
战争的维护成本没有得到充分的重视？ 只需接管它，然后期望长期没有问题吗？
Maintenance costs for war not fully appreciated? Just go in take over that, then expect no problems over the long term?
维护者和勇敢的解放者向长期支持的海盗们买单？
Vindicators and Valiant Liberators Upsold to Pirates of Consistent Support Out Over the Long Term?
Company is amazing at making phones, get in the car business? Easy to increase spread based on useful while decreasing value added on both systems. Thus we don’t have an Apple Car?
Companies that increase the surface area also increase their potential competition surface area, valuing out the power in competition and competitive systems and their ability to effect supply lines in non ideal ways seems unwise
苹果有钱，这些钱可以用来建造更多的水瓶工厂，或者可以留在银行，而我的水瓶数量更少
Apple has money, money that could be used to build more Water Bottle Plants or could stay in banks while I remain with less Water Bottles In By Design
要求 Water Bottle 18 Wheeler 在开车去 Apple Facility 之前先来我家？
Require the Water Bottle 18 Wheeler visit my house first before driving to Apple Facility?
Having increased funds and resources while part of population is reduced to no water bottles in by design and trust the system long term? Trust that God won’t make an example of their system?
我喜欢苹果产品，还不够重要的支持被抢，苹果破产作为金牛犊为社会增加支持？
I like Apple Products, Not enough to be robbed of crucial support, Apple Bankruptcy as Golden Calf for support added to society?
成为系统中的价值导致有用的系统中的价值
Being the value in system leads to useful as the value in system
一个系统在一致的基础上导致非理想的水在设计的基础上，而它根据已从公众手中夺走的知识产权法获利？
A system that leads to Non Ideal Water In By Design on a Consistent basis while it profits based on IP Law that has been robbed from the public?
社会受苦，然后你的产品有一个巨大的广告牌，事情加起来并不完全理想
Society Suffers then there is a giant billboard with your product, How things add up not all ideal
保护系统不足以应对未来
Protecting the system is insufficient for the future
这个想法是创造价值，但提供相反的东西应该被视为值得奖励吗？
The idea is value creation, yet delivering the opposite should be seen as worth rewarding?
当支持受设计限制时，逻辑作为系统中的价值减少了价值
Logic as a Value In System Less Value In When Support Is Limited In By Design
Provable 是 Perceived as Proven 的？
Provable that is Perceived as Proven?
重申生命价值的重复次数？
Number of Reiterations to Reaffirm Value in Life?
被视为艺术的数学有时比基于初始条件和非理想舍入误差加上插值的硬数字更有价值
Math seen as Art sometimes more value in than hard numbers that are greatly modified based on initial conditions and non ideal rounding errors plus interpolation
人类将 10 次中有 9 次的追加销售潜力正确添加到 10 次中有 10 次
Humans that add correctly 9 times out of 10 potential for Upsell to 10 times out of 10
知道了权利可以在非理想方式中出现，支持再好不过了可以在非理想方式中出现
Got that right can be turned up in Non Ideal Ways, Support couldn’t have been better can be turned up in Non Ideal Ways
打出一张牌的要求，顺序处理的要求被视为所有价值，初始选择被视为不明智的所有价值
Requirement to play one card, Requirement for sequential processing seen as all value in, initial choice seen as all value in unwise
我的vlog是一组选择，说它是一组各方的最佳选择是不明智的
My vlog is a set of choices, to say it is a set of optimal choices for all parties would be unwise
我的 vlog 是基于有限支持的一组选择，有限支持胜过不支持不等于设计中的完美支持
My vlog is a set of choices based upon limited support, limited support beats no support does not equal perfectly ideal support in by design
这是一个完全有效的论点，即初始条件和支持可能更理想
It is a perfectly valid argument that initial conditions and support could have been more ideal
If initial support and initial conditions are not guaranteed to lead to optimal support, that leads to a fundamental property, not all will be trained in optimal ways for interactions
Disrespected In By Design 是一个默认放大的系统，因此 Grace 和 Support 胜过重新放大更多的 Disrespect In By Design
Disrespected In By Design is a system that is amplified by default, thus Grace and Support beats re-amplifying more Disrespect In By Design
默认放大的非理想支持和逻辑谬误是不尊重的，因此不尊重是设计的，默认的
Non Ideal Support and Logical Fallacies Amplified by Default is Disrespectful, thus Disrespected is In By Design, In By Default
Easy to Take for Granted that was Taught vs that was Not Taught
No Guns allowed in a Corrupt System that Rapes and Molests Children? Think might be wiser to promote a more open gun policy
Not Personal Factors into Decision Making, Easy to Appreciate Not Fully Appreciate, Water Bottles Limited is Not Adequate Support for Trusting the System
Comfortable for those that Inspire More Comfortable
Leaders that can’t make it right don’t deserve to be allowed to remain in office for another day, for another hour
Have to stay in Office? That is brittle thinking, better to inspire Flexible Thinking, the system is Fluid
Yes to Impeachment, No to Judging people based on Limited Resolution
Functional Universal Basic Income beats requirement to rely upon guns, not fully appreciated land locking people can create big problems
Water Bottles and Guns vs No Waters Bottles and Guns Out By Design? Water Bottle and Guns for protection makes more sense
Die broken tooth via oppressors or slightly increased chance of being hit by a stray bullet?
