Creative Problem Solving, January 26th, 2024

There are still hard problems in the World. It is easy to think that Law, Governments, and Militaries is the only way to solve problems. People taught to solve problems in Creative Ways, Different Ways matters. There might be, are likely ways to solve problems in ways that lead to less lives lost, but are harder to entertain when practical and speed factors into results.

Imagine if Google, Microsoft, NASA, Tesla, or MIT tried to solve problem with terror tunnels, extremists and instability, antisemitism in the Middle East? If could have solved it, would have already solved it?

Head starts matter, words and ideas today can’t fix October 7, 2023 yet might be able to help reduce potential for problems like that in the future.

A ton of brain power and solving problem potential in The World, seems like we should be further to solving these problems than we are. Head starts matter.

My guess is all those companies, organizations would see Iran funding terrorism less, the region allowing extremism to amplify less would be part of the solution though I don’t speak for them.

After September 11th, 2001 I would like to have thought October 7th, 2023 could have never happened. I believe in The USA Government and The Pentagon, I believe in our Military, I believe we do and have capacity to do good things like Inspiring Peace, Freedom, and Less Oppression in The World. I don’t want to discourage, I also think a report on how this happened in the Middle East might be a useful way to see that 20 years from October 7th, 2023, same problems do not happen. Is 2043 to far away to think of a place where Muslim Extremism and Terrorists groups no longer plague The Middle East? Possible to fix believed or not believed factors into funding, momentum, and directions chosen.

Reduced funding, reduced capacity to stomach long and discouraging wars, combined with a World that does not fully perceive or comprehend that Threats to Israel, Antisemitism is a Threat to us all seems like it all factors in. Status quo becomes status quo might not always equate to ideal capacity or desire, ideal head starts to problems being fixed. Less antisemitism before World War 2, how many lives would that have saved? Head starts matter. My visibility, perception, and comprehension of threats and not threats amplifies far less than ideally, does not equate to those threats allowed to exist or not exist are not consequential. 

Being from USA, this many years after I Have a Dream Speech by Martin Luther King Jr. it is easy to think humanity is passed racism, threats are not as real as they once were, easy to have a rosy view of history in less than sufficient ways. Anti-racism turned up has potential to lead to grouping, in crowd and out crowd – turned up with inclusivity matters and amplifies less than ideally by default. 

Not sure they are cool enough to be part of the anti-racist crowd is a thought that might amp, thus finding ways to prevent in advance is useful. Perceived and valued as anti-racists factors into who has jobs and who does not have jobs. A plan for inclusivity might amplify in less than inclusive ways that profit some over others. It is not always easy to perceive or comprehend those that are profiting and those that are hurting in society – truth around the matter is less than ideally turned up. People in Jails and Prison do not always see threats that amplify in society does not equate to inability to see threats does not factor into future success, real problems. 

Moral Superiority has shown Historic Precedent for amplifying less than ideally for all. Moral clarity and levels matter, antiracism has potential to be valued, comprehended, and gauged in non-ideal ways “if you don’t spend 100% of your time, effort, and resources” caring about Caucasians with Red Hair (or any group) would be insufficient protection for other groups. Spending 100% of time on racism, might equate to no time for sexism, or curing cancer, many other problems does not equate to racism allowed or not adequately addressed is not a huge problem. I like Jewish people, I don’t want them to hurt, I don’t want to allow Antisemitism to be turned up, does not equate to I want Caucasians with Red Hair (including myself) (or any group) to hurt more. Potential for Genocide dictates where time, resources, and effort is spent.

Does Muslim Extremism and potential for terrorist attacks lead to ideal reduced discrimination for the US-Asian population? The groups likely bank on the fact that they have the potential for reminding secondary tensions from World War 2. Citizens fighting each other is one of the desired objectives of groups like that, not giving them their objectives matters, requires thinking better of each other and fostering inclusivity, less problems. Evil, The Devil, Demons which all have the potential to influence people has potential to be harder to see when listening to what is set as right and wrong, good and bad on the World Stage.

Someone might set me to evil, based upon bad data they have from others, does not equate to I want that someone hurt, evil for evil is less than an ideal system. Misrepresentation factors into actions likely not always pondered. Those pursuing making the World a better place are not required to be given good data, adequate representation initially. For example Texas citizens could be set to part of cartels. Cartels exist. Texas polices the border less than ideally. Believable and proximity factors into useful. I don’t like what they have to say, desire for better, and proximity does not always turn up adequate representation. Imagine being in Mexico being a Politician and having powdered sugar dropped from second story on you before walking into a building.

There is reason to be scared of covered in powder, does not equate to it amplifies ideally. Desire to reduce corruption both is valuable and amplifies less than ideally, reduced proximity is value that is not always fully appreciated in timely manners. Imagine a Peaceful citizen in Canada moved there from Gaza in 2022. Distance is valuable and not always, not usually pondered as an option. A citizen that moved to United States in 1920? Citizens that move might not always have ideal capacity to gauge threats, problems, and evil in new situations, thus increased support and inclusivity invested in matters.

As a Texan citizen, I do not have ideal capacity to comprehend the threat posed by Cartels in 2024 or years before, could be a minor problem, could be a huge problem, and there is allot of range and likely nuance in all of that, that is hard to fully comprehend and appreciate. Who controls the narrative matters, and it is not like there is a giant scoreboard that says good or evil is winning. If Texas was going to be a scary place to live by 2030 I would want to know, does not equate to businesses that are trying to thrive and profit would ideally turn representation and comprehension up. 

2030 will be a scary place to live in Texas if you don’t do A, B, C, and D could be turned up, projections set to ideal, get claimed as ideal, are equated to ideal non ideally. Society will fail if you don’t do A, B, and C combined with Society not failing after doing A, B, and C does not equate to Society would have or would not have failed if you don’t do A, B, and C. A, B, and C variables that are choices could profit, are likely to profit some parties over others. People like things fixed gets set to people like things fixed ideally (exactly the fix desired), gets set to people like things fixed ideally (with no side effects, not profiting anyone more than anyone else). Same words can be read and comprehended in correct ways, different ways. Ideal representation is less than ideally agreed upon.

