My Tech Blog

Governments and Companies that claim to protect my best interest, the public’s best interest while not protecting to better without vengeful reciprocity. How things are fixed matters, Evil for Evil far from makes things better.

When my cybersecurity, ability to produce is called into question (over and over) while tech companies and other companies rake in billions feels like insufficient protection. Who is responsible might not be the company I think does not equate to systems, governments, and companies that continue to profit while seeing wrongs to me and others in society as no big deal feels fair or just.

Personally wronged might lead to too close to adequately divest from biased to solve problem in a more ideal way. Nobody else is fixing, thus I need to fix is not an all value added system. When being hit undercovers, behind the scenes with cyber attacks that factor into real support losses it has potential for raising accusations at wrong parties, systems, governments, and companies. Less false accusations in advance, less inadequately turned up judgment, assessment is not something that is always invested in adequately in advance.

I desire to profit, to have sufficient support to survive. Seems like a reasonable request for All People on this planet (and above it, ISS for instance). I don’t like that my desire to continue to profit, to continue to make gains has potential to convolute correct delivery of action and protection (justice in a system that is far from ideal comprehension, truth, and relevance limiting out seems unlikely at best). I have challenged companies at times to be better based on both real concerns and less than ideal desire to consolidate support lines out.

Fixes might lead to less than all need to fix out. I don’t want people stuck in long jail and prison sentences unfairly, and I don’t think large scale or small scale loss of hours for support is ideal throughput delivered. Not to mention stuck in Jail at Holidays is not how I would wish to be treated. Golden Rule matters, not always amplified with appropriate value when considering justice and law.

Fixed and Protected might equate to 0.1% reciprocity for an action, Fixed and Protected might equate to 1000% reciprocity against systemic problems. Vengefulness and Personal wrongs have the potential to convolute desirable levels, response will always be at same level is unlikely thus divestment in advance is much higher value added at times. It is unwise to return Evil for Evil, yet not always pondered that letting Evil continue could be associated with returning Evil for Evil. Evil set to Evil, People not set to Evil Matters, factors into capacity to accurately fix situations – Permanent VLC Villain Level Contrast is Evil for Evil, what is the power of unforgiveness amplified in society over time?

Victimized by Systemic Injustice does not equate to ideal capacity to Challenge and Call Out Oppression, more that challenge in advance, High Value Added. Likely people in Jail or Prison might resonate a similar message, yet I get capacity to point to an example I have because I have accessibility, throughput, sufficient encouragement, sufficient access to update skills like communication.

Systems and documents are not required to be represented in the same way for two separate people. AB Testing has potential to lead to some seeing more Evil than others and potentially turning up desire for less-than-ideal assessment and judgment, justice amplified less than sufficiently. 9 people out of 10 get same document equates to 10 out of 10 get the same document? Adequate time to equate and verify truth, perception, and comprehension amplified same for all parties? Might make meetings longer could factor into support delivered and not delivered.

Cybersecurity problems equates to less time for support. Support’s Time and Throughput not always adequately valued.

---

Inability to adequately gauge safe or unsafe products on International Support Lines factors into potential for lost time in reflection, hypotheticals that is likely to limit Support Throughput in real ways that is hard to fully gauge. Peace saves time, working together saves time not always fully represented.

What is considered Kosher by Government matters. Trade iffed with China, still use Chinese products? Still use Vietnamese products? Proximity always amplifies ideal representation? The conversation amplifies less than ideally factors into potential to lag support throughput.

Easy to take International Trade and Support for granted. Easy to set to does not have to be invested in with sufficient protection in less-than-ideal ways. Support valued factors into value in Support. Gains will ideal without support working together unlikely. Peace, Love, Harmony, and Grace more than just fluff, factors into motivations, possibilities seen, less landmines like those left in Cambodia.

