Time before a city gets upsold to that was ideally how reality would play out.
Time before a supercomputer has its switch turned on gets upsold to that was ideally how reality would play out.
Shiny Blue Marble in the Past likely said Lightning is in the sky, it is not able to be captured and put in a glass jar
A supercomputer, A new supercomputer likely to be turned on in 2040? Yes
More likely Now that I said that? Yes
World before that Supercomputer in 2040 existed, World after that Supercomputer likely to be new and changed in Profound ways I cannot currently fully comprehend. I believe it is likely to rely upon electricity, thus I provide starting preparation to help with the Power Efficiency of that 2040 Supercomputer.
Little changes upfront? Documentable? Power in that
160 years of Civil Rights has failed to Amplify Ideally for Diversity and Minorities in the South of United States of America? Yes. A many year head start for that supercomputer could be a lot of help? Yes
Resistance over distance has potential for Energy Loss
Interesting Increasing Resistance can lead to lower Current, if Current is kept constant, then Increased Resistance would likely increase heat
What variables are held constant in the system factors into perceptions of increases. Point of Reference not something always considered in Electrical Circuits?
P=I^2*R
thus if current through a 1 kiloohms wire leads to a specific power loss
P=I^2 * 1 kiloohms = I^2 kilohms
if I set the current to constant, say 1 kiloamp
P = 1 kiloamp squared kiloohms = 1 (some-prefix)watt
if I were to double the resistance to 2 kiloohms
Power Throughput would be?
P = 2 kiloamp squared kiloohms = 2 (some-prefix) watt
1000 AMP * 1000 Ohms = 1,000,000 Watts = 1 MW
So if I had wire that over a distance 5 kilometers created 1 kiloohm, doubling the distance of that wire 10 kilometers could lead to double the power loss if I kept current constant
Same power with double the resistance?
P=I^2 P=I^2*2
i^2=2(i^2)
0 = 2i^2-i^2 = i^2
i^2 = 0, i = 0? must have something wrong
current doesn’t maintain a constant value between those two equations
P=i1^2*(1 kOhm) P=i2^2*(2 kOhm)
Set power to 1,000,000 W, 1 MW
1,000,000= i1^2
1,000,000 = 2i2^2
500,000 = i2^2
i2 = sqrt(500,000) = 707.12 A
i1 = sqrt(1,000,000) = 1000 A
i1 = 1 kA i2 with double length of wire = 707.12 A
Voltage1 vs Voltage2?
P = VI
1 MW held constant
1 MW = V1*1 kiloamps
V1 = 1,000,000 W / 1000 A = 1000V = 1 kV
1 MW= V2*707.12 A
1 MW= V2*0.70712 kiloamps
V2 = 1,000,000 W / 707.12 A = 1414.19 V = 1.4 kV
Keeping Power constant increased resistance equals less amps
Less amps at same Power Output Requires Higher Voltages
Greater volts required for delivering same power over a longer distance assuming resistance per foot of wire remains constant
Using the numbers from this example (that are not real) distance of 5 kilometers equals 1 kV will deliver 1 megawatt. Increasing distance to 10 kilometers (double the distance) will require 1.4 kV to deliver the same 1 megawatt.
Proximity factors into Power Efficiency.
Keep 1 kV constant then doubling length of wire?
P = VI = i2 kV
P = i2^2 * (2 kiloohms)
i2 kV = i2^2 * (2 kiloohms)
1 kV / 2 kiloohms = (i2*i2)/i2
i2 = 1000 V / 2000 Ohms = 0.5 kA
P2 at 1000V constant would be = 1 kv(0.5kA) = 1000 V*500A = 500,000 A = 0.5 MW
Potential for resistive properties to act in different ways dependent on current temperature and state?
Does a wire have more resistance on a wire close to absolute zero or close to melting point of the wire?
Oscilloscope Output with a Torch Under the wire on a circuit?
Pessoas com apoio concentrado em vez de julgar umas às outras têm maior potencial de levar a menos situações de vitimização e pessoas julgando menos umas às outras?
Oamenii de sprijin concentrat asupra judecării unii pe alții au un potențial mai mare de a duce la mai puține situații de victimizare și oamenii care se judecă unii pe alții mai puțin?
Људи за концентрисану подршку у погледу осуђивања једни других имају већи потенцијал да доведу до мањег броја ситуација виктимизације и људи који мање осуђују једни друге?
Watu wa kuungwa mkono kwa umakini juu ya kuhukumu kila mmoja wao ana uwezo mkubwa zaidi wa kusababisha hali chache za unyanyasaji na watu kuhukumiana kidogo?