Who sets bars might profit more than others without desiring to. Negate desire might not equate to ideal negate desire. I like to profit, and I like others to be treated fairly. When I profit I will ideally check and make sure that all factors in society are considered? I desire to profit in fair ways, I don’t want others treated unfairly – fair vs unfair has less than ideal perception, comprehension, and resolution. One dollar, one gallon of gas purchased differently in mass could change fair vs unfair in not fully appreciated ways – I am not sure profit should be perceived and comprehended as ideally clean, capable of being ideally clean.

System can never be claimed as ideal might equate to better not driven toward. Fix a problem that can’t be fixed ideally? Progress matters, should be encouraging still should not be equated to ideal established, no work needed, only diminishing returns in a particular direction.

It is nice to profit, it is desirable to profit, decentralization is nice, is desirable, for all the population delivers less than ideally. If everyone on the planet, 8 billion people could easily divest from investing 1 more dollar in oppression, capacity, capability would likely be far different.

Should we tax profit and decentralization as in by design to reduce oppression? If we don’t, claim ideal fair value, fair treatment established or delivered?

Capitalism is nice, delivers better than other solutions (that have yet to be proposed – in my opinion), does not equate to it is without its flaws, no need to help sand the edges, make the experience better. Best form of Capitalism might not be found until 2500, progress possible not always promoted. Too many people in Jails, Prison and on Streets to set Capitalism to ideal, without flaws in need of addressing. Capitalism does not negate the need for kindness. Change and Dynamic nature of markets likely equates to set to ideal ever unwise – jobs this year does not guarantee jobs the next.

Thought about analytically might not be ideal love established or delivered – that means there is possibility for others with more love, better capacity to deliver encouragement than me to address concerns raised in this document. Analytical thought leads to weighing, weighing is not always turned up based upon ideal perception or comprehension, not always turned up based upon ideal truth. Analytical thought might be ideal direction at sometimes might get reinforced as more ideal at all times in non-ideal ways. 

Spending time placing weights on a scale might be less than ideal direction chosen, less than ideal love and peace inspired. Delivery of fair treatment requires time and investment that might equate to lower overall throughput and is thus sometimes divested from in advance, does not equate to the pursuit of more fair treatment is less valuable. 

Imagine you have potential to deliver 10 words to PartyA, PartyB, PartyC, and PartyD, only 10 words, only 10 words factors into fair treatment – claim that ideals? Imagine PartyA, PartyB, PartyC, and PartyD are all paid different salaries for the exact same work – claim that ideals? The combination might be more difficult for my brain to represent than others, does not equate to it is not difficult, it is easy to get right. Desire to deliver encouragement as if words approached infinity and desire to still remain fair treatment?  Desire to make better is important, useful, creates value should not be set to ideally delivers fair treatment, equal treatment for all. Adequate levels of non-zero representation, who gets to set the bar? who doesn’t get to set the bar?

People are not required to adequately respect the contributions of others, are not required to comprehended why to value the contributions of others, less than ideal truth factors into perceived and comprehended as fair vs not fair treatment. Writers on the other side of the planet might have the perfect words for Peace yet I am not required, nor would it be wise for me to read every book on the planet. 

Claim to treat others ideally fair when haven’t read their writings? Requirement for ideally fair treatment is both unwise (when thought of in certain ways) and is necessary (when thought of in certain ways). Reading one person’s writings might require reading twice for comprehension, and with 8 billion people on the planet there are allot of other writings. Too caught up in details has potential to be a problem, they are being oppressed stop it said and understood might at times be higher value added. 

Requirement to prove support added might lead to time costs that approach infinity.

The World is better with Peace, people treated fairly, and encouraged with words like “Never Say Die!”.

The previous sentence is an example, proof of value added, proof of what a good person, a person with good character might say, does not equate to it is ideal to require others, others without access or capacity are required to deliver at the same or greater levels.

Sadly, examples like this, how people act, are formed into documents, with Appendix A, Appendix B, and Appendix C, examples of value added and value subtracted to judge character, if not on paper in the minds of people. People that are not in Jail, that are not limited by Oppression have access, capacity to deliver examples that all do not have access or capacity to deliver.

Reinforced reinforced, no potential for profit in that?

Writers are given greater capacity to communicate. ”To whom much is given much will be expected.”

Readers are given greater capacity to communicate. ”To whom much is given much will be expected.”

I like quotes from The Bible should not be equated to I am God, a Priest, a Minister, or someone that never makes mistakes writing, someone that always chooses ideal direction for words that profit all equally. If God always gave people the correct words would it be unwise to think we would have more World Peace? I have less than ideal capacity to value, judge, or assess output from God on any given day, less than ideal capacity to forecast the weather, does not equate to output or non-output from God is not consequential – Tornados, Tornados I can’t predict are in by design. Image of God, Confidence and Proximity to Ideal factors into message perceived and valued convolutes at times with human nature.

Be Authority with constant reminders of Not Ideal Authority? If Leaders can fix problems yet are not gods, are not God amplified more ideally, how might that change the World? Proximity to Life and Death choices not always good. Wars, Death Penalty, and Nukes all in by design does not equate to it is all good, all respect for limited power of being a human, and being in leadership. Separations of Powers is wisdom as a reminder “men are not angels”.

“If Men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and the next place, oblige it to control itself.” – James Madison

Some thoughts on Historic Precedent used Unwisely

Important reminder – I am not a Lawyer, Doctor, Expert on International Relations, Foreign Policy, or International Law. Not an expert could lead to important voices, important details not fully valued.

