My Tech Blog

Could AI lead to increased comprehension of Physics?

Safer Roller Coaster vs Nukes?

AI as a special name is likely not fully appropriate, many systems in the World are not fully deterministic.

I don’t want to be nuked and non-deterministic systems might factor into me not being nuked.

Some people have potential to profit more from learning is likely not fully appreciated. You stop working on that and I keep working on that is not likely to be a fair and just system in all cases. Better equipped not required to deliver better for all parties kind of in by design in non-ideal ways at times.

Fee fair delivered. Fee justice delivered. Fee capacity always delivered seems apt. Fee comprehension delivers in way that makes fair and justice comprehendible always seems apt. Aid delivers better for me, or worse for me, a truly comprehendible system? Negate ideal comprehension not of potential for dire consequence? I deserve A level comprehension others deserve A level comprehension, yet in practice I don’t think system delivers that way.

Some thoughts of Marvel’s Avengers and Warnings from Hollywood lost in Charm of Special Effects. Villains in Movie not seen as real matters, potential for real likely not always entertained.

Inned feed (as in fee) more is expensive, not always ideally turned up

What is disclosed and not disclosed by corporations factors into support. Boston Dynamics is useful for example yet far from the only corporation worthy of more ideal investment in monitoring for safety and research ethics concerns.

People get old, comprehension has potential to be leveraged.

Ultron with a medical degree might save my life?

A future that is not deterministic will be attempted to be determined

Companies see all tech that other companies are working for? Combinational awareness potential for less than ideal. I know how it works to I don’t know how it works possible in new conditions, different environments. 8 billion people, lots of companies, combinational possibilities set to ideally comprehendible? Not all knowledge that is known (knowns amp less than ideally) is factored into design, fully appreciated?

Marching forward like in the case of arms race is not always left with ideal capacity to turn down

Engineers that have more knowledge might have their visibility limited at times for both good and bad reasons. People that profit factor into perception of good and bad is gray not fully comprehendible.

Those Robots used in searching terror tunnels in Gaza? Perceived as can’t get away with might factor into less desire. Mine clearing robots not a new idea, reminders we are in 2024 potential for allot of new gains not fully comprehendible not always turned up.

Imagine there is a company named Jason’s Robotics. My name is Jason, just giving an example. Should that company be required to expected to benefit all of humanity because it is capitalizing on useful technology, game changing technology, technology that has potential to be non-deterministic and dangerous? Setting precedent matters, less than ideally turned up. People always agree ideally on what is the benefit to most parties? All parties always required to be acknowledged and taken into consideration?

Who sets bars matters, who sets societal benefit met matters. If I am in Jail I might not feel like Boston Dynamics is meeting the bar I set? Could happen to a future Boston Dynamics employee, or someone from a similar company, worth acknowledging the potential.

Engineers and Research Scientist likely to be feed at A grade level not turn up A level protection and prevention? Trustworthy might create the company does not always equate to trustworthy will have ideal capacity to keep the company out of the hands of Evil.

Imagine my opponent and myself are both twice as smart as we are today. Greater intelligence, more possibilities known factors into potential for Peace over War. Should I invest in opposition based upon known possibilities, or invest in training for both competition and self to increase number of possibilities, better trajectories? More comprehension turned up as a desirable system.

Does Comprehension and Knowledge amplify with Sufficient Love and Grace? Trying to find a puzzle piece might not equate to ideal desire to make sure that puzzle piece, the puzzle being completed benefits all of society, not just some of society. I put the last piece in the puzzle always leads to show others the completely work? Can a bluff be delivered without desire to deliver a bluff? Yes. See I don’t have all the pieces, yet I might desire to look like I have all the pieces put together? Let it stand could be equated to lying, relevance limiting? End of conversation chosen by man leads to ideal Truth? Don’t know what to fix, don’t know have to fix is likely to be in by design.

Reality at the level Truth amplifies less ideally I am surprised we don’t have more problems than we do, another potential reason to believe in God.

Provoked has potential to turn up imprecise retaliation, thus retaliation not always wise.

Speed at which seek and find delivers is potentially less than time desirable for fighting injustice.

It is sometimes desirable to stop injustice, access for others to have throughput of injustice, while it is still less than desirable to set a responsible party, to assess and judge wrongly.

Reduced proximity and ways outside of violence, ruining lives, and locking down finances of others has potential for more desirable outcomes when truth is less than ideal, hard to see.

Making Peace when hit from an unknown direction, from unexpected trajectories is harder. Reinforced that Protection and Authority is not helping stop, furthers perception of injustice that truth amplifies less than ideally. Straightforward and direct factors into capacity for Peace at times.

Can’t see it does not equate to not a problem.