Människor till koncentrerat stöd framför att döma varandra har större potential att leda till färre fall av offer och att människor dömer varandra mindre?
लोगों द्वारा एक-दूसरे के बारे में राय बनाने पर एकाग्र समर्थन देने से पीड़ित होने की स्थिति कम होने की संभावना अधिक होती है और लोग एक-दूसरे को कम आंकते हैं?
לאנשים לתמיכה מרוכזת על פני שיפוט אחד את השני יש פוטנציאל גבוה יותר להוביל לפחות מצבים של קורבנות ואנשים שופטים זה את זה פחות?
Οι άνθρωποι που λαμβάνουν συγκεντρωμένη υποστήριξη για να κρίνουν ο ένας τον άλλον έχουν μεγαλύτερες δυνατότητες να οδηγήσουν σε λιγότερες καταστάσεις θυματοποίησης και οι άνθρωποι να κρίνουν ο ένας τον άλλον λιγότερο;
Menschen, die sich konzentriert unterstützen, wenn sie sich gegenseitig verurteilen, haben ein höheres Potenzial, zu weniger Situationen der Viktimisierung zu führen und Menschen, die sich weniger verurteilen?
Mennesker til konsentrert støtte fremfor å dømme hverandre har høyere potensiale for å føre til mindre situasjoner med offer og folk som dømmer hverandre mindre?
Le persone che concentrano il supporto sul giudicarsi a vicenda hanno un potenziale maggiore di portare a meno situazioni di vittimizzazione e le persone si giudicano meno?
Ihmisillä, jotka saavat keskitettyä tukea toistensa tuomitsemisessa, on suurempi mahdollisuus johtaa vähemmän uhritilanteisiin ja vähemmän toistensa tuomitsemiseen?
Les gens qui se soutiennent davantage que de se juger les uns les autres ont un potentiel plus élevé de conduire à moins de situations de victimisation et les gens se jugent moins les uns les autres ?
Mọi người tập trung ủng hộ hơn là phán xét lẫn nhau có khả năng dẫn đến ít tình huống trở thành nạn nhân hơn và mọi người ít phán xét lẫn nhau hơn?
Чи концентрована підтримка людей, а не засудження один одного має вищий потенціал для того, щоб призвести до меншої кількості ситуацій віктимізації, а люди менше засуджують один одного?
Ludzie, którzy mają skoncentrowane wsparcie na osądzaniu się nawzajem, mają większy potencjał doprowadzenia do mniejszej liczby sytuacji wiktymizacji, a ludzie mniej osądzają się nawzajem?
¿Las personas que concentran su apoyo en lugar de juzgarse entre sí tienen un mayor potencial para conducir a menos situaciones de victimización y que las personas se juzguen menos entre sí?
Jalma-jalma pikeun konséntrasi ngadukung pikeun saling nangtoskeun gaduh poténsi anu langkung luhur pikeun nyababkeun kaayaan anu kirang korban sareng jalma-jalma anu nangtoskeun kirang?
Люди, которые сосредоточены на поддержке, а не осуждают друг друга, имеют более высокий потенциал для того, чтобы привести к меньшему количеству ситуаций виктимизации, и люди меньше осуждают друг друга?
Moun ki konsantre sou sipò yo jije youn lòt gen pi gwo potansyèl pou mennen nan mwens sitiyasyon nan viktimizasyon ak moun ki jije youn lòt mwens?
서로를 판단하는 것보다 집중적으로 지원하는 사람들은 피해 상황이 줄어들고 사람들이 서로를 덜 판단하게 될 가능성이 더 높습니다.
People to concentrated support over judging each other has higher potential for leading to less situations of victimization and people judging each other less?
Events, a single scene is limited. Number of scenes required for a Short Story? Short Story need be an entire Hero’s Journey to be meaningful?
Men and Cats have something in common, they are both amplifiers of each others support but less than ideal amplifiers
A few strokes of Free Design followed by Fixed design in a Short Story?
As if the Budget was in Time Dollars?
Invest more likely to get more, though this Reality does not Amp Ideally
Cup of Water will In No Way Lose Their Reward. Love is Greater than Many Sins
Small Contributions Respected with Never Say Die Encouragement
People to meaningful contributions without biting off too much to chew that can lead to both non ideal reliance and losses to support?
8 Billions People with knowledge of How to Add Directional Support for the person with the least help on Earth?
Focused Laser of Support couldn’t amplify greater support for World based on weakest link?
People to concentrated support over judging each other has higher potential for leading to less situations of victimization and people judging each other less?
Unexpected can be Interesting, Less Expectation as Mathematical Systems?
