September 4th, 2022 Pt 1

Free Communications Diagram https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ark4M0NGAmjPgeIeLmTy8HzNt1xn7Q?e=ZdCuXi

好撒玛利亚人真的需要通过支持对比来筹集赌注吗? 免费入门图片
Good Samaritans Really Need Stakes raised via support out Contrast? Free Starter Image

不知道我应该相信这张图片,看起来被篡改过,可能是画在上面的

Not sure I should trust the image, looks doctored, possibly painted on

像盗窃一样的战争潜力 吞吐量

Potential for War like Grand theft Throughput

我重申兔子不能有棒球棒,小狗不能有单片眼镜

I reiterate bunnies can’t have baseball bats, and puppy dogs can’t have monocles

容易分解,有时难以将未知的理想因素考虑到未来计划中以非理想方式

Easy to Factor Out, Hard to Factor In sometimes Unknown Ideals Factor Into Future Plans in Non Ideal Ways

世界从没有工业革命到工业革命,没有火到火,发明会随着时间而改变,下一次突破何时不定

World Moved from No Industrial Revolution to Industrial Revolution, No Fire to Fire, inventions change over time, when the next break through will be not a given

因此,让你的想法在一夜之间化为乌有的突破是可能的

Thus a break through that leaves your ideas in the dust overnight is possible

好像压缩算法从 0.5 大小变为 0.001 大小

As if a Compression Algorithm went from 0.5 the size to 0.001 the size

吞吐量和动量就像彗星一样,可以不知从何而来,并以理想和非理想方式显着改变景观

Throughput and Momentum like a comet, that can come out of nowhere and dramatically change the landscape in ideal and non ideal ways

芝士蛋糕是一种很棒的甜点,如果10倍芝士蛋糕的甜点就在拐角处呢?

Cheesecake is an amazing dessert, what if a dessert 10 times the amazingness of Cheesecake is right around the corner?

如果您经营芝士蛋糕工厂,则不理想

Not ideal if you run a Cheesecake Factory

冰淇淋店和另一家冰淇淋店就在隔壁开业? 一分为二的销售总是增值? 额外的吞吐量总是减去价值?

Ice Cream Shop and another Ice Cream Shop opens right next door? Sells split in two always value added? Extra throughput always value subtracted?

写小说等于有更多人阅读 -> 好,写小说等于可能更少的人阅读你的小说 -> 差

Writing a Novel equals more people reading -> Good, Writing a Novel equals potentially less people reading your Novel -> Bad

All Value In,All Value Out 似乎不明智的小说,反馈过程中没有人参与编辑过程并不总是理想的,反馈过程中额外的人压迫和限制作者并不总是理想的

A Novel as All Value In, as All Value Out seems Unwise, No hand in the feedback process editing process not always ideal, extra hands in the feedback process oppressing and limiting the authors not always ideal

有控制能力会导致影响和压迫人们一开始并不想从事这项业务

Has the ability to control can lead to leverage and oppression people didn’t really want to be in the business of in the first place

可以压迫,不等于应该压迫,压迫需要时间,不是最聪明的制度

Can oppress, does not equal should oppress, oppression takes time, not the wisest of systems

竞争的潜力 使用容易的压迫目标,然后当人们受到压迫时,竞争就会骑上正义的闪亮白马来拯救世界

Potential for competition employing easy targets for oppression, then when people are oppressed competition rides in on Shiny White Horse of Justice to save the Day

竞争并不总是完全理解简单的目标生命很重要,他们的健康可能不允许他们骑上那匹马

Competition doesn’t not always fully appreciate the easy targets lives matter, and their health might not allow for them to get up on that horse

技术人员实际上是创新还是在竞争和真正的技术进步中拖后腿? 可能会有测试

Tech people as actually Innovative or Drags Feet on Competition and Real Tech Advances In By Design? There will likely be a test

您准备好将数月的时间和资源投入到一个您可能无法实现的项目中吗?

Are you ready to pour months of time and resources into a project you might not live to see to fruition?

当监视监视移动并启用某些系统而不是其他系统时,您准备好将数月的时间和资源投入到项目中吗?

Are you ready to pour months of time and resources into a project when surveillance is watching moves and enabling some systems over others?

投入的时间和资源并不总能带来足够的产出,并不总是导致其他人不相信或重新利用发现以适应自己的目的

Invested time and resources does not always lead to adequate output, does not always lead to others not taking credit or repurposing discoveries to suit their own purposes

让我赚钱不必那么努力,这可能是一个很难选择关闭的系统

Makes me money don’t have to work as hard at that can be a hard system to turn off by choice

Upsold 的潜在腐败在设计上然后可以采取发明不必支付

Potential for Upsold to corruption in by design then can take inventions don’t have to pay

知识产权法中的大量 Iffiy Pirate Land,很多内容交付或不交付取决于它

A lot of Iffy Pirate Land in Intellectual Property Law, and a lot of content is delivered or not delivered dependent upon it

在我的资源有限且连续数月不断接近零的情况下,允许公司获利确实需要以更理想的方式重新评估专利组合

Companies allowed to Profit while my resources are limited and approach zero constantly and consistently for months on end really requires re-assessment of patent portfolios in more ideal ways, Allows oppression in by design should lead to forced to pay check each month in by design

打仗需要时间,我可能没有时间

Fighting the battle requires time, time I might not have

战斗需要不止一方面的资源,资源需求并不总是有价值的,因为 Shiny Blue Marble 的设计问题较少

Fighting battles requires resources on more than one side, resource requirements are not always value in for less problems in by design for Shiny Blue Marble

系统给人一种上帝交付不足的感觉

System gives a bit of a feeling of God as Underdelivering

September 3rd, 2022 Pt 2

讲述价值系统,同时宣传我的价值被剥夺以不被充分理解

Telling be about value out systems while promoting my value being robbed to less fully appreciated

建立特定的词汇集以及句子是如何形成的可能会告诉我们很多关于世界领导人如何解决问题并希望问题得到解决的信息,不太可能在 The World at Large 上快速发布

Building up specific vocabulary sets and how sentences are formed can likely tell us a lot about how World Leaders solve problems and want problems solved, unlikely to pull a fast one on The World at Large

句子长度变化和音调也可能提供很多重要信息

Sentence length variance and tonality likely gives a lot of important information as well

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/cessation

noun

a temporary or complete stopping; discontinuance:a cessation of hostilities.

假设为什么使用停止一词与停止,防止,减轻,在敌对行动面前设置障碍?

Hypothesize at why the word cessation is used vs stop, prevent, lessen, put an obstacle in front of Hostilities?

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/hostilities

noun, plural hos·til·i·ties.

a hostile state, condition, or attitude; enmity; antagonism; unfriendliness.

a hostile act.

opposition or resistance to an idea, plan, project, etc.

hostilities,

  1. acts of warfare.
  2. war1.

临时的或完全的(有点范围)->进度是完全停止的价值,就像汽车刹车一样?

temporary or complete (a bit of range in that) -> progress is value in to complete stop, word like a brake on a car?

如果我是在促进和平,而绿色信号意味着战争,那么完全停止停止似乎更有价值

If I were promoting peace and the green go signal meant war, pulling over complete cessation stop seems more value in

我向世界领导人发起挑战

I challenge World Leaders there needs to be a Temporary to Complete Cessation of Oppression Against Artists In By Design Swiftly

在敌对行动定义中添加对艺术家的压迫? 通过宣传利用艺术家 In By Design 可能会减少战争,减少潜力

Add Oppression Against Artists to Hostilities definition? Might lead to less war, less potential via propaganda leveraged artists In By Design

用枪指着头的艺术家或多或少可能会吸引纳粹宣传? 最好不要压迫世界艺术家

Artist with a gun to their head more or less likely to draw Nazi Propaganda? Better to not Oppress Artists of the World

我是枪到头的少专业艺术家

I am pro less Artists with Guns to their Head

我是带有单片眼镜的专业小狗,得到更充分的赞赏

I am pro Puppy Dogs with Monocles More Fully Appreciated

很容易根据他们的互动增加的有限价值来评估人们,根据他们为整个系统增加的更高水平的价值更难评估人们

Easy to value out people based upon limited value out their interactions add, harder to value in people based on the greater level of value they add to system at large

对我来说没有完美的词不等于可能没有完美的词和另一个谜题的关键部分

Does not have the perfect words for me does not equal might not have perfect words and critical part of the puzzle for another

语言有时会成为障碍,即使无法理解单词,也无法理解单词并看到人们享受生活的肢体语言是鼓舞人心的

Language can get in the way sometimes, not understanding the words and seeing body language of people enjoying their life is inspiring, even if the words can’t be comprehended

更多像 Grace 这样的卫生纸是设计的,或者更多的狂犬会咬你的头是设计的

More Toilet Paper like Grace In By Design or More Rabid Dog Bite Your Head Off In By Design

可以根据对系统的附加值来提高中断干扰级别

Interrupts Annoyance Level can be raised dependent on Value Added to System

在白天的平静期间或电影高潮之前被打断?

Interrupted during a Lull in the Day or right before the Climax of the Movie?

攀登珠穆朗玛峰 100M 到山顶,由于氧气不足而不得不折返?

Climb Everest 100M to Peak and have to turn back due to low Oxygen?

质量词量在质量词之前

Volume of Quality Words is Preceded by Quality Words

选择词是否保护和激励他人时间和自由? 这些话是否增加了尊重和鼓励的价值,还是增加了没有为故事增加足够价值的对抗?

