Man is Not Perfect

Man is Not Perfect

Man can be tested and tested right up to the point of judgment then can be told why that judgment is wrong right in the middle of thinking that judgment.

If ManA is not perfect, man likely can be said to have done VarB, CarC, and VarD wrong. A Corrupt system full of other men and women that are not perfect easily can punish VarB. If VarB is punished then ManA loses his house people can prescribe man losing his house to judgment of God, God’s plan when it might just be a corrupt way for others committing VarC and VarD to profit.

Bad things that happen to someone that coinside with Punishment can easily be prescribed to Judgment was sound more ideally. In unsure situations people are looking to know how to act and can easily stray from something that looks even close to VarB, VarC, or VarD which can look like turning back on VarE, VarF, VarG, and VarH.

Man makes choices, other imperfect men prescribe meaning to them, delivers less than ideally.

System hurts and tests my family past the point that any man would judge and then calls it no big deal.

Man wants to judge, wants to get pushed to the point of legalism, not all true value added.

People with knowledge of how things generally play out stay silent in society gives more feeling of paths with traps than a clear message of “Don’t walk down that path”.

“They new better” easy to say, easy to misuse. Leaders views can be obfuscated, their job to know does not always equal more important things leave ideal attention to details that can ruin lives. Focus is power for solving problemA, not always sufficient for problemB, problemC, or ProblemD.

Where is the Justice for Iffed close to Judgment? There is pain in iffed close to incorrect judgment, there is lost confidence in iffed close to judgment, there is lost throughput in unable to make real choices that enable greater throughput of fair and just in society.

Society punishing for VarB is being watched about VarC and VarD and make no mistake, useful is not always useful until it is, thus memory has a tendency for being stored less than ideally.

Logs can be changed in positive ways.

Logs can be changed in negative ways.

Data for making Judgments can be less than ideal, can be inconsistent, can be corrupted, can be altered due to rounding, and floating point errors that were installed to increase throughput, can be dependent upon binary data that was not under ECC Memory that has potential for being less than true value in specific cases. The errors possibly less catchable in mass does not equal they cease to exist, does not equal one might not be able to use the system like a slot machine until it provides the value desired.

Potential for querying database enough times a value flips, how would that change things? Because bugs are always addressed, because Programmers always are adequately funded for debugging over business goals?

The system doesn’t make mistakes, thought, used as reliable high potential for wrecking lives.

People make less than ideal judgments under pressure, easy to upsell it to less. Personal problems and stresses heightened by oppression do not always lead to more sound judgement based on ideal visibility. And Visibility is always less than ideal.

Society teaches VarA, PathA, then punishes PathB yet does not always examine the failures in how VarA, PathA was taught, or how one actually arrives at PathB. Harder to judge PathB likely many times when you stand in the shoes of the person that chose PathB magnified over a life time of time delays.

Judgment has potential for less than discrete, more like a Jenga piece, a Domino piece, that if you judge one can lead to need to right many more wrongs. A less than accurate and precise system used to make precision cuts will likely amp less than ideally.

People might choose PathB not comprehending that choice will lead to 10 years of back and forth of society punishing PathA and PathC. People have the potential to save time via choices in ways they can’t always comprehend. Sometimes it is not about the choices, it is about what an imperfect society will do with those choices. Further just because one person does not choose PathB does not equal others will not choose PathB, that ideal support will be amped for people to not choose PathB.

Making a better choice and putting on the blinders has high potential for delivers less than feeling of good deal.

Society as a whole delivering clear view of right and wrong is far less than ideal. Argument and in the air without delivery of support has high potential for wrongly being upsold to they were imperfect thus God let them have it.

Thoughts of Witch tests of float or sink.

Important to remember ChoiceB is a designable choice. An action will be punished can easily become a useful system for design considerations non ideally.

Designer babies, designable time sentences?

People tendency to Think Better of Others, their Choices can’t be Designed and Orchestrated in Non Ideal Ways. That is not truth, and that is not always, not likely known by all.

When I say ALL People, I mean ALL People, problem is I am a person, one man still with limited support and preferences. A man with preferences is unlikely to be able to cover ALL Bases for ALL People, means he has to trust God with that. If you are helping a widow make their house better you are not removing cancer in a hospital and vice versa.

Supporting others creates surface area, surface area has more potential for being hit. Easy to upsell surface area to zero cost. If it is zero costed, it is not always adequately factored into support. There is a reason why famous people have body guards, why they need to maintain body guards.

What value does protection add to a speaker that amplifies support? Ability to amplify support for a longer still indefinite period of time. One person can add value for a time, a society that does not embrace a support each other mentality will fall short of amplifying that value long term. More than one person that believes in a cause is required.