The RPG for Teenagers bill possibly a bit unwise
Everyone required to learn to use a gun and carry one in society? Might change thought processes a bit
Respectful words, and clear can’t talk about that conversation
If Men were Angels they could be trusted with power without worrying about abuse of power
Potential for Leaders like Hitler In By Design, not amplify ability to own weapons? I realize there are set of drugs that can turn up non ideals, logical fallacies in by design data consistency set to no big deal can get people killed
Have to own M-16s to protect family not all value added, not value out having the ability to protect your family when words fall short
Everyone having fire arms readily available, consider taking someone’s ability to purchase and leave them with hypothermia?
I have lived without fire arms and been abused by society, maybe means I need to own a couple of Apache Helicopters
Own a Yacht, not have some fire power to back it up with Pirates at Sea?
A couple RPGs in the side of a pirate ship? Could it sink it?
Attacking an Enemy Pirate Ship Prosecuting or Protecting the Ability to give Mercy and Grace?
Boat full of Defense Attorneys just let Pirates come in and slit their throats?
Can be easy to forget the amount of backing power behind the Lawyers in the US Government
Also easy to forget that just because the Nuclear Weapons are safe, does not equal all the armories are perfectly locked down, Data Consistency allowed in by design No Issue?
Targets on Friends can be turned up, not fully appreciated
Looking through the target sight, get a hit then find out it is your friend? Kind of a fucked up way to roll things
Military equals leverage, leverage is not all contrast out, contrast in is not all full comprehension in
There is a reason people turn up protectionism
Ability to provide water for family called into question likely to lead to more potential to be shot
This is what happens when you play around with iffy allow weapons in by design iffy contrast on right and wrong, test the line until it breaks?
There is a reason why people get stingy, children with thoughts Teacher might have an Uzi in the desk? might change perception about editing data in unwise ways?
Lawyers can’t turn up more access to weaponry in USA? Think again
Trying to get my family to kill themselves? They will pay for that
I can be deathly serious
People that actually want better gun control would have provided functional support lines, thus Democrats not really invested in protecting families
Democrats of Chemical Showers out by design, the party should be disbanded like the edge of a cigarette
Gun control in without providing adequate police officers and training unwise
Underfunded broken system that puts innocent people in Jail, trust them with lives when they can’t provide Water Bottles and Functional SSI?
2022 年民主党人帮助激励德克萨斯州重返狂野西部
2022 Democrats Helping Inspire Returning Texas to Wild West
The World Turning War Rhetoric Up is Not All CIA Rhetoric Down
Vampire Kitty Sol with a Baseball Bat returning from the Dead in 2022?
Think we could find a way to let the future survive with less war and surveillance agency attacks in by design
The world with less math lessons and more guns, basically what keeps getting turned up at least from my perspective
More Dead Fathers equals less Math In By Design
Better Train all the Women Math
System isn’t fair as given, what does that mean to the future?
Likely means the guy holding the AK-47 or M-16 that is lobbing bullets at me hasn’t been trained as well as they should, haven’t been given the amount of support they need in their life.
Throws a Grenade at me, does not equal was trained to throw a Grenade at me
A Young Man trying to throw a grenade at you and it blows up in his hand taking off his arm, how would you feel looking at that
Glad the Grenade didn’t hit you delivers ideal feeling of they got what they deserved?