E-bike throttle seems to still be being iffed. At close to 200 miles. Might be an electrical or mechanical malfunction. Had throttle and battery replaced (Pedego has 5 year warranty, nice they will fix so easily), still seems to happen though. Happens intermittently like if controlled via cellular. Sometimes on hills, more often while in garage of building than outside (though happened at a stop sign as well). Happened in a rain storm yesterday, technical problems, combined with being on bike outside in rain has potential to make awareness more difficult, turned in a less than ideal way – compounded by environmental and technical problems (rain and throttle iffed).

Rain was a bit of surprise – bike handled nicely on slick roads though don’t think I would make it a habit of riding in the rain, slippery streets. Easy to forget with sprinklers, and potential oil spills in by design equates to slippery streets are in by design at times. Today I noticed a driver that I could have caught by surprise that was turning, he didn’t pull forward must have turned and saw me in time – potential for those turning onto streets not always to see bikers combined with cars behind could lead to potential accidents – not really sure how to ideally avoid that condition. Potentially could have slowed down and pulled to the curve ahead yet likely hard to gauge how much other drivers see and don’t see.

E-bike power iffed one more thing to think about. Complexity not always easy to divest from.

E-bike experience has been nice up to this point, don’t want to make things harder for Pedego – company and service has been impressive, that said with cybersecurity problems I have been having, potential for War in the Middle East, and Trade being iffed with China makes it harder to gauge level of problem. Simple electrical problems might be seen as potentially more – iffed by enemies? Easy to divest ideally from bias in the mist of cybersecurity problems?

It is nice to have a local E-bike shop – maintenance like replacing brake pads, oiling, and replacing filling up tires not always thought about during purchase (at least I didn’t really think about maintenance requirements before purchase outside of knowledge batteries potentially degrade over time and cycles). I bought a Ryobi 100 psi inflator from Home Depot though I need Eye Protection (tires might pop) and the electronic gauge on the inflator is not calibrated, thus I need to purchase a calibrated pressure gauge. If the gauge was reading 5 psi lower than normal and max pressure before pop was 2.5 psi higher, could lead to a pop (which reinforces need for eye protection).

Another thing to note, though I am not sure how much of a problem it is, E-bikes are using higher voltage (at least from what I have seen) 48V+ and from my understanding on Electrical Safety over 24V has potential for Electrocution. I realize these E-bikes and E-scooters are many times likely sealed yet might be worth turning up knowledge of Electrical Safety for users. Metal frames, riding in the rain, and potential for high voltages equates to higher grade products might be higher value than all fully appreciate.

Another part of E-bike experience is most stores do not have bicycle racks, and the E-bike feels a bit light for a parking space, specifically without full wheel locks and disables. I have added a Samsung Tag (like an Air Tag) that should give GPS coordinates of it, though would still be nice to have an easier way to lock down the E-bike when I go into a store. Less capacity to easily go into stores factors into ability to go to restroom, potentially not always pondered. Further I purchased a Workout bike conversion kit that I have yet to get from Amazon that might be nice to turn the E-bike into a workout system as well – easier to get a workout in on rainy days. Though with E-bike I am not sure I would claim most of my outings have been a real workout – throttle is nice.

I like E-biking, I like green tech and technology that has the potential to make the environment better. That said less potential for World War likely factors into actual gains. Peace invested in, in advance highly valuable.

I rode south, towards Duncanville on Saturday. I used the Dart train for part of the ride. There is a big hill on Westmoreland I think, get going closer to 30 mph (my E-bike is capped at 20 mph default, I might have been only going 24 mph or so but felt quite a bit faster) and is a bit scary with potential for cracks and potholes, didn’t have a problem does not equal problems potentially impossible. Checking brakes early in the ride and knowledge of slickness of road might equate to desire to stop or put more room between you and the car in front, going faster like downhill (which doesn’t happen all that often here) equals greater need for room as well. 

On that note, throttle when first starting to ride E-bike takes getting used to, angled away from car in front sometimes helpful (don’t go into the next lane, but if having issues angled a little bit helped me when jump started to close to the car in front of me – veered off to side a bit and missed trunk). I am by no means an expert, I have about 190 miles on the bike so far (rounded earlier yet more precision after stating knowledge might be useful). 193.3 miles to be exact on the odometer.

