Systems like Encouragement, Inspiration, Imagination, Experience, Charming, Clear Communication are Systems and Fields of thoughts that can be Improved with Increased Surface Area in Time.
Listening to Videos on Loop has potential for more oversight on critical areas, potential for greater comprehension amplification of what the video is trying to make Known, Raise Comprehension on. Repetition Matters, Surface area over Time Matters. x = topic, y = time, greater surface area more time for critical thought, potential for system more valued in way that will lead to greater delivery of Value and Experience
Repetitions Factor into Precision and Accuracy
For example
I am currently listening to this video on Exascale Supercomputing. It raises importance of 10^18 as a number that reminds me of scientific notation. Thus fueling my desire for providing the following video.
Concrete Examples of What Drives Comprehension Amplification is Helpful
3D Simulations that are perceivable, Comprehendible, versus just a black box?
Light and Sight is a Powerful Sense, Not the Only Sense needed for Imagination, Descriptive Writing
Ray Traced Dolby Atmos that has texture you can feel, smell, taste?
The stone felt smooth to their bare feet. The cold wind air blew against their skin reminded them snow might be around the corner. Temperature and feeling potentially not always fully appreciated in Descriptive Writing.
Lemon and Sugar like a Juxtaposition Comprehension Amplifier?
Communication Through Taste?
0 = Sour 1 = Sweet
0101 0100 = ?
Painting Throughput for Imagination
The mind like paints that if left out to dry, not enough practice, lost to sands of time?
Writer’s Paints, Do Literary Devices come in tubes that you have to squeeze out or palettes?
Systems of different level of tolerances can be turned up in ways not all have the ability to fully appreciate.
Trained to speak at a United Nations Conference likely very different than speaking with friends different than speaking in a court room different than writing dialogue for a book or short story.
Juxtaphorical Flashbacks? No Mixing Paints!?
Buzz Bang Blip Alliteropia?
Puns, Travel, and Translation amps close to ideally?
People are not ideal categorize and classifiers and knowing when to use what language is far from a given. Potential for Creativity to Not Always be Ideal Clarity and Less Miscommunication.
Hedging bets with offsets?
Language with a Historic Precedent for Useful for some to Maximize Profit while leaving others without sufficient resources is a system worth of protecting ideally?
Puns with Name of those that Maximize Profit at the Expense of Others to fair game?
Might be a wiser route
Precedent for Throughput valued over iffy, Precedent for Legalistic People that use Iffy Legalism to be upsold to Time Dependent on same system
Having to defend is a system that creates time losses, reduces throughput, and has the potential to pull names through the mud.
Requirement to Defend Null Costed High Potential for Problems.
Respect for the Rule of Law is Less than Ideally Amplified. Better Authority Possible, far from a given
Taking people to court has the potential to non ideally leverage Children in not fully appreciated ways
People in Trials are not working on All Knowns, easy to non ideally upsell it to less
Lengthy process with obfuscated curveballs that have the potential to change everything day to day
History has the potential for misuse
Pyramids, Vatican, Great Wall of China are still Amping Value
Negate Ideally
History is useful sets Precedent for Historic Precedent is both useful and not an ideal amplifier for future?
Imagine going back and being able to see legal documents surrounding a trial in Egyptian times
War, Famine, Drought, and Slavery are normal parts of life that factor into thought, syntax of sentences, precedent on how to make decisions.
Hypotheticals around systems from long ago are used many times because they are safer. More Confrontational to discuss Hypotheticals around current events.
The Imagination exercise is useful, a reminder that all those that were party to the trial eventually wound up dead is also a useful reminder. Life is but a vapor and legalism can limit life in non ideal ways. Sitting in court rooms not all appreciation for Phenomena in
Infrared True Why playing is a Theatre, Alluded, Noun, or Verb?
Alluded Metaphorical Dramatic Irony drawing on connections that magnificently relent, exquisitely event?
Engineering and System Design that is Practical and Useful for Similar far from Exact Systems
Very similar to Music Practice, Input Piece of Music, Process into Output, Wrong Notes fed into Feedback Process which updates the Practicing Party to Improve the Process
Charge a Capacitor with a Feedback loop to a controller that flips over to instantaneous power upon charge, then flips back to recharge the Capacitor?