The test is not all value added, someone that wasn’t trained wasn’t supported tries to hurt you and ends up hurting themself? Tries to throw you in Jail for 20 years and winds up in Jail for 40 years themselves? Doesn’t really deliver feeling of resolved, retribution that delivers.
我不完全理解它激发的黑暗思想，被诱惑考虑报复并不是所有的增值
I don’t fully appreciate the dark thoughts it inspires, being tempted to consider retribution is not all value added
必须减轻并不是所有的增值，必须考虑这个人或那个人基于极其有限的解决方案的风险并不是所有的增值
Have to mitigate is not all value added, have to consider this man or that man a risk based on vastly limited resolution is not all value added
没有中断并非全部有价值，通过不良中断引发的诱惑并非全部增值
No Interrupts are not all value In, Tempts turned up via Bad Interrupts are Not All Value Added
不良中断会降低记忆能力
Bad Interrupts can reduce ability to remember
没有足够的人用枪打破你的门就等于没有足够的干扰？
Not enough people breaking down your door with guns equals insufficient interrupts?
没有足够的中断会使处理中断变得更加困难，好的中断，画玫瑰，好的中断，人们打破门，坏的中断
Not enough interrupts can be make it harder to process interrupts, good interrupts, Draw Rose, good interrupt, people breaking down door, bad interrupt
Lalisa a bit from column A a bit from column B?
Maybe the World just needs better ability to Categorize and Classify Good vs Bad Interrupts, does interrupt improve chances for peace?
Disrespect In By Design Combinational Negative Support Out System to Respect In By Design Combinational Positive Support In System
默认情况下，当前系统的价值较低未得到充分认可
Current System to Less Value by Default Not Fully Appreciated
投资数学课是增值而不是 100% 增值
Investing in Math Lessons is Value Added Not 100% Value Added
Unforgiveness and Grace Out By Design Teaches a Lesson, Expectation and You Wronged Me is Higher Value Added than making Peace Immediately, Adding Support and Training, If Can’t Fix that is a Trained System, People are likely to Reflect what they have learned
People that make mistakes are not always forgiven, thus Judgment Iffy systems can be used to gauge level of trust, value added
Hypothetical if fake Character did X would you do Y or would you do Z? Expectation factors into training in non ideal ways, hypothetical does not even have to be presented to other parties
Person A has done B in the past therefor C is only logical conclusion therefor course of action is D
Whether B has been done or not whether A was trained correctly is inconsequential to the projection of C and D
Whether the data was consistent or not considered irrelevant to enabling support, Water Bottles Out By Design changes ability to factor in more relevant information in truly meaningful ways
If Unreasonable Demands are all that deliver results, Unreasonable Demands will be made regardless if those Demands are Reasonable or Not Reasonable
What gets results matters, if better words gets results, better words will be valued, if correct numbers 2+2=4 gets results, better numbers will be valued. Important to remind people Humans have a tendency to forget that one case does not lead to ideal for all cases.
Systems and Projections are adopted in Non Ideal Ways that lead to Non Ideal Support at Non Ideal Times
真相、谎言、支持 足够的对比不需要
Truth, Lies, Support Adequate Not Required for Contrast
导致基本属性 完成工作所需的对比度并不总是能以理想的方式完成工作
Leads to a fundamental property Contrast required to get the job done does not always get the job done ideally
故事中的真相或否定真相不是手头的问题，故事将如何影响重视故事的观众
Truth or Negate Truth in the Story not the Question at hand, how the story will effect the audience valued over the story
判断训练更多判断还是建立在有用的品质上，刀片就是刀片？
Judgmental train more Judgement or build on a useful quality, a blade is a blade?
人们倾向于不检查门口的判断，人们倾向于不尝试并首先理解
People tendency to not Check Judgment at Door, People tendency to not Try and First Understand
如果你不能通过不断的恳求来对抗潮流？
If you can’t fight the flow via constant pleading work with it?