Listening to News and Genocide Case against Israel in background a bit

Some thoughts, kind of related and different

Cases have the potential to be made against Governments that limit capacity to protect their people from Terrorist Attacks.

Not Protecting against Terrorists Attacks is consequential, potentially emboldens other parties and governments in the region.

Governments cracking down on perceived wrongs has potential to be done in unfair ways. Someone says the wrong thing could be set to all Freedom of Speech removed.

Attached to Terrorists attacks is possible, could be turned up in Non Ideal Ways. If someone is part of a gang, or group that is stealing from people, mistreating people could be correlated to Terrorist Attacks. This might allow law greater freedom and accessibility to crack down in ways they might not be able to under other laws. This could be a highly desirable situation, imagine an anti-terrorist group, military group gets stolen from, or mistreated by a gang or group (that is both a problem and not a terrorist group) – inability to solve a problem easily that is reducing throughput.

Less Problems in advance matters, Governments could have reason to control narrative around War on Terrorism, War on Drugs. Perceived as War changes dynamic of what is allowed and what is not allowed. Fighting guerrilla wars with arms tied behind backs not always ideal, Fighting guerrilla warfare like that in Vietnam far form always ideal. Set to could be both desirable and unwise to turn up, equating to less than ideal momentum, less than ideal capacity to stop momentum.

Leveraged by desire for less pain could lead to less-than-ideal decision making. Details matter greatly, and examples set in some cases might be and at same time should not always be set to Historic Precedent. Details will not always be turned up, perceived, or comprehended ideally, and similar not exact systems to useful, to value, to max profit is common and turned up in both comprehensible and incomprehensible ways in society. Historic Precedent, Similar not exact systems bias, have high potential to bias future decision making in not fully appreciated ways – different times, different technologies, different possibilities get set to similar, same, useful.

They went to war based on VarA. This group went to war based on VarA leads to Peace, equates to going to war based on VarA is wise. VarA gets equated to made based on ideal, if not ideal sufficient information based upon win over loss. Making decision based upon Historic Precedent is many times turned up, is built in many times by laws that are left in place, and have shown precedent for being less than ideal, turning up less than ideal wins. Worked in VarA might be equated to will work in New Conditions, Different Conditions, Conditions with New Technologies and Possibilities that cannot always be perceived or comprehended.

Decisions are made, are many times required to be made based upon less-than-ideal Historic Precedent, less than ideal amplification and appreciation of details. Relevance Limiting can be more awful than once thought (at least personally). Relevance Limiting is a complex system which takes range from small white lies for encouragement (Saying “I’m fine” when one is not fine, ok, in good spirits, others don’t want to know, or care about my struggles and problems, won’t use them in my best interest thought) to details limited that might lead to War, Oppression, and incomprehensible losses based on lost details. Truth Matters, Details Matter, and Direction Chosen Matters factors into Relevance Limiting – World always turns up most important problems happening, never uses distractions? On the defensive is useful, less capacity to call out problems, only enough oxygen and attention in the room to call out certain problems, certain details is useful, and less than ideally turned up.

Posting Profits some parties over others, Desire is to make World Better for All People, Posting this factors into a Head start, that might not otherwise exist if I were to say wait a week to post these thoughts, this writing

Others in Jail or Prison, under Oppression, might post similar words, better words than I am posting here. More with a Voice is valuable, hard to fully appreciate losses that are only comprehendible by God. Hostages might have different words, better words to prevent problems in the future like World War 3, yet their voices are limited.

The USA Civil War was an awful time, people in the Future might have thought I am glad we are past that time in history, awful things can no longer happen, progress and new inventions leads to Peace. Past World War 2 and Genocide of Nazi’s is nice, gets upsold to the Worst Time in History, that Worse times do not have the potential to be turned up. How Threats are gauged factors into Action, Funding, capacity of the World and external parties to relate. 

I have degrees in Computer Engineering, and my love for engineering, and computing could bias, my desire to think best of my others could bias, desire to turn up less awful hypotheticals could bias my capacity and desire to turn up potential for Threats, Real Threats that might exist. Huge amount of computing storage not enough to turn up barcodes and death machines for everyone on Earth? I don’t like the thought so I generally don’t turn it up. 

Potential for problems I can’t fully gauge, I have limited and obfuscated ability to see true value added and subtracted, all compounded by complexity that is greater than capacity of any human to ideally represent, ideally factor in details. Self-driving cars with comprehension of human vs not a human, with blood thirst, with blood thirst for less than 0.1% of the population? Political opponents of corporations, governments given less than ideal safety, haven less than ideal safety and discussion invested in? Closer to ideal visibility is hard, more on the World stage (like wars and changing governments), will, is likely to equate to sufficient visibility of new technologies, threats created by new technologies? FBI has limited funding, might not have sufficient funding for sufficient visibility likely not always fully pondered. Results matter and are far from ideally turned up.

Companies are unlikely to be able to fully appreciate the damage that they do, liability that they would be responsible for if capacity to litigate was ideal. Humans divest from Acts of God (that might include War) does not always equate to Human actions, decisions, words, and choices might not help fuel or facilitate those things that are classified as Acts of God. Divestment from Liability is a Human Choice, seen as an Ideal Choice by God? Big Companies and Safety in Numbers? If CorpA doesn’t have to give a sufficient living wage, CorpB might think they don’t have to give a sufficient living wage (divestment from Liability to do right), If CorpB doesn’t have to give a sufficient living wage, CorpA might think they don’t have to give a sufficient living wage (divestment from Liability to do right). What example is that for CorpC, CorpD, and CorpE? If all the Corporations agree they can divest from Liability, requirement to do right by people, how might that affect things?

I might not see what Historic Precedent CorpA is turning up, does not equate to I agree to it, does not equate to Historic Precedent set is not consequential.

I might not see what Historic Precedent CorpB is turning up, does not equate to I agree to it, does not equate to Historic Precedent set is not consequential.