King Arthur only lives for a time, after that will the future generations be run by the Mad King (Game of Thrones Reference)? Enabling reliance and direction without inspiring critical thinking is unlikely to inspire ideal support for a future that cannot be accurately predicted.

Unwise to hold one man responsible for the sins of a society, for how a society is allowed to amp. A society that is allowed to amp responsibility on the shoulders of one man has high potential for turning up another time and time again for non ideal use that delivers far less than ideally.

Ideal Leaders, Leaders upsold to ideal has potential for limiting the safe guards that prevent oppression. Important to remember that even the best leader can be turned into an abomination with the wrong support.

Visibility can be obfuscated. Help them can be registered and comprehend as hurt them. Zero oversight is not an ideal amp, left in Jail while oppression is allowed to amp has consequences.

Limits oppression can easily be put in Jail. Those limiting oppression thrown in prison has high potential for first part of a plan.

There are new ways to limit voice, to Limit Throughput and Network Reach. Not fully comprehended and appreciated can easily lead to surrounded. Narrative control and how people are trained, what is upsold to truth factors into perception and comprehension.

People can deliver knowledge with full belief their results are true, does not equal it is wise to upsell results to true. First hand knowledge, direct knowledge matters and it is upsold to less. Just because I can see something in person does not equal I can always derive truth from it better.

If I hear a voice, it could be from a blue tooth speaker that is hidden behind a wall.

Someone can say honestly, with full account they heard someone say something, say something that they did not, and Words get Upsold to Ideal Amplifiers of Comprehension.

People say something usually amps this way, gets upsold to I know how that will amp is not true value added.

Works differently is a possible system. Works like this in most cases is a useful system for delivering surprise.

Imagine lemon and limes genetically modified to create more fructose. Expect Sour and get sweet. Surprises are not always bad does not equal misdirection taught as a known system always amps the wisest thought processes.

Scary unstable power to show a bunny out of a hat? Houdini is Power, easy to upsell magic tricks to less. Epic story that beats the odds that keeps people on the edge of their seats has the potential to create value, less than all ideal value.

Value Creation, Story, and Throughput are all important. All with less than ideal surface area will fail to ideal comprehend the system. Risk mitigation is useful does not equal Risk is ideal, without Cost.

A System can amp 75% Support and create 25% Problems, and that can be the wiser choice does not equal no Grace, Support, and Accountability needs to be generated to mitigate the 25% of Problems.

Right under supported can create more problems, such as 75% not allowed to be easily amped again based upon 25% of problems that have a history and track record for non ideally being supported.

The right decision in front of people does not always equal the right decision is sufficiently supported. People need to work together, need to support each other, that is hard, requires surface area and that gets upsold to less.

Easy to over simplify, to the right choice will amplify right on its own.

Choices in the past were made, supporting the future with less than ideal choices of the past require taking losses, losses that are less than ideal. And all choices of the past are less than ideal, less than ideal that have been made with good motivations many times.

If the Church and British Government of the past was more ideal, would Indians have been robbed of their land? If Indians scalped less people in the past and worked together better, would the combination have amped a better future? A future without slavery? People learning earlier to work together and not dehumanize goes a long way, gets upsold to less.

The past was written, negate written ideally. The past had to deal with Typhoid and other problems that are less of a problem today. Will the gains that we have in this day and age lead to people actually working together for a better tomorrow? Or will it play out similar to the past? Like it did with World War 1 and World War 2, Vietnam, 911 Iraq, Afghanistan?

Negate Humanity can be ideally trusted with Humanizing each other, at least based upon history

People are not Birds, Dogs, or Cats, they are Complex Beings with the potential to Amp Dyson Sphere level gains, upsold to less not really a value amplifier.

Able to discuss potential problems is limited via legalism, and that factors into real losses.

If I discuss a problem will it lead to open and honest discussion or will it lead to others misusing that data to limit my profit and maximize their own? Truth is amplified insufficiently based upon legalism, conversation and comprehension amplification is amplified insufficiently based upon legalism.

Rare cases, knowledge about rare cases exist does not equal people can talk about them easily, does not equal society lets there be zero cost for talking about them. A judgmental legalistic society is less capable of Dyson Sphere level gains.

Truth not supported, punished, has consequences. Data and knowledge that could catapult the future generations forward is limited, is disincentivized. Risk mitigation required is not all risk mitigation delivered.

If I know a certain over the counter drug creates a rare case issue, if I talk about the rare case issue will it lead to that drug pulled from the shelves in a way that limits support for those it amplifies more ideally?

