My Tech Blog

Investing in Better Healthcare and Cancer Research would ideally lead to better personal Health. From my Life Experience that has not been the case.

Gains possible, less of a guarantee in a system that does not appreciate small contributions.

A Jewish Teacher teaches a German Student in the early 1900s Math. Later that Jewish Teacher sees the student they taught lining up Jewish people on train cars, using the same Math the Teacher taught them to oppress.

Take away? Teachers are not required to be appreciated. There is no guarantee that those you train today will not use that training against you tomorrow. Morality and Ethics should be a given does not equal Morality and Ethics is a given.

Small Contributions not appreciated, oppression allowed to run rampant is not a consequence free system.

The World needs Engineers. Systems require maintenance. Systems can be turned oppressive on a dime and without fail safes in place it can be hard to prevent in the future. A system that constantly tests ethics on Engineers and leaves them between having a roof over their head and left out on the street amplifies less than ideally over time.

Weary Engineers have the potential for decreasing total amount of Engineers. Less Oppression to fight, Oppression reduced earlier rather than later can be a lot of Power.

Easy to comprehend the danger in building a gun. The gun could end up in the wrong hands tomorrow and be used against the designer of that gun. Harder to comprehend the danger in a math lesson, in a lesson about running a business. What and how much people can be trusted with is not always agreed upon.

Design and Engineering, building systems would ideally be 100% appreciated for value added without loss of support for the non ideals the system introduces. Helicopters means Care Flights that can save lives. Helicopters means Machine Guns and RPGs. The future changes designs from original intent in both ideal and non ideal ways at times.

People are not Perfect. Engineers are People. Engineers design Less than Perfect, Less than Ideal systems without full comprehension of the potential value a system can add to the future and without full comprehension of the potential value a system can take away from the future. All served over a Max Profit system that factors into who gets food and a roof over their head at the end of the day amplifies less than ideally.

An Engineer building and drilling a water well. Locals could question their loyalty. The Locals could test the Engineers loyalty to insure better water supply. The Engineer could pass 5 of the tests but fail the sixth due to fatigue. The tests delay and then halt the drilling of the well completely.

Extra Tests from Oppression are weight and have potential for limiting Throughput in very non null ways.

Not saying God always listens to my Prayers, I would say a Prayer worth making everyday is for Less Oppression in the World. Engineering systems are more and more powerful everyday, limiting oppressive momentum that is hard to turn down in advance can be a lot of power. Bandwagon appeal and Pop culture has the potential for atrocities left unchecked.

Tech Companies that don’t protect Artist’s Studios and Contributions have no business saying they Love or Care for those Artists.

팔다리에 산소를 밀어 넣은 것처럼 문제가 해결되었습니다.
Problems solved like Oxygen pushed out to limbs

근접성은 처리량에 중요합니다.
Proximity matters to Throughput

산소 호흡과 같은 문제
Problems like breathing Oxygen in

폐를 통해 공기 밖으로 빠져나감
Pulled out of air via Lungs

혈류로 밀어 넣어 뇌, 기관 및 사지로 전달
Pushed into Bloodstream and Delivered to Brain, Organs, and Limbs

혈전 감소로 혈류 증가
Increased blood flow with reduced clots

• 아스피린과 알코올 Aspirin and Alcohol
• 운동과 유산소 Exercise and Cardio

Cardio 시스템과 같은 슈퍼컴퓨터 미들웨어? 문제를 흡입하여 유용한 에너지 가치 처리량으로 전환
Supercomputer middleware like Cardio system? Problems breathed in and turned into useful Energy Value Throughput

잠금 및 세마포어 종류가 필요한 공유 데이터는 가능하면 처리량 증가 가능성을 피하기 위해 혈전과 같은 종류입니다.
Shared data that requires locks and semaphores kind of like clots, if possible to avoid have the potential to increase Throughput

자가 치유 네트워크 및 동적 경로 재지정에 대한 생각
Thoughts around self healing networks and dynamic rerouting

거대한 자물쇠, 처리하지 않으면 처리량을 제한할 가능성이 있는 교착 상태와 같은 암 및 대량?
Cancer and Masses like giant locks, deadlocks that have the potential to limit throughput if not handled?