Disclaimer: High Voltage can be fatal, please use caution when working with High Voltage and Live Circuits
Feedback Loops Improve Accuracy, allow Power to be used in More Directed Useful Ways
Feedback can factor into accuracy of bullies
People watching are looking for reasons to
Limit access to resources, liquidity of assets for bullies
Bullies have High Potential for having assets Frozen, sometimes the one calling the other the bully can actually be the bully. Villain Level Contrast can wreck lives.
Bullies with potential to have their assets frozen freeze others assets instead?
Painting a target that limits problems for self based on Proximity is useful and Friendly Fire not that big of a deal when not quite respected as friendly?
3rd parties with very limited visibility have the potential for generating problems, leveraging feedback in non ideal ways. That has the potential for consequences on limiting precision and accuracy.
PartyA, PartyB, and PartyC turned up to question value on each other with very limited information where potential to be thrown on the street, death via hypothermia? Hypothesizing created as a result of problems added to a system with feedback listening to that hypothesizing always plays out in ideal ways?
Closed loop system where Competition comments on Output, saying notes that are accurate and resonating are not accurate and resonating?
Feedback is Power, the process leveraged can lead to major problems.
Voice that can sound exactly like someone we know on the phone? Calls don’t actually equal calls?
Call someone you care about an Marvel’s Ultron might be on the line instead?
An Output Measured can generate an Expected Output
Use a decoy bomb on other side of the battle field, enemy soldiers start shooting it? Now their location is flagged?
Active Listening can be power, when less oppression is involved, far from a guarantee in this reality.
Bullies that leverage via listening can be leveraged in non ideal ways
Associations are less than all value added, associated with Competitor can be turned up non ideally.
Competitor TeamB wants TeamA to throw their star PlayerA to the wind so TeamB makes PlayerA look like they are sharing information with TeamB?
Potential for systems of non ideal leverage based upon limited knowledge to amp non ideally especially in war times.
Playing Nice might not always equal All are Free, at Liberty to play nice.
People null cost investment in fields of study and work. Potential for problems and curveballs that can’t be fully comprehended just by being in engineering.
It is Logic, It is Reason thus it will amp ideally given hard times, people not perfect, obfuscated limited information and requirement to make swift judgments.
God lets things be wronged, does not equal God always rights those things and that can lead to momentum over time that is less than ideal.
Potential for the closer we get to success to goals achieved for more problems to show up via non ideal control mechanisms trying to control the system.
Easy to upsell current process to all ideal listeners. WordPress potentially like Engineering has the potential for problems that might not always be easy to fully appreciate. Systems exist does not always equal adequate Cyber Security exists to protect from a system of Max Profit.
People limiting Throughput needs to stop
IP Law as a system that profits some over others many times in ideal ways has potential for not long for this world
System required to Right Wrongs based on past statute of limitations can set very non ideal precedent
System that doesn’t right wrong allowed to bake in overtime, like Intellectual Property law that profits the rich, High Potential for issues generated.
Require all corporations that profited off less than ideally fair leverage to pay all citizens of the world?
All tech companies bankrupted and $8 billion people with a $15 check?
Legalism fails to deliver sufficient Experience seems apt.
Legalism can be shaky ground at best. World has tendency to test people at start of their careers then leverage them based on that.
Leveraged Leaders, now why would we want one of those when we can have this non leveraged leader?
EventAfromPast to more effect is easy to non ideally turn up
Claims of Statute of Limitation do not deliver Statute of Limitation Results
The future brings Exascale does not equal the Future always sufficiently rights wrongs
System is More likely or Less likely to Turn up Detail Based Legalism and Surveillance over time?
Claimed Resolution can be Improved based upon Interpolation Fully Appreciated?
Life tendency towards.
People make a mistake, call it MistakeA.
MistakeA is never claimed or brought to attention.
MistakeA is seen by some, and kept as a card in back of deck.