Do the choice words protect and inspire others Time and Freedom? Do the words add value respect and encouragement or do they increase confrontation that doesn’t add enough value to the story?

单词作为系统中的价值,理论与实践?

Words as a value in system, Theoretical vs Practical?

更少的单词可以更强大,知道什么时候这并不总是一个简单的系统

Less Words can be More Powerful, knowing when that is is not always a simple system

恩典是可能的 不等于糟糕的选择 不尊重的选择不会改变事情

Grace is possible does not equal bad choices choices not respected doesn’t change things

希望彼此成功的人可能会以不理想的方式相互竞争

People that want each other to be successful can be pitted against each other in non ideal ways

压迫的话语,第三方的杠杆作用可以以真实的方式影响话语,指责杠杆不明智,不等于人们总是想在风暴结束时花更多的时间与对方相处

Words of Oppression, Leverage by third parties can effect words in real ways, blaming the leveraged unwise, does not equal people always want to spend more time with each other when the storm is over

想象一下,如果两个人一起放在棺材里,空气充足,并在那里放置 5 个小时,那些不想一起被放在棺材里的人

Imagine if Two people were put in a coffin together with enough air and left there for 5 hours, People that didn’t want to be put in the coffin together

这两个人是想在彼此的未来上花更多的时间还是更少的时间? 在那之前,那两个人可能没有任何敌对关系,这并不等于活着时被迫留在棺材里是增值的,是为潜在的增值而增值,双方之间的戏剧性更少

Do those Two People want to spend more time or less time involved in each others future? Those Two People might not have had anything against each other before that point does not equal forced to stay in a Coffin while alive is value added, is value added for potential and less drama between the parties

创伤性经历并非都对缔造和平有价值,幽闭恐惧症并非所有对缔造和平都有价值

Traumatic Experiences are Not all Value In for Peacemaking, Claustrophobia is Not All Value Added for Peacemaking

通过社会支持被迫共度时光并不是一个全增值系统,不是一个为更好的友谊而全增值的系统,也不是一个经过适当培训的社会,不能容忍逃脱

Forced to spend time together by societal support out is not an all value added system, not an all value added system for better friendships or a society properly trained that getting away with that won’t be tolerated

让人们因虚假指控而被困在腐败监狱中?

Leave people stuck in Corrupt Jails under False Allegations?

将小鸟作为促进自由的开罐器或行星熔化器?

Iffy little Bird as a Freedom Promoting Can Opener or Planet Melter?

我更愿意将两者都留在我的团队中

I prefer to keep both on my team

不要忘记带有兔子耳朵的小猫,没有老虎,纯种狨猴

Don’t forget about Kitten with Bunny Ears no Tiger, Purebred Marmoset

Unreal Tournament 和 BFG 的奇异爱小鸟像 Redeemer 合体?

Strange Love Little Bird Like Redeemer from Unreal Tournament and BFG combined?

流行文化参考暗示并非所有价值

Pop Culture References Alluding Not All Value Out

Think Fast History 在非理想方式中使用了您的名字,这些方式会影响未来日期的选择

Think Fast History has used your name in Non Ideal Ways that factors into choice for Dates in the Future

名叫 Loraine 的女性不允许改名?

Women named Loraine Not Allowed to Change their Name?

推广 MotionLeap 应用程序和瀑布? 似乎是纯种狨猴那里没有吸血鬼

Promoting MotionLeap App and Waterfalls? Appears to be purebred Marmoset no Vampire in there

将真爱如血中的 Jason Voorhees 和 Lorraine 混合会产生什么影响?

What would the implications of mixing Jason Voorhees and Loraine from Trueblood lead to?

有点邪恶的蝎蛛龙?

A bit of an unholy scorpderagon?

其他制作兔蛇,不是自己制作一条来战斗吗?

Other making Buakes, not make one of my own to combat?

教人们拒绝保护主义,同时反对我自己?

Teach people to turn down protectionism while turning up my own?

调高正确的风险缓解措施同时调低错误的保护主义很重要,摩托车头盔好和 5 个死锁螺栓可以把你困在火里,说我知道完美的平衡,期望别人知道完美的平衡,知道完整 他们的话的力量和他们随着时间的推移创造的故事是不明智的

It is important to turn up the right risk mitigation while turning down the wrong protectionism, Motorcycle Helmets good and 5 Deadlock Bolts can trap you in a fire, to say I know the perfect balance, to expect others know the perfect balance, know the full power of their words and the stories they create over time would be unwise

完美无缺,无需维护,有点狂妄自大

Got it perfect, No Maintenance Required, a bit of Hubris in the thought

更多内容 更多更新可能很棒,也可能意味着维护和支持的潜力更少,5000 种媒体资产与 5 首音乐会的歌曲? 数量不同于质量,能够保持并不总是完全赞赏

More content More updates can be great, can also mean less potential to maintain and support, 5000 media assets vs 5 songs you know for a concert? Volume is different than Quality, able to maintain not always fully appreciated

5 首歌曲可以在手上轻松重复使用,像太阳前的放大镜一样放大,在 1000 种不易维护和放大的资产中可能具有更高的价值

5 Songs right easily reusable on hand magnified like a magnifying glass in front of the Sun, could likely be higher value in then 1000 assets that can’t easily be maintained and amplified

复杂的航行可能导致对简单仍然有很大影响的事实的不太充分的欣赏

Voyage to the complex can lead to less full appreciation for the fact simple still has a large impact

字量并非全部价值,多余的文字,无法维护可能是高价值的,并不总是被充分欣赏,期望作者对所有对比算法和作品保持维护似乎是不明智和不可能的,作者被迫在 第二次世界大战死于轰炸,然后他的书在 60 年后出现在书店? 艺术家长久以来的压迫不等于不受设计中邪恶影响的未来

Volume of words is not all value out, Superfluous words, Inability to maintain can be high value out and is not always fully appreciated, expectation of authors to maintain maintenance on all contrast algorithms and writings seems unwise and impossible, writer forced to write propaganda in world war 2 dies in bombing then his book shows up 60 years later in a book store? Oppression of the artist long past does not equal future not effected by the Evil In By Design added

过去可以通过设计以未被充分理解的方式带来僵尸一样的邪恶

Past can bring Zombie Like Evil In By Design in Not Fully Appreciated Ways

Potential for Upsell all contributions of an artist to the Oppression they were under

Can’t trust that can be turned up as a useful system

没有80亿个leader slot -> 基本属性,slots是有限的

There are not 8 billion leader slots -> fundamental property, slots are limited

由于不断的监视,期望每个人都需要像领导者一样完美地说话并不是所有的增值

Expecting everyone required to speak perfectly like leaders due to constant surveillance is not all value added

不够搞笑 不够有趣 不够励志 不够热情 太无聊 不喜欢封面

Not Funny Enough, Not Interesting Enough, Not Inspiring Enough, Not Passionate Enough, Too Boring, Not a Fan of The Cover

部分内容会很无聊,不添加任何无聊的内容是否明智? 枯燥的内容可以让有趣的内容大放异彩,枯燥的内容可以用于引出有趣内容的供应线

Part of content will be boring, is it wise to not add any boring content? Boring content can make the interesting content shine, Boring content can be required for the supply lines that lead to the interesting content

人们可能不希望因为他们增加的无聊价值而受到重视

People don’t likely want to be valued in for the Boring Value they add

365 天的闪电风暴到真正因其力量而受到重视的闪电风暴? 还是在那段时间里突然出现的几场大风暴?

365 days of Lightning storms to a Lightning storm truly valued for its power? Or a few major storms spread out over that time that come out of nowhere?

好的中断与坏的中断,导致更好的用户体验的中断还是导致更差的用户体验的中断?

Good Interrupts vs Bad Interrupts, Interrupts that lead to better User Experience or Interrupts that lead to worse User Experience?

过去被视为不明智的所有价值,过去被视为 Gingers 不明智的完美充分价值

Past seen as All Value Out Unwise, Past seen as perfect adequate value in for Gingers Unwise

声称做对了,并非所有增值

Claiming Got it Right, Not All Value Added

听力完美,权利是不可能的不是所有的增值

Hearing perfection, Right is impossible is Not All Value Added

未来的基本属性,未来比过去知道的更多,知道更多可以但并不总是导致更好的决策

Fundamental Property of the Future, the Future knows more than the Past, knowing more can but does not always lead to better decisions

放弃担心不明智,根据过去的结果说没有理由担心似乎也是不明智的

Giving into Worry Unwise, saying there is no reason to Worry based on Past results seems unwise as well

System could be No Worry in 不等于系统目前是 No Worry In

System could be No Worry in Does Not Equal System is currently No Worry In

每个人都被迫制作自己的水瓶,可以减少世界范围内的支出,减少的支出并非所有价值

Everyone forced to make their own water bottles, could reduce spending world wide, reduced spending not all value in

弹劾的行星融化对比?

Planet Melting Contrast for Impeachment?

弹劾唐纳德特朗普定于一年前? 时间码搞砸了并非所有增值

Impeachment of Donald Trump set to 1 year ago? Time Codes messed up not all value added

世界支持基于不确定的时间代码,可交付成果从 1 天到 20 年不等?

Worlds support based on iffy time codes, deliverables anywhere from 1 day to 20 years?

Given a choice No Impeachment of Leader that leads to less Water Bottles and Less Diamonds

Or another choice of Impeachment of Leadership, More Water Bottles, and More Diamonds In By Design?

I don’t have Diamonds I can offer, sell people communication updates as if they were Diamonds?

Updated words that sparkle like rain?