No sign of my cats, status unknown

Inability to gauge, inability to have true knowledge of level of oppression in society equates to varying levels of investment in reducing oppression. Same goes for making Peace, if the World thinks it needs 100 people to make Peace, it will invest in 100 people, if it thinks it needs 1000, it will invest in 1000, if the World sees it needs 8 billion to make Peace, will it invest sufficiently?

Many likely do not invest in Peace, Peacemaking because they are unsure of their impact, might feel like their words that have been trained less than ideally might be used against them in legalistic ways. Less grace in society at times factors into less grace in society. Inability to see impact is in by design – if I invest in a charity, I might be unlikely to see the impact during my lifetime. Raising comprehension of value created and value delivered takes time, perception, and comprehension that not all people have time to invest.

Contributions that are known to be less than ideal (Humans are not perfect) equates to faith necessary that God will help them be utilized in more ideal ways. If I have no Faith, if I see a charity I am unable to verify, would I give knowing they might not use my funding in the ways stated?

Working against Oppression, making contributions in oppressive conditions have potential to reduce Faith, investment might further enable power, power that oppressors might misuse. Oppressors might not be the best word, it ties a human that is not perfect to the evil that is oppression. Dehumanization is in itself a form of oppression, and society needs to be able to negate correlation of evil from the people that perpetrate it. Not being oppressive in an oppressive society, in a society that is less than ideal oppression out is not always simple or straightforward, less oppression in advance is power in not always fully appreciated ways, fully understood ways.

Both comprehension and insufficient comprehension factor into gains for better in an oppressive society. Well intentioned matters, well intentioned backed up with real support matters.

There is a saying “The path to hell is paved on good intentions”. That might be equated to good intentions are bad, so better to have bad intentions, only self-profiting intentions, which might be turned up as only valuable, only logical course in an oppressive systemic environment. Motivated right, Right intentions will have sufficient comprehension raised, sufficient obfuscation reduced to factor into decision making is far from a guarantee, especially under an oppressive environment. Bad intentions not right, good intentions not always aimed in right directions.

Negate reinforcement of oppressive systems, simple? Status quo has potential to reinforce (negate change is not always good), fighting might strengthen – far from always ideal. Humans taught “Don’t judge” equal ideal accessors of personal motivations for good and bad? It profits me reinforces support, Capitalism, which reinforces Freedom, Freedom of Speech potential for slippery slope greed to ideal value-added system. Choose not to win, choose to lose? The line of reasoning ideals less than ideally.

A personal win might not always be a societal win and is not always simple to gauge. A team win, A corporate win might not always be a societal win and is not always simple to gauge. Less simple to gauge has shown precedent for not always working ideally for all parties. Less than ideal visibility and comprehension factors into decision making around wins, losses, and maximizing profit – as if standing outside of a cave at times.

“Blessed are the Peacemakers” – Matthew 5:9, Peacemaking is a risk (“no risk no reward”), and has potential for more ideally turned up, those that turn up Peacemakers Peacemakers as well? Blessed are the rebroadcasters? Factors into max profit?

Reminder I am not affiliated with the Government, this is not a Government site

Oppression has effects on decision making, it is not easy to decipher always whether a decision would be made differently not under oppression. Oppression has an effect, is desirable to call out, is desirable to factor into reason for mistakes, does not equate to decisions are always easier when not oppressed. Some decisions are taken into consideration more, owe let under oppression might be more likely – I need to stop this or that has potential to be convoluted.

Before Cartels move into Texas and through cities, people are likely to have more capacity and desire to fight, potentially less possibilities to be hurt. Numbers grow might lead to Oppression growing, under Oppression people might have less desire to fight it. 1 out of 10 you challenge vs 9 out of 10 you challenge? I like the Hispanic community, the Hispanic community protected requires both better immigration policy and capacity to make sure laws profit all parties, and are followed in my opinion. I don’t want people dying on the border or in oppressive conditions in their own countries while failed by long immigration lines and laws that make becoming a positive contributor to society harder. Keeping bad out factors into protecting the good, and I also realize Villain Level Contrast delivers far less than sufficiently by default.

