My Tech Blog

I am not a Doctor, or a Lawyer – some thoughts

Levels of contrast required for action get equated to sufficient representation – a wheel might need to squeak loud to get fixed does not equate to highest level of contrast, contrast that will lead to action, action such as will fix is always truthful or ideal representation established. It is understandable someone or a group of people might desire sufficient levels of contrast perceived and comprehended to get action, yet over amounts, stronger amounts might be generated in pursuit.

If someone says they have pain that is 4 on scale of 10 might not get fixed. If someone says they have pain of 10 on a scale of 10 more likely to get fixed, equated to pain of 4 not a problem, 10 was likely ideal representation. People that have potential to raise comprehension of problems better might be more likely to get their problems fixed, thus using voice to help others is potentially more valuable than people always ponder. If 4 is not respected, blame someone for claiming 10 when fix is desirable, and 4 is known not to deliver? Society (including myself) potentially reinforce non ideal truth by requiring high levels to perceive and comprehend need for action.

If someone else has a problem with an unknown level, say it is a 4 on scale of 10 or a 10 on scale of 10? Desire to help others, implement Golden Rule might never obfuscate truth? Well-meaning people that fight for each other might convolute truth, not all good, and not all bad. People that get their problem fixed might have extra freedom (and their problem fixed first might have or might not have been ideally established) thus carrying it forward to help others seems wise.

Less than ideal representation factors into problems solved does not equate to more adequate representation is always likely to be turned up at another date. Speaking in generality, think of the fact that stories and movies can highlight really important problems in society, yet might highlight them in a very shocking way that might lead to problem perceived at a much greater level than actually exists. The actual problem is a problem, the problem perceived at much greater level is sometimes terrifying.

The loudest voice, the voice that sways the most hearts might be set to the one with the most ideal capacity to perceive and comprehend truth non ideally. Delivery of Charm does not require ideal truth delivered initially. A leader has potential to be charming, truthful, yet what is required for them to give ideal representation of truth might be obfuscated from their view. Accurate representation of what is said in a movie, YouTube, or article might be directly correlated to accurate representation. Well-meaning people that speak truthfully do not and are not required to ideally track down the most truthful representation.

Most truthful representation might require probing line of questioning, yet Golden Rule might state probing line of questioning not really how others wish to be treated. The most adequate representation of truth not always the most morally right? The most adequate representation of truth factors into reason and logic, thus reason and logic while sometimes ideal is not always ideal.

Leaders that win via Charisma might be set do ideal paths to start pursuit of Truth. 2024 equates to we are past potential for relevance limiting and obfuscation due to being charmed? It’s nice, desirable to think the future, technology ideals political systems though I don’t think that is how the future and technology have amplified at least during my lifetime. Progress and Change is forward never backwards, up and never down is a nice thought though not really full appreciation for the continuous work required to make change and societal gains have greater throughput for the future. Change that is more maintainable is more sustainable.

Discouragement Limits Throughput

The Church teaches the Golden Rule. If the Golden Rule had ideal throughput, when someone else succeeds we would all be happy, be supportive – that is not how the World seems to work.

One fixes ProblemA, yet ProblemB, ProblemC, and ProblemD left unfixed? What if you are or your support is ProblemD? It makes sense people desire support and seeing others supported when they are not has potential to be hurtful.

That said if someone fixes ProblemA and then are demoralized, discouraged expect ProblemB, ProblemC, and ProblemD to be fixed once the wind is out of their sails? Proclaim the injustice or reinforce the good while attempting to minimize the bad without obfuscating truth?

Supernovas, Blackholes, and Galaxies the Universe is a beautiful place. Yet the Universe and The World is not always a beautiful place. It might be desirable at time to make everything cleaner – organization, everything in its place factors into encouragement, clear thought, and clearer direction. The combination might lead to never desire to get dirty, never to incur liability by getting involved, trying to help others.

No Risk No Reward is somewhat useful saying to inspire Love, taking on increased risk by choosing to fix ProblemA, ProblemB, ProblemC, or ProblemD first. Fix one problem first one will risk increased liability increased visibility of not fixing other problems. Curing injustice in the system doesn’t find the cure for cancer, curing cancer doesn’t cure injustice in governments. Demoralize and Discourage the person that tries to reduce injustice because they don’t cure cancer? Demoralize and Discourage the person that tries to reduce cancer because they don’t cure injustice? Try to solve both claim zero love? claim ideal love?

