70 year life if lucky potential for still more of a temporary stay. Investing in a system that we are only momentarily a part of has the potential for less than ideal results by default.
In Engineering systems, complexity grows without always looking at a system and saying, can we maintain a system that grows exponentially complex over time effectively? Small parts that work well are a lot of power. A bottle of water can be the difference between life and death yet we get hung up on very intricate parts of the system that facilitate complexities that might not always have the longest term view in scope.
If I buy a car today, 10 years from now, what will it have added, what will it have taken away. Will it still be a useful car, what will have rusted on it? How many storms covered is it likely to see, how many storms uncovered is it likely to see?
Investments in Mobility like cars are meant to increase mobility and freedom overtime, not reduce it.
God that allows others to corruptly rob health, support, mobility, and encouragement while simultaneously being excessive lag on prayers gives feeling of not trustworthy as real God. I am getting sick of a system based on a God that claims Justice while delivering shit and robbed resources.
I would pray for all on Earth to be blessed, yet God seems to being a bit too latent to be ideally trusted with that these days. Not trusting God with that seems to be less than ideal as well.
Someone that has spent 8 hours yesterday reading might have higher capacity for reading through something today than someone that spent 30 minutes yesterday reading.
Faster ability to process, faster results verified does not always equal same level of confidence as working through something.
Numbers you have added yourself, checked with a calculator yourself have potential for greater confidence than a machine even though the machine might have verified many more times. Confidence and Belief matters, factors into tone and thus how people hear and perceive results.
Humans less than ideal throughput by default, thus those listening are generally looking, listening for a reason to question results. Confidence factors into sales, and more surface area and time such as checking results with a calculator or having spent more time reading a book factors into confidence likely in not always perceptible ways, that are possibly perceptible in a way that can lead to reduced sales and throughput.
The numbers on 0 to 60 over 5 seconds check out from verified sources matters, nothing like driving in the car yourself and experiencing. Experience likely conveys meaning simple number and words cannot.
Results factor into confidence, and sometimes results are based upon luck. Preparation matters, ability to take on, to mitigate risk matters.
Negate People, Humans as Perfect Amplifiers of Support
Thus
Leaders Need Help
Leaders in 2023 seem to have a listening problem
I think that means the people that put them in Power have a listening problem
We manifest what we allow in leadership. CEOs set to don’t have to have real conversations equal unlikely to be sufficient observers and active listeners in society.
Leadership is competitive like a star quarterback or wide receiver. Thus it is not always sufficiently trained and fostered. Limited support in, limited support out.
Probably wise for all people to pray for better Leadership Worldwide Each and Everyday
What would the world be like if we required 5% more Support Throughput from Leaders and 25% less oppression?
360p from YouTube and not real resolution seems incorrect
Google invests in Resolution for what it cares about?
I would highly advise people that care about Video and Image throughput to not rely upon Smartphones for Throughput. Smartphones connected to the network can be easily limited via corrupt network practices.
Likely more powerful DSLR and Mirrorless cameras can be limited remotely as well. The cost of oppression is High, likely a very non zero death toll associated with all that.
People that are oking limiting my cameras and support output may God prevent them from amping a message for 10 years to make them comprehend the value they are subtracting.
People that want to continue to profit don’t limit others ability to profit.
Google has proven unable to protect from Oppressive power, Apple has proven unable to protect from Oppressive power. Trusting them with Throughput of Video and Pictures is a Choice.
Convenience does not always amp ideal results.
System learns, Doesn’t Really Learn.
System is headed in Right Direction? Has proven it has made changes, and choices that has the potential to lead to more Ideal Directions? No
Part of Support Network relies upon a system that makes gains in corrupt ways leads to need for real change, real change that is made harder because of reliance on a system that is ineffective corruption out by default.
ProductA is amping ProblemB. But to fix ProblemB requires reliance on ProductA.
Alternatives are harder, costly, take time to learn, in ways that can lead to support reduced in other directions.
Engineering and tech systems should be like a bridge, they should build support and potential for making progress in the future. Should be systems that increase value creation over time, not reduce it.
Engineering and tech systems are more like a car that is claimed to go 0 to 60 in 5 seconds that can’t go 15 mphs. Maybe better to say 0 to 60 in 5 seconds *
>* for some, some that are deemed worthy to not be oppressed
That can be controlled can’t run that at top of the page
Easy to upsell less ideal message to Flash Player for Apple
Can’t run that interoperability required is a useful system, consider the possibilities
Doesn’t Amp Profits, Products doesn’t have to be factored into Search
Oppression that can prevent my family from eating is just a part of doing business? Par for the course?
If you found out an oppressor built your house, do you tear the house down? If you do, now you have lost time rebuilding you could have been amping to reduce oppression for others. Do you let the oppressors that built the house keep oppressing so they can build other houses? No.