Grand Theft Photon 要像口头阳光一样鼓励?

Grand Theft Photon to Encouragement like Verbal Sunshine?

想象一下中层管理人员保护管理人员免受测试

Imagine Middle Management protects Management from Tests

最终,降低风险的测试数量压倒了中层管理人员

Eventually the number of Tests Risk Mitigated Overwhelm Middle Management

A+B 和 C Protected 突然变成 A->C,中层管理应该被尊重,关键时刻不让路是不明智的

A+B and C Protected suddenly gets turned to A->C, The idea Middle Management should be respected, can’t get out of the way at critical times would be unwise

更明智地支持中层管理并且不增加不合理的测试,这并不总是一个容易学习的课程,有时不打扰的人可能会更有价值

Wiser to support Middle Management and Not Increase Unreasonable Tests, Not always an easy lesson to learn, sometimes the people that don’t interrupt can be higher value in

https://youtu.be/R7ckmaB50Dg

木材设计,排除防火和设计规范,生锈的潜力?

Wood Design, Factor out Fire and Design codes, potential for Rust?

2300 可能会以未完全理解的方式更新我的图表? 耻辱!

2300 might update my diagrams in Not Fully Appreciated Ways? For Shame!

并非所有人都被教导消息会生锈,不播放的歌曲会生锈

Not all are taught that messages can rust, songs not played can rust

史诗和没有观众? 少史诗

Epic and No Audience? Less Epic

初始输入可能导致截然不同的结果

Initial inputs can lead to vastly different results

超级计算机需要根据随机算法做出启动器选择吗? 一个处理器设置了一个变量,该变量在主要方面影响了运行数天的模拟?

Supercomputers required to make starter choices based upon a random algorithm? One Processor sets a variable that factors in in major ways over simulations that is run for days?

硬币翻转吸血鬼或龙?

Coin flip Vampire or Dragon?

免费入门图片 Free Starter Image

做一个很好的生姜 Makes a pretty good Ginger

Money has the the ability to make somethings better possibly Factoring out the God or Evil In By Design Unwise

需要钱来维持维护的系统可能会以不理想的方式进行验证,例如 Bright Smile

Systems that require money to stay maintained can be iffed in non ideal ways, Bright Smile for instance

祈求某事变得更好并不等于它不会变得更糟

Praying for something to get better does not equal it not getting worse

理想情况下,祈祷会更快地提高价值

Prayer ideally would be swifter high value in

没有信心就不可能取悦上帝,失败的期望会导致信心降低,期望越少就等于信心越低

Impossible to please God without Faith, Failed Expectations lead to reduced Faith, less Expected equals less Faith

走进和谈,也许能解决这个问题

Walk into Peace talks, might be able to fix that

或走进和平会谈,期待在一天结束时回家,知道家人不会被烧死

or Walk into Peace talks looking forward to going home at the end of the day knowing families aren’t going to burn to death

即使人们在多样性水平上不能完美地交付,他们也不会,添加 if 并不是防止 if 的全部价值

Even if people don’t deliver perfectly on the diversity level, and they won’t, adding the if is not all value in for preventing the if

负担可以以非理想方式制造负担

Burden can create the Burden in Non Ideal Ways

我只是想为这份工作聘请最优秀的人,然后必须考虑多样性配额可能会让人们质疑他们是否真的在每次招聘中都增加了价值,真的所有增值都是为了长期成功吗?

I was just going to try and hire the best person for the job, then have to factor in diversity quotas can make people question are they really adding value with each hiring, really all value added for long term success?

在决策中考虑了橙色头发压迫不是所有的橙色头发压迫

Orange hair oppressed considered in decision making not all Orange hair oppression out

刚找到工作,因为头发颜色不适合更换而不是真正有价值?

Just got job because of hair color doesn’t lend itself to replaceable not truly valued?

把斯坦利杯递给我只是因为被命名为杰森而曲棍球的对比并没有完美地融入我的生活?

Hand me the Stanley cup just for being named Jason and that hockey contrast didn’t factor perfectly into my life?

被重视但实际上没有被重视并不是真正被重视的,前期更公平的竞争环境有很长的路要走

Valued but Not Actually Valued is Not Truly Valued, a bit more even playing field upfront goes a long way

September 3rd, 2022 Pt 1

更优雅地理解消息并非全部价值

More Graceful Comprehension of Message Not All Value Out

以对我更有用的方式理解,以证明我的观点,作为竞争的优势并非所有增值

Comprehending in way More Useful to Me, to Proving my Point, as Edge over Competition Not All Value Added

鼓励的话,需要一些东西

Words of Encouragement, Require a few things

  1. Not perceived as Disrespect
  2. Health
  3. A system that can be trusted (non ideal trust out is not active listening in)
  4. Comprehension with enough grace turned up -> easy to perceive things that are meant well as Disrespect instead of the Truth they that are meant to be value Added
  5. Communication trainings to understand the words used
  6. Active Listening Required to hear the words
  7. Not interrupted, Not Prevented by Corrupt Systems or Corrupted Competition, Competition doesn’t always want the other team encouraged

以对我更有用的方式理解可能是系统中未被充分理解的一种优雅

Comprehending in way more useful to me can be a grace in system not fully appreciated

我可以说玻璃杯中充满了不尊重和沮丧,或者我可以说不完美的话反馈系统中的沟通培训质量

I can say glass is half full of Disrespect and Discouragement, or I can say imperfect words give feedback on quality of communication training in the system

鼓励的话,需要一些东西Words of Encouragement, Require a few things

  1. 不被视为不尊重
  2. 健康
  3. 一个可以信任的系统(非理想信任输出不是主动监听)
  4. 出现了足够优雅的理解->容易理解那些本应是不尊重而不是真理的东西,它们本应是有价值的
  5. 沟通培训以理解所使用的单词
  6. 主动聆听 需要听到这些话
  7. 不被腐败的系统或腐败的竞争打断,不被阻止,竞争并不总是希望其他团队受到鼓励

鼓励的话语听到,真正听到,以及理解并非所有人都具备完美话语的能力,可以为世界增添更多恩典

Words of Encouragement heard, truly heard, and ability to comprehend not all are enabled with the perfect words can go a long way in adding more grace to the world

尊重的鼓励的话可以像95码接近的足球和充满恶魔的防线

Respectful Words of Encouragement can be like Football with 95 yards to close and a Defensive Line full of Demons

人为什么喜欢组队? 加入团队,加入公司?

Why do people like to group up? Join teams, Join Corporations?

所有 Teams 都增值了吗? 所有 Teams 是否都为我和我的同类增加了价值?

Are all Teams value added? Are all Teams value added to me and my kind?

团队,团队球衣造成分歧,分裂的公民并不总是最准备好迎接战争,迎接挑战闪亮的蓝色大理石,上帝,向系统抛出

Teams, Team Jerseys create divides, divided citizens not always the most ready for wars, for challenges Shiny Blue Marble, God, throws at a system

加入一个团队是鼓舞人心的,而不是让人们有一种被包容的感觉 不是所有的增值

Joining a team is inspiring, not giving people a way to feel included Not All Value Added

加入团队可能会造成分裂、设置隔离墙和保密协议,这可能会导致对系统的支持减少,而这些支持可能会以非常不理想的方式出现

Joining a team can be dividing, setting up walls and confidentiality agreements that can lead to reduced support to the system that can be turned up in very Non Ideal Ways

使能的团队在各方竞争中具有很高的价值,团队并不总是导致团队拥有的未来

Teams that enable can be high value in over competition from all sides, Teams do not always lead to future owned by Team

政党试图让人们以对他们有用的方式唱歌?

Political parties trying to get people to sing along in ways that are useful to them?

不是团队成员不能相信他们可以出现

Not part of the Team can’t trust them can be turned up

不是团队的一部分不能相信他们可以并且随着时间的推移以非理想方式出现,这导致了更大的战争和支持可能性

Not part of the Team can’t trust them can and has been turned up in Non Ideal Ways over time that has lead to greater potential for wars and support out

作为系统的全价值获胜,作为系统的全价值的竞争,建立支持线所需的并不是所有的增值

Winning as an All Value In System, Competition as an All Value In System, Required for Establishing Support Lines is Not All Value Added

Turning off water bottles is real Disrespect Added to System, would expect a bit more from Democrats

Prototypes start somewhere

Taking water bottles and resources is a way to teach resourcefulness, resourcefulness is not always value added

购买一堆技术的潜力,像一年的野营旅行一样脱离电网

Potential for buying a bunch of tech, going off grid like a one year camping trip

系统通过支持网络受到攻击的可能性较小

System has less potential for attacks via support out networks

问题是当我们回来时系统可能不在身边

Problem is System might not be around when we get back

更新并不总是为生产力增加价值,无法修改的画布有时可能会更有价值,访问较少的记事本可能会很有价值,锁定的会议室可能会很有价值

Updates are not always value added to productivity, canvas that can’t be modified can be higher value in at times, notepad that has less access can be high value in, conference room locked can be high value in

不锁定会议室,然后在不开灯的情况下进入会议室? 当灯打开时,有可能在董事会上被描绘成三K党人,人们并不完全理解像猪血凯瑞这样的恶作剧可以在系统中制造的东西

Not lock a conference room, then go present in it without turning on lights first? Potential for being painted as a Ku Klux Klan Man on the Board when lights are turned on, people don’t fully appreciate what bad pranks like pig blood Carrey can create in the system

在将人们的支持设置为 Nullified 之前让人们三思而后行需要非 Null 投资

Getting people to think twice before setting peoples support to Nullified Requires a Non Null Investment