Success has potential to bring Critics. Success also has potential to save lives, make things better. If I was the person with ProblemE I might desire to call out the injustice, yet it might be potentially more wise to reinforce the good in the successes. Problems left set to unknown does not ideal, problems known and acknowledge not fixed is discouragement, demoralization of its own, those that have potential to fix problems demoralized, discouraged, and limited has potential to factor into less throughput, into reinforcing perceived as less throughput by choice.

Being a Critic does not always ideal, problems not acknowledged does not usually ideal – criticism might not always amplify in encouraging way does not equate to problems less known is always higher value added. Problems perceived and comprehended without perceived and comprehended as discouragement and demoralization not a given, right words and grace matters, forgiveness for unknowns matter, don’t judge factors into what needs to perceived as in need of being forgiven. Acknowledged as a problem might leave something in the air, bring in thought paths that are non-null time costs? Should I forgive or should I not forgive, what is the level of the problem, is there similar problems? Thought paths that take time and do not always amplify less judgment, judgment that is in direct contrast to don’t judge.

Feedback delivered in right way, with right level of grace and kindness factors into problems solved vs not solved. As someone that likes tech, I want others problems solved as long as their problems solved does not equate to others hurt or with more problems.

There is injustice in society. I don’t know how to stop all of it. That should not be equated to I want injustice.

There is ambiguity at times in government messages. I don’t know how to stop all of it. That should not be equated to I want ambiguity in government messages.

Things have potential to be perceived and comprehended in ways not intended. I don’t know how to stop all of it. That should not be equated to I want things perceived and comprehended incorrectly. Sometimes might work in my favor, sometimes might be creative, does not equate to I desire it or it will or is likely to always amplify that way.

Less than ideals factor into people’s profit in life. People don’t know how to stop all of it. That should not be equated to they want less than ideals factoring into profit. If I buy gas I might need it to go to the store or to work, or even to buy solar panels. CO2 emissions contribute to global warming does not equate to I or others desire global warming. Continued use of gasoline by Police Cars and Ambulances – both of which save lives, might fuel less energy independence, continued reliance on The Middle East, that said Police and Ambulances should not be equated to desiring global warming, desire energy dependence that empowers less than ideal regimes.

Awareness is raised less than ideally. Awareness raised less than ideally should not be equated to desire. Raising awareness in the right ways, in the way that actually leads to change requires building bridges over demonizing, demoralizing, and discouraging people that might see things another way. I desire more green tech, more energy independence for our country, and less global warming, I might not know how to raise awareness in ideal ways, should not be equated to I desire to discourage others.

New technology does not always deliver. Selling people on the gains matters and has shown precedent at times for amplifying less than ideally for all in society. Supercomputers have been in by design for a while, Homelessness and People on the street have been in by design regardless that Supercomputers have been in by design – what is sold as has potential to make all peoples lives better sometimes only delivers for a portion of Society. Inclusive path forward Matters, and has shown precedent for turned up less than ideally. Green and Less Global Warming should profit all, making implementation desirable and practical factors into real gains.

More Energy independence could equate to less desirable GDPs for some nations which is less than desirable. I want Venezuelan people less oppressed not more poor – though financial power generated via petroleum has not always amplified less oppression ideally. Paths forward that sound good, that are desirable from an environmental standpoint, do not always require less change for those that are hurting.

Reduced Energy dependence equates to less leverage for other countries on The World Stage, combined with Governmental instability compounded by reduced financial power has shown historic precedent for amplifying less than ideally. Is the United Nations and The World prepared for the costs associated with reduce dependence on oil? People (including me) desire Less Global Warming yet I am not sure practically People of The World (including me) are ready to make sure it amplifies ideally for all nations it will affect. Looking at The Middle East, partially idealed seems to be delivering less than sufficiently. True cost of change without Humanitarian crises?

If I take a landmark, an area in the city, and I imagine a kitten walking on the ground close to the crowd, when I visit that landmark again, I might remember a kitten that walked there. Imagination factors into memory and potential for truth obfuscated.