Foreshadowing what a Summary of the Short Story Might look like?
Authors that can project the Key Details about story likely to be taken away have higher potential for delivering those Details in an Effective Manner
If man could think 20 times as fast, but all men could think 20 times as fast, how would that change things?
More is Not All More In
20x is not 40x, 40x is not 80x, 80x is not 160x
Future likely brings more potential than we have right now
2023 to 2033 Power in Thought? 10 year of Gains Empowered with Worldwide Supercomputers can be a lot of Power, a lot of Power that is not all 2043 Power in.
Always concentrated on Throughput gains unlikely to lead to ideal appreciation for fact life is short, not always lived
People that spend 100% of their time improving Throughput gains for the World that don’t live always likely to create larger gains than those out living life, critical thinking inspired by a World full of Phenomena?
If a man didn’t invest in greater throughput gains might the world have wound up with less? Yes. If a man didn’t invest in more than throughput gains might the world have wound up with less? Yes.
People put undue burden on themselves to make gains in a system that does not always amp truth. Gains are valuable, without Hubris those Gains couldn’t have been better if support was delivered in other directions, set to given? Gains are value added, required to be sold like fountain of youth to get funding is not all truth amplified.
Sales, perceived as potentially more valuable than reality is in by design.
If I sell ProductA which has a certain amount of support amplification
ProductA = 1 water bottle
or ProductA = 10 water bottles
Both add support, both have potential for being support amplification in different ways, light and head starts matter, did I need 10 water bottles or did I need 1? Did I need 2 water bottles and survived on 1 to help others? Did I need 2 water bottles and give 8 water bottles away to save others?
Money can be spent on Water Bottles. Support is more than Water Bottles, thus purchase of water bottles might be limiting support in other directions.
People without access to resources huddled next to a giant pack of water bottles in a blizzard?
Support is More than Water, Support requires Water too.
Life is More than just Water and Shelter. Bread and water.
Nsdtp! – Never Say Die Throughput!
Not all reminders out that people need Toilet Paper too
People don’t always have ideal visibility to what increases and what reduces support
3 Important Details that Reinforce a Theme that are Memorable over a Short Story can be Powerful
Powerful Wisdom, Stored Away, so nobody else can get to it breaks?
5 deadbolts is less than ideal pots of wisdom protected?
Lets think about this for a bit
ChangeA = Civil War and Abolition of Slavery ChangeB = Martin Luther King Jr. I Have A Dream Speech
ChangeA+ChangeB = ResultA
ResultB = system that doesn’t protect Diversity, and is known to not amp ideally for Minority or Majority
ResultA is Expected, ResultB is the result after 160 years.
ResultB does not lead to feeling of World will get their act together, that less protectionism is a wise choice. Protectionism amped has consequences. Legalism amped has consequences.
Supercomputers are going to fix instantly what man, including man with supercomputers has been unable to fix for 160 years?
Knowledge of likely to fix, cost to fix factors into cycles allotted for use.
Defense Law as after thought or built in by design?
It amps insufficiently in ways that hurts.
It amps insufficiently in ways that hurts ability to rely upon logic.
It amps insufficiently in ways that hurts ability to rely on less legalism, which factors into throughput.
It amps insufficiently in ways that hurts capitalism and ability to depend on hard work as value creation system.
It amps insufficiently in ways that limits clock cycles and future progress in Real Ways. Documentable, Distinguishable losses that factor into reduced output and throughput. Output and Throughput claimed to be of concern to computer systems.
Trust a system that claims to be invested in Throughput gains, yet is not actually invested in those Throughput gains?
A system less filled with hate an rage at unfair more or less likely to amp data consistency?
Increased Sleep and Constant Consistent Robbed Resources
Current Experience set to a Trust Engine, set to desires to Generate Trust does not give feeling of True
God of this reality does not seem to resonate of Christian God. Words, access to words and information of others gives feeling of limited, reduced.
Potential for people close to end of life feeling like a Ghost, excessive sleep, less potential in waking
Factors into Hope, far less than ideally encouraging, this reality itself gives experience of Bad Deal
A machine where words on the keyboard are allowed but helping is not?
God keeps alive for a time?
For a time believed without actual comprehension of time
Physics works this way or that way dependent upon not all ideal sensors
This reality gives sufficient comprehension for guilt vs not guilt? No
Mitigating factors are limited
Comprehension of mitigating factors are limited
That factors into support
Which is thus non ideally limited
Comprehension gets upsold to sufficient is not a fully appreciated system
A system where actions and justice is more like a ball of miscommunication than actually delivers feeling of right to decide on this or that. No ability to decide does not equal wrongs are not real. Perceived as responsible gives less than ideal feeling of justice, nobody to be responsible does not give ideal feeling of justice.