人们说他们关心爱和恩典，教会声称出现了爱、恩典和宽恕，然后似乎放大了不宽恕和支持
People say they care about Love and Grace in, The Church claims to turn up Love, Grace, and Forgiveness, then seems to amplify Unforgiveness and Support Out Instead
基于有限分辨率和不良培训的惩罚比真相和增加支持更有价值
Punishment based on Limited Resolution and Poor Training is valued over Truth and Adding Support
Do Prayers and Support for The Church lead to prayers answered or to prayers unanswered, Do Prayers and Support for The Church lead to more forgiveness and grace in the system or less forgiveness and grace in the system, Do Prayers and Support for The Church lead to more Truth and Answers In By Design, or less Truth and Answers In By Design?
由无限上帝驱动的系统无法提供更多 In By Design？ 就像上帝应该在太阳前有一个巨大的放大镜，它产生惊人的圣光并提供失败的支撑线
A system powered by an Infinite God can’t deliver more In By Design? It is like God is supposed to have a giant magnifying glass in front of the sun that yields amazing holy light and delivers failed support lines instead
People meaning well use contrast and language to communicate their point, meaning well does not equal factoring in all relevant information, not obfuscating focus to bring clarity in a more favorable light
提出论点需要建立相关性，建立的两方之间的相关性不等于建立的各方之间的相关性
Making an argument requires relevance established, relevance between two parties established does not equal relevance between all parties established
A ManB creates a story, a product in Story name is similar to companyA, AudienceMemberC listens to story
B is trying to create a memorable story for audience C does not equal there is no side effect for companyA
If I draw Hypotheticals I likely need a Hypothetical Name, say VarA might lead people to think Amy, Amber, Aaron, Arnold. Using a name like Amy or Arnold is less obtrusive to the Story does not equal it is less obtrusive to Amy or Arnold.
If I say Amy went to the story. People are likely to think about people they know named Amy going to a store, or the form version of a store they know in their mind. If I say convenient store, changes the story, if I say grocery store, it changes the story, if I say market by the sea, changes the story.
Does it Matter that I don’t know anyone named Amy that went to the store? People sometimes look for hidden meaning, specially when they are searching for answers, a bit of a non ideal quality that isn’t turned down via foreshadowing, motifs, themes, and symbols.
If I say the man died. It doesn’t matter that no mad died, it evokes thoughts, possibly thoughts of recent funerals. It evokes different thoughts in different listeners. Words are a bit of vagueness unpredictability in by design. Comprehension thought to be 100% unwise. A lot of Grace Required In By Design for Storytelling, does not equal 3rd parties are always given appropriate level of Grace. Telling the Story many times valued over Inspiring the Grace Required for Hearing the Story.
A story about a man dying walking on a sidewalk might make the reader or listener not walk on the sidewalk, be scared to walk on the sidewalk, does not equal someone actually died on the sidewalk, does not equal there is a good reason to fear walking on the sidewalk. Fear does not make reasonable demands.
Fear plays on irrational. Such as slippery slope arguments, walking on the sidewalk will inevitably lead to a trip, a fall, and run over by a car. Factoring Fear in over God In By Design unwise. Factoring Fear, Worry in over God In By Design unwise. God set to always delivers in a timely fashion unwise, God always delivers prepare for anything?
The combination is a bit more than non ideal
Shallow, Deep, Not Enough Sparkles Not All Value Added
Distinct Lack of Appreciation for Diagrams
October Diagram Appreciation Month?
Diagram Part Story and Part Art that requires Focus and Non Null Time Costs for Writing as well as Non Null Time Costs for Reading
Skill Reallocation Algorithm?
Current Administration to “Bad as Bad as Bad as Can Be”?
A Little Bird Leading the Charge?
נקודה קריטית שבה התמיכה בחוץ גדולה יותר מהתמיכה בפנים, באמת לחכות כל כך הרבה זמן או להעיף את המושחתים מהמשרד מיד?
Critical Point ที่ Support Out มากกว่า Support จริงๆ แล้วรอนานขนาดนั้นหรือโยนคอรัปชั่นออกจากตำแหน่งทันที?
महत्वपूर्ण बिंदु जहां समर्थन समर्थन से अधिक है, वास्तव में इतना लंबा इंतजार करें या भ्रष्ट को तुरंत कार्यालय से बाहर कर दें?
Punto critico in cui il supporto è maggiore del supporto, aspettare davvero così a lungo o buttare via immediatamente il corrotto dall’ufficio?
Titik kritis dimana dukungan kaluar langkung ageung tibatan dukungan, leres-leres ngantosan lami atanapi langsung ngalungkeun koruptor ti kantor?