If I take a landmark, an area in the city, and I imagine a tiger walking on the ground close to the crowd, it changes the dynamic dramatically – Tigers are dangerous, can’t have a tiger close to the crowd. Tigers might be endangered, shoot an endangered animal? Or maybe I imagine a circus tiger, trained to be like an attack dog that protects me. Regardless of how I imagine things, it could factor into my memory of the landmark, perception of truth, perception of potential threats at a particular landmark.

Not real factors into perception, perception of truth, capacity to comprehend, details that factor into threats perceived or not perceived accurately.

If people see Authority, or an Officer as a kitten, or as a tiger, claim either is good? People use similar not exact systems to amplify comprehension, dehumanization amplifies less than ideally – people are not animals, yet in some prisons in the World conditions have potential to convolute that idea.

Imagination has potential for useful for hypotheticals, what would one do if there was a kitten in the crowd, what would one do if there was a tiger in the crowd (Zoos sometimes have animals, not people escape). Having a plan for potential escaped animals might be useful for cops, reminders of the idea every time they visit a landmark might be less than ideal. Trying to listen to a dispute, citizens communicate and seeing a tiger in their peripheral vision could be less than ideal.

Authority having some imagination matters, thinking things have the potential for only happening one way is not always sufficient citizens protected. A child or an adult could use imagination telling a cop that someone released a tiger into the crowd when they might have been confusing a memory they had of the circus.

Levels and balance matters, wouldn’t want people seeing a circus at every landmark. Capacity to control imagination might be greater in some than others is likely not fully appreciated. I like Imagination – great Writing, great Songs, great Art, and great Movies, that said I do theorize there is the potential for problems, potential for problems I don’t fully know, perceive, or comprehend. Inception is a pretty amazing Movie, also a pretty powerful Movie – that said it was not blocked from the public, for better and worse. Less than ideal truth is in by design yet desire to factor in that fact is potentially less than sufficient at times.

Authority and Cops might not always have ideal access to truth. Less proximity (like being on a boat in the Ocean) might be higher value at times than all fully appreciate. Governments never mislead? Always easy to know, always easy to have access to know when Governments are mislead? Access to oversight is valuable, yet likely distributes knowledge, allows for transparency less than ideally – I have capacity to comprehend threats in society might be thought to known capacity to comprehend is far less than ideal not a given. Having a stable government and society might spoil into thinking it is a given, does not need to be fought for and protected, justice is just in by design and injustice never a problem.

Things are the way they are because God wants them that way thought to change, progress is desirable though change and progress do not always protect all parties. Change and progress, inspired correctly not always a simple system. USA political system constantly changes, leaves change in by design, which is less than all value out for training people to create change and progress in more valuable ways. Practice with Change and Progress factors into better Delivery, delivery of Change and Progress that hurts less and helps more. Being on a boat might limit capacity to interact with the system in a way that protects others, a satellite phone plus distance might be less than all support reduced. Seeing as boats for all to avoid a corrupt system is impractical, better to have a stable non-corrupted system.

Risk mitigation matters, reduced proximity factors into risk mitigation might not always be entertained as an option. Unwise to act on fear, might be comprehended as acting on fear, does not equate to reduced proximity is always value out, should be equated to most value out. That is acting on fear has the potential to be turned up in a way that could reduce risk mitigation. Might be turned up in similar not exact systems in ways that could be allot of value out, thus potentially not always stated. Stand by a defendant, the accused to help protect them, or reduced proximity is higher value added? Standing by one defendant might lead to less capacity to stand by another defendant, likely not fully appreciated people have to choose their battles and more helping protect and defend far from all value out.

Christ has ideal capacity to stand next to people and man that is not God does not have ideal capacity to stand next to all people on Earth and on Space Stations at all times. If I am trying to amplify defense law in Dallas, TX I want God protecting people on the Space Stations? Yes. Desire to cover all bases does not equate to requirement to feels good. Houston is close, yet Space Stations everyone in the World’s neighbor?

I would not want psychopaths or murders walking the streets. That said in The Middle East my understanding is they hang people from cranes – gives feeling of system as more of a Tiger than a kitten. Texas government has used the electric chair, and lethal injection – which gives a feeling of more Tiger than I might like to admit. Dehumanization turned up matters, yet we put people to sleep like animals feels ideal?

I am not authority, that said I want all citizens protected, authority and non-authority, less proximity to dehumanization, dehumanizing systems not always value out.

