My Tech Blog

You want to be passed over for a supermodel or rock star? You want to be settled for or settle for less than desirable? Requirement to accept ugly couldn’t be turned up in less than ideal ways? No requirement for appreciating cuteness, delicate beauty? No reason to turn up exercise and reduced consumption? Claim it all amplifies ideally, with ideal feelings protected, with ideal people invested in and protected, inspired and de-ire-d?

Ideal buy in with Cute Funny Beautiful – CFB? Ideal buy out with CFB? CFB factors into valuation, all should, good, would, could? CFB and Golden Rule, treat others as you wish to be treated, no complexity in that? Waste time with people that don’t support you that make you uncomfortable, fake ideal effort support added? No problems with setting See to everything people need to know? Golden Rule and Relevance Limiting, unsaid always ideal truth, ideal truth always ideal value added? Bible says Be Perfect, and James 4:17 knowing not doing is sin – in combination with Golden Rule and CFB? Set to everyone, priests, and preachers are sufficient sin out on a daily basis? Who needs to repent why when and how no potential for capitalizing on high ground established less than ideally, in way that doesn’t have to factor in?

Self-punished for sins, others punished for sins when the system is reinforced in non-ideal ways set to sufficient, as sufficiently mins as sufficiently comprehends? Forgiveness beats punishment in a system that doesn’t A mins, A comprehends, A what is sin all along side of doesn’t have to factor that in, thinned.

I want to add support, support that helps all 8 billion plus people doesn’t hurt them. That said claiming I deliver ideal support would not be true, not ideal Golden Rule delivered. I know others would prefer to be supported in the right way but because I cannot, I know and don’t ideally deliver I am set to constant sin? Sin needs to be punished, what bases are you not covering ideally – pinned? Helping A while not helping B, helping B while not helping A, all while failing to C. Golden Rule first or last, Golden rule others want others to be first or last? “They were at the front of the line, they got all the help they need” set to A see? Increased contrast sometimes needed for comprehension, support does not equate to it is all good, all should, all would.

“What kind of man paints a rattlesnake tail on a kitten? You get double hugs.”

“I don’t know what you are talking about officer, the painter only paints Caribbean bliss which for a limited time and a small price of not setting the painter responsible gives it away for free.”….”but they painted a rattlesnake tail on a kitten” – I state to raise a point in humor, not to set officers to unable to accept and use free content, worthy of note free content might give appearance of bribery, there is no law against painting rattlesnakes on cat paintings at least as far as I know (reinforcement of preposterous nature factors into valuation), I also paint more than Carribean bliss, including the picture of the cat with the rattlesnake (further raising comprehension of preposterous nature)

Hollywood and Music that provides beauty that reinforces defense and protection of others? Motive of corruption or motive of support factored into what is a bribe and what is not? Intent matters and has potential for less-than-ideal perception and comprehension. I give away free art to potentially help people free people from prisons and jails in other countries, could that be considered as a bribe in other countries? Any support set to bribery, potential for corrupting, weighing in on things, like sink or float in Boston Witch Trials?

You gave the officer water in a Texas Heat Wave set to guilty? Giving might facilitate unfair treatment? The officer later sees two people hurting, you or the one that did not give them water? I say giving people water in Texas outweighs potential for being set to bribery, Golden Rule I don’t want to die of heat stroke in Texas based on an iffy law.

I didn’t even really consider the possibility until writing this. If-ed capacity to support officers not all value added. If I am CitizenC and OfficerA helps OfficerB out, and I am being unfairly accused I might find it useful to remind that OfficerA helping OfficerB, and OfficerB helping OfficerA reinforces less than ideal support for CitizenC, reinforcement of ideal to less than ideal might be another way of saying corrupting ideal.

BRIBERY Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com

BRIBE Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com

2nd definition of bribe – “anything given or serving to persuade or induce:” – Dictionary.com

What is a peace sign? Free Starter Image (I disagree that is a bribe, I do not disagree it matches the 2nd definition of bribe)

Trying to persuade and induce peace? Double Guilty!