If I were trying to escape a Cartel Leader with a Machete and start a New Life in the USA free of oppression, I would not want to be followed and leveraged. Threat is real factors into desire for better immigration policy and amicable resolutions.

Throttle on my E-bike appears to be working intermittently. Compounded with Cybersecurity problems I have had over the past couple years raises concerns of potential for remote disables or possibly worse remote enables.

People that increase cybersecurity problems have potential to reduce trust in companies in a compounding way not always fully appreciated. Might just be a technical problem on the e-bicycle that needs to be fixed, might just be cybersecurity problems on my computer and limiting my deliveries. Might be something has potential to establish associations in less than ideal or sufficient ways. I am trying to be green, trying to add value, be lower impact. Driving a car might be safer (at least for me), though not driving a car might be theoretically safer (for others) with the cybersecurity problems. I am not sure I would want to stand around in crowds until problems are fixed to a more sufficient level. Country close to War, can’t guarantee cars won’t accelerate without consent?

All cop cars and dart buses to stopped until cybersecurity problems are fixed? Or potentially just a problem for me? If it was a problem for more people, Society would always say it out loud? System has ideal grounds to claim justice is being iffed in more significant ways? Best practices for others, not for authority? Roads potentially more dangerous than I would like for people I care about to be driving on, driving potentially greater problems for environment, parts of the World that are allowed to be turned up, yet part of society does not wish to be held to same level of accountability as others – stack burdens that do not wish to follow for self, for people one cares about while claim ideal Golden Rule added?

Parties Responsible for Cybersecurity Problems might not realize the significance, potential to turn up more protectionism, protectionism that can exponentially increase time costs. 5 passwords not good enough, require 6? Protectionism like dual factor authentication might limit Doctor’s time too – throughput delayed could equal throughput denied.

Say this might lead to paused ambulances, not say it might lead to ambulances driving through crowds. I know the full scope of the problem to assess whether the problem is more than just a problem for me? No. People not in control of their cars could be shot – stopping remote gas pedal on is important.

If I were in a car, truck, or SUV that I couldn’t control driving through a crowd I would want police to stop it in anyway possible (even if it did kill me). That said I would prefer to divest from that situation in advance. Up to and including lethal force is necessary at times, finding ways to stop potential problems before they happen could lead to gains and lives saved.

Society might make investments in Green Tech harder, not always for expected reasons.

Power to remotely disable a car might be good under a Just and Trustworthy Government. That said, all governments are subject to able to be controlled by corruption at a later date and is not always pondered as plausible.

A woman that is 400 lbs grows to 1000 lbs. At 1000 lbs she makes the comment “you all go on”, she is trying to help not trying to hurt.

A society of men and women that were not attracted to her at 400 lbs failed to encourage, failed to encourage the right things and discourage the wrong things. Discouraging the wrong things takes investment, investment in words, and time, effort – men that are attracted to skinny, women that reinforce skinny and pretty as ideal do not feel like they have the right to assess, to judge, to comment.

People trying to be nice, trying to do the right thing do not always deliver ideally. The one that told her “your fat, you need to change” might have said it the wrong way, yet might be more value added than those that never said anything in the first place. People that say harsh and discouraging words, do not always do so because they don’t care.

Claim to be ideally inclusive if you have a party that is majority of people that are overweight, claim it reinforces a good thing, claim there is no problem with PR caused by the combination?

It is one person’s responsibility to look out for all with similar problems? One person unlikely to be able to solve similar problems for all. Not think Society divests in mass, bandwagon appeal that leads to insufficient single investments?

Requirement for A level delivery, as if society amplifies ideally (A being grade like in school) has high potential for leading to significant divests. Law and Legalism, requirements to comprehend liabilities has potential to lead to feeling of can’t add value, will be punished if I do.

Society reinforces have to pay if you want to learn more at times, not always wise to turn up. Everything has levels of balance, mean spirited comments not always meant to help, do not always help.