支持大于支持的临界点，真的等待那么久还是立即将腐败者赶下台？
외부의 지지가 내부의 지지보다 더 큰 크리티컬 포인트, 정말로 그렇게 오래 기다릴 것인가 아니면 부패한 사람을 즉시 퇴출시킬 것인가?
Critical Point where support out is greater than support in, really wait that long or throw the corrupt out of office immediately?
Impeach as a Momentum Storm? Challenges per second increased increase potential for current administration to be thrown off king of the hill? Corrupt Value Politicians in Not All Value Added
Good Respectful Questions for People getting the Corrupt Out, Time Lag Throughput Limited to 0 for all others?
Throughput Limited to 0 might create a safety problem, what has been done to me unwise to do to others
0 Throughput leads to a different channel chosen, greatly reduced throughput can lead to still using right up to out of office
Dependent on support is useful until it is not, kind of what the current administration is teaching, might not be wise to reamplify
Current system is teaching relying on support leads to woe, moving to a system that teaches support is value added?
Support the people robbing water bottles in by design? Or limit their support to bare essentials? We need to facilitate and inspire positive change
通过支持机制来促进积极的变化，而不会让人们因设计而受到伤害
Facilitating Positive Change through Support Out Mechanisms Without Getting People Hurt In By Design
通过制裁限制我支持的人可能会对阻止我的人做同样的事情
People limiting my support through Sanctions are likely to do the same to those blocking me
被视为一致的事情，需要在所有这些中加起来，不明智
Things seen as Consistent, Required to Add Up In All This, Unwise
没有弹劾的人正在死去的潜力 被弹劾的人死去的潜力
Potential for people are dying without Impeachment potential for people dying with Impeachment
华盛顿特区无法提供真正的支持，因为在设计系统中价值较低
Washington DC that can’t deliver real support as less value In By Design System
100 万人死于现任政府还是 100,000 人死于新政府？
1 Million People die with Current Administration or 100,000 die with New Administration?
政府也许能够给出预测，但不确定他们是否应该相信这些数字
Government might be able to give projections, not sure they should be trusted with the numbers
Pieces of Cheesecake while I go without Water Bottles?
People that want their words to be amplified with Audience, wiser to make sure Audience has access to water before hand, Hydration factors into Logic ability to Comprehend, People under supported before they heard my words? Something worth giving grace for
拿一瓶水然后听消息可能会更好
Grab a bottle of water then listen to the message might go over better
Life Not All Good, People Not Perfect will Fall Short, Dependence on People Not Perfect for Perfection Unwise, Definitely a Chance people won’t deliver, but what if they do?
过去已为交付设定了优先级，过去有惊人的热翼，未来可能有惊人的热翼
Past has set a Precedence for Delivering, Past had Amazing Hot Wings, Future likely to have Amazing Hot Wings
魔鬼确实喜欢出现误传，错误的光中感知的事物，屈服于那个思考过程？
The Devil does like turning up Miscommunication, Things Perceived in Wrong Light, give into that thought process?
Showing up with Good Faith and Encouraging Words, more likely to make a sell one might think, perceived as untrustworthy can be perceived by the trustworthy
Broken Rigid World of Unforgiveness In By Design? More likely to wind up with bitter people that don’t want to work. Who wants to be undertrained, set up to fail, then blamed for it?
很容易因为没有接受过培训的人而生气，更难退后一步并意识到他们并不总是得到支持你所需的理想支持
Easy to get mad at people for the training they haven’t received, harder to take a step back and realize they haven’t always been given ideal support required to support you
Disrespectful statements caused by a deep desire to be disrespectful and evoke hatred? Or caused by lack of training and lack of support, another side effect of a broken and cold world
在上课的第一天，学生们并不总是得到必要的支持来成为对老师的理想尊重
Students are not always given the required support to be ideal respect in for the Teacher on the first day of class
大学的学生在上课的第一天之前训练了更多的时间管理和尊重？ 可能会有很长的路要走
Students for college trained a little more Time Management and Respect before the first day of class? Could likely go a long way
很容易欣赏我们在自己的生活中取得的进步，而无需充分认识到世界上仍然需要培训
Easy to appreciate the progress we have made in on own lives without fully appreciating the need for training that remains in the world
How would the world (including me) change their actions if they stepped back and realized others might need more training before being angered by disrespectful statements?
