Offensive Language

If someone wears a T-Shirt that says “Go fuck yourself” they are making a statement, choosing to wear that shirt is a valuation or potentially they were homeless and that was the only shirt they were given to wear.

If I think A see matters, if what they are wearing is displaying ideal value, exactly the message they are trying to communicate, what are the implications? If I take the message at face value (and I am not sure it is wise to) the messages basically says you can’t rely on me for support. You can’t rely on me for support might actually be kinder than saying, I claim to love you but when the going gets tough my actions not my words will say “Go fuck yourself”. Taking messages at face value not always good, not always should, not taking messages at face value not always good, not always should.

If I have taken the message at face value I further might think the person has made the conscious to decision to say mean things to me outweighs the pain it causes me. Just because a person wears a shirt that says “Go fuck yourself” does not equate to they will know the pain and suffering I or others have been through on a given day, and less perception and comprehension of relevant details is not always ideal comprehension established. Further the person might know society is hard, not always supportive, wearing that short might reinforce the warning in that, actually delivering higher value than someone that wears a shirt that says “Don’t worry, it will all work out”.

What people are wearing, with people always reinforced in the value in seeing (red means stop green means go, orange means parking cone, prison jersey) not always ideal value added.

We as society never encourage people to wear shirts like that via action and inaction? Reminders of speech is free, you don’t get to stone people for wearing or saying offensive language all value out?

Politicians that wear this shirt U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time (usdebtclock.org), what are they saying to the future? We want to protect you?

“But it is the only shirt God gave us”…. “Tell it to the judge!”

Said for humor, reminder not right to stone anyone regardless of the shirt they are wearing.

A baby born today owes $100,000 and then $260,000 (could by a house for that) when they become a taxpayer? The price of doing business, all taxpayers to minus one house? Telling babies they defaulted on their loan payment as possible feels less than ideal (talking about actual babies, not trying to reinforce patronizing derision, though loans have the potential to feel that way).

If the past didn’t rob $260,000 from babies, how might people’s choices be different, is it likely to be factored into their defense? Take that $260,000 (as not real real money) and invest it in top 10 fortune 500 companies today and see what it would be worth in 20 years? Possibly useful for saving people in 2044.

$26,000 to Walmart, $26,000 to Amazon, $26,000 to ExxonMobil, $26,000 to Apple, $26,000 to UnitedHealth Group etc… compounded over 20 years? Investing that much in healthcare least we could do is pay doctor bills…. Doctor bills that should be paid, could be paid not factored into defense? September 11th, 2001 and October 7th, 2023 did not A (like in school grade, 100%) debt for the future – more peace and less terrorist attacks factor into value for self and others. United Nations and World News that inspires peace, saves money or doesn’t save money? Acknowledging hostages need to be released immediately and terrorists attacks can no longer be allowed to threaten the future factors into peace, saved money. Are we treating current babies like billionaires? Stacking their future with debt and legalism?

Free Starter Diagram, Impulse buying Peace

Free Starter Diagrams

For a limited time only

Free Starter Image

Increase stress slightly to get less bombs dropping on children? Increased knowledge, more teaching and learning “for a limited time only”

Less bombs and landmines might lead to more teachers long term, more teachers likely to lead to greater levels of peace than the alternative

A CEO that does not respect your time, does not truly value you or a person that has been on the street for a week that wreaks of needing a shower? Who is likely to be perceived as clean, who is likely to be treated with more dignity and respect, who being treated better is likely to lead to real peace, real problems reduced in society? Clean that makes one work harder to be valued, might not always be the one of greater value to help. Doesn’t like me does not value me equated to I need to change, work harder not always ideal to turn up – Stockholm syndrome-esque drives value at times? Not trying to turn people against CEOs, am trying to highlight humans act in counterintuitive ways that are not always ideal value added, not always ideal oppression reduction reinforced. Something you get for free or something you have to climb a mountain to get, which one is more rewarding, which one is higher value? Free less time costs less risk for altitude sickness? No view from the top of the mountain, win wins to reinforce the value, factor out value added via exercise and appreciation for hard work? Someone with a CEO title or someone on the street, which one has more potential to make you climb a mountain? Sounds A, rows A, shows A, not all A.

The big paragraph makes the short paragraph that much nicer to read? Easy for all to see?

