My Tech Blog

Reducing Oppression, March 22nd, 2024

Oppression is hard to ideally divest from. Less than ideal divestment is hard to fully comprehend impacts of.

USA borrows money and buys goods from Communist China. We allow a less than ideal path forward to be reinforced, reinforced in a consequential way. Less money, less involvement does not guarantee to less problems in a Communist country. Invest or Divest becomes a less straightforward path does not equate to path chosen is inconsequential.

Too much money reinforces the grip on power by the communist party.

Too little money might facilitate less reliance, less capacity to sway alongside of harsher conditions.

USA Citizens are taught to value Freedom and Reducing Oppression. The idea we are allowed to ideally invest, that investment isn’t both complicated and hard is a potentially oversimplified view.

I invest in Electricity, yet I do not want to think about all child electrocutions that are possible every time I turn on the lights. I invest in Cars, yet I do not want to think about all the accidents that are possible every time I turn the key in the ignition. I buy a product, many times not knowing where it was produced – I don’t want to think about oppression it is potentially reinforcing yet I do not want to reinforce it. The three are examples of systems that we invest in less than ideally, less than ideally in consequential ways.

Better does not equate to perfect. And deaths from Communist China seem to be much higher than both Child Electrocutions and Car Accidents – though numbers, numbers that matter greatly are obfuscated from view at times. In a system where numbers and communication is less than ideally straightforward, based upon perception and public sentiment, divesting ideally from oppression investing in Real Freedom and a Better Future becomes more complicated.

Golden Rule and Christianity becomes a more difficult path. Call out beatings in Communist China of Christians in comparison with Isis beheadings? No potential for playing favorites with those that control the purse strings? All this while USA citizens are combating their own problems, problems like preventing oppression in our own country, while battling for moral superiority and high grounds in consequential ways – less access to freedom and prevention of freedom in USA is both possible and consequential. Less of a problem is desirable, consequential – at war with each other in society has high potential for less-than-ideal strength combating problems on the world stage.

Part of the idea of a democracy is that people can disagree, can voice their opinions in ways that work together for the common good. Seems at times democracy can be polarizing, and vastly limiting capacity and power in society. If every four years, depending on the party one chooses their economics can be thrown into shambles, expect that to deliver ideal oppression out on the World Stage?

USA Citizens More United for common goals like Reducing Oppression and Inspiring Freedom is vital to capacity to actually deliver better on that for the world. A less united front is less wind in the sails of reducing oppression and inspiring freedom. We fight the world suffers seems apt. Head starts matter – no guarantee when the next war, natural disaster, or pandemic might be. Future gets set to guaranteed, time to fix and make peace gets set to plentiful.

USA needs solid leadership with a clear compass, factors into capacity to Unite and Protect Future Generations. Clearly able to see problems factors into what I turn up and what I turn down in society. Systems, like CFB – Cute Funny Beautiful and Art are consequential systems, turned up is consequential, turned down is consequential, not fully perceiving and comprehending problems of the day is consequential. Less capacity to comprehend should not be equated to less consequential. Put a pause on that versus don’t put a pause on that less than ideally straightforward, not always said outright, expectations without words not always an ideal system. A compass that ifs, maybes the grounds between North and South, East and West is unlikely to be followed.

The Government A’s met on whether people should be in society or out of society at times. Yet the Government does not always A met on choices people should make on what factors into perceived as desirable vs less desirable, like buying products from China. A like in grade, 100%. Judge but don’t discuss, if ground and expect ideal is not right for fellow citizens, let alone future generations. Be involved in international trade, be close, just don’t be too close, for children that will be running businesses of their own one day? Not really good enough for me or fellow citizens, yet on current trajectory unlikely to be fixed for the future?

I am well educated, and it is difficult for me on a good day, consider sufficient flex, grace, and forgiveness added for people in society that might not be educated to same extent?

De-Fee A Ow

A like in grade of 100%.

Feeing at A level of hurt is unwise. Take electricity for example. Electricity leads to non-zero number of child electrocutions every year. Yet we don’t require every person to see all the faces of every child every time they turn on the light switch or the air conditioner.

A less punishing world is desirable, far from a given by default. Every time someone turns on the ignition to a vehicle they are required to see the mangled faces of the victims in car crashes? It is unwise to Fee at A level – people don’t like it reinforced on the common does not equate to people don’t always turn up and reinforce something they would not appreciate in return.