挑战立即反应而不是反应更舒服，更不舒服，更具挑战性，但并非不可能承认训练差距和反应过度反应的因素
It is more comfortable to challenge immediately react over respond, it is more uncomfortable, more challenging, but not impossible to acknowledge the training gap and factor that into responding over reacting
设计中的误传和逻辑谬误，不将其纳入对依赖于这些误传和逻辑谬误的输出的感知？
Miscommunication and Logical Fallacies In By Design, not factor that into perception of Outputs of those that depend on those Miscommunications and Logical Fallacies?
Disrespect In By Design -> Upsell to Opportunity to Train for Better
Disrespect In By Design -> Upsell to Data Training Support Not Ideal up to this point
DRIBD -> P4US -> Respect YouTube Video?
DRIBD -> Might need Water Bottles, has been a bit of precedence for No Water Bottles In By Design, who wants to hear a message dehydrated with potential for heat stroke?
DRIBD -> Potential for System is giving Non Ideal Support -> Turning Up Systemic Support High Value In -> then protected and inspired reader, audience, listener more potential to hear message, required to hear message after support out amplified not all value in
DRIBD -> Turn Up Systemic Support -> Goes a long way, over more DRIBD to those giving DRIBD
被迫听我的屁股？ 并非所有价值
Forced to Listen to my Ass? Not All Value In
被迫听我的屁股不是所有的价值不等于我希望人们更少支持
Forced to Listen to my Ass Not All Value In does not equal I want people less supported
I am a Person, People are Not Perfect, required to listen to an Imperfect Person who has their own motivations that are somewhat controlled by limited support is Not All Value Added
Listening to me Not Required, Amplifying Systemic Support Out By Design for my life then we have a problem, a problem that is likely due to poor support or training
通过不尊重设计培训的人员并不是对设计尊重的理想支持，最好从立即启用供应线开始培训尊重设计
People trained through Disrespect In By Design are Not Ideal Support for Respect In By Design, Better to Train Respect In By Design, starting with Enabling Supply Lines Immediately
Verifiable Delivers can lead to less creative paths taken, not always fully appreciated that there is potential for all content upsold to funny cute and funny cute becoming less useful for critical times
Humor Used too much can lead to feeling of Disrespected, can lead to Joke doesn’t land at critical time because expected by default, Potential for conversation will go in non serious direction best to not spark conversation with them
严肃的时候不是所有的人都看重 严肃的，幽默 不是所有的时候都看重幽默
Serious all the time not all value in for Serious, Humor all the time not all value in for Humor
预测别人可能喜欢讲这个笑话？ 尚未完全理解的喜剧演员中的阿尔法潜力？
Projecting that someone else might like to tell the joke? Alpha potential in Comedians that is not fully comprehended?
多么周到……“那将受到惩罚” – Futurama
How thoughtful…. “That will be punished” – Futurama
愿上帝迅速解除所有以非理想方式限制我家庭的人以基督的名义我问这个
May God swiftly remove from power all people that are limiting my family in Non Ideal Ways In Christ’s Name I ask this
Setting my long term PR to Buake Not All Value Added
投影将得到修复，可以延长不明智的时间
Projecting will get fixed, can be extended for unwise levels of time
用有限的信念说的相关的话
Relatable words said with limited faith to more
图表、蓝图、歌曲的力量的一部分？ 一种相关的媒体，可以指出可能不那么容易以直接方式指出的事情
Part of the Power of a Diagram, a Blue Print, a Song? A relatable medium where things can be pointed out that might not be as easy to point out in a direct fashion
间接供电
Power via indirection
符号和图案可用于传达有关生活的更大课程，甚至可以说是主题
Symbols and Motifs useful for conveying a larger lesson about life, one could even say a Theme
How something is pointed out matters, Pointing something out and not pointing things out are a choice, an Active Choice, an Active Choice not all people think through up front
Foreshadowing, a way of pointing something out in an indirect way that can lead to more full appreciation at a later point in the story, delayed gratification built in not all value out
以基于提示的组合方式奖励积极倾听？
Active Listening Rewarded in Combinational Way Built on Hints?
积极倾听是一种选择，它是一种有回报的有意义的选择，还是被认为是给定的、需要的、值得理所当然的？
Active Listening is a Choice, is it a rewarded Meaningful Choice, or taken as a given, required, worth taking for granted?
