Multi-threading can Improved User Experience, Responsiveness

Multi-threading can Improved User Experience, Responsiveness

More Power, Cores, and Performance can be used for Greater Experience or Oppression, seems like the system many times goes for the latter. A system that does not treasure investments is unlikely to see the level of gains it would see if it did treasure those investments. A system invests in its own lag when it fails to appreciate smaller contributions.

Throughput Gains Appreciated factors into Feedback

Would I?

Would I give 1 hour out of my 24 hours on my computers, phones, and processors to compute Cancer Research, better Accessibility, better solutions for Peace? Yes.

Society has the potential to amplify vast amount of support based upon unused cycles, but does it make that easy, simple, light?

Society seems to amp more this person or that person needs to spend 15 hours a day amping Accessibility or Peace when it is a collective effort desirable for Risk Mitigation. Society that is encouraged to work together for the common good is different than one that is setup to try and maximize profit at each others expense.

Not fixing the problem, problems factors into ability to capitalize on Power Vacuums.

Society can amp more support for all people on Earth, but does it choose to? And if it does not choose to, what kind of lesson is that setting for future generations?

System of you are useful until you are not amps less than ideally. Claim to care about future generations while fostering that mentality?

Older generations tendency towards not fully appreciating younger generations, and younger generations potentially having to rewrite and restructure things because that is the hand they are dealt. Taught Power will amp less than ideally factors into appreciation.

The same story plays out PartyA not fully appreciated has potential to build resentment towards those in power. PartyA establishes their own power and then PartyB shows up and PartyA has a choice, appreciate and inspire the future, or limit them like those in power did to them originally.

The future taught a lesson people are just a use until less useful system has consequences.

Multi-threading Thoughts

Multi-threading Thoughts

  1. Performance Testing Factors into Ability to Debug
  2. Ability to Verify Swiftly Factors into Ability to Debug
  3. Throughput is Powerful and can easily be limited via overlap, requirements to access same data sets that can likely be reduced in many cases
  4. Tools and APIs that are easier to use give more time and surface area to actually test and debug multi-threaded code
  5. Single threaded does not guarantee less bugs
  6. Multi-threaded does not guarantee higher performance
  7. Ability to perceive problems that could be solved via multi-core systems factors into ability to magnify and use multi-core systems effectively. A problem that can easily be broken into smaller parts that have limited to no overlap are generally good candidates for concurrency.
  8. Latency and blocking can be expensive as far as losses to performance. Multi-threaded systems can generate greater performance and responsiveness yet are not guaranteed to generate more performance.
  9. Virtual threads that block until interrupts can likely be cheaper than continuous polling on timed intervals.
  10. A mutli-core system can be like 50 employees standing by on a moments notice to finish a task. Power available might lead to leveraged design choices. Multi-threaded approaches can produce greater value does not equal they are always the most simple, elegant, or performance increasing approaches.
  11. Multi-threaded approaches have potential for more complex problems like race conditions and deadlocks, potential for transient errors or errors with splitting the problem in non ideal ways, 2 threads 50 operations each given 101 where will the extra 1 operation go? Systems that reduce complexity around splitting problems into useful subsets can be powerful for both local multi-threaded computing and remote multi-system multi-core multi-threaded computing.
  12. Visibility has potential for being more obfuscated as the problem set is broken into more subgroups. 100 in two sets, 50 and 50 is different than 20 sets of 5. Issue is in first set or second set versus 7th or 13th set. 20 sets is more to debug, more to juggle, easy to null cost the price of complexity non ideally.

Life

Life of Not All Sugar Out is Not All Good Days In

70 year life if lucky potential for still more of a temporary stay. Investing in a system that we are only momentarily a part of has the potential for less than ideal results by default.

In Engineering systems, complexity grows without always looking at a system and saying, can we maintain a system that grows exponentially complex over time effectively? Small parts that work well are a lot of power. A bottle of water can be the difference between life and death yet we get hung up on very intricate parts of the system that facilitate complexities that might not always have the longest term view in scope.

If I buy a car today, 10 years from now, what will it have added, what will it have taken away. Will it still be a useful car, what will have rusted on it? How many storms covered is it likely to see, how many storms uncovered is it likely to see?

Investments in Mobility like cars are meant to increase mobility and freedom overtime, not reduce it.

God that allows others to corruptly rob health, support, mobility, and encouragement while simultaneously being excessive lag on prayers gives feeling of not trustworthy as real God. I am getting sick of a system based on a God that claims Justice while delivering shit and robbed resources.

I would pray for all on Earth to be blessed, yet God seems to being a bit too latent to be ideally trusted with that these days. Not trusting God with that seems to be less than ideal as well.

Momentum is Power

Momentum is Power

Making a fast decision

A fast fix can be power

It generally can’t make up for hours of lead time

Someone that has spent 8 hours yesterday reading might have higher capacity for reading through something today than someone that spent 30 minutes yesterday reading.

Faster ability to process, faster results verified does not always equal same level of confidence as working through something.

Numbers you have added yourself, checked with a calculator yourself have potential for greater confidence than a machine even though the machine might have verified many more times. Confidence and Belief matters, factors into tone and thus how people hear and perceive results.

Humans less than ideal throughput by default, thus those listening are generally looking, listening for a reason to question results. Confidence factors into sales, and more surface area and time such as checking results with a calculator or having spent more time reading a book factors into confidence likely in not always perceptible ways, that are possibly perceptible in a way that can lead to reduced sales and throughput.

The numbers on 0 to 60 over 5 seconds check out from verified sources matters, nothing like driving in the car yourself and experiencing. Experience likely conveys meaning simple number and words cannot.

Results factor into confidence, and sometimes results are based upon luck. Preparation matters, ability to take on, to mitigate risk matters.

Leaders could have more Help

Negate People, Humans as Perfect Amplifiers of Support

Thus

Leaders Need Help

Leaders in 2023 seem to have a listening problem

I think that means the people that put them in Power have a listening problem

We manifest what we allow in leadership. CEOs set to don’t have to have real conversations equal unlikely to be sufficient observers and active listeners in society.

Leadership is competitive like a star quarterback or wide receiver. Thus it is not always sufficiently trained and fostered. Limited support in, limited support out.

Probably wise for all people to pray for better Leadership Worldwide Each and Everyday

What would the world be like if we required 5% more Support Throughput from Leaders and 25% less oppression?

360p from YouTube and not real resolution seems incorrect

Google invests in Resolution for what it cares about?

Throughput Limited Time System

The way this World makes me feel at times?

  1. Throughput is a Temporary System
  2. Clean is a Temporary System
  3. Contributions far from guaranteed to be Respected
  4. Good Choices does not equal God always Rewards good choices (is the feeling Life has given me up to this point)

System gives more feeling of amps Gotcha legalism while allowing Oppression to Amp than a timely Value Creation System

If a God of Infinite Power Exists, He could do far more.