Out of context scares lead to products removed from shelves is a possible system. Max Profit Government systems that are leveraged by lobbyist factor into choices available is common in this World.

Amplifies more ideally for self is a common system in this World.

People that discuss real problems are punished by society instead of rewarded factors into inadequate amplification of support. If I think talking with a problem is unlikely to cause me problems I am more likely to talk about the problem.

Could I Amp the following message in China with Zero Consequences? Unlikely

Imagine having to work on this video in Final Cut Pro, how might that make an employee feel?

Required to use an Apple device, to rely upon the same system that lead to suicides to deliver a message about how the system has abused and oppressed?

Same electricity Power Plant used to deliver Electric Chair electrocutions delivers electricity to the Media that delivers the message about why the Execution was unjust, and unfair?

Unfair gains of the past factor into ability to amplify Message about the Unfairness. It is a bit jading to realize that reliance is not an ideally clean system. Always wonder if why you get something is because of privilege or actually earned?

God distributes resources ideally with zero attachment to corruption delivers less than ideally.

A child born in a system to the middle class where they are blessed with ability to make gains based upon how the Rich and Ruling class does wrong by the Poor?

Easier to say when rich, life has served me amazing that I didn’t earn or deserve. Easier to say when poor, life has made me have to work for ever gain.

Iffy ground convolutes comprehension.

Poor man in USA could be rich in other parts of the World, the Rich in USA can likely use that as a system to limit.

Things cost more in USA can easily be null costed by a World that has less. If I am dirt poor in a third world country and never get a slice of cake, do I really consider about how landlords raise prices of poor in USA to the point they wind up on the street and don’t know how to live dirt poor?

A poor USA citizen has potential for being more dangerous than people that have been trained how to live on less. Reliance is turned up does not equal when reliance is removed those aren’t left to fend for themselves. Negate our system won’t take value creation potential on a moments notice without training a new value creation system.

A system that doesn’t support the middle class sends a message to the Rich and to the Poor. Reliance is a useful system that can easily be taken. Does that lead to people spending more money, or hoarding resources because they can’t trust the public and those around them to work together effectively and efficiently?

If I am poor and I have seen hard workers in the middle class thrown to the wind will that make me want to invest time and resources into the same professional fields?

On the other hand, If I am poor an see others working hard rewarded and appreciated for value creation in a way that leads to success, higher potential for that making me want to work for more and greater. Ability to create value perceived matters, lied about has potential for a lot of loss.

Time and Investment in Better can easily be taken is not an ideal way to make people strive for more in society.

A man that invests in supercomputers is allowed to be robbed of healthcare and transportation equals ideal support for future investment in supercomputers?

A nurse trained to do two things exactly right has potential for being greater value creation for the World than a PhD. Yet society for some reason does not Amp that way.

Swinging a Hammer and Cutting a Board is a lot of value creation that gets upsold to less based upon proper and societal beliefs.

The value creation with education has the potential for being less than ideal. Has the potential for being a lot of value creation. Eliminating value creation as a common part of education seems unwise. Teach people to add two plus two equals four, having them add two and two water bottles to a table for supporting the community likely could teach a valuable lesson.

Math can be used to increase Water Support, and without it has the potential to reduce it.

Just FYI I have Ryobi reciprocal saw that is missing after working on the lawn a day or two ago. Might have left if out somewhere.

Found it just was hidden beneath some other tools, easy to think the worst in a system of legalism.

Please do not misread the following. I provide the advice because I find it useful. I have a reciprocal saw that had a rusty blade, using the same blade for a bit removed the rust. A system in motion has the potential for more maintained is a useful system worthy of comprehension that can be misused.

A train that delivers goods constantly less likely to be rusted to the tracks. Easy to upsell a system that maintains static will easily be able to moved to dynamic non ideally. Car that is running moved more often more likely to be maintained, to have a battery that functions, to have potential problems flagged.

Putting a man in Jail or requiring them to leave for 6 months gives a lot of time for a car to rust, or things to fall apart in less comprehendible ways. I have an electric keyboard that I played when I grew up that I turned on many years later (might not have been turned on for multiple years) and it played fine. Some systems require less maintenance does not equal systems left static is ideal.

Amplifying Right without being Invested in the End Product to a Topic worthy of Discussion

Imagine Microsoft’s CEO running a Mac as their primary laptop of choice

Again this is a Hypothetical, A Microsoft CEO might need to know what the competition is up to be effective to amplify more value, still doesn’t seem to be a vote of the highest confidences in own products.

CEOs and Employees invested in the product equals greater potential for being able to see and flag problems within the products in advance.