Just because a non oppressive company built your product, does not equal they will not oppress others in the future once enabled with gains from your purchase.
Purchasing from a currently non corrupt company does not guarantee future throughput will be corruption free. Like if you give money to a clothing company that takes those profits and reinvests those profits in another company where they think they are increasing jobs in a locality but are actually funding slave and child labor.
Oversight reduced can lead to gains is a common system that fails to deliver adequate results, adequate reduced oppression.
Fixing problems quietly with a High Value Check attached might not always be adequate inspiration for Throughput of Real Change.
Future has High Potential for Amplifying More Light on subjects. Accepting lump sums of money and going own way in amicable way might be less able to be a useful system going forward. Mediation and Solving things quietly leads to Flint Michigan like Water leads to less trust and belief in mediation and solving things quietly?
Corrupt corporations profit in non ideal ways has potential for less trust in Arbitration as a useful system going forward, a less beneficial system for public safety and trust going forward.
Public strings attached and long lengthy painful court processes that bankrupt companies time and effort has high potential for not amplifying feeling of good deal either.
Pain point not high enough has potential for not fully appreciated.
My Java Programming brush limited is one thing, if it factored into lines that take twice as long at the airport, as it taking twice as long to get a meal? Losses that can be felt, without knowing the cause?
Corrupt companies is why lines take twice as long? Consider the implications.
The Right Words at the Wrong Time can be Devastating.
Things can be verified faster does not equal they always should be verified faster.
Process and expectation met is an important part of throughput. How Game Changing is delivered factors into future choice.
Some results delivered can be enabling of many, likely not all.
Some results delivered can be enabling of some, a subset can equal less appreciated by many.
It is not wise to enable a system that limits others based upon how things should be delivered. Arbitrary delays can be generated. Game Changing limited is not always appreciated Game Changing delivered is not always appreciated. Negate always appreciated. Negate always appreciated as a requirement for delivery. Negate that has zero cost.
Live systems listening that factor into live advertisements delivered has the potential for not utilized in all ideal ways.
Need to control that factors into support amplified can lead to divestment from support that appears biased.
Potential for conductors trying to amplify results that maximize their profits, not my profits. Feeling of trying to control can lead to early divests from what could be a mutually beneficial relationship.
Feedback for algorithms, algorithms that don’t take into account my need to amp and have support are not algorithms that are long term sustainable. Binary search that enables Throughput for all, including me, Turn that Up, Binary search that allows others to rob my support so they can profit? Reduce the potential cycles throughput for them. Case specific matters, extra cycles to reduce cancer and improve healing for some, amp those cycles, adding an extra room onto mansions while I am not able to amp support reduce Game Changing investments to less profitable ventures.
Logic systems and algorithms, numbers factor into who stays in Jail, who has a meal they enjoy and who does not.
Limiting a tool for those that are not amplifying value for me is unwise. Dulling everyone’s knives that aren’t cutting food for me has potential for reducing cutting for food for others. That increases problems for me rather than reduces problems for me. Limiting tools that are allowing corrupt people to rob me? Less of an issue with that.
Sharp knives for those that don’t rob my fellow country men, my family, that don’t hurt my fellow country men and women, that don’t hurt my family, dull knives for everyone else. People that can’t be trusted with Power and Throughput will not be given Power and Throughput.
People that allow oppression to amp, high potential for lost profits short term and long term.
Systemic oppression factors into Throughput is weak, gains made based upon lies are likely to be found out
People can fake a system into saying it can compute 5 million lines of codes in 5 nanoseconds, precomputed results with a single fetch or load operation is possible. Performance can be less than sold as is not a wise long term system.
Gains delivered based upon Engineering and Programming as a useful system factors into Future Engineers and Programmers amped, or passed by for other careers.
Once Engineering gets in the potential limiting business it has high potential for being limited by those same limiting elements. Innovation is encouraged and appreciated, nourished into better, or let to be thrown on the ground like broken glass.
Apple and Google as those that protect from earthquakes or those that help break the glass and throw it on the ground?
Output can be limited is not a system where, Output Output can’t be limited.
My accounts limited factors into my inability to purchase food from stores or restaurants. My accounts limited factors into employees of Apple and Google from unable to purchase food from stores or restaurants?
More specialized factors into ability to amp support, greater support for some than others. Potential for power struggles and inversion of who profits from investments.
Path of least resistance does not benefit all equally. Desire to amp less oppression does not always equivocate to less oppression amped.
Life as a series of Trials Easy to upsell generate input, generated relaties as less of a test, when in fact they could be much more of a test. Things that we rely on can be taken as reliable on a split seconds notice, like gravity, or magnetism.
