Free Starter Diagram, May 15th, 2024

Free Starter Diagram

Worthy of note, truth around the matter is limited at times

I like Japanese people, I like sun rays, I like the colors blue and yellow, I like blondes

I do not like suicide bombers running planes into US ships, systems that reinforce oppression of Jewish or any people

People might set art to suspect – Blue and Yellow aren’t those cop colors? reinforcing authority in a system that is less than all oppression out, isn’t that what a Nazi might do?

I create a cross to increase encouragement, show respect for Christ and increase my art skill based upon a blue bird, a blue bird God created and it has the potential to set me to a Nazi or Rising Sun member feels less than ideal. In Texas, potential for proximity to cartels, proximity to authority does not always make things easier.

Support that is less than ideal doesn’t have to be factored in, min-ed.

I shouldn’t cut so close to the line? Just leave all people wearing blue and yellow shirts to chance?

Less invest gets set to ideal bless, met

We let law makers that don’t fully enforce the border set fins. Maintain ideal representation without potential for proximity problems? Texas AC and Heat Strokes? that’s a state problem?

Thinking further I am a Christian but not a priest or preacher. There is precedent in The Bible for Christ turning over tables when the temple becomes a profit center if memory serves me correctly. I give this cross image away for free, that said people that provide cross images require materials at times – people that print bibles have to cover material costs. There is good reasons to stay away from Christian genres of Art and Music – might be fuel for Rock Music.

Churches rely on Tech Platforms, Tech Platforms that reinforce access to some parties, parties with enough funds to purchase computers and network connections. Ideal altruism, zero profit required might be a lot of reduced awareness. As James 4:17 says…. Say one’s LTI (less than ideal) altruism is kosher while setting others to a sin, a problem resonates in LTI ways. Who factors what in, when why and how.

God nor Church members told me to stop providing, also really haven’t heard contribution was appreciated…. Strategic ambiguity, this world invests in less is not all true value added.

Building companies versus a Church that builds itself for free? Profits some parties over others. Church that relies upon some venders over others for maintenance? Profits some parties over others. Church somewhat leveraged has potential for less than ideals. Preachers that practice communication and raising awareness, no profit in that? The problem with getting to set we A mins, we A comprehend. Electricity powers lights of churches, microphones, and AC units that lead to less heat strokes. Car rides deliver people to churches, also create more potential for accidents. Electricity invested in as a system is less than ideal child electrocutions out. Walk to an un air-conditioned Church? That is less profitable for self – that is what altruism is all about seems not all ideal. A-ing experience for self while A-ing shark fins, VLC (villain level contrast) for others feels LTI. I don’t want old people dying of Heat Strokes (per the Golden Rule), saying it is ideally altruistic when I might be old one day, don’t like seeing people suffer seems incorrect.

Counterargument God sets the thermostat as He likes, otherwise would have AC-ed the original temple? People walking more, less need to amplify electrical safety and reading comprehension as ideal value added?

World has a problem with see we A, see you less A, may-ed (without sin cast the first stone), and that is reinforced by less than ideals

Boston Witch Trials, Slavery, Racism, Starting Wars, Capitalizing on Oppression, Voices don’t matter, Genocide (all somewhat based upon see we A, see you less A, may-ed)

Untrained doctors and botched surgeries vs World Peace? Good Reason to A, A let is not always A met. A level comprehension leads to greater comprehension for some not all. People that sit at expert levels doctors tables at lunchtime? People that sit with NASA engineers at lunchtime? Comprehension is a system based upon access and inclusion. Some of that data I would likely not want in the hands of all people, some of that data might increase survival yet due to woven in combination might not be provided.

Man capitalizes on Less Than Ideal Throughput

I support people driving cars, yet I know cars might lead to accidents

What is the value in a peace sign? A peace sign that is from someone that supports people driving cars?

Free Starter Image

Car accidents equate to less than ideal, don’t have to factor that in? Ambulances also lead to saved lives, car trips that grab AC window units from hardware stores prevent heat strokes. Texas Summer right around the corner, more prepared not always value out.

Support that is less than ideal doesn’t have to be factored in not wise to turn up.

Make no mistake it can and has potential to be weaponized, is turned up at times in society. 8 billion people in the world, doesn’t have 4 PhDs not able to speak, add value not wise to turn up.

Computers and Artificial Intelligence, Systems should be required to factor in value I add to the World, if they don’t are they, will they really work in others best interest? What if I am not as pretty as they like, what if I am 1000 pounds to them without being 1000 pounds?

Computers that type when we press keys, or computers that decide if they like us first?

Not to be confused with I want all 8 billion people to carry around my peace sign, the combo would likely not be the results I would be going for, turning up reasons for de-inning support.

I like most others on Earth likely factor in support that I like without wanting to be required to factor in all support, without equating to that support is not factored in as value added. Buy only one phone from one phone companies or buy all phones from all phone companies? Say phones I don’t buy aren’t support, don’t have to be factored in as value added? People make those products.

Being from a military family, desiring world peace does not equate to a system should be allowed to control me. Associated with government (and not a part of, inside of the government) does not equate to get to control preferences.