System amps less than truth and that makes Justice unlikely, does not stop Victimization, and that factors into Support that has the ability to generate more Justice Unlikely Victimization far from impossible.
Limited Comprehension factors into perception of Justice and perception of Right vs Wrong and that factors into Non Ideal Support for Future that is Limited at best and is likely to Amplify Limited Comprehension.
System tries to amp decide, amp perception of justice in way that leads to anger when really that is insufficient support, comprehension for knowledge need to judge.
People’s reality and sensor gives less than sufficient information needed for adequate use of Judging, adequate installation of Justice.
Thoughts around Don’t Judge
Perception and Comprehension is far less sufficient for Judging
The word Judge itself is a bit of a complicating factor, linguistics that are less than ideal factor into viewed as judgment vs a choice
Deferred judgment and choice is a value creation system that amps less than ideally, clouds in the sky might not be judged as rain does not equal people that see those clouds are always likely to go outside, good days get upsold to less? likely
Precedent is set less than ideal, Categorize and Classify is useful to enable Throughput in ways that are for convenience proximity over fair
Is capitalism Broken? Under the eyes of Don’t Judge?
to act as a judge; pass judgment:No one would judge between us.
to form an opinion or estimate:I have heard the evidence and will judge accordingly.
to make a mental judgment.
Communication and Context around the Word Judge can be iffed
PhraseA = The judge PhraseB = was the wrong choice to make PhraseC = was in charge of the decision PhraseA+PhraseB vs PhraseA+PhraseC?
He judges them -> He, judges them -> Writers never speak in odd syntaxes?
People are required to rely upon a system of Language, Dictionary, and Thesauruses that have less than ideal Throughput.
Formatting and Editing requires work and people are less than ideal printing presses.
Judge as a bit of a vague vs vivid verb?
Vague verb spoke. He spoke “Be silent”
vs vivid verbs, shouted, joked, whispered
Generalizing less vivid language can factor into non ideal judgment, verbs that cut less than ideally precisely and accurately. Adverbs exist for a reason.
Able to communicate effectively set to valued in this reality potentially not true value added. This reality seen as more than has a particular jaded slant that is not open to discussion potentially not true value added.
Potential for we want to hear what you say said but not close to ideally meant? More likely we want you to think we care about what you think while we want you to actually get off stage?
Interpretations of Reality that are outside our own are not always fully appreciated or even perceived and comprehended by all people.
More conversation complicates things and is not always fully appreciated leads to early divests that could save lives?
Potential for web filters built into browsers that change words like “a” to “as”, “too” to “to” to “two”. Less than ideally consistent Throughput factors into support in ways that has potential to lead to death.
There is enough problems in the system, there is enough decisions upsold to convenience and proximity are useful for enabling Throughput to have grace in this system.
Society as a Throughput enabler? Cars have potential for deaths added that might not otherwise exist. That probability might be only 1% of population does not equal %1 accounts for all the other systems in combination with that. Might be better to look at the system like 15% probability of leading to death in non ideal ways.
15% is a level, perceivable level of Contrast that is of Greater use for Comprehension. Factors into choices, what choices are seen as valuable.
Knowing you won’t get out of this life alive long term and a system that enables non ideal probabilities by 1% in one direction does not equal 0% or 100% in other directions. Rare case knowledge can factor into useful as perceived as can get away with a crime. Perceived as can get away with does not equal can get away with, does not always equal crime less committed.
People have a 1% chance of dying from car crash but system shows 5% in one area? Just needs more funding for salt for the roads? A system that is corrupt or just has factors that need to be factored in that can’t be fully comprehended?
Deferred judgment useful, yet inadequate for should I tell others to go spend time in the same town?
Deferred Judgment is useful, less than ideal, and can factor into less support in real ways that causes problems. Potential for messy when we are human and imperfect not fully comprehended? Even if we do get involved in certain cases we might not have the support and throughput to deliver in real way, then what? Buy in without further invest is not always appreciated by the world.
If I support CountryA, then I die early. Family now expected to support CountryA? We make choices that we think will affect the World in More Ideal Lights yet we attach others to requirements non ideally via proximity?
I want CountryA to go unsupported? No. I think it is fair I make the decisions for all the people surrounding me, leverage them to required to provide for CountryA? No.
People are limited supported. Claimed as known, when this world is monstrous at times, is not true value in.
If I am a Part of CountryA and I am getting good support I have reason to want more from supporting parties does not equal it is fair for me to demand it of them.
