My Tech Blog

See Heaven, truly see Heaven, claim God can’t meet needs?

From Heaven, looking glass at Earth? No potential for pain in Heaven?

Is there a price for tempting Angels?

Fallen Angel to Demon Possible – not really trying to turn that up

Angels if Man, Man ifs Angels? Fair is Fair? In Heaven equals higher up on totem pole? God loves less, God loves more? Not sure I want Angels feeling less loved.

Man and Woman, Mankind desires greatest level of support possible from God. Claim God can’t turn things up?

Should preachers support people that have Lingerie Companies? Real support vs distant support with potential wars looming – Golden Rule likely to deliver ideally? Temptation reduced matters, Temptation reduced factors into personal profit, Personal profit is always ideal Temptation reduced? Ideal people protected? I don’t want to tempt, I know society tempts by default and claims it does not. Sweaters not always ideal Texas weather, protection from Adultery not always ideally turned up. People with lingerie companies give reasons to claim mitigation, reasons adultery is acceptable both ideally and non-ideally. Understandable, comprehendible gets convoluted with acceptable.

A company that doesn’t get stage time is unlikely to be protected or profitable. When people that want to get their stones ready, they might look to a preacher to what they see as acceptable, potentially a tuning fork, not all good to divest from involvement. Claims of ideal divestment might equate to grounds for reduced support, no support seen as acceptable, righteous. Involved is not sin free, negate involved is not sin free. Golden rule has to deliver ideally to equate to zero sin matters, factors into less stones thrown. Who is the sinner factors into ideal ground established non ideally. No big deal don’t have to get involved might lead to problems not seen, problems not fixed. Divestments and claims of sweaters ideal, less vulnerability ideals. People less attracted to each other if all wearing hazmat suits, not an ideal future to turn up.

I don’t want to sound like the Villain choose one or the other does not always lead to ideal ground, ground free of sin established. Other potential options? Different trajectories not always pondered, potential for not always sin free.

Imagine seek and you will find ideals, ideals in a time frame you desire. I don’t believe it does but work with the hypothetical. Imagine you find another path on your pursuit to find knowledge, knowledge that is far more valuable than the original pursuit? Seeking free of temptation? How valuable is the original piece of information, is the new path fool’s gold or more? No potential for pretty along the way to finding answers?

Current paths of let vs let feel less than ideal. Let equated to I don’t have to fix, not fixing is wise, maintenance turned up as less valuable? I know how to establish ideal ground on maintain in a land where heat strokes possible in a large part of the year? Christ and God know how to ideal, have had chance to ideal, yet ideal has not been delivered over time. God could deliver ideal sin out by removing man, has chosen not to sets historic precedent for sin is in by design does not equate to the future is written or easily knowable.

Understand the following logic. All people are less than ideal sin out, if I let people that are less than ideal sin out around me I have temptation, is important to limit temptation, thus it is important for nobody to talk. No communication likely to lead to ideal safety delivered? Strippers need to comprehend high voltage signs? No, Yes. People visiting strippers likely to be talking about electricity? Potentially not, does not equate to not possible, less communication is always wise. How many people are around matters in not fully appreciated ways, left alone not always good does not always factor into ideal support even if support given by someone visiting a strip club is less than ideal. People don’t always see their own light shining in the darkness. Negate hubris lows, hubris woes, negate hubris woes. Be less confident, we need you to follow, not to lead (said not said, comprehended not comprehended)? Low and humble might equate to discouraged seen as righteous, will deliver ideally?

Important to remember that the devil has potential to use both encouragement and discouragement, sometimes in tandem, combination – either ideals not always true. Discouraged from A factors into encouraged to B said from a friend or from a foe?

A question is asked gets set to knows what thoughts it generates based upon own thoughts of potential answers does not equate to all possible answers? Will amplify the same answers I think gets thought, potentially non ideally. What is 2+2? A Math Question? 1+1+1+1? 2 Questions and 2 Answers? 4, simple as that? There is value in knowing there is potential for greater representation. 2 bottles of water and 2 helping hands? Representation to a prettier picture? 4 peace or 4 war? Creativity might less than ideal accounting? Good numbers factor into Research Ethics and Studies, that have potential to be delivered more or less ideally. The next trial after 776 never biased to a jackpot? Encouraged not always ideal oversight, impossible?