Problems in Society

We see we are A (A level knowledge, like a school grade, 100%). Training equates to feeling of dignity, respect, and privilege – one that is trained is given feeling of deserves respect, capacity to state right regardless of problems within that training.

Not all voices have to be respected – this is consequential, leads to dehumanization, gives grounds for slavery and oppression, gives ground for competitive systems like the Colosseum (fight to the death and violence, butchery establishes who is right and wrong, survival of the fittest pinned, all while failing to highlight those in power not always doing the fighting)

Belief equality is possible and will deliver in ideal ways – if everyone has same amount of money, that does not equate to everyone is happy, everyone is free of health problems, that there are no power dynamics in society. Belief without delivery might lead to unfair assumptions, and all not treated as an individual is not ideal fair, ideal equality delivered.

Belief good, a better society is something that ideally maintains itself, doesn’t require better work.

Belief that change, a system that is dynamic, known to be dynamic due to new innovation and changing ideas, landscapes due to wars and natural disasters, health problems like pandemics will change in ideal ways, ways that reinforce the good within the system. Man learns to fly, bombs soon follow.

Throughput based upon Oppression is useful, adequate, desirable, achieves sufficient results. Doesn’t have to be called slavery to reinforce non ideals in the system. Non ideals in the system reinforce highlight weakness, highlighting weakness is not always sufficient challenges reduced (for good reason many times). Aqueducts built by Roman Slaves equal more water for Citizens, Pyramids of Egypt reinforce perception of power and delivery – throughput based upon oppression is allowed to stand as the norm is consequential, if it reinforced in ideal ways we likely wouldn’t have had WW1 or WW2 this many years after Christ.

Income inequality – less capacity to deliver in society, less capacity to maintain own way of life drives wars at times. There have been many examples in history where current lifestyle is made and encouraged via less-than-ideal oppression out in history. People that have perception of have it good might equate to past results are a given – who really wants to reduce the power and mobility they have in society even if that loss produces better results for others. A boss walks in and says I am paying you all 25% going forward and giving the other 75% to the poor in society, those that deserve it more will be loved or hated? Imagine you have a hard time paying bills at 100% and are now given 25%. Everyone to 25% of plate to cure World Hunger could be claimed, might never get to The World, people are less than ideal corruption out at times, visibility and capacity to verify distribution is obfuscated far less than ideal, bosses (even if boss is self) are replaceable.

Rock Music, May 13th, 2024

Some bands I like – not to say I approve of all songs, or songs are without risk, not all content for all people

Also an Evanescence and Avril Lavigne fan, as well as Of Monsters and Men, Mumford and Sons, Lumineers, Devil Makes Three, and Cold Play, SOD – System of a Down (would have written out but was out of room)

Again reminder give away a lot of free content on this vlog, band names not free

While this is a diagram of Rock Music I do enjoy many other genres, including the inspirations they add to Rock

Less Than Ideal Agreement is Consequential

Is the World going to end tomorrow, likely to end tomorrow? I would say based upon past experience no, but that said I can’t prove or disprove. I am a Christian, like a thief in the night as a concept is consequential.

Should I recycle, or should we just throw all of our trash in the ocean? I think we should recycle, protect our environment, that said if you think the world might end tomorrow, you might consider whether we recycle or drop trash in the ocean as less consequential.

The Bible says the World will end, and we won’t know when it will end. That was around 2000 years ago, and there has been prophets and claims throughout history. If the World does not end predictions might be up sold to they predicted wars, or natural disasters not actual cataclysmic world ending events.

Even if the World will end, the way it says in The Bible and I am not sure that is all literal, that might not be for another 98000 years. That is a lot of time to worry about plastic toxins in fish that feed future generations. Because I can’t guarantee the date, somewhere between tomorrow and 98,000 years from now or further, it might be up sold to likely, known as likely (in sharp contrast to won’t be known, like a thief in the night).

Thus if I take the median of my numbers (that are not ideal in the first place) say the world ends 50,000 years from now – we project based upon unknowns and knowns, trustworthy data and known data is less than ideal. That is a lot of time for potential problems in the World caused by not protecting the environment.

We know landmines, landmines like in Cambodia are a problem for leaving for future generations. What about piles of trash and plastic in the oceans and in landfills? What about CO2 and Methane emissions that might make brutally hot Texas summers even hotter?

The World has shown historic precedent for progress and throughput matters, and the future which I cannot predict is not my problem, not always worth factoring in. Less to clean up matters, less than ideally turned up. 1900 no threat of nuclear Armageddon, 2024 real threat of nuclear Armageddon. Our capacity to destroy ourselves grows at a faster rate than our capacity to support each other, foster better peace and comprehension is less than ideal value added. Hospitals are harder to build, take longer to add value yet weapons of war subtract value in near real time – moments, not months or years.

Potential for World ending events, problems like war and great threats to life and personal protection are not always ideal protection for decision making, decision making that factors into a cleaner environment for future generations. The population is 8 billion now, gains we make today factor into more solid ground for when population reaches 16 billion, 32 billion, etc. Time seen like the wake on a boat, we leave a bigger trail than we always realize for both good and bad? Low impact and sustainability not always considered and factored in.