A man walks in front of a strip club and is stoned to death with screams of adulterer, he was actually trying to go to the shop in front of the strip club, but details are less than ideally turned up. Doesn’t have to be stones to be set to less, set to less can wreck lives.

Those that fee at A level, might be feed at A level – thus wiser not to fee at A level. Might lead to no car and no electricity. Having a system that is less than ideal equates to necessity for grace and forgiveness, feeing at less than A level.

Pay for the shit you turn up, you need to pay for that, I need to pay for that, we get to assess and judge that are all less than ideal systems.

I don’t want to be Feed at A level every time I turn on the lights or turn on a car and I want to be appreciated for my contributions to society?

Free Starter Image

god of allows contributions to be finned, min-ed?

People wouldn’t want their ambulance disabled remotely before arriving at a critical time, yet cybersecurity that factors into my success is allowed to be limited. What is the power in the loss of a head start, funds lost today that factors into capacity to pay an ambulance tomorrow? The problem is someone might be feeing me at A level, now how to correct without Feeing at A level? I want the problem fixed, not others sitting without electricity or a car.

The Letter K

The letter K is one of 26 letters, letters that are taught to all students studying the English language. Should be no big deal. Yet in the South of USA, the letter K resonates reminders of KKK – an oppressive organization fueled by hatred.

People do not always speak straightforward or say what they mean. This is reinforced in society on the common. I could be speaking about Knowledge and start three sentences with the word Knowledge and be set to have said KKK in a backhanded way.

311 – ck

c is the third letter of the alphabet

k is the eleventh letter of the alphabet

So at two times a day, 3:11 PM, and 3:11 AM one’s speeches, messages, and emails might be misrepresented to mean something racial biased that it was not meant as.

Imagine there is product. A product name that starts with a K and has a white background with a logo. I might like the product. I might like that the product might be protection for people named Keisha or Kevin. I do not like that it might reinforce racial bias as more useful, oppression as more desirable.

There might be reason to tuning fork people in society. Give them iffy ground to stand on and see if what side they fall on. Do you want to protect Caucasian people or do you not want to be racially biased. It is not all fair ground society might make people choose between the two, that society might reinforce tuning forks iffy ground that makes capacity to protect self and others more difficult.

It is not all straightforward, it is not all represented by the Letter K. The ground is less than ideal and reinforced in less than ideal ways while being claimed as not a big problem, not something that requires real conversation. People set to will just know is not true. Some people don’t learn as easy, some people learn in other directions. Play on words, artistic wordplay might be obvious representation to some people and not obvious representation to others.

There is real bias in Society. Real Bias in Society does not equate to it is ok to label people as Ks. Not labeled as KKK does not equate to delivers ideally for all races or even own race. Oppression is IBD – in by design, does not equate to it is always delivered fairly or labeled fairly and that is consequential to society.

I don’t like that there is the potential in Society that being Caucasian and buying something that starts with the Letter K might set me to a klans man. I am from the South, and I know Villain Level Contrast amplifies less than ideally and that factors into gains and losses in society that are not fully comprehensible.

The Letter K is one example. Wearing Blue or Red is another example that isn’t all fair. It has the ability to give momentum to people’s paths in non-ideal ways. Reinforced negative representation is consequential and hard to turn down.

I do believe there is Oppression in Society. I do believe I do not see, perceive, or comprehend all of it. I am Caucasian and I am less than all value added to all races. I do not wish to be labeled a K. I do wish other Caucasians as well as All people to be protected.

Further we are Allies with Kenya and South Korea. K to a less useful system is consequential in less-than-ideal ways. All of this in combination is not easy to ideal. We have new generations of citizens that have potentially grown up in 911 era where categorization and classification of people has not been ideal profiling out. This conversation is important, far from ideally turned up – truly combated and talked about by candidates running for office? Conversation leads to Peace, less conversation is not desirable, consequential.

People do not want to be oppressed or demoralized dependent upon their ethnicity one of many reasons Golden Rule is useful. I know Diversity, Accessibility, and Inclusivity are all important topics that get turned up less than ideally does not equate to I know how much to turn them up, how much time society should be spending on them. Set to ideal seems unwise. Gains perceived and comprehended as can be made factor into people actually investing time and effort. Most people would likely spend some extra time if it meant our society was stronger for wars and natural disasters in the future, yet the combination doesn’t seem to amplify by default.