Casinos use numbers might get correlated to Math Teachers as convicts. Casinos don’t equal convicts, Math Teachers don’t equal convicts. Not stop feed attach correlation that amplifies less than ideally? Trial 777 maybe the cure? Cures only require one pull of the slot machine, one roll of the dice? Better not risk another pull, didn’t work for me in Vegas? Risk and Risk Aversion ideally valued as valuable? Hedge the bet between the two, sounds good, sounds would, sounds could?

Maximize Good and Minimize Evil might be equated to easily perceivable, easily comprehendible, easily deliverable. Jackpot future no reason to show effects of the bad? Representation should equate to Maximize Good and Minimize Evil does not equate to useful ground never factors into profit seen as Maximizing Good and Minimizing Evil. Some people’s sins get turned up while others don’t. Imagine if everyone talked about how they judged incorrectly all the time. Less desirable for self-equates to greater value delivered? Judgment factors into where focus is delivered. What is focused upon not always ideally established. What should be focused upon not always ideally comprehendible. Desire to protect self factors into value established is not free of consequence.

If I go to a lingerie website I should be punished? Reinforcing less sweaters required in Texas is not valuable? Just because I have potential to defend my point equates to ideal judgment established and delivered? Judgment and assessment never get convoluted? Can win equates to should win? Can win equates to should not win? Who wins an argument, wins a case, wins right always ideal love delivered? Winning is nice, love is not always ideal wins. Love is not nice? Love sometimes leads to gossip, examples set, claim it all nice? Establishing precedent not always ideal love.

Someone that doesn’t try to dissuade me personally from visiting a lingerie website gets to comment on right or wrong surrounding it? Fend involvement matters, I am not married, and exhibition of rings delivers less than ideally. Reminder though I am not a lawyer. Rings could be used as focal points, as remote tests likely not always pondered. Tuning forks more enabled always ideal? Divest from ideal gray in a World of less-than-ideal sin less than ideal comprehends? Feed gray may might not lead to full appreciation for proximity to black, over the line, that people don’t always categorize and classify gray as not black, as not white. Gray is hard to divest from does not make everyone great at categorization and classification by default.

I like beautiful women, beautiful women encouraged and protected, business profiting – does not equate to I like human trafficking, want to see underaged girls anywhere in the mix. Cheerleaders and Highschool football games ideal gray out? Society miscomprehends. A man in a strip club might equate to not close to your daughter equated to ideal golden rule, ideal love for the man in the strip club? Extra paths min-ed, thinned not all good. Owned delivered let fully pondered? Freedom, Love, and Golden Rule never feels like less-than-ideal ground established? All free of sorrow for the owner? Meant for more claimed from grounds of an imperfect person, ok for their daughter not for my daughter (from a guy with no daughter)? Sons need to be protected too, no desire to talk about that? Sons sometimes Men, Men always ideally protect self, never charge headfirst into the unknown? Women and Children need to be protected always ideal Bike Helmets inspired?

Preachers would likely Preach for a week without ceasing if they thought it would make the World a better place. Support might be available does not equate to people always listen, it is desirable to listen all the time. Each second is consequential vs value delivered over time? Hard to know impact.

Never Say Die!

Never Say Die!

Never Say Die!

Never Say Die!

4 times enough? too much?

Not my video, do want people encouraged

Ever just feel like you need to turn up support?

People grow over time might get set to people grow in ways that ideally benefit self (meaning the person watching the person grow) not others. Appreciating grow that profits others is both necessary and might feel less than ideal at times. They fixed A and not B and everyone is happier? Yet B factors into my happiness. Friends might grow over time does not equivocate to they will grow in directions that ideally profit self, or personal direction – sometimes friends part ways for good reasons, that might be better for the world yet might feel less than ideal at times. Convolute grow, Convolute grow potentially useful to the devil. Tied up could lead to less-than-ideal value established. Either friend likely to be perfect at the end, No, both worth protecting? Yes.