Free Starter Image (same as before)

Man pours water on the ground, water seeps into a tree, tree generates oxygen, oxygen breathed by authority – man not set to has influenced, induced behavior through support? Specific words might be changed to reinforce legal points, or induced one might say? Reminder I am not a lawyer, I am someone that doesn’t want artists set to bribers for trying to add support to the world.

They don’t want support they want to follow the law, others to follow the law, set to the law ideals gray, may?

Should not a lawyer that does not exactly know what a bribe is or is not a bribe give water to someone dehydrated in a Texas heat wave regardless if they are an officer or not? I would say yes. If one has an old suit could they give that to an officer or would that be considered a bribe, free help at wedding ceremonies bribe or not a bribe? Whether it is available to all people or not to all people, does that factor into consideration of bribe or not a bribe? Artwork and Software that is available online, open source, that is not available to and accessible for those in jail? I like Free content I also think it might be worthy of factoring into their defense, that society reinforces value for those outside of jail and prisons that amplifies less than ideal value for those in jail and prisons. Inducement of reinforced less than ideal, steeled? A pretty peace sign, serves more than one purpose min-ed? Inducement of impulse buying, corrupting or not corrupting?

I don’t like the idea that rock music could be considered a bribe.

If God puts a cat up a tree, and authority is sent to rescue it, does cuteness equate to inducement? Man’s law that sets God’s blessings to bribery seems less than ideal. “You can rescue it you just can’t appreciate the cuteness, that’s bribery.” Seems a bit contrived.

If someone wears a T-Shirt that says “Go fuck yourself” they are making a statement, choosing to wear that shirt is a valuation or potentially they were homeless and that was the only shirt they were given to wear.

If I think A see matters, if what they are wearing is displaying ideal value, exactly the message they are trying to communicate, what are the implications? If I take the message at face value (and I am not sure it is wise to) the messages basically says you can’t rely on me for support. You can’t rely on me for support might actually be kinder than saying, I claim to love you but when the going gets tough my actions not my words will say “Go fuck yourself”. Taking messages at face value not always good, not always should, not taking messages at face value not always good, not always should.

If I have taken the message at face value I further might think the person has made the conscious to decision to say mean things to me outweighs the pain it causes me. Just because a person wears a shirt that says “Go fuck yourself” does not equate to they will know the pain and suffering I or others have been through on a given day, and less perception and comprehension of relevant details is not always ideal comprehension established. Further the person might know society is hard, not always supportive, wearing that short might reinforce the warning in that, actually delivering higher value than someone that wears a shirt that says “Don’t worry, it will all work out”.

What people are wearing, with people always reinforced in the value in seeing (red means stop green means go, orange means parking cone, prison jersey) not always ideal value added.

We as society never encourage people to wear shirts like that via action and inaction? Reminders of speech is free, you don’t get to stone people for wearing or saying offensive language all value out?

Politicians that wear this shirt U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time (usdebtclock.org), what are they saying to the future? We want to protect you?

“But it is the only shirt God gave us”…. “Tell it to the judge!”

Said for humor, reminder not right to stone anyone regardless of the shirt they are wearing.

A baby born today owes $100,000 and then $260,000 (could by a house for that) when they become a taxpayer? The price of doing business, all taxpayers to minus one house? Telling babies they defaulted on their loan payment as possible feels less than ideal (talking about actual babies, not trying to reinforce patronizing derision, though loans have the potential to feel that way).

If the past didn’t rob $260,000 from babies, how might people’s choices be different, is it likely to be factored into their defense? Take that $260,000 (as not real real money) and invest it in top 10 fortune 500 companies today and see what it would be worth in 20 years? Possibly useful for saving people in 2044.