I find the following message valuable

I am not the person on the video. I, the writer of this vlog, desire people that are not active threats to have greater access to freedom and to be treated with less injustice. I have less than ideal capacity to assess or judge whether people are threats or not. People left in Jail might be safer at times should not be equated to ideal justice delivered, the system is a flawless system.

I recently purchased a Logitech Ergonomic Keyboard – better capacity to reduce wrist strain and possibly carpel tunnel is what I am going for.

That said the keyboard comes with software, software that has a privacy policy

Logitech Product Privacy Policy | Your Privacy is Our Priority

The privacy policy states that it collects product use data, which includes button presses

Being someone that is in Tech, and in Programming, that uses computers for typing passwords and logging into websites the combination is a bit concerning.

Data breaches happen (Adobe for instance), how much and how long is Logitech storing this information? Ergonomics should ideally facilitate better experience with the product, and I find the Privacy Policy, while common to many companies less than an ideal experience amplifier in purchasing of a keyboard.

Government agencies likely have that data by default, yet also potentially have another route to get the data easier might be less than ideal value added. Companies that are trying to profit might have early access to documents and key presses that have yet to be released to the public – insider information possible.

I am not a lawyer, that said the combination is a bit concerning. Protecting my own ability to profit in the World relies upon my ability to work in confidence, through tools such as a keyboard.

Some people at Logitech have put allot of time into creating a More Ergonomical product to deliver a better experience, companies should follow suit to provide a better experience from a Legal and Consumer Protection route as well. Someone buys an Ergonomic keyboard potentially set to disclosing proprietary information, breaches non-disclosure agreements without trying to?

Who gets put on the street, who gets put on the jail happens, negate I think it happens via an ideally fair and just system.

All people using keyboards set to insider trading possible? Didn’t read the EULA on a keyboard or a smartphone not possible? Always a big screen, easy to read, plenty of time and zero health problems? Even if it does not lead to legal action taken, it could lead to distrust, accusations.

The right key presses on a trial? How did the other side know that? Backroom deals via big tech companies for greater access to information in iffy gray legal territory with limited visibility and oversight? Extra data might increase chances for liability, whether or not that data was misused, less data is power likely not always fully pondered. Iffy territory reduces productivity, I can trust or I can’t trust factors into support delivered and not delivered. The World should facilitate better Peace – this sentence might have been higher up on the document.

My life’s work and Many other’s life’s work is on computers and with computers – going back to a typewriter might allow less capacity to influence does not equate to it is a sufficient route in this day and age. Real protection matters. Increasing desire to air gap machines for protection and legal protection is less than ideal visibility for systems that matter. Access might lead to temptation to limit Freedom of Speech, utilize Control in ways that sometimes help in ways that sometimes help reinforce paychecks for some.

Government and Authority required to prove that they deliver on the Golden Rule better might be a worthwhile concern before they are granted access to data. Disclosure profits some more than others, equates to which companies thrive and which ones sink? I should be able to trust authority, governments with data, greed always out of the picture? 

I don’t want someone’s evil plan being used to hurt people, authority and governments with less data not always good. Someone’s life dreams could easily be set to evil plan as a way to guarantee some companies thrive and some companies sink. Authority should always be or should never be trusted seems unwise.

Less Data and More Data are sometimes worthwhile pursuits, and they are driven in less-than-ideal ways less-than-ideal conditions. A keyboard less trustworthy might obfuscate what is actually gathering data. Only effects 1% of population of users not a possible problem, a problem that is likely to be versed? A problem that doesn’t matter if you are in the 1%? The thought “I go to work and go to sleep each day safe equals the system must be doing something right” could be equated to the system is sufficiently protecting the rest of the population, whether that be 1%, 10%, or 20%+.

Less trustworthy amplifies Bias, Bias that might be directed towards the wrong person or group of people. Systems and capacity to work in more trustworthy way, in ways that actually equate to gains matters. Imagine walking into work on Monday and seeing your keyboard broken in half – shocking, hurtful, potential to raise hypotheticals, accusations in the mind with less-than-ideal proof. Having people remotely mess with your typing is kind of a bit of that, kind of a seed of doubt that has potential to spark anger and accusations – a constant reminder that your work, the place you live, everything has potential to be taken in an instant feels like less-than-ideal trust inspired. Key loggers and VNC might be used as a practical joke at times, that said people making the joke don’t likely know that it has potential to call previous work into question. 