Statute of Limitations runs out on MistakeA does not equal others are the Law. Others won’t Maximize Profit based upon that stored card.
Mistakes can lead to other Mistakes that can lead to leverage likely in Not Fully Appreciated Ways.
MistakeA leads to MistakeB (unknown to PartyA that originally made MistakeA) then PartyB is leveraged by MistakeB that leads to PartyA leveraged by MistakeA in non ideal ways?
Obfuscation can be multistage in non ideal ways.
Flagging Problems can lead to Proximity is Useful in Non Ideal Ways. Just talking about this kind of stuff can flag non ideal potential for Max Profit. Thus conversation is limited many times before it begins and is thus generally insufficiently provided.
People say Think the Best of Others, turn up a message of Forgiveness and Hope, while the world actually says if you step on CrackA we will never let you forget CrackA because we have video of CrackA being stepped upon. Further the world has potential to tie webs of problems related to CrackA and leverage from CrackA being stepped upon.
Christianity proclaims a World of Less Legalism while capitalizing on gains from Legalism. Trust a system that seems to thrive based upon hypocritical results?
Churches that claim to amplify forgiveness while having a metaphorical beware of dog sign and a fence surrounded by razor wire, combined with trespassers will be shot?
Someone steals statue of David to feed family not fully appreciated by Vatican or Italian Authorities?
System that claims Forgiveness and Shakes with right while hold “a rock in the left” behind their back fully pondered? (thoughts referencing House of Cards)
Church that amps legalism is not all legalism out.
Reliance on Christ and Christians for less legalism that does not deliver? Reliance on a system that fails to deliver can be dangerous.
Too Rosey of a view of Church is easy to turn up. Choir that hits the right notes wrongly upsold to won’t throw you in Jail?
Church is Not God, is Not Christ, upsold to will deliver close to God or Christ unwise. God will make it all right leads to feeling of bad deal not fully pondered?
Ideally God would right all wrongs from the past while not holding any parties responsible for events that are past the statute of limitations fails to deliver?
World doesn’t like to forget, not really very good at forgiving. If a woman that was humiliated was your daughter would you want her name constantly reminded to the world?
Memory factors into concrete examples that are not always used wisely or without consequences. People that use past examples have potential to be upsold to past examples useful.
People require names from Trials and Precedent to make legal arguments leads to names continuously ruined by a corrupt system fully pondered?
Potential for Consistent Re-amps of Villain Level Contrast with a God that fails to deliver adequate protection?
Private life of others useful for proving points sets non ideal precedent for allowed to be allowed in by design?
Having to defend is a system that creates time losses, reduces throughput, and has the potential to pull names through the mud.
Potentially a Challenge Worth trying to Amplify Supercomputer Cycles towards Everyday
Start to an Outline
Miscommunication, Better Communication Critical Thinking
Outline
Less Miscommunication can be Clarifying
People don’t always take time to think about Communication
People communicate in a particular way for a particular amount of time
People like small talk, potential for ramp ups in communication that take time, similarly maintaining communication channels properly might take a certain amount of ramp down time to maintain communication channel
Amplifying Better communication requires time, investment, access to tools and systems like Computers, Lessons, people to Communicate with
Teaching and Learning can be enabled by clearer communication
Communication does not profit all equally, in a World of Max Profit easy to undersell the importance of all having better communication skills
Hackers are sub optimal support for communication. Like people that cross out words in medical dictionaries and right FUCK YOU instead. Send those testing to the ER they limit? Potential for sitting in an Emergency Room not being able to talk and knowing the doctors are talking about a document you changed? “Only darkness there and nothing more” – Edgar Allen Poe to better?
Conclusion
Again a reminder the people testing my life are damaging data consistency, in real profound ways
I love me some shade and rain, does not equal the Future will be all Dark Days In
People on the Right Page about Not Limiting Teachers Would Go Far
System of requires elementary school teachers to First Teach Students Cybersecurity before they can teach lesson plans like English and Math?
Inspiring Creative Writing
Paper to a Canvas? Simple as that?