Might make a good song, a song that doesn’t inspire it? Pull together and increase communication vs space, time to listen, and observation is valuable? A little space does not always equate to feels sufficient, too much is hard to fully appreciate until delivered in a way that has both ideal and less than ideal properties. Space and ample time to read vs fighting alpha winds on teams and in corporations leads to ideal touchdowns scored?

Future gets upsold to will ideal, will ideal without health problems and curveballs. Plenty of time to make peace (which in truth establishes less than ideally at times) gets thought. Less than ideal peace beats no peace, beats friends hurting for infinity. Art and World News, small actions could lead to peace or war, leads to A wind (like Grade of A 100%) desirable, set to if undelivered, less sufficient value added. Accept C level peace and compromise? Where people round, where people accept losses, where people should set something to an acceptable loss amplifies less than ideally, with less-than-ideal perception and comprehension, with less-than-ideal truth established by default or in practice.

Easy to accurately make compromises that lead to better for others and self in communications?

1. Caucasians shouldn’t be let alone with imperialism
2. Flight not all little girls running from bombs out, man was meant to fly like birds?
3. Ground with landmines does not always equate to past leaves future in ideal positions
4. Things rust and maintenance is not always invested in, could be capitalized on, could be perceived as capitalized on, and that is less than all value added – Peace as shiny new steel?
5. Marriages pressured by international wars feels like less-than-ideal leverage out – choose someone different equals more little girls live? Fee wars ideal the future with sufficient oppression reduced.
6. Know don’t know is a common system, teaching Math equals better businesses, teaching Math equals less bombs?
7. Writing has potential to be both interesting and reinforce correct points, feels right does not always feel like reinforces in ideal ways – gets traction today might equate to has to be interesting tomorrow? On ramp with steeper incline not always ideal.
8. History got that wrong is useful, not always ideally capitalized on – Fee A (as in Grade, 100%) let is in by design and has potential to be less than all value added to self
9. I would have done better backspaced. Given similar training and experiences, same World atmosphere I might like to think I would make better choices, but the future knows more than the past is hard to fully appreciate. Investment in Peacekeeping and Art like Photographs that change minds dramatically are in by design. Impact matters gets downplayed, understated.
10. The writer might think they know sufficient amount of information to write this document. The writer’s mind is always open to the future knows things, adds value – changing perception and comprehension previously stated as fact might be necessary? History even delivered wrongly, is hard to unwrite – Fee change is easy, light, ideally turned up. Setting record straight on past is Important, less than ideally turned up – capacity to change minds is not always easy yet is a necessary part of life and peacemaking. Propagandists left with ideal control of history does not lead to ideal comprehension of history.
11. 10 talking points is useful gets set to ideal value delivered. Useful gets set to ideal value delivered.
12. I want a future that protects African Americans and Jewish people better, historic precedent for not carrying forward in ideal ways, in timely ways
13. I am a caucasian with red hair (or at least was in the past), easy to set voice to matters less? Viking axes to protecting the World from bias and racism vs from enabling it potential for not always ideally turned up. Gingers might need to protect gingers better is hard to fully comprehend. I am a parking cone, you are a parking cone to real humanization? Less desire to like similar, there are reasons that gets turned up – proving not gay, establishing not gay factors into less challenges that are far from all value added. Look at self like a Phoenix, Demi-god might equate to less than ideal hubris out, less than ideal hubris out for engineers has shown less than ideal precedent. People don’t always fully appreciate the range, the desire for overcompensation potentially in non-ideal directions. Antiheros valued for capacity to see evil in self, red kind of goes with vampires fully appreciated? Burns in the light and nobody wants to give sunscreen? Over dramatization is interesting and that is less than ideal value added – a world running to you with sunscreen bottles might sound good in theory. Dating a ginger taking one for the team to actually desired, wise to turn up rare as beautiful and useful in a world full of human trafficking? Protection might lead to discouragement, perception of mistreatment. You can’t always win with gingers, equates to gingers might desire to win less. Ginger and contrarian might not always lead to ideal value established. Choice as a game to be won instead of something to be ideally delivered? Fend see know, fend see negate know? Reminder I am not a lawyer. Think better of others and the world, humanity, even self-delivers less than ideally at times to ideal choices?
14. Hate war but love the military? What if your family is military? Associated with government always feels like ideal capacity to win? Oppression not reinforced matters, perception and comprehension less than ideals. Stockpiles turn up don’t turn up. Loving family, reinforcing family might not always be ideal love for family, ideal peace that protects family reinforced. Over investment in military might lead to surplus nukes – love hate simple as that? Ideal ground upon what is love is ideally established?
15. Ginger from a military family can win, equals should win? Silver metals sometimes look prettier than all might venture to ponder. Silver as the win better take the gold? I lose sometimes equates to I win likely better understood for fathers seeing their daughter get married.

