Reminder I am not affiliated with the Government, this is not a Government site
Oppression has effects on decision making, it is not easy to decipher always whether a decision would be made differently not under oppression. Oppression has an effect, is desirable to call out, is desirable to factor into reason for mistakes, does not equate to decisions are always easier when not oppressed. Some decisions are taken into consideration more, owe let under oppression might be more likely – I need to stop this or that has potential to be convoluted.
Before Cartels move into Texas and through cities, people are likely to have more capacity and desire to fight, potentially less possibilities to be hurt. Numbers grow might lead to Oppression growing, under Oppression people might have less desire to fight it. 1 out of 10 you challenge vs 9 out of 10 you challenge? I like the Hispanic community, the Hispanic community protected requires both better immigration policy and capacity to make sure laws profit all parties, and are followed in my opinion. I don’t want people dying on the border or in oppressive conditions in their own countries while failed by long immigration lines and laws that make becoming a positive contributor to society harder. Keeping bad out factors into protecting the good, and I also realize Villain Level Contrast delivers far less than sufficiently by default.
If I were trying to escape a Cartel Leader with a Machete and start a New Life in the USA free of oppression, I would not want to be followed and leveraged. Threat is real factors into desire for better immigration policy and amicable resolutions.