My Tech Blog

If I turn the volume up on a speaker system. Then I walk away to talk to other people. Then a bus of old people drive by and the most vulgar words fly out of the speaker to my dismay (shortest path is valuable and I am too far from the speaker system) – does not equate to I desired the event to happen, does not equate to I am not partially responsible.

We turn things up in society and we allow things to happen that is not always our desire. I invest in tax dollars, that pays for many of the systems that we have in place. If the system is oppressing people, and it does in likely many different ways that are hard to fully grasp that does not mean I desire to invest in oppression, wouldn’t turn it down if I could, have sufficient access or knowledge to know how to volume down the oppression.

We turn things up without always meaning to, does not equate to they do not get turned up at times, there is no reason to turn them down.

The term G in the urban dictionary says Friend, also refers to Gangster

I don’t want to be rude or reinforce racial stereo types. I have heard the phrase G-ing something to refer to messing something up, making something non-deterministic, and looking for synonyms in the dictionary found the word subversion.

Undermining principles sometimes useful, sometimes common. Law gets set to ideally established and delivered on ideal grounds with ideal comprehension with ideal Golden Rule amplified for all parties subject to a particular law.

People sometimes have words and phrases that are taught, without always being given other choices of words, other paths that might lead to less problems, less financial losses. What people reinforce matters, gets set to has been delivered ideally by default.

Investment in learning matters. English and Language, Communication is one place where people have the potential to learn yet is not always valued to the level it should be. Less valued does not always equate to ideal capacity to argue or defend one’s points of views.

People that have hard hearts, that are set in their ways, have no desire to make peace or a positive path forward for all parties might be subverted at times via systems like CFB – Cute Funny Beautiful. There is reasons at times to reduce seriousness, reduce belief that system and practices have been delivered in ideal manners with ideal problems reduced. Subversion has potential to remind of the need for grace, test people that might be hard nosed, that might want to remove all flex from the system.

I don’t always make things less deterministic on purpose, I have potential to add randomness without that being my goal. Rockstars, People on Stage, and People that Grab Focus are all examples of things that might make life less deterministic. If I go walking down a street and there is someone performing music on the side, it is inspirational, nice to hear. It also makes the experience less deterministic. Walk from point A to point B with no problems nothing new is deterministic, yet deterministic seen as the more valuable path is not always true. That said non-deterministic systems can be miserable as well – imagine you have your life set out in front of you, instead of the determined path you are thrown in jail for a non-deterministic point in time. Altered path sometimes desirable, not always desirable.

Re-branding is useful, subversionist to Value-Added Randomization Rockstar? Celebrated for randomness I add without belittled for it? Public Relations and Re-branding exist for a reason and are useful, win wins are a potential problem solving path not always ideally entertained. Permanent labels are problematic, have potential for less than ideally set.

I am a programmer, I use vars, value-added randomization, set sometimes, not always equates to get

Reliability that is the same results for 99 days does not equate to the same results for 100 days. That does not equal it is, that does not equal reduced capacity and desire to verify is a non-consequential system. People might revisit cases more often given that as a known, does not equate to people likely always question reliability of evidence, evidence that’s comprehension is dependent upon underlying system’s reliability – reminder though not a lawyer or expert witness.

Ideal value established reinforced on the common is a consequential system in my opinion. Not usually a problem for me gets set to sufficient, sufficient factors into repetitions, repetitions reinforce claims to truth, potentially in non-ideal ways. Triple modular redundancy – truth in more than one place is sound truth?

Updated March 23, 2024 – was thinking a bit on this post. I do not want to reinforce racial stereotyping or undermine the seriousness of the topic. Truth is people with less training, less in the know might refer to someone as G, and they might mean that as a friend, as a gangster or subversionist. I know it might amplify less than ideally in practice, inflection in voice, thus I stray from the term might not equate to all people know. Encouraging better communication might lead to bridges and peace built tomorrow, likely not always pondered in a fast paced world that is far from ideal competition and desire to maximize profit reduced. Desire to be less jading to the world might not always equate to trained the ideal words to be less jading.

I do not have PhD in history. A PhD in history would likely lead myself to assess the current level of threat in the world different.

God would tell me if I needed to know more is a nice thought yet feels less than sufficient at times in practice. In a World full of 8 billion plus people, determinism seems to be a bit of a myth. People control truth, including people from Churches – perception and comprehension is far from ideal, potentially scary at times, disseminating the wrong information is costly.

God could likely have told people the right words or right course of actions to anyone in history to stop wars or could have delivered miracles to stop wars. God has potential to does not equate to God does, does by default, will, is likely to, is guaranteed to.

I pray, I want people protected, yet depending on Moses to Part the Red Sea level miracles is forgo-ed for preparation and defense spending. How people think God will act, to what level people think God will act factors into protectionism vs less protectionism on any given day.