$26,000 to Walmart, $26,000 to Amazon, $26,000 to ExxonMobil, $26,000 to Apple, $26,000 to UnitedHealth Group etc… compounded over 20 years? Investing that much in healthcare least we could do is pay doctor bills…. Doctor bills that should be paid, could be paid not factored into defense? September 11th, 2001 and October 7th, 2023 did not A (like in school grade, 100%) debt for the future – more peace and less terrorist attacks factor into value for self and others. United Nations and World News that inspires peace, saves money or doesn’t save money? Acknowledging hostages need to be released immediately and terrorists attacks can no longer be allowed to threaten the future factors into peace, saved money. Are we treating current babies like billionaires? Stacking their future with debt and legalism?

Truth is sometimes a useful system. Truth is valuable to turn up – 2+2 = 4, if someone is told to get two water bottles and two water bottles and I am the 4^th one to get a water bottle then 2+2 = 4 factors into me getting water or not getting water.

There are drug dealers in society. There are police in society. People do not always know who they are, people that want both alive well and not oppressed at the end of the day. Truth becomes gray. Too much power in authority’s hands could lead to great levels of oppression, as WW2 has taught oppression not combated significantly, sufficiently is consequential. And an oppressive system, a system that gives 99.9999% truth at all times could be taken over by a drug king pin.

Thus drugs exists in our society. I don’t see them going away anytime soon – major breakthroughs that are game changing is possible does not equate to I have seen them over my lifetime does not equate to they are not possible.

I don’t want drug dealers selling drugs that hurt people in the first place, and what hurts people is up to debate at times. I also don’t want authority oppressing people and delivering injustice to drug dealers or any citizen for that matter. People that want to stop drugs might not always have adequate energy to ideally reduce oppression in the system – this equates to people want less drug deals and Golden Rule yet might not deliver on that in a sufficient way. Capacity to change, change in a way that does not wreck one’s life factors into and facilitates change, people actually leaving a criminal lifestyle.

From what I have seen in the system, the system can be trusted to protect former drug dealers, people that leave crime? They leave permanent records on citizens and society reinforces criminal background checks in ways that do not take into account innocent and guilty sufficiently, oppression in the system and reduced access to sufficient defense attorneys – run the check equates to talk about results, address potential oppression? Support is limited purposely from what I can tell on this earth, equates to there is likely more oppression in the system than people would like to believe by default. More oppression than perceived equates to people are unlikely to assess risk to sufficient levels.

There are wars on this planet. There are droughts and natural disasters on this planet. There is also evil on this planet, the Devil, and Demons. People have a tendency to compartmentalize – we are talking about war, not about the devil, talking about natural disaster not about potential for evil in combination. Drugs and Authority, Good and Bad categorized and classified, does not always factor in evil that exists in the world, evil that is hard to fully perceive and comprehend, hard to say that is really the cause or not the cause, cause and effect if-ed not all gift.

Governments invest in teaching and truth based upon today – not upon 5 years from now, and levels of corruption have high potential for changing within 5 years for both better or worse. Truth set to always ideal value added when we can’t predict the future has potential for problematic. 2+2 always has to equal 4? Even if 4 oppresses people? Authority that adds right, or authority that adds when adding is just, the two get equated to the same thing?

Politicians ruled by a national debt, potentially leveraged by it get set to be the ones that approve laws with prison terms. Set to value in ideal ways, in un-leveraged ways feels like a bit of tough pill to swallow. Don’t have to factor that in is not likely to be sufficient oppression reduced. The people that are arrested are told you did wrong yet aren’t required to be told the system is kind of rigged, and thus likely don’t always have potential to factor that into their defense. The nation borrows money, who gets it? not you, set to ideal Golden Rule, not rigged? I want our Allies protected, I also believe there are pet projects, and I also know having money or not having money factors into people’s capacity to defend self, whether or not they get a permanent criminal record they can or cannot escape. Government research grants or criminal defense law, criminals can take one for the team (innocent until proven guilty rowed as guilty) said but not said?

Idea for top view camera on hands while typing as a way for supercomputers and AI to pattern match for increased throughput. Potential for easily detecting problems in new typers, potential for same thing used for musical instruments.