https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Load_balancing_(computing)
Compression can reduce Request Visibility. Increased visibility can lead to ability to design systems like Caching on top of Network Topology that might lead to unexpected results. Distributed Caching can be Power, is Not Guaranteed to be Power.
Can see can understand can lead to belief have greater visibility, can build on this or that without fully thinking through potential combinatorics.
Potential for an application that is in a set of states, is wired for performance in one state without thinking through what happens when the application transitions into other states.
State 1 Can profit at the Expense of others Unfairly
State 2 Can’t profit at the Expense of others Unfairly
Throughput can be increased and costs can be reduced is a common system.
Throughput can be increased and costs can be reduced at increased cost of others is a common system.
Throughput can be increased and costs can be reduced in a way that is a win win for others is not a common system. Less common systems are worth investing in yet do not always have ideal investment and oversight.
If you are part of TeamA, CorpA, and you need TeamA and CorpA to be Profitable, are you going to factor in how that will effect TeamB, CorpB?
Eventually TeamA gets set to TeamB, then new TeamA has the same question posed to it. All with your fellow citizens, children, mothers, daughters, brothers, and sisters on the line. The competition can be eliminated can easily be set to self.
Greed gets upsold to might create the best system. Saving can be Greed based, not sure it is all fair to upsell those that want to have enough to survive to Greedy. Trying to do Right by the World should leave people with enough, yet time and time again the World has proven that doing Right by the World, does not equal the World doing Right by you.
Not saving $10,000 has not lead to me having optimal Throughput. Maybe system works different for others. Saving $10,000 could easily lead to released bank account numbers to potential enemies. Money in the account leads to extra medical costs paid through some health conditions turned up for gain? System of saving, system of not saving with insufficient protection from God is unlikely to be truly useful.
System is negate upward mobility, negate health, negate hope and encouragement. In a Just World, System would pay for that sin. What does pay for mean? Requirement to issue a public apology, pay all losses in full. Negated Justice Throughput matters, and is Non Ideally Upsold to will have time to Right the wrong.
There is obfuscation in systems, groups of people, nobody to hold accountable all while sets of people hold onto large bank accounts behind the scene. Obfuscated visibility, leads to unable to hold accountable. Thus when useful, not generally when useful to the one wronged, but when useful to the next political party or set of people trying to capitalize on a power vacuum those accounts have potential for made public, useful to show how wrongs will be punished in the new age.
Pursuit of Justice can be less than a Just pursuit. System does not give feeling of magnifies Love and Grace. Running a deficit has consequences, leaves sharp edges like the edge of a table that need to be sanded. Not corrected sets examples for others, that is sufficient (while being completely insufficient). System that sets a bad example should not be null costed, important to do better, future depends on it.
Never right and never forgive. Call them ChoiceA and ChoiceB. High potential for grouping people that use ChoiceA and ChoiceB in the same area, surrounding them with the same types of people that don’t allow forgiveness or making things right.
Allow bridges built and promote forgiveness, grace. Call them ChoiceA’ and ChoiceB’. High Potential for those kind of people grouped together free of those that choose ChoiceA and ChoiceB.
May God prevent plans of all those that claim ChoiceA’ and ChoiceB’ while actually harboring ChoiceA and ChoiceB.
Elementary schools teach Don’t Bulley.
Colleges and Life after school teaches Maximize Profit for Company required to keep lights on, food on table.
Think the two match up ideally? With zero consequences? Greed that has the potential to lead to bullying, some with less equals a necessary evil in the system?
People aren’t equal workers. Some work harder than others. Those that work harder not rewarded has potential to lead to not working hard in the future.
People aren’t equally empowered with good health and energy to work in exactly similar ways. People aren’t equally empowered with training, support, and encouragement to work in exactly similar ways.
Hard work is important, needs to be rewarded. Greed is part of the system needs to be reduced. Greed for Rewards has the potential to drive Results, Hard work. The combination claimed as amps ideally fails to deliver.
Get one Reward can lead to thought can get two, three, four, five. Could be greater results and harder work, could be less for others and non ideal single point of failure.
Sometimes Employees can be responsible for multiple Tasks. Sometimes employees required to handle TaskA, TaskB, and TaskC is turned up without first thinking about will they be able to handle TaskA, TaskB, and TaskC for an extended period of time. Can overload employees does not equal zero cost to encouragement. One test might teach a lesson, 15 tests at once can be like being hit like a Pinata.
Single points of failure are turned up without first considering potential consequences.
A man that polishes Greed and Corporate Elitism as gold might be revered in the USA. Another man that talks about the need for sharing, mercy, and grace can be upsold to a Russian Communist. Doing right does not always lead to fair results, actual change is hard when people seem to be more concentrated on image than on truth. Image matters, can lead to no food on the table. Image has the potential to lead to no food on the table seen as zero consequences would be unwise.
My Tech Blog 