People don’t by default value all the senses that factor into Experience. Transporting the reader to a New World that paints on the imagination is possible. Getting someone to value Descriptive Writing requires saying far from a given? Better ways to say a key detail worthy of memory that is not always fully appreciated?
Comprehension Amplification is Powerful and more Powerful with Surface Area. Concrete examples that are go to for delivering. And Abstract concepts that inspire critical thinking around the topic, inspire more investment. Potential for Gains is Power.
Vivid Verbs can be more precise, require less clarification, deliver more power per word.
They said [adverb] “It was an amazing experience”.
softly, loudly, quietly, magnificently
said softly -> whisper
said loudly -> shouted
said quietly -> muttered
said magnificently -> proclaimed
They whispered “what does it mean?”.
They shouted “Stop! who goes there”.
They muttered “how do I escape….”
They proclaimed “Better Summarization is Powerful for Improving Communication while Maintaining Key Details is a not always fully appreciated brilliant shiny golden key detail worthy of memory”.
Time before a city gets upsold to that was ideally how reality would play out.
Time before a supercomputer has its switch turned on gets upsold to that was ideally how reality would play out.
Shiny Blue Marble in the Past likely said Lightning is in the sky, it is not able to be captured and put in a glass jar
A supercomputer, A new supercomputer likely to be turned on in 2040? Yes
More likely Now that I said that? Yes
World before that Supercomputer in 2040 existed, World after that Supercomputer likely to be new and changed in Profound ways I cannot currently fully comprehend. I believe it is likely to rely upon electricity, thus I provide starting preparation to help with the Power Efficiency of that 2040 Supercomputer.
Little changes upfront? Documentable? Power in that
160 years of Civil Rights has failed to Amplify Ideally for Diversity and Minorities in the South of United States of America? Yes. A many year head start for that supercomputer could be a lot of help? Yes
Resistance over distance has potential for Energy Loss
Interesting Increasing Resistance can lead to lower Current, if Current is kept constant, then Increased Resistance would likely increase heat
What variables are held constant in the system factors into perceptions of increases. Point of Reference not something always considered in Electrical Circuits?
P=I^2*R
thus if current through a 1 kiloohms wire leads to a specific power loss
P=I^2 * 1 kiloohms = I^2 kilohms
if I set the current to constant, say 1 kiloamp
P = 1 kiloamp squared kiloohms = 1 (some-prefix)watt
if I were to double the resistance to 2 kiloohms
Power Throughput would be?
P = 2 kiloamp squared kiloohms = 2 (some-prefix) watt
1000 AMP * 1000 Ohms = 1,000,000 Watts = 1 MW
So if I had wire that over a distance 5 kilometers created 1 kiloohm, doubling the distance of that wire 10 kilometers could lead to double the power loss if I kept current constant
Same power with double the resistance?
P=I^2 P=I^2*2
i^2=2(i^2)
0 = 2i^2-i^2 = i^2
i^2 = 0, i = 0? must have something wrong
current doesn’t maintain a constant value between those two equations
P=i1^2*(1 kOhm) P=i2^2*(2 kOhm)
Set power to 1,000,000 W, 1 MW
1,000,000= i1^2
1,000,000 = 2i2^2
500,000 = i2^2
i2 = sqrt(500,000) = 707.12 A
i1 = sqrt(1,000,000) = 1000 A
i1 = 1 kA i2 with double length of wire = 707.12 A
Voltage1 vs Voltage2?
P = VI
1 MW held constant
1 MW = V1*1 kiloamps
V1 = 1,000,000 W / 1000 A = 1000V = 1 kV
1 MW= V2*707.12 A
1 MW= V2*0.70712 kiloamps
V2 = 1,000,000 W / 707.12 A = 1414.19 V = 1.4 kV
Keeping Power constant increased resistance equals less amps
Less amps at same Power Output Requires Higher Voltages
Greater volts required for delivering same power over a longer distance assuming resistance per foot of wire remains constant
Using the numbers from this example (that are not real) distance of 5 kilometers equals 1 kV will deliver 1 megawatt. Increasing distance to 10 kilometers (double the distance) will require 1.4 kV to deliver the same 1 megawatt.