当人们在监狱中、在房间外以及并非总是以增值方式时,对比度会发生变化

Contrast changes while people are in Jail, Out of the Room, and in Not Always Value Added Ways

只是有点朋克只是在系统中添加了一点恐怖,并在非理想时间以非理想方式重申可能是高价值的

Just a little punking just a little horror added to system and reaffirmed in non ideal ways at non ideal times can be high value out

世界的优先权并没有完全重视人,教会未能提供更多的优先权

Precedence for the world does not fully value people, a bit of precedence for Church failing to deliver on more than that

战争和实际阻止战争,压迫和实际阻止压迫完全是两件不同的事情,过去声称和平是价值的重要先例,以及在那之后带来战争和压迫的未来

War and actually preventing War, Oppression and actually preventing Oppression are two different things entirely, large precedent for Past claiming Peace as Value in and the Future bringing Wars and Oppression after that point

第二次世界大战没有阻止越南,越南没有阻止伊拉克和阿富汗,基本财产 激励和平并不总是导致和平,和平的话并不总是导致和平

World War 2 didn’t stop Vietnam, Vietnam didn’t stop Iraq and Afghanistan, fundamental property Inspiring Peace does not always lead to Peace, Peaceful words do not always lead to peace

基督死了,圣灵注入人类,理想情况下,这将等于没有战争,法国大革命,内战,第一次世界大战,第二次世界大战,朝鲜战争,越南,伊拉克和阿富汗,基督教作为一个完美的和平缔造者比不完美多一点 增值

Christ died, Holy Spirit infused on mankind, ideally that would equal no war, French Revolution, Civil War, World War 1, World War 2, Korean War, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan, Christianity as a Perfect Peacemaker a Little More than Not Perfect Value Added

神圣的核弹地狱,永恒的和平一个简单的祈祷,交付少一点被上帝注入? 上帝允许魔鬼继续存在,因为没有对比和故事也是Devil In By Design?

Holy Nuke Hell, Peace for Eternity a simple prayer, delivery a bit less infused by God? God allows the Devil to continue to exist because no contrast and story is Devil In By Design as well?

上帝可以在战争发生之前阻止它们,可以在坦克和地雷建造之前阻止它们的建造

God could stop wars before they happen, could stop tanks and landmines from being built before they are built

Support Out Limited Learning No Grace In By Design 少宽恕 更多基于有限分辨率不足的判断 -> 很多魔鬼的对比

Support Out Limited Learning No Grace In By Design Less Forgiveness More Judgment based on Limited Inadequate Resolution -> a lot of Devil’s contrast in that

学习是一个可以以非理想方式抑制自己的系统,名字不靠谱的英语老师教学生双关语只会被文字游戏嘲笑?

Learning is a system that can disincentivize itself in Non Ideal Ways, English Teacher with iffy name teaches students Puns only to be mocked by the Play on Words?

Venn Diagram to Penn Biagram, Easy to create monsters out of Math Teachers just trying to teach sets

不舒服可以通过竞争以非理想方式出现,真实性和数据一致性作为系统中的更多价值可以通过竞争以非理想方式出现,保持原样并不总是完美的增值

Uncomfortable can be turned up in non ideal ways by competition, truth and data consistency as a more value in system can be turned up in non ideal ways by competition, leaving words as is is not always perfect value added

没有从根本上保护我的画布或图表的上帝,没有从根本上保护我的画布或图表的系统,这告诉我关于世界的什么见解?

God that does not fundamentally protect my Canvas or Diagrams, Systems that don’t fundamentally protect my Canvas or Diagrams, what insights does that tell me about the world?

网络图标的存在是有原因的,电源关闭按钮的存在是有原因的,而不是按设计打开支持的理想选择,以允许按设计打开支持

The network Icon exists for a reason, the Power Off Button Exists for a reason, not an ideal thing to turn up support out in by design, to allow support out in by design to be turned up

针锋相对不是所有的附加值,不是保护自己免受未来的影响不是所有的附加值,不得不依赖一个部分支持的系统并不是所有的附加值,就像任务控制是老大哥

Tit for tat not all value added, not protecting self from future not all value added, having to rely on a system that is partial support out is not all value added, like mission control being big brother

只需关闭系统使用笔和纸就不会真正为产品所花的钱增值

Just turn off the system use a pen and paper not really value added for money spent on product

可以调高非理想接近度

Non Ideal Proximity can be turned up

关闭系统可以提高电源效率,被迫关闭产品,因为被那些贪污的人剥夺了使用产品的能力并不是所有价值

Turning off a system can be more power efficiency in, forced to turn off a product because robbed from ability to use product by those profiting corruptly is not all value in

可爱 有趣 有趣 增值 并非所有增值

Cute Funny Interesting Value Added Not All Value Added

民主党人关掉水瓶和空调只是一个小小的爱水龙头?

Democrats turning off water bottles and AC just a little love tap?

只是一个值得为大众制作原型和重新利用的小爱水龙头?

Just a little love tap worth prototyping and repurposing for the masses?

所有作为要求的增值都会让你少花钱

All Value Added as a Requirement will Leave you With Less

喜欢偷工减料解决问题,解决的办法是增加更多的角落? 不确定随着时间的推移创造更多价值 法律中的系统会增加对现行法律的尊重

Likes to cut corners to solve problems, the solution is to add more corners? Not sure creating more value out over time systems in the laws increase respect for current laws

挑战和测试可能导致系统重新布线,有时会以非理想方式阻止所有未来测试

Challenges and Tests can lead to rewiring of systems, sometimes in ways that prevent all future Tests in Non Ideal Ways

被认为是对 Infinity 价值的操纵? 不确定这是否明智,所有不完美的人也容易产生感官错觉

Perceived as Manipulative to value out for Infinity? Not sure that is wise, all People Not Perfect People also susceptible to Sensory Illusions

被认为是操纵性可以以非理想方式被激励和放大,那是在需要知道的基础上,“那个”不存在并不重要

Perceived as Manipulative can be incentivized and amplified in Non Ideal Ways, That is on a Need to Know Basis, it doesn’t matter “That” doesn’t exist

必须以实际方式降低风险可能会导致非理想的风险缓解

Having to Mitigate Risk is Disincentivized in Real Ways can lead to Non Ideal Risk Mitigation Out In By Design

更多的法律并不总是增加系统的价值和力量,只是添加另一个法律可以创造非理想的复杂性,不需要重新修改的想法原来的法律并不是所有的增值,只是附加另一个法律对社会来说并不是真正的价值

More Laws does not always increase value and power of System, Just add another law can create non ideal complexities, idea original laws don’t have to be reworked is not all value added, just tack on another law is not true value in for society

汽车上的排气不足只是粘在另一个排气管上? 不确定系统总是以简单的方式工作,思想可以以简单的方式工作并不是所有的增值

Inadequate exhaust on car just tack on another exhaust pipe? Not sure systems always work in simplistic manners, thought can work in a simplistic manner is not all value added

无法以实际方式线性添加到系统中会导致撤资和投资的潜力并不总是得到充分的重视

Inability to linearly add to the system in real way leads to potential for divestment and for investments not always fully appreciated

完善法律的正确措辞可能需要几个月的时间,但法律只有几段长? 简洁比 1000 页的小说更有价值

Perfecting the right words for a law might take months, yet the law is only a few paragraphs long? Concise can be higher value in than a 1000 page Novel

有意义的改变的信息,不被理解为感动 灵感来自为什么这些话是有价值的

Message to Meaningful Change, Not Comprehended to Moved Inspired with why the words are Valuable

少咬一口狗可能会导致世界和平,超卖吗?

One Less Dog Bite Could Potentially Lead to World Peace, Overselling it?

被罗威纳犬伤害的领导人家庭不会得到充分的赞赏

Leaders family mauled by rottweilers would not be fully appreciated

不要走那种可能有地雷,被视为威胁或领导的方式?

Don’t walk that way potential for landmines, taken as a threat or headed?

Leadership taking water bottles should know better than that

Judging homosexuals not right, thinking homosexuality is all Devil Evil In By Design Out would be unwise

+69

85

People are not perfect, homosexual not a homosexual, both not perfect

Society turns up innocent in Jail where shower curtains are removed, Society equals homosexuality in by design not all ideal

Leaving people in Corrupt Jails, not really Straight++

Just group all the homosexual people up in jails and take away their shower curtains? how about we not turn that up

Everything bigger in Texas including Homosexual Amplification Engines?

Thus I propose we leave people in Corrupt Jails via False Allegations less, I will run the risk of saying that is the right thing to do in many cases

September 2nd, 2022 Pt 2

宇宙中最神奇的歌曲,但你只能听到一次?

The most Amazing song in the Universe but a catch where you only get to hear it once?

获得踢球潜力,将所有东西都加售到踢球上

Get on the kick potential for upsell everything to on the kick

红变绿、黄变紫、蓝变橙的想象

Imagination of Red that Morphs to Green, Yellow that Morphs to Purple, Blue that Morphs to Orange

变形为地面的血太普通,变形为力量的黄金太普通,警察变形为囚犯太普通

Blood that Morphs to Ground too Common, Gold that Morphs to Power too Common, Police that Morph to Prisoners too Common

创造性约束作为一种挑战,尝试考虑不那么常见的事物,可能会激发世界上的一些优雅

Creative Constraint as a Challenge, try to think of the less commons, might inspire some grace in the world

没有充分认识的更好的路径会导致错误的地方出现通风口

Better Paths Not Fully Appreciate will lead to vents in the wrong places

尊重未来,其他值得为未来增光的系统,例如鼓励和更好的沟通培训,作为必需系统的宽恕,作为不总是给定的系统的数据一致性

Grace the Future with Respect, other systems worth Gracing the Future with such as Encouragement and Better Communications Training, Forgiveness as a Required System, Data Consistency as a Not Always Given System

一个空的咖啡杯,一个煮更多咖啡的机会,还是世界末日?