I might not see what Historic Precedent CorpC is turning up, does not equate to I agree to it, does not equate to Historic Precedent set is not consequential.

I might not see what Historic Precedent CorpD is turning up, does not equate to I agree to it, does not equate to Historic Precedent set is not consequential.

I might not see what Historic Precedent CorpE is turning up, does not equate to I agree to it, does not equate to Historic Precedent set is not consequential.

CorpA-E might not be real companies, might be variables, does not equate to all companies CorpF-Z for instance

Negate Liability is Desirable, Desirable has potential to be set to an ideal system, an ideal longer-term system. Reign in less-than-ideal paths that have been turned up, profited on, compounded upon? Water and electricity, max profit finds paths of least resistance, just nature? Harder for some, harder for those without access to funding or sufficient funding, has shown historic precedent for being allowed, being just in by design should not be equated to good – investors the only one protected, factored into necessary protections in products?

People that build the products need to be protected for continued production might be equated to ideal level of protection established. People in companies desire to protect others in their companies, does not always equate to all others, to all other companies ideally protected. Ideal requirement to perceive and comprehend potential for problems, side effects is not turned up. 

Take a basic Math lesson as a product – Teacher means well, wants to help Society, Society taught Math better could lead to Throughput Gains. A Teacher creates a basic Math lesson then thinks for 10 years about potential for value added and value subtracted by Teaching others Math? More time and thought might lead to more capacity to perceive and comprehend potential problems might be set to ideal, 20 years, 40 years, 100 years – any really sufficient time to fully comprehend risk created by Math as a system that is In By Design? Greed and Max Profit, Polygons that are like the one used on Guns and Tanks – society teaches Math to all bad, to all good? One country sees they have less nukes than another, simple less than sign equates to exponential capacity for more destruction? Society invests in Legal Tender, like the US Dollar – society always held accountable, full justice always delivered for what society invests in, in mass? Discouragement, feel bad about this or that not always sufficiently, or wisely turned up – guilt is a less than ideal system based upon less-than-ideal perception and comprehension, should not be equated to guilt is not a useful system, a system that might be turned up by others trying to max profit.

Teaching people they should feel bad about something is not always based on ideal perception and training of the original party. Guilt has throughput, and throughput is not always ideal. Less guilt throughput, less discouragement throughput has potential to be Powerful, Enabling – not all might like to see others enabled, free of burden. De-up, Never up, Never better, Don’t encourage, Discourage, Disrespect, Don’t respect is turned up by People, People that are not ideally perfect. Make feel bad has potential to create harm, harm that might be in need of justice, thus better to not turn up, better to turn up Forgiveness, Grace, and Love.

Guilt enables ideal Throughput might be claimed, negate it ideally delivers. These words are likely to amplify less than ideally for all, I should just not speak/write them, I should feel bad about them? Reading Comprehension ideally turned up? Access ideally turned up? Don’t have to factor that into ideal turned up? Investment gets equated to ideal investment. Gives head start to those out of Jails and Prisons, those less oppressed by reduced access, does not equate wiser not to state them.

There is always something to feel bad about, feel guilty about to reduce throughput. Perceived and Comprehended might lead to other things brought in that are Perceived and Comprehended that factor in less than ideally, thus negate there is ideal relevance limiting out and that factors into Perception and Comprehension of who is guilty and why they are guilty. Fingers not always pointed at ideal people or ideal problems, and that has potential to distract, obfuscate bigger issues. Society in mass generally does not, many times is not held accountable for value subtracted does not equate to Value Subtracted that factors into Justice, Perception of Justice, Comprehension of Justice, and Truth in Justice does not exist.

Guilt has throughput, and it is important to be careful of what one turns up. That said what causes guilt is not always meant as guilt. Sufficient contrast might be required to get a system or government to stop oppression might be equated to feelings of personally responsible for the lack of perfection in the system, in the government. I am not trying to discourage a general public that is less than ideal, I am trying to reduce discouragement for the oppressed yet might not always amplify that way. Less than ideal perceived and comprehended does not always lead to ideal reduced discouragement – Justice, Authority, and Government is liked to be seen as flawless, ideally protects and represents people. Desire to reduce crime might lead to investment in being a Police Officer might lead to hearing how one reinforces less than ideal, less than sufficient at times laws might be discouraging – desire to fix the problem does not equal desire to discourage amplifies in combination less than ideally. 

I used “amplifies in combination” instead of the word “cuts” – potentially useful for future communications. Pieces of cake, one with more frosting on one piece than the other amplifies in combination less than ideally? Too much divestment from certain words to sound more ideal might not always equate to ideal oxygen and reduced significance in room for others. Requirement to sound better, more politically correct might not always turn up ideal repetitions, reinforced ease of communication. The man had an angry outburst, or the man exploded – how things are said might correlate to suicide bombers and terrorist in a dynamic world. 

It is reasonable to desire to use better communication, does not always equate to it is wiser to turn up specific words have greater meaning, are more valuable. There are parties in the World that might desire to misrepresent meaning behind words, might have perception and comprehension based upon less-than-ideal training that might make them want to desire to misrepresent meaning behind words. People make decisions based upon quality and quantity of evidence that is not always ideally turned up might lead to desire to use different words, potentially in non-ideal ways.

Words misrepresented or turned up to mean something could be attached to one party, say GroupA, then another group say GroupB could be taught to use words in a frank way that offends GroupA without meaning to offend GroupA.

Words misrepresented or turned up to mean something could be attached to one party, say GroupB, then another group say GroupA could be taught to use words in a frank way that offends GroupB without meaning to offend GroupB.

I might be able to hear

the man exploded

the man had an angry outburst

in the same way, not biased by word choice, might not equate to all people might have that same capacity, and that is only dependent upon conscious perception and comprehension of bias

People say what they mean, words don’t bias results, who is speaking never biases results?