CountryA = country that depends on USA Support CountryA = USA CountryA = Country that supports USA that relies upon CountryB’s support
Feels good to be needed equals USA borrows more at personal expense to help CountryA. USA becomes CountryA. Feels good to be needed equals countries that support USA borrows more at personal expense to help USA?
The chain of support seems intertwined heavily and far less than ideal for sustainability long term.
The economics obfuscate in ways that limit support in real ways? That give oxygen to greed and max profit systems? Yes
Greed and Regret can be iffed in not fully appreciated ways
Negate Comprehension is Sufficient value for Judgment, Comprehension known is not always Inspiring, Enjoyable Life Amplifying.
Knowing why someone made the wrong choice always an ideal amplifier of joy?
Better Comprehension is Not Ideal Comprehension, and Better Comprehension can be less Joy
From 2+2=(3,5) to 2+2 = (3.9, 4.1)
Where (3,5) might be light and lift, and (3.9, 4.1) might be drink yourself into a coma bad. Where 4 might be the brightest light at the end of the tunnel.
Closer proximity that is less than a true answer might give a darker feeling than limiting comprehension vastly initially? The pursuit of that 0.1 swing to the real value could be years of lost time. Yet not pursuing upselling to not the wisest path could enable many 2+2=4s in other directions in life.
Further Comprehension is Dynamic, 2+2=4 today can lead to 2+2=(3.9,4.1) tomorrow, the knowledge of had things settled to now need to check that is not always an ideal amplifier.
Man’s joy dependent on ideal comprehension is a time sink with potential for misery served until the time of death.
We like to think our ability to perceive and comprehend reality increases over time, yet sensors get harder to read, memory has the potential for amplifying less than ideal via distance from an event over time.
Need an Answer on Anything as Requirement for Walking forward in time is unwise
Front View Focus Matters. People on the road thinking about how they could have chosen this or that better in the past? Regret does not ideally enable future support and safety.
Life is a Limited Memory Limited Comprehension System that turns up Obfuscation on the common that requires one foot in front of the next and faith that fire and destruction won’t rain on the individual by default.
Children Walking should ideally be able to live without Bombs dropping overhead. Many cases Children can walk without having to worry about landmines. Many cases Children can walk without having to worry about beartraps.
A World that limits able to rely upon that to 100% is not all long term value amped.
There is some peace in death, less attached to a world that enables land mines that might rob children of hope and dreams.
Less Pain can be Inspired, far from a given in this world.
New Words are added, syntax and grammar is improved over time.
Language is Dynamic that gets upsold to static.
Man writes with pen and paper is enabled over those with less access to pen and paper.
A type writer, a printing press, all are originally enabled with?
Hands on a keyboard conjure words, conjure meaning while some sit in corrupt Jails, control a language without disabling oppression and call it a fair, just system?
Economics factors into words available, time practiced. Forced to rely upon a system that is not enabled with fair and just throughput to Proclaim a God that has the ability to affect reality in more ideal ways, yet chooses not to.
We like to upsell this reality to potentially more than it is.
We see a table in a room on one day, and we see it on the next day. We then decide matter cannot be created nor destroyed. We decide our perception is sufficiently originally established, sufficiently established for the long term.
Matter cannot be created or destroyed is a useful system that can many times be relied upon. Many times relied upon is not always an ideal amplifier. 95% of the time equals sufficient value to establish as 100%?
It is useful to say I have a table, I leave it in a room for 365 days and see it every day thus the table has not moved, could not have been easily changed over time. Repetitions have the ability to reinforce a non ideal perception that our eyes and ears, those things we perceive are ideal representations of reality.
Matter might not be able to be created or destroyed in some Universes? True. Eyes and Ears that perceive the reality of that previous statement are less than ideal at times? Yes
We see the sun every day, and we say ball in the sky will provide light at this time and then will go away for a time (night) and then show back up again. We can set our watch to it, repetitions reinforce beat into our brain, brainwash us into believing that is the way it is.
Then there is an eclipse, known possible set to given?
Never see the Sun get blotted out then one day half the town is blind? Potential for upsells to Witch.
Science doesn’t work that way perceived not comprehended systems?
First time you see an object float from an electromagnet?
Bluetooth Speakers hidden in walls?
Electromagnets in a cape turned on at a right moment via a switch leads to a ground full of dramatic iron filings following the wearer?
Similar to a Jacob’s Ladder
Reality of far less than ideal perceivers and comprehenders factors into future freedom and hope?
Reality can be iffed on the fly, might not have been true before supercomputers does not equal supercomputers haven’t changed reality like the industrial revolution, or like from no electricity to electricity.