An Empty coffee cup, a chance to make more coffee or the end of the world?

给权威一杯咖啡一个额外的甜甜圈,如果给我的咖啡给我的甜甜圈被污染了怎么办

Offering Authority a cup of coffee an extra donut, what if the coffee given me donut given me was tainted

为军官提供更好的客户服务并非全部价值,为军官提供更多测试并非全部增值,生死攸关的使用枪支的潜力,首先测试 1000 次等于更高的增值?

Better customer service for Officers Not All Value Out, More tests for Officers Not All Value Added, potential to use a gun in life or death, tested 1000 times first equals higher value added?

倾听权威,向权威道歉 – 很抱歉,您在试图让事情变得更好时遇到了糟糕的经历,解决问题,感谢反馈至关重要,业务不是给定的

Listen to Authority, Apologize to Authority – I am sorry you have had a bad experience trying to make things better, Solve, Thank Feedback is Critical and Business is Not a Given

几句话,可能意味着生与死之间的区别,这很容易说出来? 弥合死气沉沉的系统并不总是一个简单的系统,字数并非全部增值,字数较少并非所有增值

A few words that could mean the difference between life and death that could have easily been said? Bridging dead air not always a simple system, Volume of Words not all value added, Less Volume of words not all value added

使用的词,希望它们是优质的选择,并非所有人都会做出优质的选择,总是使用完美的词->可以这么说,减少对自我的影响

Words that are used, would like them to be quality choices, not all will make quality choices, always use perfect words -> potential for less shit on self in by design so to speak

我们想赢得争论,我们希望以最好的方式被听到,获胜并不总是系统中的更多价值,以最好的方式听到关注并不总是更多的附加值

We want to win arguments, we want to be heard in best light, winning is not always the more value in system, heard in the best light attention not always more value added

Improve the Photons better Solar Panels so to speak

有时,复杂词的价值更高,粉碎很有用,粉碎可能更具描述性,通过在非理想方式中简化词以实现简单性,可能更高的机会不被理解

Sometimes the Complex Word is Higher Value In, Smashed is useful Pulverized might be more descriptive potentially higher chance for not understood by simplifying words in Non Ideal Ways for Simplicity

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/superfluous

多余

不太复杂的单词可能会导致更长的不太简洁的沟通,而不是需要足够多的单词

Less complex words can lead to longer less concise communications more than sufficient excessive words required

复杂的词如果被理解可以迅速传达复杂的信息

Complex words can convey complex information swiftly if comprehended

更多的单词被简化实际上简化的想法并不是真正的价值,更多的单词更多的字母更多的通信吞吐量要求更多的时间要求

Idea that more words that are simplified actually simplifies is not true value in, more words more letters more requirements for communications throughput more requirements for time

相互理解的人,可以使用复杂的短词可以以未被充分理解的方式带来更高的潜力,更高的潜力被认为是价值需要信仰

People that understand each other, that can use complex short words can lead to higher potential in not fully appreciated ways, Higher Potential considered as Value In takes Faith

不是多余的信息

Not Superfluous Message

不等于普通消息,故事是多余的

Does not equal Normal Message, Story is Superfluous

减少多余信息是一个改进过程,一个重要的反馈过程,可以以更理想的方式为许多各方节省时间

Less Superfluous Message is a Refinement Process, a Critical Feedback Process that can lead to Time Savings for Many Parties in Much More Ideal Ways

想最好的人,当他们使用更短的信息时更难

Thinking the best of people, when they use smaller shorter messages is harder

使用更多的词会导致人们认为人没有信心投资

Using more words can lead to thought man does not invest with faith

二分法或伊卡洛斯这个词可以在短时间内解释异常复杂的主题

Dichotomy or the word Icarus can explain exceptionally complex topics in short periods of time

二分法这个词很有价值

The word Dichotomy valuable

伊卡洛斯这个词很有价值

The word Icarus valuable

字典、词库、启发人们使用工具是有价值的,需要一点信仰

Dictionaries, Thesaurus, Inspiring people to use the tools is valuable requires a bit of Faith

认为设计中的邪恶可以从新发明的维护要求中排除是不明智的

Thinking Evil In By Design can be factored out of Maintenance Requirements for New Inventions would be Unwise

通常在供应线完好但供应线并不总是完好时发明事物

Things are generally invented when supply lines are sound but supply lines are not always left sound

一个我们都拥有更多吞吐量的世界需要宽恕、优雅,并在设计中互相照顾,因为逻辑谬误和可爱有趣的价值高于逻辑是系统的一部分

A world where we all have more throughput requires Forgiveness, Grace, and looking out for each other in by design, because logical fallacies and cute funny valued over logical is part of the system

免费入门图片 Free Starter Image

倒钩像那样连接天使的翅膀

Barb wiring the Angels wings like that

任何一个人的输入都可能被损坏导致一个基本属性

Any one individuals Inputs can be Corrupted leads to a fundamental property

更好的投入是每个人的责任,并不是每个人都获得适当的投入以使他人更好投入

Better Inputs is everyone’s responsibility and Not Everyone is funded with proper Inputs for making others Inputs Better

质量输入带来更好的输出通过设计击败毒药

Quality Input Leads to Better Outputs beats Poison In By Design

像抗蛇毒血清这样的词? 可能需要一些毒液前期

Words like Antivenom? Might require a bit of the Venom Upfront

听到有人受伤或看到有人在痛苦中不得不查看肢体语言的视频更鼓舞人心?

What is more inspiring hearing someone is hurting or a video seeing someone in pain having to view the body language?

与质量和平相关的事项,在讲故事中考虑到恐惧和错误信念可以导致更相关,因此更相关的和平

Relatable Matters to Quality Peacemaking, Desire Fear and Misbelief factored into Storytelling can lead to More Relatable, and thus More Relatable Peacemaking

我可以激发和平,但我无法阻止一年后可能开始的战争,我无法阻止 10 年后、20 年后、50 年后没有世界帮助的战争

I can inspire Peace and I can’t stop a war that might start a year from now, I can’t stop a war 10 years from now, 20 years from now, 50 years from now without help from the world

Less Continuous Backhanded Punishment in the World and More Support In By Design could be Very High Value In

地雷类系统的历史潜力

History Potential for Landmine like systems

历史虐待人,人们灰心丧气去酒吧,受到虐待的人酒后驾车的可能性更高,那么历史虐待人有可能变成人行道上的鲨鱼袭击人

History mistreats people, people discouraged and disheartened go to Bars, mistreated have higher potential for driving under the influence, then History mistreating people has the potential to turn into Shark attacks for people on the sidewalks

言语、气馁、鼓励和不尊重都可以以非理想方式影响未来

Words, Discouragement, Encouragement, and Disrespect can all factor into the Future in Non Ideal Ways

对完美词的期望可能等于对建立在“不完美的人”上的系统的不尊重

Expectation of Perfect Words can equal Disrespect for a system built on People Not Perfect

用言语强化否定,过去的错误并非没有后果

Reinforcing the Negative in Words, Mistakes of the Past is Not without Consequence

你告诉我你想让我珍惜你说对的一切并原谅你说错的一切,嗯,是的,就是这样的想法

Your telling me you want me to value you for everything you say right and forgive everything you say wrong, well yeah that is kind of the idea

未来带来的更新可以对过去的话做出真正的判断,这是一个不道德的系统

The Future brings updates that can make true judgment on words of the past an unethical system

因为我有一个中风的梦想,我们将把散步作为一个更敷衍的系统

Since I had a dream about having a stroke we are going to factor in walks as a more Perfunctory system

Free Starter Image

2025年台湾战争没死导致对2040年系统战争还有用吗?

Didn’t die in China Taiwan War of 2025 leads to still useful for the War of 2040 Systems?

人们并不总是完全意识到他们因开战而失去的东西,未来有可能因开战而失去的东西

People don’t always fully appreciate what they have to lose by going to war, what the future has the potential to lose by going to war

以前没说是 可以在非理想方式中成为未来有用的系统 可以在非理想方式中出现

Didn’t say Yes before can be a useful system for the future in Non Ideal Ways can be turned up in Non Ideal Ways

将人们从一场战争的潜在枷锁中解放出来,只是为了在另一场战争中失去他们?

Free people from one the potential shackles of one war just to lose them in another?

Best to sell Peace and Peacemaking not like your waiting for the bus

荣耀猪可以调高友军火力

Glory Hog can be turned up to amplify friendly fire

最后一刻谁挽救了这一天,在比赛结束时跑球 5 码的足球运动员在人群面前跳舞 10 分钟?

Perception of who saved the day taken at last moment, football player that runs ball 5 yards at end of the play does a dance in front of crowd for 10 minutes?