Details set to ideally represented and comprehended by language, language that has multiple definitions for same words, and amplifies more ideally for some over others? Language like a bridge everyone walks across that might be reinforced in ways that are both valuable and amplify less than ideally for all?  Imagine if I spent all these words saying Never Say Die, there is still Hope! A different choice of direction that might have been more valuable for some, a different choice of direction than initially chosen that might have been more valuable for some than others. I desire the words to amplify like that yet addressing practical matters might equate to they do not always amplify like that? 

Encouragement and Hope is valuable does not equate to it is always ideal perception and comprehension of details – feeling of ready for the day, ready to take on the World might equate to less than ideal risk mitigation, comprehension of details that need to be factored in? Desire for Encouragement and Hope might be for greater throughput yet might obfuscate details at time. Discouragement not better, greater attention to detail when inspired, charmed, and enamored matters. Ideal comprehension of details might lead to discouragement, that equates to no throughput, thus sometimes ideal comprehension of details might be turned down. People that save the day will be working on ideal details thought to more adequate representation?

January 26th, 2024

My life has been limited in real ways that is hard to fully perceive, explain, or comprehend

Free Starter Images/Diagrams

Others voices

Voices that are potentially imprisoned

or limited from posting as well

Likely would desire people to understand these diagrams, would likely want to be able to provide diagrams of their own

Get to have Examples of Value Added to Society

Required to have Examples of Value Added to Society

is less than an ideal requirement to turn up

Authority and Cops get to protect the streets, and those in Jails and Prison mean to harm them? Good guy and Bad guy biased by default?

Access to Post seen as Ideal value for who posts? One man that posts about Peace and Freedom of Speech good, Many More that post about Peace and Freedom of Speech protected, reinforced far better. System should not be equated to as good as it could be.

Likely some people in Jails and Prisons Worldwide, that have seen oppression and crimes I haven’t that would likely be high value for the World to know yet voices are limited. Authority questioned too much or not enough both less than ideal systems.

Have to have Experience, Credentials, and Expertise to call out injustice is less than an ideal system? Everyone without a law degree just stop talking wise to turn up? Expertise of Speaker confers rights to who gets to say it is ok to go to the bathroom?

I both invest in systems and dislike the oppression they have included by default, do not always know the oppression they have included by default, learning that oppression is in by default hurts. People that are trying to do good, trying to Protect the Public, sometimes reinforce laws that profit some over others, reinforce systems that feel less than ideal, especially when amplified over long periods of time.

Our system is good, sufficient, amplifies sufficiently for other parties – based upon comparison to World statistics is less than an ideal system to turn up. People in USA Jails and Prisons might beat being in a Mexican Jail or Prison, does not equate to zero capacity for injustice. Does not equate to zero capacity for being shived (stabbed with sharp objects, prison/jail contraband). Does not equate to it is a good idea to leave them in for long periods of time.

As someone from Texas – Not as bad as has to potential to be equated to sufficient in the mind with limited visibility, perception, and comprehension. Could be worse potentially not always wise to turn up, likely not fully pondered. Could be better likely to be as easy on time costs? Requirement for sufficient contrast to get attention, to get fixed not always an ideal system (squeakiest wheel does not equate to all wheels fixed). Not to if the line of humanization and dehumanization, just to call out People and Problems that do not always raise issues with sufficient contrast, raise issues in a way that is relatable, perceivable, and comprehendible and that likely equates to People and Problems, People with Real Problems – such as being dehumanized Not Being Fixed.

Support Amps, January 24th, 2024

Free Starter Support Amps, Rule of 3 Comedy Attempts, and Critical Thought Amps (caution: Randomly Generated)

You can do it!, You will Prevail!, Possible has yet to be defined, Customer Experience and Quality can be Improved, Small changes do add up, Customer Experience and Quality can be Improved, Possible is Power, Initial conditions can mean a lot, Nsdtp! Never Say Die Throughput!, Possible is Power, There is hope in a New Day, Possible is Power, Others do not get to claim ground on what you can and cannot do, There is hope in a New Day, Don’t forget an extra bottle of water can change a lot.

Never Say Die!, Small changes do add up, There is hope in a New Day, Possible is Power, Encouragement Throughput has yet to be maximized, You can do it!, Small changes do add up, You will Prevail!, Customer Experience and Quality can be Improved, Customer Experience and Quality can be Improved, You can do it!, The future has yet to be written, Small changes do add up, Small changes do add up, Past activation energy can be clear sailing.

Protection of Children, More Peacemaking, Problem Solving, Carbon Monoxide Detectors, More Peacekeeping, Ethics, Protection of those that have had their support robbed, Reduced Cognitive Biases Training, More Peace, Glass of Water, More Peacekeeping, Protection of those that have been devalued and dehumanized by society, Encouragement, Carbon Monoxide Detectors, Improved Hospitals, Seat Belts, Improved International Relations, Defensive Driving, Throughput, Reduced Child Labor, Human Rights, Encouragement, More Peace, Human Rights, Habitat for Humanity

Improved Battery Power, Time Management, Protection of those that have been devalued and dehumanized by society, Protection of Widows, Less Burning Buildings, Time Management, Ethics, Improved Research Ethics, Validation, Improved Medical Research, Improved Learning, Water Desalination Plants, Protection of the Mentally Ill, Seat Belts, Improved Optics, Teacher Training, Reduced Cognitive Biases Training, Improved Battery Power, Reduced Cognitive Biases Training, Protection of Widows, Reduced Villain Level Contrast Training, Diversity Training, Problem Solving, Respect, Respect

Time Management, Focus, Respect, Reduced Oppression, Less Burning Buildings, Cancer Research, More Peacekeeping, Water Bottles, Improved Microscopes, Protection of the Elderly, Electrical Safety, Reduced Villain Level Contrast Training, Protection of the Disabled, Reduced Miscommunication, Protection of Children, Defensive Driving, Throughput, Improved Humanization, Rescue Blankets, Improved Research Ethics, Improved Hospitals, Improved Math Support, More Peace building, Improved Chemical Showers for Labs, Reduced Miscommunication

