I don’t want to write the same song others have heard before.
There is a limited number of combinations that sounds good – harmony versus dissonance.
Distortion and effects have potential to increase uniqueness change sound vastly.
Words and what is talked about has potential to change sound vastly.
Time signatures, different tempos, drop beats or accelrandos have potential to make music sound more unique.
Sung or rapped, how the words are stated obfuscated or clear has potential to change uniqueness.
Common elements
Songs have intros, middle (chorus and verses usually), outros (even if not real outros or intros, just reamplification of versus or choruses)
3 minutes is a good length (repeatable, enjoyable – longer peaces not always invested in long Classical Music peaces comes to mind, Appalachian Spring, The Planets, both nice, both potential for more investment than is considered useful on the common). Too long might lead to desire for uniqueness, 3 minutes allows for changing things up pretty commonly.
8 billion plus people, even if only 1% are muscians that is still 10 million per billion, 80 million+. Similar melodies and chord sets are likely to be turned up. Has potential to be jading, feeling of dime a dozen. Like if you paint mountains, you are not the only person that paints mountains, will be the only person that paints mountains now or in the future when there are more people.
I have a certain comprehension of music that exists in the world. I am a fan of many artists, that said I don’t want to copy or sound like their sound yet it is hard to divest ideally. The intro I wrote sounded to close to as if one artist – yet I real listened to the music by that artists and it didn’t seem to match – maybe another artist? The process has potential to be jading at times. I vary between hating what I have created to liking what I have created, and that is before adding in realization music and art doesn’t amplify ideally for all when I really desire it to. I realize people like a particular kind of music, that said music is support and at times has potential to reduce support, inspire less than ideal choices (drugs, sex, and rock and roll). I want something cool for people to listen to, to be encouraged, without leading to problems in the world and knowledge that amplifies less than ideally doesn’t feel all good.
People that listen to music or like art might do drugs – if they would do the drugs without the music or art provided might be up to debate at times. People on drugs might drop a nicotine vaporizer for instance, might not ideally clean it up, and children might be playing where that vaporizer was dropped. Just one instance of where less than ideal choices might make a less dangerous system more dangerous in messed up ways. People doing drugs set to ideal risk mitigation is not really true value added. A world without encouragement and joy (art and music) set to ideal risk mitigation is not really true value added. LSD and Mushrooms, hallucanogens might lead to poor choices – and those on them in the first place might not be by personal choice, drugged is a possible system doesn’t feel all pretty, our world doesn’t always acknolwedge that the wrong is possible – drug tests for corporations ideally tell if by personal choice? Health problems, less than ideal combinations in the system might mimic the effects of hallucanogens. Can’t prove it doesn’t mean it can’t happen is hard to fully appreciate.
Making music does not lead to capacity to control the audience, is not always likely to lead to full knowledge of what needs to be said, when and why. Our system, people like to test people that are trying to do right – not all good at times.
Politicians, Doctors, CEOs, or even Teachers could be fed drugs by people on drugs without their consent. Known as a possible system gives feeling of God not all in the mix, maybe why it is turned down as possible? People are not required to acknowledge and factor into truth that can wreck lives. Drug dealers that sell drugs are unlikely to acknowledge full potential for problems, require people to sign discounted liability waivers. Product makers that products might lead to non ideals in combinations are not always required to acknolwedge full potential for problems, require people to sign discounted liability waivers. Can’t find real problem, source of problem, might lead to inability to believe ever was a problem is not a pretty system. I think God amplifies truth on all that ideally, fish over snake, seek and you will find? No.
The future plays out better for some parties while truth is limited on the common does not feel all ideal.
There are limited people required for teams. There are not unlimited jobs. People might see music and art as an option for success when other routes are prevented or limited. Not supported in one dimension does not always lead to supported in other dimensions, all while people continue to profit, power is reinforced in the same hands. People not ideally invested in each other’s success really lose the right to judge. Alpha winds will lead to ideal investment and profit? For who? It is worth being invested in each other’s success in society, factors into high ground. If someone gets a spot in NASA and then someone else creates a company more powerful than NASA, will the one accepted to NASA appreciate the company’s success, find ways to make common ground, peace, and gains for all? F success let, not all A.
My Tech Blog 