Proximity factors into Power Efficiency.
Keep 1 kV constant then doubling length of wire?
P = VI = i2 kV
P = i2^2 * (2 kiloohms)
i2 kV = i2^2 * (2 kiloohms)
1 kV / 2 kiloohms = (i2*i2)/i2
i2 = 1000 V / 2000 Ohms = 0.5 kA
P2 at 1000V constant would be = 1 kv(0.5kA) = 1000 V*500A = 500,000 A = 0.5 MW
Potential for resistive properties to act in different ways dependent on current temperature and state?
Does a wire have more resistance on a wire close to absolute zero or close to melting point of the wire?
Oscilloscope Output with a Torch Under the wire on a circuit?
Pessoas com apoio concentrado em vez de julgar umas às outras têm maior potencial de levar a menos situações de vitimização e pessoas julgando menos umas às outras?
Oamenii de sprijin concentrat asupra judecării unii pe alții au un potențial mai mare de a duce la mai puține situații de victimizare și oamenii care se judecă unii pe alții mai puțin?
Људи за концентрисану подршку у погледу осуђивања једни других имају већи потенцијал да доведу до мањег броја ситуација виктимизације и људи који мање осуђују једни друге?
Watu wa kuungwa mkono kwa umakini juu ya kuhukumu kila mmoja wao ana uwezo mkubwa zaidi wa kusababisha hali chache za unyanyasaji na watu kuhukumiana kidogo?
Människor till koncentrerat stöd framför att döma varandra har större potential att leda till färre fall av offer och att människor dömer varandra mindre?
लोगों द्वारा एक-दूसरे के बारे में राय बनाने पर एकाग्र समर्थन देने से पीड़ित होने की स्थिति कम होने की संभावना अधिक होती है और लोग एक-दूसरे को कम आंकते हैं?
לאנשים לתמיכה מרוכזת על פני שיפוט אחד את השני יש פוטנציאל גבוה יותר להוביל לפחות מצבים של קורבנות ואנשים שופטים זה את זה פחות?
Οι άνθρωποι που λαμβάνουν συγκεντρωμένη υποστήριξη για να κρίνουν ο ένας τον άλλον έχουν μεγαλύτερες δυνατότητες να οδηγήσουν σε λιγότερες καταστάσεις θυματοποίησης και οι άνθρωποι να κρίνουν ο ένας τον άλλον λιγότερο;
Menschen, die sich konzentriert unterstützen, wenn sie sich gegenseitig verurteilen, haben ein höheres Potenzial, zu weniger Situationen der Viktimisierung zu führen und Menschen, die sich weniger verurteilen?
Mennesker til konsentrert støtte fremfor å dømme hverandre har høyere potensiale for å føre til mindre situasjoner med offer og folk som dømmer hverandre mindre?
Le persone che concentrano il supporto sul giudicarsi a vicenda hanno un potenziale maggiore di portare a meno situazioni di vittimizzazione e le persone si giudicano meno?
Ihmisillä, jotka saavat keskitettyä tukea toistensa tuomitsemisessa, on suurempi mahdollisuus johtaa vähemmän uhritilanteisiin ja vähemmän toistensa tuomitsemiseen?
Les gens qui se soutiennent davantage que de se juger les uns les autres ont un potentiel plus élevé de conduire à moins de situations de victimisation et les gens se jugent moins les uns les autres ?
Mọi người tập trung ủng hộ hơn là phán xét lẫn nhau có khả năng dẫn đến ít tình huống trở thành nạn nhân hơn và mọi người ít phán xét lẫn nhau hơn?
Чи концентрована підтримка людей, а не засудження один одного має вищий потенціал для того, щоб призвести до меншої кількості ситуацій віктимізації, а люди менше засуджують один одного?
Ludzie, którzy mają skoncentrowane wsparcie na osądzaniu się nawzajem, mają większy potencjał doprowadzenia do mniejszej liczby sytuacji wiktymizacji, a ludzie mniej osądzają się nawzajem?