Some Free art I created a while back likely inspired a bit by Blackpink as well as other groups, pink fire on atmosphere potentially factored in as well

Free Starter Content to create derivative works from

Reminder artists left in prison don’t get to post

Looking for Pink Fire in the Atmosphere, not the same video I saw a while back but pretty amazing

Arguing a point and a reason is valuable, factors into high ground established. A point or reason accepted does not equate to arguing the point in the first place was the right choice, that the point is guaranteed to be right.

Defending arguments is sometimes necessary. Defending arguments is also non null time costs. Extra time costs are not always higher value added. What is accepted as right and wrong in law has potential to be set to like a game, winning teams and losing teams. Law that sets Precedent, Historic Precedent delivered and compounded upon by people that desire to profit has potential for establishing less than ideal truth less than ideal capacity to divest at critical times.

The fight is sometimes right, sometimes enjoyable, factors into fighting is always right. I want to prevent the indefensible, yet I do not want to defend the indefensible might be hard to ideally clarify.

Less requirement to fight, peace in advance is valuable in not fully appreciated ways, yet also might lead to less practice. What is most valuable might not always equate to what is valuable to all parties.

Reinforcing laws is in by default in our society – yet determining if they were delivered on ideal ground, in ways that benefit all parties is unlikely to be fully entertained at times.

Claim system like a game, for profit, for win or loss ideals Love and Golden Rule? Justice and Judgment in men’s courts might be non-ideally equated to same in God’s court. I am not God, my perception of assessment and judgment is based both on The Bible and men’s laws, teaching around reasoning and logic. Our Justice system fully brought to Justice at the end of time?

Fee spin is ideal truth compounded upon? Hard to assess equates to factored out yet unlikely to be ideally factored out. People that practice arguing might have more capacity to assess which problems they want to divest from in advance to save time – value likely not always pondered in Time Management.

Reminder I am not a lawyer, I use the term fee to represent make it harder to claim at times, like saying fight it yet in toned down terms (fighting brings a greater level that might not equate to ideal peace established)

People that know I might call out their less than ideals might be more unlikely to call out my less than ideals and vice versa. Mutually assured destruction might not always lead to problems called out in ideal ways. Less argument out on one particular issue might lead to less argument in on another particular issue. What might be beneficial to Lawyers or Teams might not always be ideal truth established. Agreement facilitates gains and profits, potentially in non-ideal ways.

You sin and I sin but we agree not to call out each other’s sins because who is a sinner to judge might not lead to ideal divestment from sin. What sin has to be fixed first up to debate in a system that is far less than all sin out? Come back to me when you fix all the other sin is a perfectly acceptable conclusion that might amplify less than ideally.

Society amplifies less sin based upon practicality. I don’t want all the women at beaches wearing two sweaters to reinforce modesty. Bathing suits less than ideal sin reduced, a known that is in by design in USA Society. Forced to wear 2 sweaters on a hot summer day is not how I would wish to be treated – should be set to sinful to require in my opinion. Fee Society ideals sin out, we would want to live in a society that delivers more ideally on ideal sin out, or at least is perceived as delivering more ideal sin out (to who, who judges and assesses)?

I know the sin is in by design, I know it less than ideals, I know it causes problems like adultery in society – which is far from all problems reduced, yet fixes have shown precedent for delivering less than ideally. Know the police that arrest people, the Judges that judge people, the politicians that create laws and public policy, the preachers and ministers are all reinforcing a system that is both more ideal and less than ideal in ways that leads to real sin? Sin that is factored out as inconsequential? Under the law not really under the law factors into Under the law less useful, desirable.