문제가 해결되는 방식, 답이 중요합니다. 문제 대 솔루션은 시스템 설계 방식에 따라 교착 상태 또는 교착 상태 감소로 이어질 가능성이 있습니다. 덜 밀접하게 결합된 데이터 종속성은 더 자유롭게 이동할 수 있는 능력으로 이어질 수 있습니다.
How Problems are Solved, Answered matters. Problem to Solution has potential to lead to deadlocks, or less deadlocks depending on how a system is designed. Less tightly coupled data dependencies can lead to more ability to move freely.

Event Driven Architectures, Streams, Publish Subscribe System은 자율 운영을 유지할 가능성이 있습니다. 근접성을 고려한 로드 밸런싱은 강력할 수 있습니다. 마이크로서비스는 다양한 앱이 사용할 수 있는 방식으로 추출되고 수평으로 확장된 여러 시스템에서 사용되는 라이브러리 또는 시스템을 사용할 수 있습니다. 확장 가능한 강력한 방식으로 시스템 수준에서 DRY를 더 많이 허용합니다.
Event Driven Architectures, Streams, Publish Subscribe Systems have the potential for maintaining autonomous operation. Load balancing that takes into account proximity can be Powerful. Microservices can take a library or system that is used by multiple systems extracted and scaled horizontally in a way that many different apps can use. Allows for DRY more at a system level in powerful way that can be scaled.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Load_balancing_(computing)

마이크로서비스 아키텍처는 또한 이상적이지 않은 방식으로 상호 의존성을 높일 가능성이 있습니다. 서비스 B, C 및 D가 의존하는 하나의 MicroserviceA. MicroserviceA를 업데이트하려면 ServiceB, ServiceC 및 ServiceD가 ServiceB만 수정할 것으로 예상되는 경우에도 여전히 작동하는지 테스트하고 검증해야 합니다. 신뢰는 잠재적으로 비즈니스에 이상적이지 않은 방식으로 표면적을 높일 수 있습니다.

Microservice Architectures also have potential for turning up interdependencies possibly in non ideal ways. One MicroserviceA that service B, C, and D rely upon. Updating MicroserviceA requires testing and validating ServiceB, ServiceC, and ServiceD still work even if the change is only expected to modify ServiceB. Reliance can turn up surface area in potentially non ideal ways for business.

다른 환경은 정상적이고 강력하며 복잡성에 대한 추가 비용을 발생시킵니다. MicroserviceA가 업데이트되었지만 프로덕션에서 MicroserviceA(버전-1)는 그대로 둡니다. 이제 ServiceB를 테스트할 수 있으며 다른 시스템은 계속해서 MicroserviceA(버전 1)에 의존할 수 있습니다. 시간이 지남에 따라 유지 관리하기 어려울 수있는 코드베이스의 격차와 비 이상적 분기가 발생할 가능성이 있습니다.

Different Environments is normal and is powerful, does create extra costs around complexity. MicroserviceA updated but leaves MicroserviceA(version-1) in production. Now ServiceB can be tested and other systems can continue relying on MicroserviceA(version-1). Though that has the potential for creating a gap and more potential non ideal branching of codebases that might be hard to maintain over time.

복잡성은 시간이 지남에 따라 증가하며 미리 제한하는 것이 강력합니다. 교착 상태 가능성이 적은 방식으로 시스템을 설계할 수 있는 경우 처리량 증가 가능성 및 버그 가능성 감소 가능성이 있습니다(가끔 생산에 한 번만 나타나는 일시적인 드문 경우도 가능).

Complexity grows over time, limiting in advance is powerful. If system can be designed in ways with less potential for Deadlocks, potential for increased Throughput and potentially less bugs (possibly even transient rare case ones that only show up in production every once in a while).

유한 상태 기계는 안전 및 안전하지 않은 상태에 대한 가능성이 있습니다.
Finite State Machines have potential for Safe and Unsafe states

안전 상태를 높이고 안전하지 않은 상태를 줄이면서 시스템을 설계할 수 있습니다.
Systems can be design with increased Safe States and Reduced Unsafe States

Purpose of Defense Law is not to enable more crime. Purpose of Defense Law is not to null cost crime. People make mistakes, real mistakes via inadequate training, inadequate resolution, and sometimes inadequate decision making capacity.