英雄们艰苦的战斗、子弹、死去的朋友,以及出现非理想逻辑压迫系统的可能性,迫使人们说出一些话

Heroes hard fought battles, bullets, dead friends, plus the potential to turn up non ideal logic oppressive systems force people to say things

药物影响和对比不能让人们说错话的想法是一个不明智的假设,如果我自己没有经历过,我可能不会相信

The idea drugs influence and contrast can’t get people to say the wrong things would be an unwise assumption, wouldn’t likely believe it if I hadn’t experienced it myself

不做荣耀的人可以依附荣耀的保护机制

People not trying to be glory hog can be attached to glory for protection mechanisms

竞争不喜欢失败,提出支持,以至于人们依附于错误的系统,说错误的事情是可能的

Competition doesn’t like to lose, turn up support out to the point people attach to wrong systems say wrong things is possible

有可能让某人看起来像他们偷走了荣耀,而不是试图偷走荣耀,用AK47或M-16从男人那里偷走荣耀是剃须刀片,具有正确竞争逻辑的剃须刀片可能会扼杀某人的喉咙 狭缝

It is possible to make someone look like they stole the glory that was not trying to steal the glory, stealing the glory from Men with AK47s or M-16s is a razor blade, a razor blade that with the right competition logic could get someone’s throat slit

通过权威利用系统,直到有人破解开始附加到非理想军事系统?

Leverage on a system by authority until someone cracks starts attaching to Non Ideal Military Systems?

系统上的未知杠杆、系统上的不安全性以及 LSD 和药物等系统的支持可以在非理想时间以非理想方式出现

Unknown Leverage on system, Insecurity on system plus support out systems like LSD and drugs can be turned up in Non Ideal Ways at Non Ideal Times

测试直到它们附加到某物可能导致该物攻击,看看该物是否会攻击对于清除系统中的问题是否有用

Test until they attach to something can lead to that something attacking, seeing if that something will attack is useful to weed out problems in the system

持续的支持系统会导致生命受到威胁 附加到中央情报局或军方会成为一种更可能的选择,中央情报局和军方并不总是喜欢附属,拥有未经非理想测试的高性能支持系统的人可能会 不会导致对未来的最佳支持

Continuous support out systems leads to threats to life put in Jeopardy attaching to CIA or Military as useful becomes a more likely option, CIA and Military don’t always like being attached to, people with high powered support out systems not tested with Non Ideals might not lead to optimal support for future

仅仅因为军队中的一个人被称为“娘娘腔”不等于可以将称他们为“娘娘腔”的人绑在铁轨上

Just because a guy in the Military is called a Mother Fucker doesn’t equal it is ok to tie the person that called them a Mother Fucker to railroad tracks

我不喜欢被称为混蛋,我比某些人受过更好的沟通培训,社会产生未经训练的恶霸的可能性,称随机的人混蛋然后发现他们的嘴创造了无法支付的账单

I would not like being called a Mother Fucker, I am trained better with communication than some people, potential for untrained bullies generated by society calling random people Mother Fuckers then finding out their mouth created a bill it can’t pay

公民应对子弹和目标浮现在脑海

Citizen Cope Bullet and a Target comes to mind

可以改变逻辑谬误和信念系统

Logical Fallacies and Belief Systems can be altered Hallucinogenic Drugs and Good Old Reinforced Bad Training and Pier Pressure can be used in Non Ideal Ways Against People

做所有工作的竞选工作人员将他们的工作交给另一个承担所有功劳的人?

Campaign staffer that does all the work hands off their work to another that takes all the credit?

可怕的对比是有用的,军队想让别人相信他们可以毫无反响地夺取荣耀?

Scary contrast is useful, Militaries want to let others believe they can take the glory without repercussions?

我不想拿军队的荣耀,我想要自己的荣耀,团队之外的荣耀并不总是容易推销,码头压力系统并不是所有的荣耀,团队也不是所有的荣耀,社会上的一些想法可以 ‘不要通过压迫看起来像窃取荣耀的人是一个价值输出系统,通过设计优雅,宽恕和潜力来判断真相和逻辑谬误我没有听说这可以走很长的路,因为数据安全问题我 听说可重现可以转向我听说但无法在设计中找到

I don’t want to take militaries glory, I want glory of my own, glory outside of a team not always an easy sell, pier pressure systems is not all glory in, team is not all glory in, the idea some in society can’t be made to look like glory stealers through oppression is a value out system, truth iffy and logical fallacies in by design grace, forgiveness, and potential in I didn’t hear that can go a long way, because with data security problems I heard that reproducible can be turned to I heard that but can’t find that in by design

不理想的可重现支持系统不适合在

System of not ideal reproducible support is not ideal for building logic on

不理想的可重现支持系统不适合在

Need to fix that not always value in for fixing that

可以进行反向测试,男人说不要判断,然后尝试让他们判断,男人说 2+2 = 4 然后给他一个问题,其中 2+2 = 4 个问题给他自己

Inverse testing possible, man says don’t judge, then try to get them to judge, man says 2+2 = 4 then give him a problem where 2+2 = 4 problems for himself

“Burn it all” – Mad King,权力的游戏并不总是最不鼓励的系统,就像男孩 – 演讲

“Burn it all” – Mad King, Game of Thrones is not always the most disincentivized system, like The Boys – Speech

Say I was middle management and wanted the CEO Position, Seems like it might be useful to turn up VP in CEOs Face, and CEO is pissing in VPs face

Just because the VP and CEO are Gingers does not equal it is ok for the Ginger Middle Management to turn up support out in leadership

As if I was the CEO, VP, and Middle Management and the Unruly Investor on the sideline waiting on my paycheck

Or possibly the other route? Treat CEOs and VPs too good butter them up so they aren’t ready for the punches at critical times? Yes Men, “You always right” Men not always full value added

Social welfare buttered up for Nixon’s Hansel and Grettle Machine?

September 2nd, 2022

People that love Microscopes are sold on Microscopes Possibly Not Always Aware of how their Time Spent towards Microscopes might factor in in Non Ideal Ways to others

People that love Telescopes are sold on Telescopes Possibly Unaware of how their Non Null Time Costs added towards Telescopes might factor in in Less Than Ideal Ways for others

Focus in other directions, different directions magnified over time dependent on sold on the system as value added

Not all people that are sold are sold for good reason, a detail, a detail worth putting a microscopic idea that magnifies it to higher relevance

People sold on Time Management…. Time Management that updating fundamentally leads to less time, a detail worth actively noting

Looking at Time Management with a Microscopic Mindset, Mindset of Resolution, Direction is limited and Magnification in the right direction is useful value added

Potential for Missing the Big Picture, the Macroscopic Telescopic view, potential for the Telescopic view being pointed in a direction that is less support in by design for earth

International Space Station looking at Earth with a telescope, Macroscopic lens line a Microscope might be of greater relevance, remind that surface level view does not equal comprehension not all value out

International Space Station might be able to see top of Washington, DC with a telescope that acts like a microscope does not equal that Macroscopic Microscopic view is more than surface level, cover to a book level

Going in one direction does not equal Non Ideal Resistors won’t be added if we try to go in other directions, controlling current and power is useful, does not equal controlling current and power is always useful to the power

Just going to Magnify Studio? No potential for problems in all that?

Inspiration, Encouragement, Respect, Health, and Energy are all power sources that depend on each other

Resistors can stack process with Jade, dust off a gem just to have someone else throw problems on top of it?

Feedback is valuable to system, problems are not. How to add value added feedback without calling out issues seems unwise. Saying calling out issues doesn’t have potential to increase problems would be unwise.

Energy of a Fighter, or No Day Seized?

Could the world say they are calling them a Reject? Yes, could people appreciate the counterintuitive effect? World no need for a wake up call, to stand up against oppression?

Think the stalker won’t call you a Reject? Think the stalker won’t use Fear as a value in for Narrative Control system? System as a giant stalker with an Axe? Maybe not ideal support in

People preparing for war, a little different mindset not always fully appreciated

Mitigating Risks like storming Normandy a bit different

Reminding people that corrupt police systems can take power and destroy lives without upselling current system we rely upon to corrupt police system that takes lives

Just make Peace with Nazis likely iterated more than once, before Peace was lost, fundamental property, people don’t always heed warnings about Peace is a value added system

Studio will Not Always be Pastel

Protecting from an imperfect system viewed in different lights by different people

High Contrast useful can be turned to less useful in Non Ideal Ways added by potential for war

Rock music useful for working out might stir up non ideals within system pre war time

A system that can be iffed to a less value system, lots of potential for that in the world, the potential is not always value in, people and countries don’t always play around with the potential

People don’t like paying full price, someone that needs a job and requests 100,000 doesn’t mean you can’t have the employ just if them down to they only need 70,000 to live? Might be more value in for both systems might be more value out for both systems

Company can only pay 85,000 give them 85,000? Company utilized at edge of resources not all ideal

Truth at the end of the day that Man could have been happier with 20,000 if system wasn’t nickel and diming to all value out for a reminder?