Amazon employee that never buys Amazon products?

Society does not always make it easy to see the own problems we generate, and society many times generates visibility of those problems with discouragement attached. A Society that is maximize profit oriented that generates with discouragement attached is not to be ideally trusted. Easy to say there is zero cost associated with not amplifying comprehension in a supportive way.

It is desirable to amplify belief and truth in those that are corrected that support is trying to add value rather than generate discouragement. If it is just lip service, not actually trying to be invested in better, high potential for setting support and similar support to not worthy of trusting, potentially in non ideally. VarA might be support provided does not equal the boolean opposite !VarA is always an ideal amplifier.

If 2+2=4 is used as a system to deliver water, Potential for more consistent math to be generated. 2 years + 2 years = 4 years of negated support in Jail equals more shitty support on the outside high potential for less belief that math is a Useful, Desirable system worthy of turning up.

I created a video about correcting people in better ways, yet that video’s access to the World has been turned off by the Powers that be. Not sure the Powers that be will appreciate the negated Grace and Support denied access will add.

Products that move on shelves equals they sit for less time, equals the machines that make those products are more well oiled. Consumers serve valuable support amplification for Other Consumers. Future innovation and better tools are a system people have to invest in, and are many times limited from investing in non ideally.

If you have a machine that makes hammers and nails, then suddenly block everyone from having enough to purchase hammers and nails. High potential for that machine being shut off, possibly not enabled in the future.

Ability to maintain environment factors into ability to maintain environment.

A message not played, likely to get Archived.

Funds to purchase Vegetables are required to Amp Vegetable Support Lines, less access to vegetables can decrease memory.

Vegetables defunded leads to inability to remember why vegetables are useful? Could really use some V8 not fully appreciated?

https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/11-brain-foods#TOC_TITLE_HDR_6

Clear water does not guarantee safe water. Knowledge of potential problems is not always ideal hydration support. Amplifying knowledge and conversation solves and creates problems sometimes.

Many times clear water is safe water, pool water is clear does not equal it is safe, acid looks clear does not equal it is water.

Research Labs have limited funds, limit their ability to provide safety and labels by increasing the number of lawsuits against them? Chemical Showers have a cost, Lawsuits have a cost.

A little extra funds for researchers to be healthy, hydrated, and ready for work in the lab factors into results that have higher potential for actually being real. Making those researching your drugs fight for survival has potential for less than ideal drugs amplified.

Society making Throughput cost too high has a cost

5 years of 16 hour days supporting VarA to believe can be trusted with VarA equals ideal support amplified, invested in? Potential for more value to be generated in society by 6 month fast paced medical training for a much larger percentage of the population.

A program might be running incorrectly, a record might be set incorrectly does not equal an expert is required to modify fields that generate less than ideal output. If experts support an oppressive system, their value output will be much less, and thus a non experts value can be greater value creation.

Experts leveraged are less appreciation for Experts, less appreciation for experts has the potential to amplify change that is less than ideally delivered. Oppression has the potential to amplify side effects.

Real doctors won’t fix, potentially will leave stuck in jail can lead to less trained doctors utilized for support. Even a trained doctor fixing might not be the best trained doctor fixing. Best to set support to useful, less than ideal. Doctors 20 years ago didn’t have access to the tools they have available today. In 2043 Doctors will know more.

The best doctor of the time might not have been able to save to a known system not a given. All support is less than ideal, 99.999% fresh bottle of water has the potential for being a lot of value added. Potential for carcinogens in the 0.001% potential for the value to have been verified and computed wrong.

Support that is less than ideal beats no support, making support more ideal does not happen generally with less conversation.

I have been far from all support in during my life life time. I have been far from all support out during my life time. People appreciated for small contributions and less than ideal value established, for good motivations matters.

A bottle of water might not be 1 million dollars, has potential for being worth more than 1 million in the right circumstances.

Would I like 1 million dollars? Yes

Would I trade being able to give someone a bottle of water that needs one for 1 million? No

A life is worth more than a million dollars, simple as that

Can be taken too far, if one person is required to give 90% while all others only give 10% that is not an ideal way to magnify support. What happens if that one person magnifying 90% gets lost? Wiser to amplify all of society as support generators that are limited, valuable, but reliance upon needs to be load balanced.

Easy to upsell hail merry passes where giant sums of money fixes something to an always possible system.

God’s pocket book has no bottom does not equal people or God’s people have bottomless pocket books. And that can be used as an excuse not to amplify real support. Society to less excuses for not amplifying real support matters.

God’s love is infinite, how many times does someone have to punch me for me to continue hugging them? One punch can lead to many never talking to their enemy again. Give someone that shoots at you a second attempt? It is important for people to comprehend the loss for being an enemy.