What is meant to get a few laughs likely not meant to destroy appreciation and trust in years of work. Work meticulously on a 100-page document that could save lives, to find out on page 99 that your typing might be being messed with – how many times should you re-read the paper, when reading page 1 page 99 could be being edited, on page 20 page 1 could be edited. Less than ideal verification is in by design has potential to be less than a pretty system. Lag factors into who’s work is appreciated, and who’s work might be set to old news. Competitive systems and less-than-ideal capacity to gauge levels of wrong.

I like humor, I don’t like being mean, humor can be mean, people that have less than ideal motivating factors like a competitive work environment might not have ideal intentions when using humor is hard to gauge, is likely hard to fully appreciate.

Too serious not always pretty. People use humor to relate to one another, to build bonds and encourage at times. The combination could be used to make practical jokes seem reasonable to play a joke on PartyA. One decides not to play a joke on PartyA could lead to PartyA saying “why didn’t you joke with me, why did you choose not desire to relate with me”. Or one could realize the devil in the details Hypothetical words of PartyA does not equate to words of PartyA. People like to laugh, people don’t like to be singled out and embarrassed, people don’t always gauge properly what people will take serious, what might lead to distrust, doubt, and discouragement. Capacity to take things lightly, think better of others many times has potential to be higher value added than the alternative does not equate to it might ideally establish and deliver truth.

Someone editing my words when I type trying to just joke with me, be inclusive? Or trying to derail support to starve my family? Allot of range in that likely not fully appreciated by those who make practical jokes. Could just be a broken key on the keyboard, happens at the perfect times always just coincidence? Thinking better is wise, maybe just trying to joke with me, be inclusive beats accusing the wrong party, the manifestation of the anger caused by full appreciation of injustice. Less than ideal truth might beat wrong parties accused, jumping to conclusions that might be partially true. 

Part of the problem with insecure computing and problems where who is responsible is not found, shown, or acknowledged is people get put on the might be correlated list in the brain. Finding who is responsible factors into greater productivity. Who is responsible never found does not equate to people are ideally pulled off the iffed trust list. PartyA might be part of the problem but insufficient proof does not always lead to PartyA trusted ideally in the future when they were not involved. Lack of proof creates Questionable, Questionable is not an ideal value to be set to.

I have worked allot with computers, I have worked with VNC, people with capacity might be equated to responsible parties. I like to help people not hurt people though people’s experiences with computers over the years factors into their capacity to trust me, to factor me out as a problem by default. Requirement to establish trust is less-than-ideal especially when inability to prove is in by design.

Getting messed with remotely has potential to create Anger for good reason yet I don’t want that anger directed towards me or others when I am not the responsible party. Potential for wrong parties to be blamed and inability to prove sufficiently has potential to create murky waters, distrust. The person or people thought responsible are not always the cause is likely not always pondered and reflected upon. Thinking better of others might lead to less time costs though might not always equate to problems solved real conversation. People might mess with remotely and then when an employee outbursts competition might set to unhinged. Response is not ideally turned up does not equate to reduced security and transparency is all value added. Add in people of a different race or different sex and the combo could easily lead to ruined careers and costly discrimination lawsuits.

Tech relies on Law and Business, relies upon many, many different fields that are all unique fitted to a similar mold. There is potential for many win wins in tech, yet how the combinations amplify less than ideally for all is likely not always turned up. I am a tech guy, thus I might see more problems in legalism than tech, in desire to make businesses profitable than tech, yet tech relies upon and reinforces both of those systems and other systems in less-than-ideal ways. Everyone with giant calculators (computers) amplifies more ideally for some than others, yet gets set to Math ideals. People like bridges, yet they might be more apt to call out the laws and funding that go into the bridge than the bridge as a problem. I like bridges to drive across, I like gains for the future, yet I don’t want to reinforce laws and reduced funding that amplify more ideally for some rather than others.

Bridges are locality based, they profit some more than others. Engineering work on a bridge likely will increase knowledge, capacity, and data for years to come thus profiting entire World, yet to say the combo amplifies ideally for all seems unwise. Data that is useful, that is derived from government projects is likely only shared with some, full comprehension of value likely only amplified for some. Some people recently died via electrical lines falling on a car, combined with what looks like falling power lines in Dallas not being repaired swiftly, and our national debt gives reason for concern, inspires thoughts of danger not fully amplified or valued sufficiently by Society.