Value is relative, and there is reason to play with levels of encouragement to win in competition to increase potential in systems

Encouragement and Validation dependent upon Salary Not Ideal, Encouragement and Validation dependent upon Companies with Interests Not Fully Aligned Not Ideal

We invest time and resources reinforcing a system that is nickel and dime play with iffy validation and confidence levels in by design

Potential for discouraging systems into Non Ideals, System of Non Functional Safety Nets is kind of amplify Evil In By Design

Someone that makes 100,000 forced to live on 30,000 changes things, scale up does not always equal no scale up in requirements thought possible

Nice suit leads to expectation might have money, might have money equals worth selling to, worth selling to does not always equals has time or that buying would be a value in system

Thought that potential scales in proportional linear ways is not all ideal

Getting a Raise that actually leads to More Value In, Not Always as Easy of a System

1 GB used properly can lead to 2 GBs, 2 GBs not always more value added for proper use of 1 GB, potential for Non Ideals to be turned up over time with health that lead to less ability to utilize 1GB or 2GB, non parallels that effect system, variables thought to have less impact that can have much greater impact than initially expected

Bigger hard drive might equal less money for Dentist, less money for Dentist not always more Oxygen into system

Easy to Value in Variables that are useful to our Arguments in Non Ideal Ways that can lead to non ideal support out at critical times

Money as a limited resource, Reliance on Tech for Success as a value in system for money, funding

They only need enough money to buy food and have shelter equals adequate teeth and tech support? People that say they want others to be successful and people that actually want people to be successful are different, and people that mean to help enable others are not always enabling others appropriately aren’t reinforcing non ideals in the system

Easy to get caught up trying to fix a problem, unable to fix problem, and reinforcing non ideals when God seems to not deliver, God not delivering can be turned up by Competition (if God wanted to Deliver He could have created a Miracle, could have made the Poker Hand a Royal Flush) -> Has potential to reinforce competition can do whatever the fuck they want because if God wanted it to play out differently He would make it play out differently

The idea God wants us to succeed wants us to succeed at we want to Succeed at, Not Entirely Value In

Infinite Genie Like Power with Less Value In By Design Less Value In By Design that could lead to choking to death and constant reminder that broken teeth plus food is a misery in by design system

God of paints with broken teeth and rust over time seems more in line with truth

God of reinforces Government roads and Infrastructure by default?

New Testament God seems more value in for many cases does not equal current system always reinforces Grace as a value in system, God as a less break stuff in by design system

After Christ died perfect support should be in by design but support is not perfect

Or God’s view on perfect support is different, water until you die as enough not all value added in my opinion

God allows things to rust and doesn’t build maintenance in by default

Everything seen as prone to rust over time, considered before moving forward on Journeys and endeavors might prove valuable

I propose a Kitten Based Problem Solving Method

Requirement to clarify Kittens don’t equal people, people might try to upsell to Childhood story of Witch that steals and bakes children

September 1st, 2022 Pt 4

Life does not always make sense, planning for weeks can lead to failures, not planning at all a small sketch might lead to a giant skyscraper

Planning seen as always delivers not all value added, Sometimes Risk ability to accept new tasks immediately can be higher value in for Shiny Blue Marble

Making a Plan equals Discomfort In By Design

Potential for Competition having Direct Access to Plan

Potential for Surveillance factoring their plan into the plan just received

Potential for Plan showing the projection to the competition, a Plan on paper out of the mind is not always value in on Shiny Blue Marble

Surveillance Should factor in and Protect People in Ideal Ways

Does Not Equal Universal Basic Income has actually been enabled

A system built on and that reinforces has reinforced competition is useful built with imperfect people is not all ideal for ideal magnification of Studio, Et tu Brute?

Better to say that or, our tomorrows hope and dreams are left in your hands please don’t crush our hope? Kind of heavy, possibly not light and breezy enough

I am not perfect they are not perfect how can we benefit each other without making my life miserable?

Better to say You Can Do It than who the hell is cutting my support line?

Potential for not in the same reality, possible Matrix like worlds where they can’t find me and I can’t find them, appearance of on same layer does not always equal on same layer

Potential for society abused them, potential for society falling into itself in non ideal ways at times, multiple organizations required to deliver that effect each others inputs in non ideal ways because resolution is limited?

Easier to hypothesize about what has been trained than to know what has been trained, not knowing what has been trained does not lead to ideal feedback for what could add higher value and what could add lower value

The idea that actions could lead to or not lead to a certain level of deaths all over Shiny Blue Marble is a bit daunting, if one person died every 10 minutes? Not the real number not sure the real number would give accurate results, given the hypothetical number that would be 144 deaths per day, 52,560 Deaths per year?

Number says 183671

https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/deaths-per-day

183671 Deaths / 365 Days = 504 Dead at the end of each day

504 / 24 Hours = 21 Dead / Hour

21 Dead / 60 minutes = 0.35 deaths every minute

3 minutes times 0.35 = 1.05 deaths

3 minutes equals one song

At the end of each song played 1 person is dead, kind of a sad discouraging statistic

At the end of each song play 8 billion people are alive, more encouraging

A certain number of the deaths can be prevented, how many? Only God knows

The idea I can stop all 504 deaths seems unwise, the idea that all 504 deaths aren’t a blessing seems unwise, the idea that all 504 deaths are a blessing seems unwise

How many could I actually stop vs theoretically stop? What choices could I make differently that makes a greater impact? If I enabled better choices would that always lead to same people living longer? Trading some people’s future or others, a bit of that in the mix

9 people saved 10 years from now and 1 person lost if I change courses right now, the course change might be correct does not equal the 1 lost is not a problem

The idea we can’t save all 10 doesn’t sit well, the idea 10 equals the 11th and 12th are protected doesn’t sit well

Impact expected to be perfect will be less, trying to save the 1 might lead to only 3 of the 9 saved

Factoring in Prioritization takes time, less prioritization means more time possibly to save the 10th, saved the 10th one time doesn’t equal can save the 10th all the time, expectation of 9 happy with 10th better

Expectation of perfection leads to less chance for perfection, perfection delivered can lead to non ideal respect for perfection might not always be delivered

Knowing when to course correct not always simple, don’t add deaths to the toll seems obvious, deaths can be added in non ideal ways through enabling support out, projections not always simple

Teaching everyone to be a bit of a defense attorney for Grace, Not All Value Out, easy to want to blame, harder to try and factor actions against us due to non ideal training in graceful way (more training for enemy to friend)

Big part of the problem is people think things are always logical, better to say something are logical, starting points are not always logical, paths derived from illogical starting points can be logical for a time

Teaching people to add then teaching people things don’t always add up in ideal ways not as simple

May God Bless and Protect all people at the Texas Border, Better Not Perfect does not always stay Better Not Perfect Long

Not enabling water bottle support in Dallas makes me question if water bottles are enabled there

September 1st, 2022 Pt 3

Gem of the Day Belief in Product can Inspire Better Product

Ominous Suspense that rips the floor out from under you then serves you an Amazing Cake?

Past Amazing Content can be a Throughput Limiter? Deliver Trustworthy Reliable to the point of No Updates required might lead to belief will always function without need for Maintenance, Shiny Blue Marble does not equal Space, Cybersecurity Problems do apply

Never Trust Always Verify, Don’t Trust Cronkite by Default?

Inspired Storyteller might lead to not believed, Moderated Balanced Storyteller might rob blind

Free Starter Image

Cronkite like salesman that leaves you in Jail for 20 years possible? And that’s how it landed

Building Bridges, what can Engineering Teach us about Communications? An Introduction is like building a Bridge, Conversation Starters never Started?

Conversations have a bit of Activation Energy, the better enabled not all value out, able to start conversation can lead to support in at critical times

Expectation Adultery can’t happen is Not All Value Added, Expectation Adultery is always judged fairly is Not All Value Added, Expectation Non Adultery can’t be Upsold to Adultery is Not All Value Added

Expectations factor into decision making, Non Ideal Expectations built on People that are Not Perfect is Not All Value Added

Rings can be be painted on pictures, Some people kill for adultery, Not investing in mitigation and gauged Expectation for That Unwise

System likes to If rings and misuse data consistency by default, I would not base life or death choices on that, grace or lack of grace can be resupplied to own supply lines, plan to kill an adulterer might be loading the gun that will be used to kill you

Someone talking with another company upsold to adulterous possible? Similar Not Exact Systems are useful for Art and Contrast, Not All People Fully Appreciate the Power

God of protects from adultery situations that create adultery seems unwise, limiting freedom and movement, choices that lead to feeling of oppression unwise, adultery as a bit of a given seems about the norm

People aren’t perfect just let another guy take your wife home from a bar? A bit of implied expectation in that kind of stuff

People aren’t perfect prevent your wife from going out? Smothered likely to lead to amplified want to get out

Balance possible, Balance seen as perfect likely to lead to woe, build thought processes dependent on knowns or unknowns?

If Adultery is just a part of life, life can be planned around that

If Adultery is considered as a grave wrong it can be used as a tool to hurt people, and people have a tendency to hurt the ones they love

Setting a line in the sand is not always value added, Adultery + Old Testament + False Allegation leads to rock to the head? Hit by that Momentum they stay down

Amplifying the Idea People can have relationships without potential for Adultery without making Concessions to Freedom seems unwise at best criminally negligently prone to High Potential for Woe, Potential to start Hellenistic Style Wars at Worst

People are Not Perfect, Freedom leads to Non Ideal Probabilities, Not Enough Freedom leads to Non Ideal Probabilities

Lord of War Movie talks about lies and relationships, a lot of wisdom in some of the dialogue

“since that is where they end up anyways it is a logical place to start” – Lord of War, Nicholas Cage

Rehearsed Like Clockwork, Trust even the unquestionable?

Ultron with Direct Sensory Input?

The world makes systems some profit from and some do not, Just part of the Logic

Logic Systems allowed to Exist that profit some while leaving some to die on the streets? Are the Logic Systems accelerating the problem on the streets or limiting them? Up to debate is part of the problem

Requirement to Win can be turned up in Non Ideal Fashion

If I don’t turn off Supercomputer X it will lead to Nazi Propaganda distributed, but I don’t know what Supercomputer X is and likely a lot of possibility to be upsold to Supercomputer X

Label as, Contrast that leads to support out can be and is more powerful than truth at times, 100 days of Math Lessons or one Subconscious Reminder Jason and Gingers are not always value added?

