My Tech Blog

Make Peace swiftly – if someone was robbed of all their resources they might be a greater threat to society.

Someone might wrong me, someone might wrong me based upon what they perceive and comprehend to be good data, that does not require good data delivered, consistent data delivered, data comprehended adequately.

I know people get set to villain that don’t deserve to be, and that might factor into others getting set to villains that don’t deserve to be, when everyone really just wants the situation to get better.

See I might have better words and thus better perception, comprehension, and luck than other parties raising concerns on this. See that less adequate words and comprehension could get people hurt, deliver insufficiently. See language, increased capacity to deliver is both necessary and reduced commonly (lexing, puns, double meanings, multiple definitions). Not to mention education is a profit-based system is hard to fully appreciate the implications of.

I might be A level knowledge in certain directions, that far, far from guarantees capacity to comprehend all possible side effects in other directions. People might have data, good data that they are not required to amplify comprehension of to me. Sufficient access and amplification is not a requirement has implications. We all are working on excess levels of complexity, no requirement to amplify comprehension to each other in society could cause big problems. 8 billion plus people in the World, nobody has capacity to adequately process that information ideally alone, computer systems and summarization processes have potential to reduce details and increase bias.

A (like in school grade, 100%) proceed, move forward might be better set to have we guaranteed there is sufficient grace and mercy in the system, will the system acknowledge problems that are built in or not?

I provide allot of free content on this blog, these videos are not mine thus can’t give away its content for free. I provide them to raise awareness and potentially help expedite the release of hostages.

Our society turns up You May, Freedom for both good reason and in ways that potential leads to less-than-ideal value for all parties.

Imagine two people date each other yet they have both settled. This world is a scary place and the potential for planes flying into buildings calls into question the necessity of not settling.

Imagine you are talking to someone in a bar, you just met, having your first drink – honeymoon stage of honeymoons. The person is attractive, amazing, and you know their personality might equate to they wind up on the street in 20 years, or maybe you don’t know, comprehension and perception are far from ideal systems.

You might be thinking this may or may not work out, I may or may not date them, either of us can just walk away at either time with no problems, no strings attached, no losses to time, money, resources, or energy. That might amplify more ideally for self, yet might lead to the other person in prolonged in and out of bars, failed relationships. We can’t control other people, but can we project how our influence, interactions might influence their long term view on life, their ability to profit in the future? We love, We love freedom, but do We truly Love, Inspire the Golden Rule when we A may, set freedom to an ideal met? A may met set might be A may met get.

Alone I have drank in bars – shouldn’t be equated to any former dates fault, does not equate to the combination might not be useful to learn from. I don’t want other’s futures to amplify less ideally and I also know the pain, if affects me likely might affect others too. People trying to look out for me might represent A it doesn’t hurt, more manly, less manly not all defame free. May let see not always free – it is better for both parties (yet future LTIs?).

Save the future from a similar fate potentially possible.

I rely upon God to protect people that part ways from me, in ideal ways, yet I see people on the street hurting. Fee negate see might not be free, see might hurt wee seems apt. But there is still hope, easy to forget the future is a contested system, victory is possible, not always set in stone what victory is.

Free Starter Image, birds are free (God owns copyrights one would think, though I am not a lawyer, educational rules might apply), the engineering pieces might or might not be in public domain at this point, not sure if there are any rules about showing infrastructure in pictures.

A-ing Gods will for relationships, at least in many of my adult years seems less than ideal. People could be in the exact same circumstances and if God willed it likely vastly different results. Further I am one person out of 8 billion plus people, 1 story that is very dependent upon locality, World Events, and proximity to government (all in a way that I have reduced perception, comprehension, and visibility of, making claims and projections based upon determinism, that might be pre-determined at times might be less than ideal steel). There is an affect does not equate to I know how much, less deterministic results factors into likely gains and losses in problem solving capacity. Anyone’s results really free from being biased by systemic changes, problems, and additions? It will work in my favor, it is my job to make it work in my favor, what is it? I don’t know

Disclaimer – I am not a lawyer

Critical thinking, thought around why punishment mitigation happens has potential for useful.