One example does not equate to all examples. Math and Greed, very real and in by design. A see sin reduced? (A like in a Grade). Might be less people in Jail if we all put away the stones (John 8:7-11) and gave helping hands instead. Perception and comprehension of sin in by design or not in by design factors into valuation of last sentence.

I might ask one to tear down the statue of David before requiring women to wear more modest clothing at the beach. Big rocks before small rocks. I like art, I am not gay, I don’t really desire the statue of David torn down – yet reminding others that less-than-ideal sin out is in by design and reinforced and some not all areas are highlighted is important. Not fixing big rocks first factors into single out, less than ideal punishment and justice delivered – which should be a crime, a crime worthy of punishment! (sarcasm sometimes useful, hard to tell in reading at times)

Sometimes greater levels of punishment are reinforced to deter others from punishing, having capacity to punish self. Can’t punish me because they are too busy being punished is useful. It would be better to divest from all being punished in advance. Punishment pursued might lead to undesirable time costs, and is thus reinforced less than ideally. Turn up a system that is reinforced less than ideally?

I could punish

or

I could give Free Starter Content

The above image is Free for others to use and compound upon, preferably by those that put down the stones

Reminder I am a Christian, I am not a minister, preacher, or priest

A 20 year old man fails to ask out a 90 year old woman

A 20 year old woman fails to ask out a 90 year old man

Inclusivity amplifies ideally? No. The World is a beautiful place never causes problems? No.

Claim it amplifies Golden Rule ideally? No need to appreciate Life is but a vapor, 90 year old could out live the 20 year old?

The World sometimes Fees I don’t like, that is not always wise to do

Reinforcement of image in by design is divested from ideally? Not in my opinion. I would wish others to have to divest from it ideally? No

It is possible for some to call out problems in others instead of working on self? True

Fee got it right, seems apt at times

Better inclusivity in right ways matters, too burdensome has shown historic precedent for being non ideally turned up in our World

People will understand all things that factor into decision making? If I can’t see a problem claim to know it? They just don’t want to be inclusive?

What makes me uncomfortable, factors into personal decision making, is not knowable or known by all, letting people in on know and comprehension takes time, and is not always used wisely. Trust attempted reinforced with reason to distrust has high potential for turning up silence.

I wish to be inclusive and not inclusive at the same time. Sounds hypocritical, I want others to be blessed, I like (in a non sexual way) people I do not date, and I want time to date those I wish and oxygen and breathing room because other forms of discomfort factor into my experience that are not always knowable.

Blanket, cookie cutter approach fixes all is useful at times, does not always work great for all parties

Fee others know others ideally, no ground for improvement

Fee others have access to perceive and thus comprehend enough to know others ideally

Fee surprise is out by design, future is known in by design

I want some to be discouraged because they are not my type? No. I set type ideally? No. There is good reason not to change type that is set less than ideally? Yes. This World turns up ugly at times for contrast sake, pretty and beautiful matters is not always fully appreciated. If all children looked like gremlins instead of cute, not sure they would get as many hugs.

The Devil and Demons could turn up pretty doesn’t matter, have to accept ugly. Not accepting perception of ugly means they want the other person to hurt. People correlate the two non ideally. Just because someone doesn’t want to date you does not always equate to they don’t want to help you. I want someone 90 year old being terrorized? No. I want to be forced to date someone I do not wish to date? No. It is always easy to know what purpose people of different ages serve for each other in a max profit World? No. Assessment amplifies less than ideally many times for good reasons that are wiser not to turn up.

Somethings that are iffy are written. Somethings that are iffy are not written. Does not equate to choice to write or not write is always ideally established.

Just because I want distance, want personal space at times does not equate to I want others to hurt, be less encouraged

Sometimes there are 3rd party problems like health problems, or events of a day that can equate to two people not talking is more ideal, system is dynamic is hard to always fully appreciate. Two people usually talk might be seen as needs to be reinforced by default. Thinking better of each other matters, extra tests are sometimes in by design that feel less than ideal.