Potentially a great tech paradox, Tech needs to amplify more ideally for All in Society and doesn’t. Vending machines amplify ideally for all in the room? Proximity matters, not in the room matters. What if the room is those with money, and outside the room is those without? If Churches could share all the heat and air conditioning in their rooms with all of Society, they likely would. Shelter for the less fortunate is desirable and amplifies less than ideally less than always easily.

I know Texas summer is coming, and 110 degree heat amplifies less than ideally. Potentially harder to distribute gains in the middle of the summer. More Air Conditioning installed today factors into greater capacity to make it through Global Warming. I am not a boss of any companies, bosses might find ways to better equip employees in Dallas, TX with better Air Conditioning or access to Air Conditioning. Local free cool down stations? Not sure how hot Dart trains get, wonder if they have ice chests and free water bottles?

The top 10 causes of death

I don’t know many Jewish people personally. Like all people, I want them to thrive and not be threatened and hurt by terrorists our countries that devalue their lives.

I like Texas Thunderstorms (that including Lightning). I like the Imagine Dragons song Thunder. I do not like that I see the Jewish people stressed due to potential attacks on all sides, stuck in a region where people are allowed to grow power that devalues their life this many years after World War 2.

I think there is the possibility for being set to Anti-Jewish for liking Lightning. Lightning Warfare in World War 2, thus people that like Lightning in Art and Movies might be set to lovers of nazis insufficiently. The combo is consequential.

I want to support Israel and The Jewish people. Will I stop watching Movies with Lightning, stop purchasing art with Lightning to show my support for Israel? A small concession sometimes valuable though not inconsequential. Always wonder if God is supporting nazis when He sends a Thunderstorm? People don’t always consider the consequences of making concessions about art and freedom of speech.

People use Electricity. Electricity is like Lightning. People should sit in the dark to show their support for Israel and The Jewish people, to prove they are not nazis? The combo could lead to insufficient life support systems in Hospitals all over the World.

If I make a small concession as a US Citizen and say I will not talk to Germans or to Japanese people to show my support for Israel would that really foster a German and Japanese society for the future that supports Jewish people, supports US Citizens? It is not really a small concession. It is both vitally important to support Jewish people and Israel, hate Antisemitism, and protect those that might be set to Antisemitic unfairly.

This many years after World War 2 I should be able to be friends with a German person, a Japanese person, a Blonde person (which much of my family is) without being set to arian promoter, nazi promoter, anti-Jewish or antisemitic. I like Texas Thunderstorms, Movies with Tornados, and I like Israel able to defend itself from attacks from Terrorists, I like the idea of Israel and Jewish people no longer persecuted and actively appreciated as vital members of this World. I like the idea of Peace in the Middle East, and I see no potential in that with a World that does not fully denounce antisemitism and governments that promote it.

I know the ideal level of concessions to make to support the cause? No. If I could change the content I watch the songs I listen to in a way that might lead to better support for Israel and less terrorism I would – that said I am not sure less is always more. Make no mistake there is Evil in the World that likes misrepresentation, likes to get people to go to war with each other and hate each other for perceived problems that might not always be real. Lightning set to Yellow, Yellow set to a problem? All art with suns in it set to rising sun and thus axis of evil not possible?

Just because I have the potential to argue the point does not equate to I like to bring it up. I want to stack more on Jewish people that are already hurting? No. I want my family members (many that are blonde) protected. Yes. Creating appropriate levels is less than an ideal system, allow some concessions might lead to momentum to the point where everything is a potential problem. People don’t always agree on where the line should be drawn.

I might sit in darkness for a month to show my support for Israel, our Ally, and The Jewish population? True. I think it would be wise to turn up the whole world needs to give up electricity? No. That said the combination and status quo seems like it has amplified ideally? If it had there wouldn’t be any Jewish people that were taken hostage on October 7^th, 2023.

“The child likes rain, better put them on the list, make sure to put a bar code, a qr code next to their name – that way they will be easier to scan” – Governments lists and misrepresentations have potential to be scarier than all might fully appreciate. Permanent records and people bar coded not a pretty thought.

Thoughts of the movie In Time, and Marvel’s Magneto at auschwitz.