New Power that can’t be fully Comprehended has to be factored in, like the state of maintenance of all cars on the road
What language is has changed, who can profit from it in more ideal ways, has changed
Capitalism a possible valid model with less knowns might not function ideally in an exascale computing world
Yes
31 Trillion Debt worth of Broken Liabilities that have the potential to act like glaciers when we need ready available drinking water, ice not all liquid throughput, not all liquidity amped
Sad thing about all this?
I know reality and comprehension can be iffed for just about anyone. Desire to amplify real value in a system where most can’t actually perceive real value?
We all are required to rely upon data consistency from day to day. We work 6 months on blue prints to work on a building yet we expect those blue prints to not be modified in dangerous ways?
Blueprints and Long Pieces of Important Data might not be ideally protected in current system? Yes
Expectation of data consistency can lead to reliance that expectation is useful sound. The blue prints half to be consistent, can’t change when delivered via email. Yet that is not the truth. Architecting a building requires faith and the current system of 31 Trillion Debt and Negate Infrastructure Maintenance spending does not inspire faith that adequate resources and time will go into those blue prints, let alone protecting and verifying the data security of those blue prints.
Invest in Engineering when reality adds 500 lbs to backpack?
Upsells to have potential to fix are limited non ideally.
Combine in neural links, oppressive governments, engineering has potential to be a liability in 2023.
Reality can be iffed, like no morphing walls to morphing walls, from matter can’t be created to matter can be conjured. Miracles in a system where eyes and ears, visual and auditory cortexes could be connected to supercomputers is not a fully comprehendible system.
Reality feels real therefore it is real, reality feels real because it is reinforced as real is less than ideal value established at least for my own personal comprehension. I can see this does not equal all can, and others that can rely upon the same day in and day out are likely brainwashed to a certain level to the point it would be hard to argue otherwise.
Reality iffy for one man far from iffy for all men. Someone that has a rare medical condition that makes images appear on the eye that might not exist for all? Upsold to never an intermittent condition?
I believe in Miracles as possible, I believe entire reality could be like a 3D program, I believe entire reality could be like a Movie. Belief Possible is Power
Life can if sensory inputs via outputs like light. Supercomputers that process at exascale levels can output light and other systems that can if sensory input. 10^18 cycles a second is a lot of power to change light in particular ways to suit purposes.
Content, same content can be filtered in different ways for different people. Reality and Sense iffed potentially not the same for all in the audience, where you are standing can factored into Amazed by a Bunny Out of a Hat.
Trajectories of light factor into different ability to perceive.
Gains Possible, each Day Dramatic Game Change Value Creation that can change what is Known as Possible is Possible, and Gains are Not Required to Be Amplified to the World, 8 Billion People, a lot of people to make Gains
A week of a supercomputer working on reducing shortest paths for Raytracing? Potential for a lot of Power
The World has a lot of potential yet for some reason doesn’t seem to amplify that potential
Having More choices does not always lead to faster delivery, faster ability to deliver on the fly.
Memory factors into Recall Speed, options available has the potential to factor into Recall Speed.
Compare and Contrast between Two Options can be Cheaper from a Processing Standpoint than Four Choices, or Eight Choices, or Sixteen Choices
Variety can enable, can be an enabler does not equal it is always an enabler
Ice Cream shop with 4 flavors or 50 flavors? Too many options can be overwhelming
The song is Delightful, Blissful or
Tranquil, Immaculate, Brilliant, Radiant
Simple choice less conversation?
Head Starts Matter, Latency lagged is not always Throughput Increased
If you have two books to read by end of the hour
One will lead to 70% prize money and One will lead to 90% prize money, only if you finish either. Do you delay choice?
People delay choice at times in non ideal ways that limit actual potential in not fully appreciated ways.
I could write 5 more sentences here, or
Fast choice on Words and other Systems can generate value more swiftly and variety can delay choice
Choosing swiftly not always easy, confidence factors into ability to deliver swiftly. Preparation can have Placebo effect? Likely. If you aren’t prepared your choice is less sure, then you are delayed when trying to make decisions.
Outlines factor into Confidence. Outlines are Ideal Direction Chosen? No. Outlines Enable Greater Throughput? Yes
Compass that spins for 15 minutes, 15 minutes of lost reading has potential to be a few pages of reading lost.
Like someone had an electromagnet next to it?
Supporting Topics are not always ideally invested in
People don’t always realize if the point of a paper is not a math lesson but relies upon teaching and amplifying comprehension of math, that math comprehension might be amplified less than ideally.
Relies on Calculus for results does not equal always delivers ideal Calculus Amplification?