Truth

Truth is sometimes a useful system. Truth is valuable to turn up – 2+2 = 4, if someone is told to get two water bottles and two water bottles and I am the 4th one to get a water bottle then 2+2 = 4 factors into me getting water or not getting water.

There are drug dealers in society. There are police in society. People do not always know who they are, people that want both alive well and not oppressed at the end of the day. Truth becomes gray. Too much power in authority’s hands could lead to great levels of oppression, as WW2 has taught oppression not combated significantly, sufficiently is consequential. And an oppressive system, a system that gives 99.9999% truth at all times could be taken over by a drug king pin.

Thus drugs exists in our society. I don’t see them going away anytime soon – major breakthroughs that are game changing is possible does not equate to I have seen them over my lifetime does not equate to they are not possible.

I don’t want drug dealers selling drugs that hurt people in the first place, and what hurts people is up to debate at times. I also don’t want authority oppressing people and delivering injustice to drug dealers or any citizen for that matter. People that want to stop drugs might not always have adequate energy to ideally reduce oppression in the system – this equates to people want less drug deals and Golden Rule yet might not deliver on that in a sufficient way. Capacity to change, change in a way that does not wreck one’s life factors into and facilitates change, people actually leaving a criminal lifestyle.

From what I have seen in the system, the system can be trusted to protect former drug dealers, people that leave crime? They leave permanent records on citizens and society reinforces criminal background checks in ways that do not take into account innocent and guilty sufficiently, oppression in the system and reduced access to sufficient defense attorneys – run the check equates to talk about results, address potential oppression? Support is limited purposely from what I can tell on this earth, equates to there is likely more oppression in the system than people would like to believe by default. More oppression than perceived equates to people are unlikely to assess risk to sufficient levels.

There are wars on this planet. There are droughts and natural disasters on this planet. There is also evil on this planet, the Devil, and Demons. People have a tendency to compartmentalize – we are talking about war, not about the devil, talking about natural disaster not about potential for evil in combination. Drugs and Authority, Good and Bad categorized and classified, does not always factor in evil that exists in the world, evil that is hard to fully perceive and comprehend, hard to say that is really the cause or not the cause, cause and effect if-ed not all gift.

Governments invest in teaching and truth based upon today – not upon 5 years from now, and levels of corruption have high potential for changing within 5 years for both better or worse. Truth set to always ideal value added when we can’t predict the future has potential for problematic. 2+2 always has to equal 4? Even if 4 oppresses people? Authority that adds right, or authority that adds when adding is just, the two get equated to the same thing?

Politicians ruled by a national debt, potentially leveraged by it get set to be the ones that approve laws with prison terms. Set to value in ideal ways, in un-leveraged ways feels like a bit of tough pill to swallow. Don’t have to factor that in is not likely to be sufficient oppression reduced. The people that are arrested are told you did wrong yet aren’t required to be told the system is kind of rigged, and thus likely don’t always have potential to factor that into their defense. The nation borrows money, who gets it? not you, set to ideal Golden Rule, not rigged? I want our Allies protected, I also believe there are pet projects, and I also know having money or not having money factors into people’s capacity to defend self, whether or not they get a permanent criminal record they can or cannot escape. Government research grants or criminal defense law, criminals can take one for the team (innocent until proven guilty rowed as guilty) said but not said?

Leaders of The Free World set to Let

I am not a politician. USA is a super power. People that run USA, politicians that run USA are powerful, have potential to be set to ideal value, as will deliver ideal value based on an ideal system with massive amounts of power at their finger tips.

This might not be full appreciation for less than ideals in the system like Global Warming, nuclear arsenals and stockpiles, bias that is inherent in the system, corruption that while might be less might still not be sufficiently insignificant.

I can’t control who is ideally in power gets set to who is in power is less consequential at times, has been established ideally, that God will make sure everything keeps moving forward with zero problems like civil wars, natural disasters, political instability, and economic collapse. Belief these things won’t happen factors into less discussion around these things. If we don’t talk about it won’t be a self fulfilling prophecy approach.

The combination has potential to set the system to ideal, and who is in charge of it set to ideal. Which might not be that big of a problem if you are rich and have a private jet to leave when things get bad but might be a bigger problem if you are stuck in a jail system with iffy medical support.

American Dream invests in more mobility for some over others alongside of God has got us this far, must be doing something right stay the course? There are reasons to be thankful, and there are reasons to desire change, improved experience.