Attached to the Contrast is not all value in, Imagine my family worked for MSI, if my family was threatened would I say be nice to the puppy dragon, or would I give people a perfect reminder China Taiwan is not to be fucked with

Attached to the Contrast is not all value in, Imagine my family was a Ginger named Jason, if my family was threatened would I say be nice to the Buake, or would I give people a perfect reminder Hockey Players keep their blades razor sharp

People don’t fully appreciate the Tempt in having the contrast close at hand, specially in times of trouble

Life valued too highly is Not All Value Added

Grace Not Protected Leads to Limited Out of the Gate

People go missing Jason got them or “Jason” “got them”

Meaningful Unforgettable thought not to factor into decision making would be unwise

Red Wedding Game of Thrones -> Awful Memorable

“Want to see a scary movie” -> Scream, Awful Memorable

“Think fast hot shot” – Speed, Awful Memorable

“Want to see a magic trick?” – Joker Dark Knight, Awful Memorable

Ultron, fully appreciated probably a lot scarier than we can fully appreciate

Evil version of Cable that is in all the Networks ready to utilize our entire past history derived from surveillance data against us?

Just a Woodchipper/Furnace that controls our Google Maps? No Big Deal?

AB Test, just limit half the population? Thanos learned a few things?

Treating Humans right, Comfort does not always lead to best results, refined by computers and supercomputers?

Ability to change the future by just painting a little band of gold on, a little band of gold painted on and the paycheck is ours systems?

Absolute knowledge of what pushes peoples buttons?

Training the Anger Management system seen to always value in?

Double investment in Anger Management for the World, too many tests not always value in, too few tests not always value in

Given Ultron like systems in the World I need a God that Delivers Faster

Bugs in System Exist, Cybersecurity Problems can be part of those bugs

The Combination has a property

Memorable Awful has a Property, Useful for Teaching Lessons? A lesson that people invest in Memorable Awful

Smell of Urine or Bloody Iron equals ideal support for future?

FBI has family, System non ideally limits support for part of society

Fundamental property that a Parents choice in Career has potential to limit family in Non Ideal Ways

Not investing in FBI could lead to Family never making it to later in life

Investing in FBI could lead to potential for blood on your hands contrast turned up by disenfranchised under supported reduced support case individuals

Forced into Cop or No Cop, Military or No Military Not All Value Added

Part of Problem or Part of Solution, belief people are always on the same side of that is unrealistic and criminally negligent

Thoughts of The Vulture Brooklyn 99

Taught has to Mitigate Risk at Martin Luther King Jr. level or has potential to lose Freedom or even Life is all value added to more trust for the system long term?

Forcing everyone to be lawyers is not all value added for less cases in by design

Make everyone a cop? 8 billion cops and no work?

New Diaper and a Badge just for being added to Shiny Blue Marbles Team?

How many cops have shown up at your door teaching math lessons? Let the Security and Exchange Commission add value without actually adding value?

Maybe set the Security and Exchange Commission to fixing the National Debt? A government that wants to establish numbers matter, needs to invest in that first?

Leadership leads by example set to Null In By Design?

Leadership I believed in you then you turned off my SSI and Support before Christmas

Hard to believe Leadership will make it right, important to hold out hope

September 1st, 2022 Pt 2

Free Starter Image

Joke and Improv as if your Water Bottles were Disabled In By Government Design?

The Respect the World Gives to Former Inmates

Turns up Bad Contrast, Limits Studio and Truth In By Design is Useful to Delivering Products

Then the product is Rapid Prototyped for the Masses

Thus Rapid Prototyping Impeachment could be high value in, might lead to some dying due to losses due to processing time

People necessary does not equal training always required

A man with a gun that saves the day that doesn’t know how to add can be higher value in than all the additions in the world

Able to add that part is no longer in the picture is not always value added, smarter can lead to more non ideals of not trusting God, more non ideals of thinking that just because we can add we will add right

Things can up, many times they do add up, can lead people to think things always add up, Life is Not Always Logical Doesn’t have to factor into decision making, Support given can lead to not full Appreciation for Fact Support is Not Always Given

The logic and support out can be great enough to turn off water. Water is not always optimal support for decisions around Impeachment vs No Impeachment. Corruption has potential to win based on the support out it creates.

As if the Dragon needed an extra snack

Future and Peacemaking built on Fear is Not All Value in for Future of Peace, other tools like Funny and Cute can go a long way

Support Out Turned Up After Jail, like an extra nail in the Coffin where I am slowing being lowered into the ground

Country of Delivers a little less than ideal Teeth In By Design

Could deliver does not equal has delivered

Free Starter Image
Free Starter Image

2 Days before I stopped getting my SSI Checks

Potential for system dragging me around on a string dependent on Support Out systems, getting a little more than annoying

Bunnies can’t have baseball bats, and Puppies can’t have monocles

The third joke becomes less funny, worth remembering

2 of the Same type of Joke Reinforcing Humorous, 3 of the same type of joke over played potential at least for me

Kittens can’t wear Suits

Free Starter Image

Loses its funniness, presenting Tigger with Bunny ears as some common 3rd act?

Bad jokes can lead to better jokes, not always fully comprehended, redundant leads to curveballs, curveballs are interesting

But he’s not funny, Not Funny Yet…. Iffy Reality Based on Comfort is Useful thought to have no potential for inconsistencies would be unwise

Contrast and Proximity

Military as Hero, Military as Invaders with AK-47s

Cops, Authority, FBI as healer of communities, or system that nickel and dimes people into lengthy time wasting prison terms

Contrast is useful dependent on the position your in

Generating support out that leads to increased contrast is not all support in, and theoretically is not all support out

Cops set to Mob, Ku Klux, Cocaine dealers is possible, does not equal it is true, iffing the line not all value in specially if the person is actually involved with those

Too close to home can magnify the corrupt individuals in non ideal ways for the corrupt individuals

Thus iffing the line can be seen as useful, smart criminals unlikely to buy in, high potential for making the system uncomfortable based upon the test in non ideal ways that can lead to non ideal support out

People in society exist that are likely to make the contrast algorithm, not consider hypotheticals around that and still consider free speech true?

Freedom of Speech is useful until it turns into Nazi style propaganda that can lead to Non Ideal Leadership that gets people killed

Narrative Control and Story is good, Narrative Control and Story is good until it leads to Leadership that has the potential to destroy the Future for the country

Hitler as a figure head turned up by Satan? Satan does like drugs and strings

Take away healing capacity from Leadership, put enough bad influences around them, the person is no longer actually in charge

A dragon with a pile of dead bodies on strings by a leveraged public? Buy in without buyout potential? Lighting warfare leads to several losses that possibly made the German people re-think initial investment? Initial investment they might not have been that pro on in the first place

Until Leadership is stuck in an underground bunker with a cyanide pill?

Peace and Less Imperialism might be better for peoples skin, 1st to 3rd degree burns likely not highest value in for a healthy glow

Trying to be support in leads to less hot as support in?

Too close to home is not always light and breezy

Quality Choices or Volume of Quality Choices, Less Volume of Choices is Not Always a Quality Choice

Sounding Passionate Inspired Energetic to a simple system?

Sell the message like it is from No Industrial Revolution to Man has Fire for first Time?

September 1, 2022

Pretty cool future projection, Interested to see what this one brings

Need a text file of the dictionary with ability to show all 2 letter words, 3 letter words, 4 letter words, 5 letter words…. a Program for that could be high value in

Alliteration Sally Sells Seashells at the Sea Shore

Lest Pest Nest Rest Fest Potential for Dissonance when things don’t rhyme, Resonance when on time?

The man was walking through the brilliant woods, light shown from the tree tops, as though there was more going wrong, sounding almost as if a gong?

Candence on different beats?

Delay height fly high?
Belay bright ply nigh?

The height was one

Worth bright for more

Cave tight difficult to explore

Have right required to adore?

August 31st, 2022 Pt 1

Running with Glasses and Scissors is Dangerous, Glasses in Tripping Distance is Dangerous, Cords like speaker wire that can cause people to trip near Glasses potential for Non Ideal Trips

More Organization Not All Value out for Safety More Preparation for Problems that do arise, lagged Risk Mitigation is Not All Value In for More Risk Mitigation

I Repudiate the idea of Not Taking a Walk

Non Eximplary Repudification Not Fully Appreciated

Right as I said that giant colossal magnificaent clouds of black and grey circled above head like vultures full for broken purple glass

Legalism and Silence, the two can go hand in hand

Lawyers held responsible for how hard they make speaking freely?

potential for safety throughput out not fully pondered?

Reduction in Volume of Words enabled by Risk Mitigation Boring Mitigation is Not All Risk Mitigation In Boring Out

To make people appreciate why Flex in the system is important, make every word they speak like a landmine?

Tendency towards Flex added Not Fully Appreciated

Right for the Moment does not equal Right Long Term, a Golden Gem Not fully Appreciated

Contrast useful for effecting the future in meaningful ways is and has not always been perfected

Move to the future and people call into question the original projection, but the current future might not exist in the same way without the original projection

Projection that something 90% will happen it is 100% likely for good or bad that projection will have had an effect on the future, regardless of whether the number in the original projection was real or true value in

Rewiring the future based on projections that might not have been made is purely hypothetical

Bad projections change the future, Contrast based fear projections change the future, sometimes for better, sometimes for worse, all of the time likely not fully able to extract system from gray -> profits some and profits others less

There is incentive to limit future projections and there is incentive to have a hand in future projections, people left out of the bargaining room not all value in for their future or ours

God makes the rain, no reason to be involved in decision making process?