Society has potential to pay for what it turns up. A society that turns up excessive drinking has the potential for throughput losses, visibility losses that are not always ideal. Might have been able to think through that better if I was making wiser life choices is likely a common system yet people turn up drinking and living for the moment at times because life is unsure and wisdom does not always amplify ideal joy.

Drinking can make somethings better. With less access to Aspirin it can help with blood flow, at least from my limited understanding of nutrition. Drinking can make the brain at ease yet this can be a bit of a crutch that might not always be available. Relying on a crutch that has the potential to be removed can be devastating. The World is less than ideal evil out by default, crutches are not always easy to hide.

Staying away from drinking is Power. Even reliance on things like Aspirin have the potential to be taken non ideally. Relying on less drugs has the potential for power, yet water can be less than a given. I am able to type this thus water has pretty sufficient throughput in these times. Aspirin might have greater ease of access in the future does not equal it is ideal at this point in time.

Life is More than Bread and Water. Reliance seen as ideal seems unwise. Turning up zero reliance is not all protection for people with medical problems, that rely on medications. Diabetics don’t get to just turn off reliance when convenient. A society that lets anyone’s finances become too low has the potential for problems.

Talking about potential problems, trying to protect the future can be less than ideal encouragement. Can feel unloving and uncaring. People say don’t drink excessively, yet they don’t talk about what leads to people drinking excessively, unfair treatment in life and lost jobs, lost wages, lost hope and dreams. Treating the symptom with coldness to what creates the problem is unlikely to lead to ideal long term profits. We reap what we sow in Society, and if we sow cold and callus we will likely get cold and callus.

Defense Law promotes Need to mitigate Risk. Need to mitigate Risk is not all trust in others amplified sufficiently in society. People that give people the benefit of the doubt are power, gives oxygen in the room that might not otherwise exist. If people think you will be legalistic and ruin their life over a typo or spelling error, a missing penny, high potential for losses to throughput. Have to triple check everything and worry because system mistreats even those that do almost everything right has High Potential for Throughput loss both short term and long term.

Legalism can create real losses to Throughput, the same real losses to Throughput that can lead to excessive drinking due to jaded by a system that treats one coldly and callously.

Drinking has the potential for turned up as a crutch non ideally in tough times then a crutch that can be knocked out from under you in the good times. Time does not amp bodies ideally equals alcohol output and effects on system have potential for diminishing returns over time. Imagine what you get in 20s is 90% effect with 10% side-effects, that changes to 70% effect at 40 with 30% potential for side effects.

Somewhat wise to see the writing on the wall that over time, alcohol has potential for being less value added. Thus Reliance on a system that might eventually be taken can be hard on people.

Not doing drugs or alcohol does not guarantee a long life. Using drugs and alcohol does not guarantee a long life. Not all have the potential to turn down health problems, reliance on drugs, if you can take and run with it, it has the potential (but not guarantee) to be power in later years. Later years a little better? Could be a lot of grace in a harder time.

Optimizing the future when the present feels less than sufficient love and grace is difficult. I wish others would have better than that.

Part of the problem in Life? People like to turn things up, a good song at Volume 2 or at Volume 10? Just because you might be able to amp at Volume 3 or 4 does not equal you might not invest in others that want to amp at 9 or 10.

Song as a Metaphor or a Simile?

Drinking like a Good Song, fun to listen to at first, new and different, potential for gets old over time?

Increased buy in cost is a common system in our World. Just because people want to escape Drugs and Alcohol does not equal others can’t put spiked tire treads in front of them so to speak.

Drinking does not have always the most awful characteristics. Less controlling and more chill can be attractive. Able to turn up those properties without drinking might require a bit of acting? Better if it is real. Real without alcohol might take some soul searching, and some work.

I need to control this, I need to control that can be less than attractive. Control has less than 100% throughput is unattractive, control with 100% throughput is unattractive. Power that can’t deliver? who wants that? Power that delivers how others want with zero consideration? who wants that?

Engineers desire to control things. The bridge standing matters, factors into throughput. People like somethings being controlled. People like similar not exact systems (similes and metaphors for instance). Relationships like a bridge? There are similarities there are differences. A bridge you can’t raise to let ships through?

Too much control is possible to turn up. People also look for hints in similar not exact systems. The combination amplifies less than ideally.

Negating that a mans words will be ideal with reduced health is not always a comprehended system. Less can be more, even when trying.