A system that can give superpowers on a moments notice, can also take them away on a moments notice
Reality can be made awful, hell like, and there is no requirement to make it better, to reduce trials. Reliance on a God that cannot be trusted for instant delivery on prayers. Delivery on prayers can’t be easily verified as has happened or has not happened. Iffy reality that can turn perceived wins to losses in a matter of moments gives feeling of prayers are not always answered in way that ideally amplifies.
Gains and contributions to society, forging the strongest sword for a king potentially less useful at times than pouring a glass of water. Direction and Capacity, Power in Useful is iffed in not fully appreciated ways.
What is Power, what can be Perceived as Power, as Right choice to enable can be iffed over and over.
Preparation is directionaly investment in the future. If I spend all day pouring water bottles, tomorrow I am likely to have water to drink, but potentially no bread.
Typing throughput is directional power, potentially over time, like writing. Has the potential to create Power for the ages potentially not always ideal power for the moment.
A book to those 200 years in the future? A dead man writes words of wisdom to a time where he only knows a small piece of their backstory?
Written Word has a certain amount of Power.
Never Say Die! Potentially the perfect words of encouragement for a person at a future date I know nothing about.
Potential for reality to be iffed in different directions. A moment in history that plays out perceived in one way for someone and perceived in a completely equally valid different way for someone else, all with societies and realities that create to unique perceptions of reality A and B.
They could be B and A. Depending on who you talk to. Showing two distinct possible versions without establishing order is difficult, even random numbers or characters has the potential for viewed as one goes before the other.
Obfuscating the Order in a way that keeps the variable set unbiased by their naming?
VarA and Var1? Is 1 first or is A first?
Naming, writing down options like Option 1 and Option 2 is claimed to have zero effect. Yet if I need to flip a coin, heads likely to go to Option 1 and tales Option 2.
why is X and Y useful to Algebra teachers?
why is I and J useful to Programming teachers?
Common repeatable variable choices factor into ability to comprehend
If I say Rise Over Run, y = 2x, or y=x squared it gives a picture to some
If say a cliff is y=100x, 100 feet vertical for every 1 foot to forward
Steep, daunting is evoked in the imagination, ability to paint on the imagination using math is useful, and begs the question is Math and Numbers really a system free of contrast?
Logic, Reason, Math, and Books all written by those trying to Maximize Profit in Some, Not All Directions. Trying to increase Hope, Encouragement, and Throughput for the World and Future Generations? Valuable, but to say that is all directions is far from truth.
A program that is coded is like forging a gear in a clock that will function for some time, not an indefinite amount of time, that has potential to give blue prints and potential to be useful for example for how to improve future designs.
The largest breakthroughs in parallel and multithreaded computing might be 100 or 200 years out. Delivering those break throughs in advance might be possible does not equal society will always invest in them.
Investments in Safe Medicine, Safe Engineering, Better Bridges built is possible, and far from a given over time. Getting many to buy into a future that has more potential, in a way that does not allow a corrupt few to capitalize on that power is not a given and if done right has the potential to lead to large throughput gains that has the potential to catapult, leap the future to advancements only dreamed of as possible.
Investments in more smiling pets and less scratches is Tech for the future, will it be appreciated as such?
Not dealing with a dog bite, or a scratch, the wrong kind of papercut has the potential to enable typing throughput potentially at very critical times. Easy to not fully appreciate the importance in systems required to actually deliver faster throughput required for making tech Actually Shine.
Potential Deadlocks avoided like a untimely papercut?
Deadlocks and Race Conditions, like special Use Cases capable of being Emphasized to reduce potential losses incurred by the Complexity overhead?
Multithreading
The Answers to Problems, the solutions to particular problems, can be more usefully designed for Throughput in Problems that have less reliance upon for order and less reliance upon external dependencies.
Choosing your Problems wisely, Problems that are likely to fair well in a Multithreaded, Multiprocessing system factors into ability to utilize those resources effectively.
I have a phone capable of playing a video with sound, and my computer has the ability to play videos with sound. If I play the video with sound on my phone I am freeing up those resources on my computer to do other useful work. High potential for those gains to be possible, and more useful in a fraction of the time.
Increased Throughput can increase Peak critical performance, Peak performance utilized versus processing cycles just sitting idle is far from a given. Like having 4 phones, possible to play a video on 1 might be less useful to play videos on all 4. Making those other 3 phones useful as well might be possible yet far from a given.
Peak performance Matters. Humans might spend 8 hours a day on a computer, that means potential for 16 hours of useful cycles that are wasted, potentially saving power. Running a computer 24/7 has potential for other problems.
Computers are kind of like cars where wheels have less potential for wear and tear. A system constantly in motion, processing and testing has the potential for being more available than turning it on at a random time in the future. No updates to firmware and security overtime potential for turned on 4 months later for that system to be more susceptible to problems. Potential for dust to have gathered onto fans.