If there is a law that clearly states you cannot do ActionA. Then if you do ActionA, you might be punished. Clarity of laws, clear ground established factors into what people do and what people do not do, what is punished and what is not punished.

Punishment has potential to lead to Pain. Pain might be set to ideal value sometimes (which I don’t think is all good, should, or would), yet pain killers exist for a reason. Punishment generates Pain (sometimes), sometimes the two are synonymous, and Pain is diminished, reduced, and seen as less valuable to turn up for a reason. One reason is turning up pain or punishment on others is likely to turn it up on self, thus wiser to divest in advance. Punishment and Pain are both not all time cost free – wasted time and a society with reduced throughput as the result is less than ideal value established and delivered, injustice that might be worthy of punishment on its own merits.

A society that punishes less, has less than ideal capacity to punish at times is consequential, known might lead to better choices by all parties. It is hard to ideal, does not equate to hard to ideal is free of problems.

Pain receptors are important, people stop touching a hot stove because they feel pain – if they were on heavy pain killers they might not be able to tell before significant damage was done. We reduce pain and punishment in society for good reasons, because people in general are less than ideal sin out, less than ideal profit out, less than ideal oppression out, less than ideal reduced oppression in – less pain and punishment factors into peace, and peace is both desirable and useful. Punishment might lead to perception of human rights abuses, cost to litigate is not always desirable. Punishment not always free of pain for the punisher, free of time costs for the punisher, and time costs are valuable for both parties.

Clarity of laws equates to clear laws are more likely to be punished by authority. Iffy laws might be more likely to be punished by vigilante justice, or by reducing support, profit (things generally considered as a requirement by the Golden Rule – yet Golden Rule not always set to a requirement). Iffy ground is not usually synonymous with a strong brand, and strong brands have potential to stand through the storm at times when others do not – I agree this feels less fair, just how it is I least from my perspective. Gray area that is further from crossing the line might be more defendable through human laws – though human laws, legalism, and accounting set to ideal value by God seems unwise. This is all the perspective from someone that is not a lawyer.

Punishment and Pain are not always free from Power Struggles, Control, and High Ground. There are good reasons to divest in advance. Also potential for sexual implications – just because someone in Authority doesn’t mean punishment or pain that way does not equate to it might not amplify in the mind that way, potential for generation of less-than-ideal relationships.

A society that does not punish often might not be very familiar with the process, might be punishing in not fully appreciated ways (A-ed may let potential for not all theft out, theft is both wrong and punishing, owe is iffed ground which does not always make clarity ideal), and also might punish too much or too little (not very familiar with range) at least that is my opinion from someone that is not in the justice system, and not a lawyer.

I am saying in the previous paragraph, or at least trying to say The Justice system might appear more stable and just than it is, there is good reasons to turn its image up as stable and just, yet in practice might deliver less than ideally and that factors into potential for greater levels of risk, greater levels of risk in people going to parties, drinking at bars, taking drugs, and caught on camera. The system will protect you might be less than ideal protection, less than ideal risk mitigation invested in.

God is in the mix, don’t worry trust in God with less-than-ideal momentum for drinking trains of logic mix less than ideally. Combined with perception of reduced risk might lead to less-than-ideal results. Others might have likely do have better results than self at times. All said my case is unique, different – might be an outlier for both higher levels and lower levels is hard to fully appreciate 2001-2024 World Events a reminder World is less than ideal sin and oppression out, easy to paint choice as ideally deterministic. 1 person out of 8 billion plus people really enough of a statistic to claim grounds on anything? Small population test subject highly biased by both personal locality and world events?

Bikinis at the Beach and Top Shelf Whiskey have the same problem at times, people think they have A’ed may while potentially turning up things we both like and don’t like. We might not apply to you, it has taken years for me and still can’t claim I know everything I get wrong, yet generally I set decisions to right. 2+2 = 4 it is right, but should you teach that, would you teach that, will you make sure others have accessibility to lessons? Numbers are addictive, Vegas and Reno – even writing this to explain a perspective I know likely alarm bells and sirens, villain level contrast might be flashing in the mind of the reader, gambling, less deterministic trustworthy behavior.