¿Las personas que concentran su apoyo en lugar de juzgarse entre sí tienen un mayor potencial para conducir a menos situaciones de victimización y que las personas se juzguen menos entre sí?
Jalma-jalma pikeun konséntrasi ngadukung pikeun saling nangtoskeun gaduh poténsi anu langkung luhur pikeun nyababkeun kaayaan anu kirang korban sareng jalma-jalma anu nangtoskeun kirang?
Люди, которые сосредоточены на поддержке, а не осуждают друг друга, имеют более высокий потенциал для того, чтобы привести к меньшему количеству ситуаций виктимизации, и люди меньше осуждают друг друга?
Moun ki konsantre sou sipò yo jije youn lòt gen pi gwo potansyèl pou mennen nan mwens sitiyasyon nan viktimizasyon ak moun ki jije youn lòt mwens?
서로를 판단하는 것보다 집중적으로 지원하는 사람들은 피해 상황이 줄어들고 사람들이 서로를 덜 판단하게 될 가능성이 더 높습니다.
People to concentrated support over judging each other has higher potential for leading to less situations of victimization and people judging each other less?
Events, a single scene is limited. Number of scenes required for a Short Story? Short Story need be an entire Hero’s Journey to be meaningful?
Men and Cats have something in common, they are both amplifiers of each others support but less than ideal amplifiers
A few strokes of Free Design followed by Fixed design in a Short Story?
As if the Budget was in Time Dollars?
Invest more likely to get more, though this Reality does not Amp Ideally
Cup of Water will In No Way Lose Their Reward. Love is Greater than Many Sins
Small Contributions Respected with Never Say Die Encouragement
People to meaningful contributions without biting off too much to chew that can lead to both non ideal reliance and losses to support?
8 Billions People with knowledge of How to Add Directional Support for the person with the least help on Earth?
Focused Laser of Support couldn’t amplify greater support for World based on weakest link?
People to concentrated support over judging each other has higher potential for leading to less situations of victimization and people judging each other less?
Unexpected can be Interesting, Less Expectation as Mathematical Systems?
Foreshadowing what a Summary of the Short Story Might look like?
Authors that can project the Key Details about story likely to be taken away have higher potential for delivering those Details in an Effective Manner
If man could think 20 times as fast, but all men could think 20 times as fast, how would that change things?
More is Not All More In
20x is not 40x, 40x is not 80x, 80x is not 160x
Future likely brings more potential than we have right now
2023 to 2033 Power in Thought? 10 year of Gains Empowered with Worldwide Supercomputers can be a lot of Power, a lot of Power that is not all 2043 Power in.
Always concentrated on Throughput gains unlikely to lead to ideal appreciation for fact life is short, not always lived
People that spend 100% of their time improving Throughput gains for the World that don’t live always likely to create larger gains than those out living life, critical thinking inspired by a World full of Phenomena?
If a man didn’t invest in greater throughput gains might the world have wound up with less? Yes. If a man didn’t invest in more than throughput gains might the world have wound up with less? Yes.
People put undue burden on themselves to make gains in a system that does not always amp truth. Gains are valuable, without Hubris those Gains couldn’t have been better if support was delivered in other directions, set to given? Gains are value added, required to be sold like fountain of youth to get funding is not all truth amplified.
Sales, perceived as potentially more valuable than reality is in by design.
If I sell ProductA which has a certain amount of support amplification
ProductA = 1 water bottle
or ProductA = 10 water bottles
Both add support, both have potential for being support amplification in different ways, light and head starts matter, did I need 10 water bottles or did I need 1? Did I need 2 water bottles and survived on 1 to help others? Did I need 2 water bottles and give 8 water bottles away to save others?
Money can be spent on Water Bottles. Support is more than Water Bottles, thus purchase of water bottles might be limiting support in other directions.
People without access to resources huddled next to a giant pack of water bottles in a blizzard?
Support is More than Water, Support requires Water too.
Life is More than just Water and Shelter. Bread and water.
Nsdtp! – Never Say Die Throughput!