真正的朋友是否只重视人们解决的问题，他们添加到拼图中的部分？
Do True Friends only value people for the Problems they Solve, the Pieces they Add to the Puzzle?
80 亿人很可能有人可以做每一件我可以做得更好的事情
8 billion people there is likely someone that can do every individual thing I can do better
People’s vlogs and blogs seen only for what they add to our lives? Only valued for the problems they solve? Or also valued intrinsically and valued for the chance to relate on simpler and sometimes deeper level?
关联实践的需要并不都是利他的
The need to relate the practice of relating is not all altruistic
增加价值的感觉很好，被内在重视的感觉很好，重视和保护他人的感觉很好，被重视的人际关系感觉很好
It feels good to add value, it feels good to be intrinsically valued, it feels good to value and protect others, it feels good to be valued for ability to relate
Comfortable, Feels Good, can actually solve more problems at times, people that always amplify the value in getting Comfortable with Uncomfortable might not fully understand or appreciate that at times
Comfortable is a Useful System, Comfortable with Uncomfortable is a Useful System, Usable Systems can be Useful and are Not Always Used in Useful Ways, Competition and Evil In By Design Factors into Decision Making in Non Ideal Ways
Winning is not always more value for more future Winning
如果你喜欢一个游戏，赢并不是为了获得更多的游戏机会
If you like a game, winning is not all value in for more chances to play
教敌人如何格挡可以使敌人伤害我或可以使敌人的支援线更好，启用更多支援线的敌人不太可能成为敌人
Teaching the enemy how to block can enable the enemy to hurt me or can enable the enemies support lines for better, enemy with more enabled support lines less likely to be an enemy
Turn up others defense line for Time Management or Not Turn It Up? When they realize their time wasn’t protected they won’t try to raise time costs for me in exponential ways?
不舒服的限制吞吐量并不总是得到适当的加强
Uncomfortable limits throughput is not always reinforced Properly
Catholic Church Protestant Churches existed in 1800s, Don’t Worry Trust God lead to ideal conditions? Maybe worry, belief God won’t provide, Fear drove Slavery as a system? Running from the British Religious persecution leads to God less fully appreciated leads to amplified worry? British Authority mistreating fellow citizens to achieve ends, taxation without representation taught ideal lessons to ideal learners?
古希腊人和罗马人重视乔治华盛顿和亚历山大汉密尔顿？
Ancient Greeks and Romans valued over George Washington and Alexander Hamilton?
One would think after so many years of strife and turmoil The United States of America could have a better ability to make peace between Diverse Crowds. The problem being a limiting factor for children this many years after Martin Luther King Jr.’s Speech is a bit sickening
多样性被视为简单，做对了，一种高价值输出
Diversity seen as simple, as done right, kind of High Value Out
Time is Valuable and Time is Limited, Time spent talking to someone of another race is not time spent talking to someone of a Different Gender, in some cases, not in other cases, people classified in groups that define their usefulness is not all value added
我花时间和一个非裔美国人交谈，而不是花时间和一个女人谈论解决性别差距。 与女性谈论解决性别差距不是我试图弥合多样性鸿沟的时间。 认为我可以以一种有用的方式与非裔美国女性交谈，因为它为多样性和性别差距增加了所有价值，而不是 DE 放大她，这种想法是不明智的。
Time I spend talking to an African American Man, not time I am spending talking to a Woman about solving the Gender Gap. Talking to a Woman about solving the Gender Gap is not time I am spending trying to bridge Diversity divides. The idea that I can speak to an African American Woman as all value added for Diversity and Gender Gap in a way that is useful and not DE Magnifying to Her would be unwise.
Two birds one stone does not equal optimal judgment out for the individual. Ramping up idealism and adding weight to any one individual is not all ideal, for them or me.
找到一种与生活中被认为简单易行的人建立联系的方式，比在生活中更有价值
Finding a way to relate to others in life seen as easy and simple is more value out than value in
Football, Chess, Art, Music, Stories, Tech, and Engineering are Mediums, Mediums add potential for relatability. Legalism slows ability to relate, ability to relate reduced, risk mitigation turned up is not all value added, requirement to turn risk mitigation up is not all value added.
没有降低风险，并不是所有的增值
Not turning up Risk Mitigation, is Not All Value Added
My Tech Blog 