Electromagnetism is useful for making my point here. I chose the lower time value because the supporting point plays a supporting role, not meant to play the lead role so to speak. There were longer videos closer to 15 minutes but I chose a 3 minute video. Does not equal electromagnetism is less valuable. Raising Comprehension of why I choose a video length matters, is useful value and feedback for the world.
The idea is the time spent on prioritizing choosing optimal choice is not time actually added to throughput of future paths. Two paths in the woods be stopped by left or right? Two paths provided sometimes leads to belief those two paths are optimal, were optimally provided. Maybe I need to fly over the woods, or dig a tunnel beneath them or even walk back in the other direction.
Easy to upsell the choices in front of us to the only choices available in Non Ideal Ways.
Investing in Time Management can lead to Time Savings, delaying investment in Time Management is Not All Time Savings Amped
A productive day spends more day in Throughput or more day making decisions? Both are valuable skills
When to know when choice is being delayed too long set to known?
There are a lot of choices that are not life and death in life.
Choices that are less than life or death like clean room or do dishes.
Choosing either swiftly has potential to faster delivery than delaying choice for hours deciding for the best route.
Decisions with more weight are different.
Imagine you have two paths to choose in the forest and one path would take 2 months and one path would take 1 month but you don’t know which path will take 2 months vs 1 month. Schrodinger’s cat with 1 month of time?
Buy In Cost factors into Throughput and Prioritization
One path around the mountain and one path through hot coals?
Choice of riding somewhere with no motorcycle helmet
or Walking
Where walking takes 5 hours?
Similar Not Exact Systems are Useful
People Enable greater risks for Higher Throughput at Times
They upsell convenience gains to 10% chance for fatal to be less of a big deal.
People Amp Risks sometimes Non Ideally
People Try to Limit Risks in ways that drastically reduce throughput at times Non Ideally
The man that set speed limit to 10mph now in an ambulance on that street choking? People can make choices for improving safety that can lead to less appreciation for that choice at later times.
Risk Mitigation can be an enabler is Not Always an Enabler. Concrete examples help 5 dead bolts is NOT all fire safety in. 5 Deadbolts or extra money for a printer for a High Voltage sign in society? Potential for more value from High Voltage sign.
Risk Mitigation can be turned up Non Ideally in some limited directions while reducing Risk Mitigation Non Ideally in other very important directions and it is not always easy to perceive, comprehend when that is.
Systems have trade offs, and people like to upsell it to less.
3 seat belts or leather seats
1 seat belt can increase safety
3 seat belts could limit safety
leather seats can increase experience
experience null costed can be huge
power in dichotomies can also be huge
Leather Seats or Increased Safety that can lead to Reduced Safety? A point that is both valid and could be used for a false dichotomy?
Logical Fallacies can be iffy.
People like Better Experience, Less Pain, and Adequate Safety that Doesn’t limit their Throughput to Zero.
Experience Throughput Matters and gets upsold to less non ideally, life is more than bread and water, bread and water is not all life in
If I were the Competition would I want to increase safety to non ideal levels to reduce ability to deliver? Computer Processor supply lines require Throughput to be competitive in 2023. If I said the competition had to spend 5 hours a day concentrating on Electrical Safety, then I spent 10 minutes of time teaching Electrical Safety at the beginning of the week, which one would have greater throughput?
Safety can be a useful tool to reduce Throughput of Competition Fully Pondered, Respected?
Non Ideal Requirements can be amped for those that limit Throughput Non Ideally
Safety in Excess, Requirements in Excess can add weight, be a Safety Limiter instead of Enabler
System of Profits Off Broken IP Law that limits throughput for some while allowing corporations with expensive lawyers to skate away scot-free?
Is Capitalism Broken in Real Ways? Yes
Factors into Experience of Life, Throughput of Better Quality of Life
Special Unique Matters, 한 줄을 한국어로 번역하거나 다른 언어로 번역하면 해당 줄을 독특하게 만들어 더 기억에 남습니다. 기억에 남는 특별한 고유한 요소, 기억.
Special Unique Matters, if I translate one line to Korean, or any other language it makes that specific line unique, and thus more Memorable. Special Unique Factors into Memorable, Memory.
Capitalism that doesn’t support the Math Teachers that insure it has reliable numbers? Is by definition broken.
Is a Broken United States Capitalist System that relies heavily upon borrowing from other nations likely to have Ideal Throughput in the Next World Disaster? No. They got that covered not all they got that covered in.
Liabilities factors into Liquidity factors into Throughput (Asterisk Not an Economist, am an Engineer with a Math Major)
Liabs-fn2Liq-fn2Tp – Liabilities factors into Liquidity factors into Throughput
Exascale with No Message Reach?