Not all reminders out that people need Toilet Paper too
People don’t always have ideal visibility to what increases and what reduces support
3 Important Details that Reinforce a Theme that are Memorable over a Short Story can be Powerful
Powerful Wisdom, Stored Away, so nobody else can get to it breaks?
5 deadbolts is less than ideal pots of wisdom protected?
Lets think about this for a bit
ChangeA = Civil War and Abolition of Slavery ChangeB = Martin Luther King Jr. I Have A Dream Speech
ChangeA+ChangeB = ResultA
ResultB = system that doesn’t protect Diversity, and is known to not amp ideally for Minority or Majority
ResultA is Expected, ResultB is the result after 160 years.
ResultB does not lead to feeling of World will get their act together, that less protectionism is a wise choice. Protectionism amped has consequences. Legalism amped has consequences.
Supercomputers are going to fix instantly what man, including man with supercomputers has been unable to fix for 160 years?
Knowledge of likely to fix, cost to fix factors into cycles allotted for use.
Defense Law as after thought or built in by design?
It amps insufficiently in ways that hurts.
It amps insufficiently in ways that hurts ability to rely upon logic.
It amps insufficiently in ways that hurts ability to rely on less legalism, which factors into throughput.
It amps insufficiently in ways that hurts capitalism and ability to depend on hard work as value creation system.
It amps insufficiently in ways that limits clock cycles and future progress in Real Ways. Documentable, Distinguishable losses that factor into reduced output and throughput. Output and Throughput claimed to be of concern to computer systems.
Trust a system that claims to be invested in Throughput gains, yet is not actually invested in those Throughput gains?
A system less filled with hate an rage at unfair more or less likely to amp data consistency?
Increased Sleep and Constant Consistent Robbed Resources
Current Experience set to a Trust Engine, set to desires to Generate Trust does not give feeling of True
God of this reality does not seem to resonate of Christian God. Words, access to words and information of others gives feeling of limited, reduced.
Potential for people close to end of life feeling like a Ghost, excessive sleep, less potential in waking
Factors into Hope, far less than ideally encouraging, this reality itself gives experience of Bad Deal
A machine where words on the keyboard are allowed but helping is not?
God keeps alive for a time?
For a time believed without actual comprehension of time
Physics works this way or that way dependent upon not all ideal sensors
This reality gives sufficient comprehension for guilt vs not guilt? No
Mitigating factors are limited
Comprehension of mitigating factors are limited
That factors into support
Which is thus non ideally limited
Comprehension gets upsold to sufficient is not a fully appreciated system
A system where actions and justice is more like a ball of miscommunication than actually delivers feeling of right to decide on this or that. No ability to decide does not equal wrongs are not real. Perceived as responsible gives less than ideal feeling of justice, nobody to be responsible does not give ideal feeling of justice.
System amps less than truth and that makes Justice unlikely, does not stop Victimization, and that factors into Support that has the ability to generate more Justice Unlikely Victimization far from impossible.
Limited Comprehension factors into perception of Justice and perception of Right vs Wrong and that factors into Non Ideal Support for Future that is Limited at best and is likely to Amplify Limited Comprehension.
System tries to amp decide, amp perception of justice in way that leads to anger when really that is insufficient support, comprehension for knowledge need to judge.
People’s reality and sensor gives less than sufficient information needed for adequate use of Judging, adequate installation of Justice.
Thoughts around Don’t Judge
Perception and Comprehension is far less sufficient for Judging
The word Judge itself is a bit of a complicating factor, linguistics that are less than ideal factor into viewed as judgment vs a choice
Deferred judgment and choice is a value creation system that amps less than ideally, clouds in the sky might not be judged as rain does not equal people that see those clouds are always likely to go outside, good days get upsold to less? likely
Precedent is set less than ideal, Categorize and Classify is useful to enable Throughput in ways that are for convenience proximity over fair
Is capitalism Broken? Under the eyes of Don’t Judge?
to act as a judge; pass judgment:No one would judge between us.
to form an opinion or estimate:I have heard the evidence and will judge accordingly.
to make a mental judgment.
Communication and Context around the Word Judge can be iffed
PhraseA = The judge PhraseB = was the wrong choice to make PhraseC = was in charge of the decision PhraseA+PhraseB vs PhraseA+PhraseC?