I wonder if they ever have Math conventions in Vegas. CES counts or doesn’t count? Probably microchips in a lot of slot machines. Progress in Vegas, each pull of Slot Machine factors into Greater Cancer Research Supercomputers. Small contributions to Helps mend wind important to take into consideration. Cancer Research pub craws always all value out, always all value in?

Willing to take punishment is not sufficient ground to punish others.

Joy vs Suffering – Never Say Die! if you want less suffering maybe stop reading the document here

A de-ow with a pow – gets turned up too much in society, similar far from close systems get turned up. Police Officers that have a weapon pulled on them might have to use lethal or non-lethal force to disarm. Yet as Society do we always turn up less potential for problems like that in advance?

As an Artist I know I A know, I A show, I A tow, I A row, I A low. Similar trains of thoughts get turned up in less-than-ideal ways, a city free from crime is different than a top selling album. A song I want to listen to, gets set to A know, A produce, A use. Trying to set a city to a perfect work of art that never changes, trying to hold a dynamic system still might not always be ideal value established.

If we closed down all the roads, there would be no traffic accidents. There is a price for decreased throughput, a price society is not willing to pay, yet if society isn’t willing to drop everything to save lives is that all good, should, would? A set might not equal A get.

A know for an Artist, it will sell or it won’t sell – I am not sure should really be set to A value, A comprehend, A mins. There are more reasons that just profit art is created, passion, inspiration, trying to encourage others.

“Without sin cast the first stone” one of Christ’s teaching was a problem 2000 years ago, and is still a problem now. A de-ow with a pow is not always A de-ow.

A de-ow factors into Joy. Less pain factors into Joy. We have the potential to medicate, we have potential to avoid, we have potential to type based upon bias which is not all good, not all should, not all truth amped and champed. Less conversation sometimes equals less friction, yet with failing infrastructure, high government debt, and high voltage signs potentially falling off the hinges, is less conversation really the way to less pain, less woe, less problems? We might turn down suffering for the short term yet turn it up in the long term.

Joy is important. Discouragement has potential to be lethal in certain contexts. People not appreciated are not ideal throughput established. Writing a document about suffering is not all reminders of suffering out – it is jading. One of the reasons I said at the top of the document Never Say Die – it is definitely up for debate for me at times whether a page full of Never Say Die might be worth more than trying to think through wisdom and World problems.

On the other side, thinking through problems has potential for reminders for Hope and Encouragement, the potential in Hope, Encouragement, and possibilities unknown, that A value has yet to be truly established – outside of Christ, Christ set to can’t turn up what A value means for all our lives seems an unwise assessment. That said Christ didn’t stop Slavery, The Civil War, WW1, WW2, genocides between 1900-2024 – thus while there is potential for better, suffering seems to be a bit in by design at least via historic precedent.

A (like in a school grade, 100%) owe is something one might turn up for a painting or an album.

A owe is not something one really wants to turn up for a person, including self – yet that is not really probably always fully comprehended, especially in heats of the moments. We turn up reiterations of concepts and processes in Society based upon profit, feeling of high grounds and wrongs, we turn down listening and turn up tensions at times and that is not always ideal value established and delivered.

Non-deterministic documents with exit doors at the top – is there any other kind? Disclaimer – the previous sentence was meant as a joke, my humor might not resonate with all parties, an attempt to inspire joy to offset.

I provide the following for encouragement as well, Free Starter Image

As a Christian, a believer in God, a Higher Power, I acknowledge the potential that my words, my way of thinking through things might not be as great as someone else’s writing. This document likely fills, adds a certain place in the puzzle of all knowledge known, if nothing else it is helpful for me to think through things and is less than ideal reading comprehension out, value added for technology and systems it relies upon, potentially useful to help understand me, my writings, and my art better (cheddared – improving my communication skills and problem solving thought processes in a profit based system, words that might inspire more peace might be a couple documents away, improvement is valuable, less bombs dropping on people is profitable to me, also to desirable to me and they represent different systems).

You don’t have to like the art for the art to stop wars

Free Starter Image

Potential for negate let, negate let get

Because the man saw the stop light he stopped. Owe met.

Because the man saw the turn signal he didn’t press on the gas. Owe met.

Because the man saw the prisoner released he knew the system cared about owe see met. Owe met.

But the document said he was released. “We don’t make those kind of mistakes”