People might set idea to I don’t have to comment on that, I will let the Church, will let good people cover that. They got it all covered? Set to right? It is easy to know how much to invest, if investment is desirable, if one won’t compound problems, if true view, perception, and comprehension is not obfuscated? Golden rule might not always look like Golden rule, does not equate to that always makes things easier. 

People trying to think better of others might let others discourage them further than they should, might wrongly assess sins of a society should be assessed as if carried on the shoulders of that person – where discouragement is perceived to be coming from people (that are less than perfect) or the devil, demons, societal problems that are hard to always see, understand, and realize in a timely manner. Evil should be associated with Evil, not the person committing, involved in the Evil is not always adequately turned up. Accusations, Demonization, and Divides do not always amplify for good reasons, for appropriate reasons, for reasons free of bias, for reasons free of problems that have been invested in, in mass by society, societal norms. The fix isn’t always known, isn’t always easy, isn’t always invested in, does not equate to no fix is non-consequential.

The one that knows the problem does not always know how to fix the problem. The one that knows how to fix the problem does not always know there is a problem. There is value for demons, evil reinforced to allow the two to never actually converse in a way that leads to perception and comprehension. The same person that knows the fix and the problem, might not know the fix is useful for the problem.  Just because people have matching puzzle pieces, does not equate to they always are able to put them together without help.

Some people’s MO might be truth, pain, telling it how it is like pouring salt in a wound. I don’t wish to hurt people, don’t wish to make someone 400 lbs hurt more.  Understanding how speaking out has potential to lead to liability tempts towards judgment, incorrect assessment not always discussed. Pain is not always reinforced for good reasons, when 1000 lbs, when it is too late, is the ideal time to raise ideal comprehension? Imagine if I used all these words to say “Never Say Die! There is Hope” instead.

Iffed cybersecurity and trust factors into editing capacity. Having potential to edit video that is taken factors into more capacity to do right by people and follow spirit of laws. Just because one takes a video does not equate to one will be able to edit the video in time to actually protect parties involved. Gives feeling of rigged in a bad way, rigged to pay.

Video footage has potential to equate to Time Debt, Time Debt that has potential to be increased by those wanting others to fail, profit less.

I take Videos on E-Bike rides. Children and others that do not desire to be captured on the video have potential for being in videos. Editing Capacity factors into due diligence in removing. Editing capacity has potential to be limited by cybersecurity and oppression.

Increased Time Debt valued as a good thing for our country should be strongly questioned, challenged. Making process harder might equate to less taking videos, less taking videos might equate to reduced coverage for failing infrastructure (I am not affiliated with the people that maintain the infrastructure does not equate to I do not have a stake in having more coverage). One video might be different than many videos that could potentially be viewed and pattern matched by a Supercomputer. Supercomputer that could search for potholes on videos and flag them could equate to better capacity to see problems. Seeing problems factors into capacity to fix.

The process made harder seen as a good thing is problematic, has potential for being increasingly problematic in natural disasters and wartime. Reduced Throughput, Throughput iffed today factors into Reduced Throughput, Throughput iffed, Reduced Capacity tomorrow.

Video of an E-bike has potential to make the experience known, familiarity with streets, critical thinking around potential problems. There would likely be greater support available for the community if Laws around Video were better, easier, less limited by profit some systems (some have the tech to blur faces easily, some do not).

U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time (usdebtclock.org)

Infrastructure needs all the help it can get

Video editing unlikely to be idealed (there are iffy situations, leave in don’t leave in, missed that didn’t miss this). More capacity upfront Matters.

Government that borrows excessive amounts of debt combined with laws that hamstring support to reduce it? I think Society could work together More in Enabling ways, not exactly sure how to get there.

Adobe Premiere Output in 2024 is not as reliable as I think it should be – more reliable exports on my Samsung tablet. Stops at 100% and sometimes writes the file sometimes does not. Gives feeling of a problem for me might not be a problem for everyone.

Combined with Cybersecurity Problems and iffed support lines definitely gives feeling of reduced trust, rigged. Iffed support lines not ideal for anyone in Texas, our Country, our the World for that matter.