Carbon Monoxide Detectors, More Peacekeeping, More Peace, Reduced Child Labor, Cancer Research, Habitat for Humanity, Problem Solving, Child Car Safety, More Peace building, Carbon Monoxide Detectors, Water Well Drilling, Validation, Protection of those that have had their support robbed, Water Bottles, Improved Hospitals, Validation, Teacher Appreciation, Water Bottles, Protection of the Elderly, Power Efficiency, Improved English Support, Reduced Miscommunication, Protection of those that have had their support robbed, Improved Chemical Showers for Labs, Reduced Oppression

Improved Optics, Improved Microscopes, Time Management, Water Bottles, Power Efficiency, Protection of the Oppressed, Cancer Research, Rescue Blankets, Improved International Relations, More Peacemaking, Ethics, Improved Network Throughput and Reach, Improved Telescopes, Teacher Appreciation, Child Car Safety, Reduced Child Labor, Diversity Training, Habitat for Humanity, More Peacekeeping, Protection of Veterans, Improved Battery Power, Protection of the Mentally Ill, Reduced Cognitive Biases Training, Defensive Driving, Less Burning Buildings

Reduced Villain Level Contrast Training, Improved Network Throughput and Reach, Cancer Research, Encouragement, Respect, Reduced Miscommunication, Reduced Cognitive Biases Training, Teacher Appreciation, Protection of Children, Protection of Veterans, Protection of those unable to Protect Themselves, Clean Water Support, Diversity Training, Human Rights, Improved English Support, Protection of Children, Power Efficiency, More Peace building, Improved Fire Codes, Validation, Protection of those that have had their support robbed, Water Bottles, Validation, Motorcycle Helmets, Criminal Defense Law

Improved Chemical Showers for Labs, Improved International Relations, Protection of those that have had their support robbed, Reduced Miscommunication, Carbon Monoxide Detectors, More Peacekeeping, Cancer Research, Reduced Villain Level Contrast Training, Improved International Relations, Improved Microscopes, Improved Chemical Showers for Labs, Less Burning Buildings, More Peace, Critical Thinking, Improved Science Support, Motorcycle Helmets, Improved Fire Codes, Motorcycle Helmets, Improved Telescopes, Diversity Training, Encouragement, Improved Math Support, Criminal Defense Law, Linguistics Training, Improved Telescopes

Focus, Respect, Power Efficiency, Improved Chemical Showers for Labs, Protection of Veterans, Improved International Relations, Improved International Relations, Improved Math Support, Improved Math Support, Validation, More Peacekeeping, Protection of those that have had their support robbed, Protection of those that have had their support robbed, More Peace building, Protection of Veterans, Protection of the Mentally Ill, More Peace, Improved Hospitals, Water Well Drilling, Protection of those unable to Protect Themselves, Improved Science Support, Improved Magnify Studio, Improved Medical Research, Protection of the Mentally Ill, Rescue Blankets

Improved Math Support, Geneva Convention, Diversity Training, Reduced Cognitive Biases Training, Protection of Children, Protection of the Persecuted, Ethics, Carbon Monoxide Detectors, Protection of the Oppressed, Carbon Monoxide Detectors, Improved Telescopes, Protection of the Disabled, Protection of those that have been silenced, Improved Science Support, Disaster Risk Reduction, Improved Optics, Reduced Cognitive Biases Training, Protection of those that have been devalued and dehumanized by society, Focus, Improved Network Throughput and Reach, Throughput, Reduced Oppression, Improved Learning, Reduced Child Labor, Rescue Blankets

Rescue Blankets, Water Well Drilling, Reduced Cognitive Biases Training, Protection of those that have been devalued and dehumanized by society, Improved Hospitals, Defensive Driving, Improved Fire Codes, Improved Battery Power, Seat Belts, Improved Medical Tech, Habitat for Humanity, Problem Solving, Carbon Monoxide Detectors, Improved Microscopes, Reduced Villain Level Contrast Training, Human Rights, Encouragement, Protection of the Mentally Ill, Protection of the Elderly, Improved Hospitals, More Peace building, Improved Humanization, Improved International Relations, Human Rights, Carbon Monoxide Detectors

Clean your room, Always be safe in the lab, The prettiest flowers have the most leaves

Do the dishes, Go pick up some important documents from work, Hug a kitten

Clean your room, Always be safe in the lab, you hug the lovable dictator

Clean your room, Always be safe in the lab, Never Say Die!

Always be safe in the lab, Do the dishes, Hug a kitten

Always be safe in the lab, Go pick up some important documents from work, Hug a kitten

Do the dishes, Always be safe in the lab, you hug the lovable dictator

Eat your vegetables, Go pick up some important documents from work, Never Say Die!

Go pick up some important documents from work, Do the dishes, you hug the lovable dictator

Do the dishes, Do the dishes, Hug a kitten

Valence, Imperfect System upsold to Perfect in Very Non Ideal Ways, Directed Power, Anger Management, Mangos, Pain, Forms – Aristotle, Interesting, Real Change, Mood, Speed of Heat Conductivity, Communicated Effectively, Allegory, Valence, Encouragement, Fuses, Bagels, Health Care, Flags, Speed of Light, Fair, Rain, Gross Domestic Product, Combustion, Comprehension

Dyson Sphere, Schrodinger’s Cat, Simple Machines, Impedance, Theoretical Problem Solving, Interpolation, Momentum, Practical, Risk Mitigation Strategies, Accessibility, Solar Power, Mood, Superposition, Inequality, Risk Mitigation Strategies, Snow, Open Loop Systems, Impossible, Microeconomics, Fuses, Feedback Respected, Terraforming, Carbon, Communism, Research Ethics