Imagine a cop was told you committed a crime, then non ideals got turned up and they chased you down in a road chase, in a system where authority is known to be corrupt many times.

The cop might be contributing to an oppressive system without knowing it, might have good motivations while still supporting a corrupted jading system. What does loving your enemy in that case matter? Loving a cop that is wrongly motivated? Wrongly motivated in a way that can reduce your support to family and friends in real game changing ways?

High potential for if you love that cop, you move out of range of able to be leveraged against you. That might be one way to amplify love, a harder way might be to tell that cop they are supporting corrupted authority. Asking that cop to fight a corrupted system is all appreciation for that officers family? Authority and Cops high potential for with us or against us, many times installed for good reason does not equal zero potential for corruption.

Even a simple conversation can endanger lives leads to high potential simple conversations are limited non ideally. Love might equal moving out of range. Having access to mobility is Power, power that all (like that cop) might not have.

Some places on earth might be able to amplify more value creation for some people. I might be viewed as a monster in my home town where as I might be viewed as a saint somewhere overseas. Close to home does not always equal people appreciate the gems they have.

I know about computers, might be upsold to common in my hometown, might be more appreciated and fostered in better lights elsewhere on Earth. How talent is appreciated and amplified factors into the useful value generated from it.

What we know what we are talented in gets upsold to common and upsold to common does not always generated full value possible. A choir full of singers is nice, amazing, somewhat common amongst Churches in the USA. One amazing singer, or potentially not the most amazing singer viewed in their own setting? Potential for more able to shine.

95% value surrounds 95% value and never leaves has potential for 85% value to be more appreciated in other locations. Potential for that 85% value turned up to 99% value, then returning, potential for not fully appreciated.

Not good enough not always appreciated, better than others not always appreciated. Support is not ideal. Support set to would be ideally appreciated if was Ideal is not true value added.

Does typing my vlog add value to the World? It is not zero typing practice for me, it is not zero thinking through my own issues of the day. To say it does not create value would be wrong, to say it creates ideal value would be wrong, to say it has ideal Network Throughput and Reach for others to create value from would be wrong.

Requirement for ideal appreciation of a system is unlikely to amplify ideally. Value creation might be greater some days than others. Amping no appreciation has potential for gains to not be valued and thus lost. Too much requirement for appreciation has the potential for lost time, gains that don’t actually deliver real gains.

Life and Soul outside of context of Time

People are Children

People are Teenagers
People are in their 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s

People are Elderly

Hard to Comprehend of Heaven, a system where you know the best parts of the years of wisdom, while still having the forward unjaded view of a teenager.

Time, what time period we are in in our lives to some level defines us. A novel written by someone in their 30s today likely to be appreciated in the next 5 years with more context than 50 years from now. Time has the potential to change comprehension and value potentially in more ideal ways.

The future can find more ideal ways to value your contributions can, is not guaranteed to be a value creation system. The Mona Lisa is still generating support many years later, not all writers can say they have written a book like the Mona Lisa. Likely many books at Mona Lisa level that were lost in the fires of the Library of Alexandria.

Writing changes history, painting a picture changes history, one key pressed and released one brush stroke pressed on the page then lifted has the potential to dramatically alter future events and gets upsold to less.

Amplified Reading Comprehension factors into More Amplified Reading Comprehension

The Water tower in my home town is a reminder we all need water to drink, we all rely upon the same source for support. Not quite the Mona Lisa but kind of is if you think about it.

Judging life dependent upon past failures is like a giant whole all of humanity has been drilling to China. Nothing but debt (play on words Nothing but Net). A future that actually amplifies support requires people to be less burdened with debt from the past. Freedom to move and generate support matters.

Debt or Investments seen as will, as are guaranteed to amp ideally over time is not really true value added. Borrowing against the future has potential for a lot of pain, wiser to find a better way to generate support for the future, one that does not build upon financial instruments that can leverage people in non ideal ways under governments that might not always exist.

Saving funds, hoarding resources, has potential for those resources becoming less valuable over time. Saving can be prudent and wise, does not equal it will be allowed to always be amped as prudent and wise, does not equal it will always deliver water bottles required over 1 million dollars so to speak.

Money into an account might go to someone, or access to that account might be locked and unretrievable like money stored in a time capsule. How much would 1000 denari left if a time capsule be worth?

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/denarius

One water bottle for someone that needs it at a critical time could be worth much more than 1000 Denari for the future, and 1000 Denari left for the future is much more than all value out in a system that greatly appreciates ancient treasures.