All words desired to be comprehended, not always heard. Never Say Die! The future has yet to be written.

God allows less than perfection to amp. Access to my time machine video was negated. What can I say about it? Plans matter, factor into Throughput for the future. 2+2=4 is a possible system, not a guaranteed system. Just because we think if we change A or B in the past does not equal A’ or B’ is guaranteed.

Access that can be Negated, factors into Comprehension of Variables. Every Engineer with full comprehension of the system they are creating could eventually be used against them? Build a bridge does not equal desire Build a bridge to allow enemies to drive across and kill family.

People at the top trade harsh words, those with less that would be better friends is a possible system.

I want others to have less. No. A system where everyone equals the same value output equals warm? Unlikely. 9 Engineers and 1 problem to fix. Problem is fixed. 10th Engineer is encouraged? “An elegant solution, I am grateful to be able to comment on the eloquence of your design”

Words can be amplified, does not always equal they ring true.

Better than me, could input a solution before me.

A friend told me his design plans once. I used it as a way to think of ways I could amp value for myself. I had an opportunity to amplify amazing in others. Could have possibly done better with that. Similar solutions exist does not equal it is always ideal inspiration, ideal appreciation for the unique value others add.

Engineers cut less than precise. Everything as a starting point without consideration for others has potential for amplifying less than ideally. Man can say things and be completely justified but for the wrong reasons. Right for the wrong reasons matters and is not always corrected.

You were less than ideally wrong yet your heart was not in the right place. A possible system, a possible system to combat in advance? Others might do better with it than I.

Technically right yet morally wrong is a possible system. It is not always easy to comprehend what those systems are.

Man walks into a strip club.

Technically allowed, otherwise all strip clubs would be closed in advance.

Morally right? Man desires beautiful women equals heart is in right place?

Man would go into Strip club if he didn’t desire beautiful women? Men that don’t desire beautiful women that enter a strip club should be trusted? Ideally?

Easy to judge, harder to say, man is missing something, man is less than perfect. Might not find it in a strip club, does not equal it is all value out to comprehend that man is missing something, something not always easy to obtain.

Mean is not a zero cost system. 5 years from now, 10 years from now, how is that person that was mean doing? I remember their name?

Nice. When I want to remember something, the people that gave me grace not always value out.

Alcohol and women, reduced communication amplifies less than ideally, being value added in that situation seen as easy would be unwise.

People like to solve the problem without solving the problem, set to known by default unwise.

Legal in society does not always equal won’t get you fired. Other’s like leverage.

A boss giving money to a stripper? That’s money employees could be using to feed their family. That’s money strippers could be using to feed their family. The test is all value in? No. Negating the test is all value in? No.

Media systems can be half invested seems unwise. Porn kosher yet strip clubs not kosher unstated? Equals will amp ideally? About that not about that is easy to turn up.

Skirt the line, punish the line, don’t fix the line? For your child?

Drinking – you will have time to ideally, sufficiently understand the system before it causes you problems? Unlikely. It is wise to rely upon in a corrupt system? No. A Corrupt System always shows signs of Corruption before it is too late? No.

World is currently insufficient corruption out for me to recommend drinking for future generations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Load_balancing_(computing)

Compression can reduce Request Visibility. Increased visibility can lead to ability to design systems like Caching on top of Network Topology that might lead to unexpected results. Distributed Caching can be Power, is Not Guaranteed to be Power.

Can see can understand can lead to belief have greater visibility, can build on this or that without fully thinking through potential combinatorics.

Potential for an application that is in a set of states, is wired for performance in one state without thinking through what happens when the application transitions into other states.

State 1 Can profit at the Expense of others Unfairly

State 2 Can’t profit at the Expense of others Unfairly

Throughput can be increased and costs can be reduced is a common system.

Throughput can be increased and costs can be reduced at increased cost of others is a common system.

Throughput can be increased and costs can be reduced in a way that is a win win for others is not a common system. Less common systems are worth investing in yet do not always have ideal investment and oversight.

If you are part of TeamA, CorpA, and you need TeamA and CorpA to be Profitable, are you going to factor in how that will effect TeamB, CorpB?

Eventually TeamA gets set to TeamB, then new TeamA has the same question posed to it. All with your fellow citizens, children, mothers, daughters, brothers, and sisters on the line. The competition can be eliminated can easily be set to self.