Blizzard, Camouflage, Latency, Capitalism, Lever, Memory, Maintenance, Tone, Respect, Unknowns upsold to Knowns, Ability to Change Path, Direction, Inequality, Harder to divest, Reaction Time, Adequate Support, 4th Dimension, Reliability, Customer Service, Customer Service, Obfuscation as Value Creation, Corporate Image, Maintenance, Fuel, Oranges, Low Pressure

Fire, Psychology, Communism, Point of View, Joules, Competition, Initial Conditions, Small Contributions Respected, Health Care, Practical Problem Solving, Research Ethics, Fuses, Exponential, Induction, Inadequate Support, Gravity, Activation Energy, Encouragement, Shear Strength, Magnetism, Charming, Fault Tolerance, Distance, Flags, Respect

Exponential, Open Loop Systems, Pain, Logical Fallacies, Respect, Contamination, Insulation, Low Pressure, Pattern Matching, Law, Accessibility, Oranges, False Dichotomy, Forms – Aristotle, Inadequate Support, Categorize and Classify, Feedback Respected, Disaster Risk Reduction, Activation Energy, Shear Strength, Scientific Method, Power Efficiency, Contamination, Encouragement, Unknowns upsold to Knowns

Compression, Inequality, Perception, Shortest Path, Tangled Cords, Contamination, Osmosis, Scale, Power Efficiency, Shear Strength, Story, Communicated Effectively, Coffee, Positive Momentum, Truth as Relative, Respect, Proton, Nitrogen, Tangled Cords, Pain, Obfuscated Truth, Health Care, Communism, Contamination, Accessibility

Velocity, Chain Thoughts, Logical Fallacies, Gravity, Scientific Method, Superposition, Fire, Equal and Opposite Forces, Irrational, Obfuscation as Value Creation, Feedback Respected, Energy, Green Energy, Morally Wrong, Plumbs, Associations, Green Energy, Fuses, Disaster Risk Reduction, Availability, Stress, Interesting, Coconut, Gear, Drought

Point of View, Discouragement, Supply Chain Management, Motion, Drilling Water Wells, Miscommunication, Corporate Image, Open Loop Systems, Dyson Sphere, Knowns upsold to Unknowns, Motion, Macroeconomics, Compression, Peaches, Unknowns upsold to Knowns, Possible, Pain, Nitrogen, Limits, Metaphors, Fair, Flood Zone, Pineapples, Strong Hypothesis, Microeconomics

Practical Problem Solving, Competition, Sales, Motion, Communicated Effectively, Defense Law, Sociology, Water, Camouflage, Cheesecake, Fault Tolerance, Fair, False Dichotomy, Measurement, Seashells, Compression, Red Herring, Maintenance, Enthalpy, Comprehension, Bugs, Kinetic Energy, Teams, Camouflage, Motion

Projections, Chips, Experience, Carbon Monoxide Detector, Momentum, Tone, Terraforming, Discouragement, Allegory, Macroeconomics, Respect, Equality, Sociology, Shear Strength, Hurricane, Drag, Harder to divest, Variety, Feedback, GCFI Outlets, Tornado, Fries, Unreasonable, Capitalism, Tone

Logictech Ergonomic Mouse

Purchased a Vertical Ergonomic Mouse from Logitech from Amazon. I am trying to invest in more Ergonomics and Better Engineering Experiences for all. I got a mouse, that is vertical, but it is in a Logitech box and the mouse looks different and is branded with Anker (the same brand I used for portable battery power supplies). The mouse works, though it calls into question the security of the mouse (the mouse is wireless and connects into USB slot). Might not show as a problem until a key moment where my access is disabled. Potentially just a problem with someone putting another mouse and sending back a product and Amazon potentially not checking. That said I have had many problems in 2023 and 2024 with orders which might equate to Consumer Protections needs to up their game.

Cybersecurity with iffy branding? Combo is less than ideal for Logitech, Anker, and Amazon. Anker makes some great portable battery supplies, that said heavy bricks with power are not ideal thoughts of potential problems out, compounded with cybersecurity problems not ideal.

Batteries hacked into overheating possible? Would like to say we are protected as a society better than that, some of issues I have been facing have made me desire better output from Consumer Protection.

Displacement Offset Fund

Thinking about the little girl from Vietnam running from Bombs picture, man learning to fly is less than an ideally beautiful system. What if every time governments in the World builds a plane, builds a bomb, builds a rocket, builds a drone, builds a helicopter is required to invest in a fund that helps with humanitarian crises caused by bombing raids Worldwide?

I think Space flight could be a beautiful thing, first man on Mars could be a beautiful thing, more beautiful with less humanitarian crises.

Could be less than a beautiful idea bombing perceived factors into funding or no funding.

That said even if that was not a problem, I am not sure all World governments would agree upon it – if everyone doesn’t agree potentially unlikely to be implemented, only implemented by a few governments might send a message of social responsibility, like nuclear de-escalation. Perceived and Comprehended as Socially Responsible factors into greater levels of support.

Bombing runs happen, the World has not ideally implemented peace in past, funding is not always adequately available when crises and displacement does happen. Safer rounds, less toxic rounds are invested in because it represents Better, Social Responsibility.

Head starts and Options available factors into Survival during humanitarian crises.

Ideal would be World Peace, no more bombs, no more terrorist attacks ever. Looking at the more practical bombs are likely to be dropped (past, present, and future) therefore a fund could factor into a head start that might otherwise not exist.

God, Machine, and Religion Thoughts

God is Powerful – someone that makes a boat can’t stop tidal waves, a boat rusts over time, yet God’s tidal waves are as devastating in the future as they were in the past.

Machines are Powerful, mankind might not always correctly categorize and classify machines for what they can and cannot do.

I have the potential to say words of peace, inspire people to potentially not go to war. If someone is dying and in need of medical attention, I cannot say jump on my back and get them to a hospital quickly, yet a car, a machine has the potential to get them there safely.