Can’t see it does not equate to no capacity to wreck Peace, capacity to deliver Peace, Peace throughput.

Attacks and tests from unknowns correlated to instigation of war?

Range in attacked from unknown directions is unstable power, unstable power seen has ideally desirable outcomes reinforced not always wise to allow.

Fee convolution of path is inconsequential. Cybersecurity problems seen as not a problem for self does not equate to Cybersecurity problems for others is inconsequential or adequately seen.

It is important for Churches to be more adequate representations of Truth and that feels like it should take into account delay. If I was on trial, could a Christian be taken from any Church and be expected to deliver adequate, truthful representation that does right by all sides? Ideal representation of truth and ideal relevance limiting out is hard, Christians that claim to deliver truth should deliver truth, there are cases such as hiding people from concentration camps were truth delivered doesn’t deliver ideal Golden Rule, All things are possible with God’s help gets equated to All things are likely with God’s help. God has potential for Miracles, does not equate to Miracles are a common, likely occurrence – probability for truth and support delivered factors into available and not available at critical times.

“Seek and you will find, knock and the door will open” – maybe if I understood better it would deliver better. Time delays and reliance on a system that doesn’t deliver at times is not always ideal value added (at least in perception of ideal based upon self knowns). Promised the truth will be delivered yet weeks turn into months turn into years seems less than ideal. In 30 years everything will seem less consequential, does not equate to waiting 30 years is not consequential, does not alter path.

Give and you will get seems apt, excessive time delays vs freedom

Truth or Truth Not Given does not equate to Future is likely to amplify ideally. Less ideally better to include some Forgiveness, Grace, and Freedom for the unknown.

Truth is important, Truth seen as will ideal the future, lead to ideal happily ever after’s sounds nice, likely not always truth in practice. Further skepticism leads to perception of truth, all possibilities known which is less than ideal appreciation for God throws curveballs, even Miracles.

Skepticism perceives truth, seen as perceives truth ideally might lead to more problems than less problems. Truth seen as can’t cause problems can’t be built on less-than-ideal perception, training, and comprehension seems unwise in a provable way.

“subtle but pervasive” – Dinner with a Criminal Defense Attorney | Kathleen Heath | TEDx, potential for a gem in that statement. Nuance drives change that is hard to perceive? Read more, listen up, more is there than meets the eye?

Imagine there is a version of self, a version of self that never graduated High School.

Imagine there is a version of self, a version of self that has 5 PhDs.

I am neither of these. Either of these versions of self could add less value than me in a similar situation. Either of these versions of self could add more value than me in a similar situation. Bias might lead to less capacity to fully appreciate the value in more and less knowledge in certain directions at times. 5 PhDs might raise comprehensions of truths that endanger – PhD in Physics leads to Nuclear training that flags someone for life?

I want answers yet I don’t want to be imprisoned for life for knowing more, in a real or virtual prison

People likely don’t consider potential for freedom limited when pursuing particular paths in life

College equates to knowledge has a cost, yet knowledge costs might be greater and different in a way much more important than money

Capacity to perceive always equates to capacity to forget, capacity to acknowledge in the right ways, capacity to raise awareness in the right ways?

Seek and find with no strings attached sounds good, likely to deliver correctly in practice? Seek and find might lead to less capacity to seek and find? Separation of Powers and Non-Null Time Costs? Trajectories chosen do not always make trajectories in other directions always easier.

Combinations are Powerful. Like Music and Learning. Music is Powerful. Learning is Powerful. Combined leads to greater memory, greater reiterations. Power might be seen as no strings attached. Catapult more PhDs forward in Society with a Song?

Not factor in knowledge not gathered into people’s defense? Less potential to create nukes not likely entertained when judging cases. Examples of pursuit in desirable directions should factor into people’s defense.

Nukes to more value added for society, simple as that?

Free Starter Diagram attempting to get all people’s time valued more

Each day, moment, second precious lived, gived, negate shived?

Can Peace be negotiated between Ukraine and Russia? Can the World community pull together and potentially find a win win that creates better economic prosperity for both countries? Incentives might lead to Peace.

Oppression factors into who has money and who does not.

Oppression factors into oil.

Oppression factors into food lines.

Oppression required to be 100% reduced would lead to inability to deliver anything.

That said

Purchased perceived as oppression matters

Imagine there is someone who has been wronged by a system dramatically in a way that would cost that system billions in liabilities to pay out sufficiently.

Now imagine that person does not fight to get that massive payout because they know others in the system need it.

Imagine that person is payed a small government wage – a concession potentially less than ideal less than ideally established.

Now imagine that person wants to buy Oil. Less than ideal oppression reduced not allowed from those that use government wages, fully comprehended?