People in debt have less funds to buy water bottles.
Debt gets null costed.
Bottles of water get null costed.
Politicians that speak over 31 Trillion in Debt Ring and Resonate less true? Yes
Ask the Politicians, Do we have to pay our Student Loans?
Does Debt usually come with zero Strings Attached?
Politicians and World Leaders don’t set example about what is Kosher? Nuclear Power can’t be leveraged Non Ideally? Not sure that is fully appreciation for Possible in.
Haiti likely to need Help to be ready for Next Hurricane and United States is Non Ideally Leveraged by Debt? Yes
Loans and contributions respected requires investment, oversight
Debt and Liability has more strings attached than all fully appreciate
Book keeping, Stress from debt Known is Non Null and factors into decision making, ability to support
Debt Factors into Stress on Support
While leaving Math Teachers and Open Source developers to Hypothermia, things likely to add up? No
World relies upon
Utilizes
Support
That it does not fully Protect or Respect
Potential for does Not Amplify Ideally for Child Labor
Same kind of mindset that leads to back problems
Employees as people that need to be valued, Respected or Employees as Throughput Enablers?
Bosses can be Never Say Die with Ergonomics Protection or can be where’s my delivery.
Leadership Not Always Trained to fully care about Employees, to Perceive and Comprehend why their lives are valuable and in need of protection.
Leader with 1000 Employees can easily claim they truly care about each one? Unlikely
Claims of Throughput that are Not All Throughput In Amp Ideally?
Potential for Precedent sets Lip Service Required and Not All True Support Amplified? Limited Time and Focus can be costly.
Leaders with less than ideal bases cover required to claim ideal bases covered are less than ideal throughput and reach for support.
Where support in for GroupA is 90% gains and that limits GroupB which is 10%?
Reliance on Leaders that are required to limit Relevance on the common for Support is less than ideal.
If there is a train that has to be diverted from hitting GroupA or GroupB? If I am in GroupB do I want the train to hit GroupA? No
Is there a lot of situations in life that get upsold to that, that are not that? Yes
90% leads to Throughput and GroupB gets upsold to not enough time for that, time and time again. Leads to less than feeling of ideal value established long term.
Add in Data Consistency Problems all bets kind of off the table
Accountability Fostered by World Leaders? Questionable
System of Zeros Resources for Teachers to be Trusted with Disaster Risk Reduction? No
Accountability to Fostered Sufficiently in 2023? No
But there is Hope
Logic and Binary More Useful when Math Teachers are supported with Greater than Zero Resources? Yes
Exascale and Reason can be Useful, far from a given
Math Teachers Supported in Texas factors into Trust or Negate Trust World Wide
GDP set to Zero, “having a little trouble hanging in there” – Better Off Ted.
Math Teachers having their Liquidity set to Zero, Not Shame World Leaders for that?
Not shame them for that? Potential for Precedent Set
Vatican that can’t keep Math teachers supported to Valued Remotely?
Priest and Preachers allowed to claim ideal support from God while limiting support?
Power allowed to be Abusive, No Checks to Oppression always the better route?
Witch Burning and Child Molestation?
False allegations and zeroed support is not always an ideal amplifier does not equal all allegations are false?
There is the potential for Non Comprehendibles that factor in that Not All Likely Can Fully Perceive, Comprehend, Nor Appreciate? Likely
Lies and Inconsistent Data, Neural Links, people likely can’t fully comprehend all things that are possible, for both bad and good
Priests with potential for chips implanted in brain? Might not want my child to be in the choir these days
Kidnapped priest wakes up with less than full control of cerebral cortex?
And a World full of people looking to get even, set an example of why Christianity does not deliver?
Tech Leverage and Logic Systems has the potential to amplify less than ideally?
God wouldn’t let that happen to reminders of World War 2?
Wrongs Less Likely to Have Throughput, True Justice unlikely to deliver Comprehended is Power
Wait for a Train that doesn’t deliver, that is unlikely to deliver the results you want?
Your family Victimized, and then reminded by how the World values Fair, and Justice?
Better requires Investment, known system is far less than ideal is far from a given, they got that cover not all they got that covered in
Yes
Capitalism that doesn’t support the Math Teachers that insure it has reliable numbers? Is by definition broken.
Is a Broken United States Capitalist System that relies heavily upon borrowing from other nations likely to have Ideal Throughput in the Next World Disaster? No. They got that covered not all they got that covered in.
Liabilities factors into Liquidity factors into Throughput (Asterisk Not an Economist, am an Engineer with a Math Major)
My Tech Blog 