Machine cannot replace what God can do; what mankind can do. Mankind cannot easily replace the power that machines give in certain direction at certain times. I can put food in a backpack and bring it to others, food piled onto transport planes and delivered to countries is both similar and far different.

Religion is Powerful – a machine cannot likely ideally answer questions about who is God, why are we here on this planet, give encouragement and hope in the dark times of life, hope and encouragement that might be game changing and tide changing.

Whether you are atheist or believe in God it would be wise to perceive and comprehend the power in religion, power in religions that are not your own, that have the potential to inspire people to both better and worse ends. Our World allows people to be inspired to believe that suicide bombings and terrorists attacks will lead to heaven and martyrdom. I believe that will lead to Hell both for the person responsible and the people on Earth does not equate to others are forced to, or inspired to believe such atrocities are awful, misinformed, and the way Religious Elites use fear to help reinforce their iron grip on power and people.

The Catholic Church hasn’t had such great level of influence on Rome, Europe, and even The United States of America throughout time because Religion is weak, not powerful, can be disregarded as trivial, not worthy of mention.

I believe History was likely better than it could have been without The Catholic Church? Yes, Christ, forgiveness, grace, and Golden Rule invested in matters.

I think there are parts of history that might have been better without evils reinforced by mankind (including mankind in The Catholic Church)? Yes, parts of History could have been better without evils by men both in and out of The Catholic Church. Power and Authority, Dehumanization Prevented, Religion respected for its Power without be given a free pass to commit whatever atrocities it feels like in a particular time in history matters. Not a problem today could easily be a problem tomorrow – Religion will amplify ideally overtime thought to more known for potential to change, potential for problems like Slavery, and The Salem Witch Trials is not always turned up, capacity for dehumanization In By Design not always turned up. Wait to find out if your wife, or girlfriend, or daughter gets put to the floats or doesn’t float test? Religion not always called out for damage in oppressive times.

God is Powerful. Machines are Powerful in certain directions. Religion is Powerful and not always Respected both for value added and value subtracted. Mankind reinforces Power based upon perception and comprehension of where it lies, Power is not always reinforced in ideal directions. Not all new inventions are known, capacity to comprehend all possible power, in all possible directions is far less than ideal. Not possible thought and surprise could lead to accusations of Witchcraft – like from No Coocoo Clock to a Coocoo Clock. Startling plus a population that has potential to think they understand how everything works? People are not dumb does not equate to they are ideal possibilities known, are required to factor in ideal search and retrieval of truth, are ideal accusations based on less-than-ideal comprehension of truth out.

Magnetic properties cannot be seen by the naked eye. If I look at a metal object in real life or on a video – I ideally comprehend properties about that metal object? 99%+ of the time a metal object in a video likely to not have magnetic properties is likely to be equated to 100%, truth is a given. Factors into practical throughput should not be equated to ideal throughput. Invisible properties and powers that distinctly change truth, capacity to perceive and comprehend truth, and this is just one example, and all examples likely not known. I believe God has capacity for Miracles, I also believe God has capacity to change physics, what God does 99%+ of the time gets equated to 100%, truth is a given. Ideal perception of comprehension of truth believed has potential to bias results, bias results against Faith, bias results against Good Faith in talks.

God is predictable, sufficient data perceived and comprehended correctly to be cynical to known as not always correct? I have lived through times I thought were Hopeless, cynicism delivered less than ideally. Reason to Hope wiser, more accurate representation of truth than belief ideal perception and comprehension of truth is established.

I am a Christian, and like to share some of my artwork, the following image is Free Starter Content, meaning it is Free to create derivative works from

Original Inspiration from Christ’s Sacrifice and a Bluebird I took a video of in a tree in Duncanville, TX – created with Arteza paints, a Camera, and apps (potentially Procreate and Infinite Painter)

Given the USA Civil War and a past of discrimination in the South, I feel its worthy to note I meant the image to be attractive, and enjoyable, thought the energy effects looked awesome – was not going for Burning Cross look (which could be represented as Constantine, but in The USA South might be set to KKK which is definitely not what I am going for).

From my understanding there has been an uptick in Slavery, Dehumanization, and Human Trafficking in 2023-2024. Problems that it is easy to think of as in the past seem to be reminded as still a problem, wrongly equated to fixed and out by design.

Original Painting, also a Free Starter Image

Thoughts on Ratios

Needs to be a song, free the hostages don’t take them in the first place. A song that inspires and makes everyone want to sing along.

Thoughts of Ratios

September 11th, 2001 had roughly double number of victims as October 7th, 2023 – what if there were hostages taken back then, how might it have changed USA’s actions?

300 million (maybe a slight bit less population back then) and 3000

10 million in Israel and 1500 (1139 killed + 247 hostages)

3000/300,000,000 vs 1500/10,000,000

A World that sits by and lets Arab Nations build arms, and chant death to Israel, death to America

United Nations really want the status quo to change? Seem leveraged, not fully calling out Arab Nations for allowing this build up, more than once

Hamas, Hezbollah, and Houthis would never have been forces if the World had truly learned from September 11th, 2001, if the World had actually made sure Arab Nations never denounced Israel or Jewish people again back in 2001, or 1945. If Antisemitism was wholesale divested from in the World after World War 2 we likely would not be in the situations we are in today, the entire Middle East would likely be far more prosperous.

Imagine if they chanted Life to the Middle East, instead of death to Israel, death to America

Message Based upon Universal Representation

I wonder if we could make a supercomputer representation of all the opinions and ideas, the most important factors on everyone’s brain for all 8 billion people, then have that condensed into a 10-minute message that inspires the World to More Peace, Less War, and Better Days. A message that if everyone listened to life would be protected significantly better, quality of life would be significantly better.

Rebroadcast every 4 hours? Not possible in past might not equate to impossible in the future.