Greed gets upsold to might create the best system. Saving can be Greed based, not sure it is all fair to upsell those that want to have enough to survive to Greedy. Trying to do Right by the World should leave people with enough, yet time and time again the World has proven that doing Right by the World, does not equal the World doing Right by you.

Not saving $10,000 has not lead to me having optimal Throughput. Maybe system works different for others. Saving $10,000 could easily lead to released bank account numbers to potential enemies. Money in the account leads to extra medical costs paid through some health conditions turned up for gain? System of saving, system of not saving with insufficient protection from God is unlikely to be truly useful.

System is negate upward mobility, negate health, negate hope and encouragement. In a Just World, System would pay for that sin. What does pay for mean? Requirement to issue a public apology, pay all losses in full. Negated Justice Throughput matters, and is Non Ideally Upsold to will have time to Right the wrong.

There is obfuscation in systems, groups of people, nobody to hold accountable all while sets of people hold onto large bank accounts behind the scene. Obfuscated visibility, leads to unable to hold accountable. Thus when useful, not generally when useful to the one wronged, but when useful to the next political party or set of people trying to capitalize on a power vacuum those accounts have potential for made public, useful to show how wrongs will be punished in the new age.

Pursuit of Justice can be less than a Just pursuit. System does not give feeling of magnifies Love and Grace. Running a deficit has consequences, leaves sharp edges like the edge of a table that need to be sanded. Not corrected sets examples for others, that is sufficient (while being completely insufficient). System that sets a bad example should not be null costed, important to do better, future depends on it.

Never right and never forgive. Call them ChoiceA and ChoiceB. High potential for grouping people that use ChoiceA and ChoiceB in the same area, surrounding them with the same types of people that don’t allow forgiveness or making things right.

Allow bridges built and promote forgiveness, grace. Call them ChoiceA’ and ChoiceB’. High Potential for those kind of people grouped together free of those that choose ChoiceA and ChoiceB.

May God prevent plans of all those that claim ChoiceA’ and ChoiceB’ while actually harboring ChoiceA and ChoiceB.

Elementary schools teach Don’t Bulley.

Colleges and Life after school teaches Maximize Profit for Company required to keep lights on, food on table.

Think the two match up ideally? With zero consequences? Greed that has the potential to lead to bullying, some with less equals a necessary evil in the system?

People aren’t equal workers. Some work harder than others. Those that work harder not rewarded has potential to lead to not working hard in the future.

People aren’t equally empowered with good health and energy to work in exactly similar ways. People aren’t equally empowered with training, support, and encouragement to work in exactly similar ways.

Hard work is important, needs to be rewarded. Greed is part of the system needs to be reduced. Greed for Rewards has the potential to drive Results, Hard work. The combination claimed as amps ideally fails to deliver.

Get one Reward can lead to thought can get two, three, four, five. Could be greater results and harder work, could be less for others and non ideal single point of failure.

Sometimes Employees can be responsible for multiple Tasks. Sometimes employees required to handle TaskA, TaskB, and TaskC is turned up without first thinking about will they be able to handle TaskA, TaskB, and TaskC for an extended period of time. Can overload employees does not equal zero cost to encouragement. One test might teach a lesson, 15 tests at once can be like being hit like a Pinata.

Single points of failure are turned up without first considering potential consequences.

A man that polishes Greed and Corporate Elitism as gold might be revered in the USA. Another man that talks about the need for sharing, mercy, and grace can be upsold to a Russian Communist. Doing right does not always lead to fair results, actual change is hard when people seem to be more concentrated on image than on truth. Image matters, can lead to no food on the table. Image has the potential to lead to no food on the table seen as zero consequences would be unwise.

Hard to make judgments on the unknown. Easy to think myself more capable in one area or less capable in another. Sober assessment of ones abilities and how they change over time with increased stress and pressure is not always possible.

Some might be trained 70% for something then are thrown into a tough situation and make the best of it. Now their 70% plus experience could be greater than someone trained 95%.

How the chips fall matter, real world experience is different than classroom experience.

I am not always a sober assessor of my own abilities. I can help relay a message.

Words spoken under oppression, stress, and duress are unwise to hold people accountable for later. Easy to not see all that is going on at ground level.