A system more tested is more likely to see potential problems in advanced. A system in normal lifespan of components potentially more likely to see edge case anomalies such as a bad hard drive or bad processor if run for a longer period of time.
Ideally one could turn off a device, put it in a time capsule, and 100 years later that time capsule could be opened and the device could be charged and powered on with zero complications. Potential for new wireless interference, new problems that exist in the future that did not exist at the time of creating the technology of the day.
Battery could have degraded overtime, other components could degrade in non ideal ways. Potential for similar not exact systems to old wooden machines or old brass clocks.
If a player Piano was put in a time capsule, 100 years later would it play a tune? Would tuning be maintained over a 100 year period?
Player Piano kind of like a processor. Four player pianos could potentially be played all at the same time, potentially more useful if in all different rooms or locations.
Common problem set, people like Music and Encouragement, and Sound Throughput has a Proximity is Useful Property.
There are many tasks that have sequential properties. Like washing dishes with one sink. A sink is a common resource that multiple dishwashers might need at the same time. Trying to split the task into 10 dishwashers with one sink has the potential to create more complexity and reduced throughput instead of increasing throughput.
Processors are kind of like Employees, directing more at the same Task might not always increase speed of problem solved. Too many cooks in kitchen has the potential to reduce mobility. Consider a theoretical kitchen where number of cooks approaches 1000, movement becomes impossible, throughput is reduced dramatically.
Thinking at 1000 different restaurants all with different sinks, then dishwashing can be happening all at the same time because the problems sets do not depend on each other. Dishes at Restaurant A are a completely different problem set than Restaurant B.
Similar problem different data.
Same instruction multiple data.
Wash dishes is instruction.
Data could be dishes from RestaurantA, B, C, D … Restaurant1000.
A similar problem set could be Editors and News Articles.
1000 News Reporters and 50 editors.
All 50 Editors looking at the same document could reduce editor throughput yet is all 50 editors take 20 articles potential for much faster editing throughput.
Overlap is costly, and sometimes necessary. If the 50 editors were broken into 2 groups potential for each editor to be required to read 40 documents yet that would allow verification.
25 editors read all the documents (40 each) then second set of editors verifies first editors results (40 each). Complexity that increases Throughput has potential need for greater verification.
Complexity is not cost free. More processing cores used on a problem, potential for problems that can’t always be seen, more heat on the chip, that might be generated via larger problem sets that can’t always be seen in normal operation that might only show up after hours of processing.
More moving parts including CPU cores potential for more that can go right, and potential for more that can go wrong. Potential for more concentrated liability as well. One computer can do the same thing as 20 can equal if that one machine fails it is more likely 20 computers failing than one failing.
All that said with the problem set chosen right, 1000 processors computing has the potential to give a head start searching for something in very powerful ways. If it takes one processor 5 hours to search a document, that document split up in 1000 pieces and searched (assuming it is not a file that cannot be broken up) can lead to a seek time close to 5/1000. 300 minutes / 1000 processors = 0.3 minutes. What would take one processor 5 hours to find could now be found in 0.3 minutes.
A cost of 0.3 minutes versus 5 hours changes what can be done over a 5 hour period. Potential for 900 of the same problems to be solved in same amount of time assuming all those problems were lined up in a useful way. Or potential for swiftly finding (0.3 minutes) then that same processor useful 1 hour later for searching swiftly on a new problem that would otherwise still be being used on the last problem.
Problems solved faster has the potential to dramatically increase Throughput.
Important to remember juggling tasks has potential to increase complexity. Just because I have more than one computer does not equal there is zero cost for video editing on another device and hitting the export button. Still requires a non null time cost to load a document into a program, make changes and then hit export (the process that can be let to work on its own).
Improved focus is power, power that is not always fully appreciated.
Working on the task at hand, reducing external distractions factors into ability to process data and complete tasks successfully. Increasing complexity and requirements has potential to dramatically decrease throughput in non ideal ways.
Interrupts while sometimes necessary (burning building, much higher priority item like need to call 911) does not equal they are low cost for completing a task. Tornadoes are a rare system that have to be factored into potential interrupts. Unlikely does not equal zero potential for affecting throughput.
There are many libraries in the World, unlikely to be in a library that is burning down, unlikely to be in a library in the middle of a Tornado Watch/Warning. Able to process interrupts is important, though unlikely factors into greater ability to focus on task at hand.
A Tornado Siren is Powerful, and Loud, likely to be heard.
Someone screaming in silence about Oppression? Less likely to be heard.
Interrupts that factor into faster problem solving and Throughput are not always heard
Faster Systems for verification can be a lot of Power Not Always Fully Pondered. Faster something can be verified, faster it can be run with, sometimes in non ideal ways.
