January 7th, 2026
Maybe the problem. If win wins aren’t working, why is that?
Are win wins like sprinkles, a bonus, just a given?
I like win wins, I am not sure I see the value and potential in loss loss.
There is a cost to it has value.
Violate human rights and get human rights violations. It is a loss loss. You don’t want throughput for the monsters so you decide loss loss is less valuable.
Treat me like a door mat, cheat on me. So I should cheat on you, treat you like a doormat? I have gone from fine upstanding citizen to wife beater and adulterer. I don’t see that as a win.
F is return the favor is anger, rage, might generate other paths. God will return the favor, do I really have to? But you love them, so you really don’t want God to return the favor, so you say it is no big deal, you give a thousand reasons (risk mitigation, excuses, outside of my comprehension to know fully as consequential) why they made a mistake – and thus you are an enabler.
And those cheating know this, or at least you think they might.
Win wins not working, try something different like loss loss? There is no answer to that question.
Excuses, outliers, falls out of the norm – you wanted to fix that in advance. Not in the bell curve, who cares?
You don’t have to fix that mat as 10-ed not really.
Loss loss is problematic – new projects beat beating each other up over less than ideal paths chosen in the past. I said there is no answer to that question – it is a negation that could be both perceived as a lie, and revealing the truth. The document is trying to answer that question, yet I know my own imperfection might limit it. So I lie is not what I turn up, I reveal the truth by negation of the obvious without you being able to hear my tone and inflection? Never happens.
My Tech Blog 