Fair delivered always equals fair delivered? Fair perceived based ideal grounds? Not a cop, not government always valued as not a cop, not government? Not a cop visits lingerie stores, no potential for slippery slopes? Not a cop buys cat food with their government funds when they know cats reinforce non ideals?

Grade of A (100%) Oppression reduced desired as ideal could lead to starvation. Not good enough go back to the drawing board, with throughput?

I get to control, reinforced not always a good thing

Not a cop from a military family, might not always feel like ideal government reduced – Not a cop might be perceived as a cop not always fully appreciated

From a cops family, also equates to not a cop that might be perceived less than ideally

Citizen that works with the government but is not in the government? Not a cop yet proximity factors into classification?

Desire for making the world a better place requires ideal conversation with ideal classification? Well meaning people might amplify less than sufficient conversation for purpose of protection.

See funding iffed, investments limited in ways that reduce throughput.

Imagine if one woman, determined to stop adultery wore a hazmat suit and a sweater in the Texas summer to reinforce modesty. Even if this one woman did that – which I don’t think is wise to do because heat stroke is very possible, that does not equate to everyone else would. Impacts made in meaningful ways matter, ways that are safer matters. Real conversation matters, when it doesn’t deliver sometimes people go to great lengths in not always ideal ways.

How sin is valued matters, as something we all in part add to or as a reason to pick up stones. ”Those without sin cast the first stone”, similar far from exact systems matter an amplify less than ideally, harsh words could feel like a stoning, might inspire them. Sin leads to death, or perceived we all contribute to sin leads to life?

Adultery kind of in by design feels less than ideal, beats people being stoned to death. Some sins valued higher than others feels both right and wrong at times. Lies and white lies might seem like no big deal. One day someone accusing might lie, limit relevance when you are on trial. Lies might factor into choices for violence, lies limited correctly not a given. Truth known to deliver and be established less than ideally factors into reminder we all contribute to sin, life beats incorrect assessment and judgment. If ideal truth factored into a person who lies life, society will go back and correct the lies and training from the original delivery first? Fail to stop at source, fix in correct way does not equate to ideal justice delivered. Lies don’t equal murder, lies can lead to murder, yet murder for good reason is valued differently than establishing truth less than ideally.

Does the system amplify sufficient oppression reduced in your life to justify it using the death penalty, asked to every person on Earth and in Space? Put them under oath? Claim to have ideal grounds for Justice, not verify it?

System that is less than ideal lies out is unlikely to be able to protect my life, those lives I care about ideally. Enjoying each day matters, not a guarantee. System might not be ideal does not equate to hasn’t given me many good years. Could be better matters, less than ideal matters, appreciated for value added matters. All value added appreciated not always easy with less-than-ideal truth in by design. Gratitude with truth iffed harder, still important. How much should the Church be appreciated? Truth factors into valuation, truth comprehension and perception is less than ideal factors into valuation. We all know enough to accept words from the Vatican as God in flesh speaking? If I perceived and comprehended better I might accept that, if I perceived and comprehended better, factored in potentials for humanities less than ideal nature I likely would not accept that. Fee pride matters, fee I can’t ideally see pride matters. I see ideally equated to pride? Don’t judge, assess value out from Church as valuable vs not valuable? Fee see met seems apt, reminder though I am not a lawyer

I can’t always see all the value The Church adds equates to I get to limit it seems less than ideal. Value added seen required for value added not always wise.

Support that matters not seen might equate to left in Jail or Prison is seen as sufficient support added. People with vlogs, easy access to post have more capacity to show contributions to society, more proof. Proof and Truth amplifies in ways that is more useful to some than others unlikely to always be ideally appreciated. You added value you have to prove it? No resume equates to no support added? Society and Corporations reinforce not on the resume, doesn’t have to be factored in. Hard to deliver more ideal throughput of Golden Rule without Think Better of Others. Reasons to have examples heard matter and there is only so much stage time to hear all examples. 8 billion people all examples heard to value a life unwise. CFB – Cute Funny Beautiful might not lead to important examples heard.

Notes and Art Inspired listening to Dinner with a Criminal Defense Attorney | Kathleen Heath | TEDx

vs

Leadership that feels highly biased and oppressive devalues delegation

I can feel oppression yet I can’t perceive or comprehend all biases that factor into limiting my life. More acknowledged by leadership factors into progress. Just because one can’t see it or put their finger on why things are happening does not equate to adequate capacity to fight oppression.

Leaders that want their delegation heard need to reduce oppression.

I might be able to understand why it might be desirable to silence artists, limiting output does not equate to it is oppression free to do so.

Free Starter Image

Imagine all people on Earth (and in Space – Space Stations for instance) have a particular level of oppression and experience that should have an explicit (rather than implicit) direct law with strict penalties for breaking. Laws profit some more than others not fully appreciated, reduce oppression more for some than others not fully appreciated.