The right knowledge is far from ideally distributed. Right knowledge as a requirement for conversation might be more valuable at times yet is not turned up for good reasons at times. Know what to say, not know how to say it in the right way? The right way is the way it will be best comprehended? Sufficient contrast helps me understand better, yet missing the mark on subtle is not always better. Said in a subtle way might not always be appreciated, there is good reason at times not to hear subtle, iffy. Unlikely to be comprehended by others in the room always ideal problems reduced?

Who is responsible for problems is not always knowable – is a hard lesson to fully appreciate. How am I supposed to solve problems I can’t perceive or comprehend? Problems and who has caused them, or what has caused them (which might be more often that who has caused them) has turned up less than ideally at least in my life. Accusations have potential to be desirable is not fully appreciated, Accusations that are likely to be wrong, feels awful in combination in not fully appreciated ways. Problems acknowledged does not always equate to problems solved.

I am not law enforcement or military. I have had experience with high anxiety situations over my life. My mind might have greater capacity to deal with some situations than others, and their mind might have greater capacity to deal with some situations than others. Doesn’t amp that way for me is not always fully appreciated. Experience and Learning might lead to more ideal and less ideal in some ways. Look into the abyss enough times and survive, claim to ideally assess risk?

Combination could lead to Teaching a message, lesson motivated correctly or by different reasons than perceived and comprehended. People teaching Math might know their students might own a business one day, does not equate to they desire to turn up counts of nuclear stockpiles for instance. Intended for, Not intended for, off label uses and creative problem-solving matters, amps, and has potential to amp less than ideally at times.

I feel like I have somethings figured out, yet that could be self-deceptive comprehension. Comprehension is useful gets equated to it is right, complete. People that lead are always given sufficient oxygen in the room to acknowledge they are delivering based on less-than-ideal perception and comprehension? I might be closer to death than I would like and I still pursue knowledge, realize I don’t have it all figured out (though hard to divest from thinking I have somethings figured out). Words as simple as out and in, simple to define? In the building, in the room, in the country? Quality of inclusivity, dignity factors into Peace, and Peace of Mind.

Thinking too much might lead to reduce throughput based upon increased complexity. Debate on what out or in means might be less useful at times than delivering increased support, yet comprehension factors into quality of support and ability to clarify problems.

I was born in 1983 and it is 2024. That equates to my brain has been stained with learning and experience from that time. 2083 to 2124 is likely to have both similar and different qualities. Future is likely to have better tech, more knowns, and potentially more unknowns given increases in complexity. Statistics are useful are not always edited later. Study might show something, might not equate to the study repeated would always lead to similar results. Product Testing set to ideal with less-than-ideal comprehension of changes in complexity?

More surface area in time writing, factors into ease of use, potential for seen as a potential solution is both useful and has potential for being less than ideal at times. Talk about oppression enough doesn’t mean I am great at stopping it, does equate to easier to talk about. Writing has potential to generate value that is hard to fully comprehend, potential ebs and flows that can’t be fully appreciated. Words that stop oppression written today does not equal delivered by default tomorrow. 

Training more to write and fight oppression factors into future throughput of oppression reduced. More with a platform, like WordPress, and enabled with accessibility and tools to raise awareness and deliver messages matters in not fully appreciated ways. ”Blessed are the Peacemakers” – The Bible, my guess is that has a transitive property of Blessed are those who Enable the Peacemakers with better training and tools. People in Jail equates to more oxygen for leaders to deliver their message, for both good and bad, yet those left in jail are not always recompensated for the value they add by not taking stage time. Down on luck, likely to be back in Society, a helping hand up beats judging when The Bible says not to.

Ability to write online and deliver words that at least attempt to reduce oppression is a blessing, easy to forget that gratitude factors into reduced potential for hubris. Perceived as reduced potential for hubris is useful, factors into more believable and charming, less potential for perceived as arrogant. Accessibility that is in by design gets to feel common, like guaranteed by default. There are reasons to be grateful, even in the storms of life yet would likely be harder for me to see if I was in some others’ shoes. Allot of people have sacrificed time and money that has factored into my ability to write and communicate, they should be appreciated, not sure how to adequately appreciate such great gifts.