I am from a military family. I see the importance in protection, in investing in protection for the country, in the known that protectionism amplifies less than ideally might lead to arms races equates to investing in the correct levels, especially on an international scale seems difficult, potentially costly (in more ways than a price tag).

I have adequate potential to gauge threats in my life seems unwise. Someone that goes to a battle where there are clear sides would likely have better capacity to determine threats vs no threats (not to discount potential for friendly fire on real battle fields). Unable to see the enemy, who is the enemy, to know if there are enemies that are in or not in is more difficult in a World with 8 billion plus people at borders that are open to international travel.

Guess at what is a threat vs what is not a threat? Seems to be best direction. Worrying is far from all value added, protectionism has potential to lead to lack of freedom, hope, and encouragement. 8 billion plus people that are complex equates to far more than 8 billion variables. Given I only have potential to factor in a limited number of variables at a time, I likely have less than ideal potential for deterministic protection for self, family, friends, and fellow citizens.

Best guess has potential to be problematic. Health problems both factor in and are potentially useful – orchestrated in combination possible does not equate to causation. Causation is hard to prove, hard to unprove, does not equate to what is set to cause is guaranteed to be right.

It is useful to withhold information from the perspective of governments and churches. Potentially from God’s perspective seek and you will find might not be finding the next gold mine. Riches that could change things determine path. Riches like truth, truth that is more available to some than others, truth that is not always easy or light, cost free to divulge.

I might have avoided some wars in the past, does not guarantee the wars of the future have no potential for problems, problems I cannot see. Not in a battle also equates to Not in the know is hard to fully appreciate. I have potential to gauge the value added versus subtracted for not knowing what is going on in wars? No. Less knowledge is useful, might be the chosen more ideal value at times, does not equate to that gives ideal determinism, a guarantee for safety.

I want Peace, I invest in Faith.

I am not perfect, I like all people on Earth am less than ideal sin out. I know how consequential my sins are, which sins to stop in advance that might lead to dramatic change for the world? No. Sin is consequential, sin is not always respected or valued for level of damage it causes. Others, including Politicians would likely acknowledge the same if it did not undermine their directions chosen, confidence of audience. Relevant information, is limited at times for good reason, does not equate to that information is inconsequential. It is nice to think people make decisions in a vacuum, in an ideal world, a world where sin does not effect outcomes on a day to day basis.

Less greed or lust on any given day is likely valuable for the world, claim to investing reducing either ideally on a day to day basis, claim that investing in either or both sufficiently is sufficient investment in all other sins reduced? Investment in reduced sin is directional, limited.

Others with dirty hands is useful, real conversation that would actually reduce sin costs time, is not always the easiest path, a path that is always easy to take for those with less than ideally clean hands – does not equate to the combination is inconsequential. There is value in not being involved, people are not always sin free in complexity. Claim Golden Rule path is always easy to see in combination? May is a useful system, set to an ideally chosen system? Perception of Authority and Class, Level in Society factors into representation equates to capacity to deliver advice or real conversation is limited at times – not my place a common system, maybe not an always ideally chosen system. Others might know more equates to my advice might be less useful.

Not all people agree on rules, what sin is, does not equate to oversight is not in by design. Oversight that sees rules broken, whether or not the breaker of those rules agrees with the rule is consequential – showing rules can be broken, useful to break not always the ideal direction meant to be chosen by those being watched. One might help direct and choose other’s paths without desire to. Increased oversight in by design does not equate to it is all good, all reduced complexity, sins, and problems.

One man fees another $100 when they only have $50, the man feed at a later point in time fees $50 when the original man with $100 only has $5. Fee-d and lack of mercy has potential for less-than-ideal proportionality established. High Ground is a useful, temporary system. Men and Women like to think of self as merciful, filled with grace and forgiveness yet we fee each other on the common without knowing the price, what else to factor in – LTI comprehension does not always or even usually change fees. The usual thought, at least personally is if I can’t account for that I better increase fees to add more flex, might not always be the correct thought.

World events factor into said and unsaid, should not be translated into ideal value established or delivered.

I am blessed with Freedom and I would like others to be blessed with Freedom too.

I provide allot of free content on this vlog, these videos are not mine thus can’t give away its content for free. I provide them to raise awareness.

Imagine Israel does not clear out the terrorists, and then those terrorists get their hands on a chemical or biological weapon. I do not want to see people starving or unsupported, I also realize allowing terrorist to rebuild is not a sufficient path forward for the future.

Dynamic in the region needs to change dramatically or the outlook for the future is pretty bleak.

I provide allot of free content on this vlog, these videos are not mine thus can’t give away its content for free. I provide them to raise awareness and potentially help expedite the release of hostages.