Purpose of law is to make people’s lives better, just not with specifics? People that feel better protected, protected from things like oppression are likely to feel more heard. More heard factors into Encouragement and Support Throughput, Validation. I meant this picture to be cute and enjoyable not dehumanizing. I realize cats don’t wear suits, and people especially women are not always provided with equal fair treatment, have ideal biased reduced. Requiring art to be ideal bias out could lead to zero art, less conversation. I painted it with less-than-ideal oppression reduced with less-than-ideal bias out.

Not sure we should have Halloween, or makeup for women if we need to remove this piece of art.  I have potential to defend the argument, I have a stake in it remaining in the World, does not equate to it always feels ideally right to defend.

Nobody has told me to take it down remove it, wise to take it down would lead to ideal grace for others in the World?

I want women respected and appreciated treated fairly – factors into Golden Rule. I also don’t want to level a mountain that is pretty because it might be useful to me. Cute and encouragement always oppression free? Not reducing cute encouragement always oppression free?

I like the Sphinx – cool statue, oppression likely factored into its construction at least from our perception of History in Ancient Egypt. Throughput maintained based upon previous oppression has shown historic precedent for too common in our World. Roman Colosseum as a work of art? painted with all the bloods of slaves now useful for tourism?

Skyscrapers and Bridges, infrastructure all built on ideal oppression reduced? Tear down skyscrapers because I know they were built in a time of less-than-ideal oppression reduced? Correct answer is no.

Requirement to demolish Sphinx and Roman Colosseum as prerequisite to bulldoze my art? Maintain status quo based upon status quo? Starry Night more or less influential than Sphinx or Roman Colosseum?

If I removed this art permanently, it would profit some more than others. It is a reminder that kittens with bunny ears are no tigers. Prosecution wins over Defense? Future guaranteed to have cats when we destroy habitats for animals that leads to extinction?

It is a reminder that charming and cute might lead to inability to value all details ideally. Cartoons bias the future in less-than-ideal ways set to no cartoons?

People don’t always value that people left alone find ways to encourage self, encouragement of self factored into painting – on a subconscious level it reinforces man and cuteness valued one might ponder. My voice not always heard by women, dignity not always respected or at least that is the perception which I know amplifies less than ideally. Ginger as a parking cone, not always not reinforced.

Making fun of myself factors into delivery at times. Caucasian from South combined with a system that is less than ideal bias out, has shown precedent for not enabling more ideal throughput many years after the Civil War? Time Goblin likely to be painted, not paint it?

Everyone to knowing they reinforce non ideals worn as a reason for more forgiveness and grace? Working on problem A less than ideal support for problem B. I expect supercomputers to cover problems I am not working on? Isn’t that the purpose of multicore computers?

meaning feeing set to Grade of A (100%) matters

Child Electrocutions are non null.

People in Society make a constant decision keep electricity and allow Hospitals to continue to function while allowing non-null Child Electrocutions.

People in Society could make a constant decision to not keep electricity and allow Hospitals to fail while potentially not guaranteeing less Child Electrocutions (Electrical Safety throughput is less than ideal, Lightning and Thunderstorms are in by design).

Now if you are in Jail or Prison, trying to go to sleep and there is a bright light that is always on, does that not factor into your perception and comprehension of who profits and who fails in Society?

Sleep factors into capacity to profit from Logic and Reason. Law is Logic and Reason.

My bias is based on my personal experience and World view compounded with World Wars, History, and Situations that have amplified less than ideally, are highly unlikely to amplify the same way in the future. My guess is many if not all people fall into this category. Fee Grade of A given to ideal bias reduced. Trying to learn set to ideal is unwise – progress is valuable, progress does not make me a PhD in reducing bias, required to be a PhD in reducing bias to be valued is unwise.

Even a PhD in reducing bias might likely see their own biases more profoundly and likely needs support and encouragement, including that of being released from corrupt prison that profit few over others in society.

Bias in by design in by default acknowledged factors into Grace and Forgiveness more appreciated by default, more appreciated in advance. That appreciation factors into Throughput for Peace in the Future.

Ideal wind claimed is likely to lead to feeling of insufficiently heard.

Something beats nothing, progress not valued is unlikely to lead to progress sustained.

BLESSED Definition & Usage Examples | Dictionary.com

Happy and Joyfulness brought about by Peace is amazing. I also might venture to think Miracles and Prayers answered factor into divine favor. Words with many definitions sometimes leaves room for creativity, clarification and is also a reminder that clarification and ideal agreement is not always wise to foster as a requirement for peace.

I like Art and Art has potential to reinforce bias at times, bias that could lead to war

Offsets might be less than ideal, offsets and impacts matter

Free Starter Image