Breathing Room

A 20 year old man fails to ask out a 90 year old woman

A 20 year old woman fails to ask out a 90 year old man

Inclusivity amplifies ideally? No. The World is a beautiful place never causes problems? No.

Claim it amplifies Golden Rule ideally? No need to appreciate Life is but a vapor, 90 year old could out live the 20 year old?

The World sometimes Fees I don’t like, that is not always wise to do

Reinforcement of image in by design is divested from ideally? Not in my opinion. I would wish others to have to divest from it ideally? No

It is possible for some to call out problems in others instead of working on self? True

Fee got it right, seems apt at times

Better inclusivity in right ways matters, too burdensome has shown historic precedent for being non ideally turned up in our World

People will understand all things that factor into decision making? If I can’t see a problem claim to know it? They just don’t want to be inclusive?

What makes me uncomfortable, factors into personal decision making, is not knowable or known by all, letting people in on know and comprehension takes time, and is not always used wisely. Trust attempted reinforced with reason to distrust has high potential for turning up silence.

I wish to be inclusive and not inclusive at the same time. Sounds hypocritical, I want others to be blessed, I like (in a non sexual way) people I do not date, and I want time to date those I wish and oxygen and breathing room because other forms of discomfort factor into my experience that are not always knowable.

Blanket, cookie cutter approach fixes all is useful at times, does not always work great for all parties

Fee others know others ideally, no ground for improvement

Fee others have access to perceive and thus comprehend enough to know others ideally

Fee surprise is out by design, future is known in by design

I want some to be discouraged because they are not my type? No. I set type ideally? No. There is good reason not to change type that is set less than ideally? Yes. This World turns up ugly at times for contrast sake, pretty and beautiful matters is not always fully appreciated. If all children looked like gremlins instead of cute, not sure they would get as many hugs.

The Devil and Demons could turn up pretty doesn’t matter, have to accept ugly. Not accepting perception of ugly means they want the other person to hurt. People correlate the two non ideally. Just because someone doesn’t want to date you does not always equate to they don’t want to help you. I want someone 90 year old being terrorized? No. I want to be forced to date someone I do not wish to date? No. It is always easy to know what purpose people of different ages serve for each other in a max profit World? No. Assessment amplifies less than ideally many times for good reasons that are wiser not to turn up.

Somethings that are iffy are written. Somethings that are iffy are not written. Does not equate to choice to write or not write is always ideally established.

Just because I want distance, want personal space at times does not equate to I want others to hurt, be less encouraged

Sometimes there are 3rd party problems like health problems, or events of a day that can equate to two people not talking is more ideal, system is dynamic is hard to always fully appreciate. Two people usually talk might be seen as needs to be reinforced by default. Thinking better of each other matters, extra tests are sometimes in by design that feel less than ideal.

The right knowledge is far from ideally distributed. Right knowledge as a requirement for conversation might be more valuable at times yet is not turned up for good reasons at times. Know what to say, not know how to say it in the right way? The right way is the way it will be best comprehended? Sufficient contrast helps me understand better, yet missing the mark on subtle is not always better. Said in a subtle way might not always be appreciated, there is good reason at times not to hear subtle, iffy. Unlikely to be comprehended by others in the room always ideal problems reduced?

Who is responsible for problems is not always knowable – is a hard lesson to fully appreciate. How am I supposed to solve problems I can’t perceive or comprehend? Problems and who has caused them, or what has caused them (which might be more often that who has caused them) has turned up less than ideally at least in my life. Accusations have potential to be desirable is not fully appreciated, Accusations that are likely to be wrong, feels awful in combination in not fully appreciated ways. Problems acknowledged does not always equate to problems solved.

I am not law enforcement or military. I have had experience with high anxiety situations over my life. My mind might have greater capacity to deal with some situations than others, and their mind might have greater capacity to deal with some situations than others. Doesn’t amp that way for me is not always fully appreciated. Experience and Learning might lead to more ideal and less ideal in some ways. Look into the abyss enough times and survive, claim to ideally assess risk?

Combination could lead to Teaching a message, lesson motivated correctly or by different reasons than perceived and comprehended. People teaching Math might know their students might own a business one day, does not equate to they desire to turn up counts of nuclear stockpiles for instance. Intended for, Not intended for, off label uses and creative problem-solving matters, amps, and has potential to amp less than ideally at times.

I feel like I have somethings figured out, yet that could be self-deceptive comprehension. Comprehension is useful gets equated to it is right, complete. People that lead are always given sufficient oxygen in the room to acknowledge they are delivering based on less-than-ideal perception and comprehension? I might be closer to death than I would like and I still pursue knowledge, realize I don’t have it all figured out (though hard to divest from thinking I have somethings figured out). Words as simple as out and in, simple to define? In the building, in the room, in the country? Quality of inclusivity, dignity factors into Peace, and Peace of Mind.

Thinking too much might lead to reduce throughput based upon increased complexity. Debate on what out or in means might be less useful at times than delivering increased support, yet comprehension factors into quality of support and ability to clarify problems.

I was born in 1983 and it is 2024. That equates to my brain has been stained with learning and experience from that time. 2083 to 2124 is likely to have both similar and different qualities. Future is likely to have better tech, more knowns, and potentially more unknowns given increases in complexity. Statistics are useful are not always edited later. Study might show something, might not equate to the study repeated would always lead to similar results. Product Testing set to ideal with less-than-ideal comprehension of changes in complexity?

More surface area in time writing, factors into ease of use, potential for seen as a potential solution is both useful and has potential for being less than ideal at times. Talk about oppression enough doesn’t mean I am great at stopping it, does equate to easier to talk about. Writing has potential to generate value that is hard to fully comprehend, potential ebs and flows that can’t be fully appreciated. Words that stop oppression written today does not equal delivered by default tomorrow. 

Training more to write and fight oppression factors into future throughput of oppression reduced. More with a platform, like WordPress, and enabled with accessibility and tools to raise awareness and deliver messages matters in not fully appreciated ways. ”Blessed are the Peacemakers” – The Bible, my guess is that has a transitive property of Blessed are those who Enable the Peacemakers with better training and tools. People in Jail equates to more oxygen for leaders to deliver their message, for both good and bad, yet those left in jail are not always recompensated for the value they add by not taking stage time. Down on luck, likely to be back in Society, a helping hand up beats judging when The Bible says not to.

Ability to write online and deliver words that at least attempt to reduce oppression is a blessing, easy to forget that gratitude factors into reduced potential for hubris. Perceived as reduced potential for hubris is useful, factors into more believable and charming, less potential for perceived as arrogant. Accessibility that is in by design gets to feel common, like guaranteed by default. There are reasons to be grateful, even in the storms of life yet would likely be harder for me to see if I was in some others’ shoes. Allot of people have sacrificed time and money that has factored into my ability to write and communicate, they should be appreciated, not sure how to adequately appreciate such great gifts.