He judges them -> He, judges them -> Writers never speak in odd syntaxes?
People are required to rely upon a system of Language, Dictionary, and Thesauruses that have less than ideal Throughput.
Formatting and Editing requires work and people are less than ideal printing presses.
Judge as a bit of a vague vs vivid verb?
Vague verb spoke. He spoke “Be silent”
vs vivid verbs, shouted, joked, whispered
Generalizing less vivid language can factor into non ideal judgment, verbs that cut less than ideally precisely and accurately. Adverbs exist for a reason.
Able to communicate effectively set to valued in this reality potentially not true value added. This reality seen as more than has a particular jaded slant that is not open to discussion potentially not true value added.
Potential for we want to hear what you say said but not close to ideally meant? More likely we want you to think we care about what you think while we want you to actually get off stage?
Interpretations of Reality that are outside our own are not always fully appreciated or even perceived and comprehended by all people.
More conversation complicates things and is not always fully appreciated leads to early divests that could save lives?
Potential for web filters built into browsers that change words like “a” to “as”, “too” to “to” to “two”. Less than ideally consistent Throughput factors into support in ways that has potential to lead to death.
There is enough problems in the system, there is enough decisions upsold to convenience and proximity are useful for enabling Throughput to have grace in this system.
Society as a Throughput enabler? Cars have potential for deaths added that might not otherwise exist. That probability might be only 1% of population does not equal %1 accounts for all the other systems in combination with that. Might be better to look at the system like 15% probability of leading to death in non ideal ways.
15% is a level, perceivable level of Contrast that is of Greater use for Comprehension. Factors into choices, what choices are seen as valuable.
Knowing you won’t get out of this life alive long term and a system that enables non ideal probabilities by 1% in one direction does not equal 0% or 100% in other directions. Rare case knowledge can factor into useful as perceived as can get away with a crime. Perceived as can get away with does not equal can get away with, does not always equal crime less committed.
People have a 1% chance of dying from car crash but system shows 5% in one area? Just needs more funding for salt for the roads? A system that is corrupt or just has factors that need to be factored in that can’t be fully comprehended?
Deferred judgment useful, yet inadequate for should I tell others to go spend time in the same town?
Deferred Judgment is useful, less than ideal, and can factor into less support in real ways that causes problems. Potential for messy when we are human and imperfect not fully comprehended? Even if we do get involved in certain cases we might not have the support and throughput to deliver in real way, then what? Buy in without further invest is not always appreciated by the world.
If I support CountryA, then I die early. Family now expected to support CountryA? We make choices that we think will affect the World in More Ideal Lights yet we attach others to requirements non ideally via proximity?
I want CountryA to go unsupported? No. I think it is fair I make the decisions for all the people surrounding me, leverage them to required to provide for CountryA? No.
People are limited supported. Claimed as known, when this world is monstrous at times, is not true value in.
If I am a Part of CountryA and I am getting good support I have reason to want more from supporting parties does not equal it is fair for me to demand it of them.
CountryA = country that depends on USA Support CountryA = USA CountryA = Country that supports USA that relies upon CountryB’s support
Feels good to be needed equals USA borrows more at personal expense to help CountryA. USA becomes CountryA. Feels good to be needed equals countries that support USA borrows more at personal expense to help USA?
The chain of support seems intertwined heavily and far less than ideal for sustainability long term.
The economics obfuscate in ways that limit support in real ways? That give oxygen to greed and max profit systems? Yes
Greed and Regret can be iffed in not fully appreciated ways
Negate Comprehension is Sufficient value for Judgment, Comprehension known is not always Inspiring, Enjoyable Life Amplifying.
Knowing why someone made the wrong choice always an ideal amplifier of joy?
Better Comprehension is Not Ideal Comprehension, and Better Comprehension can be less Joy
From 2+2=(3,5) to 2+2 = (3.9, 4.1)
Where (3,5) might be light and lift, and (3.9, 4.1) might be drink yourself into a coma bad. Where 4 might be the brightest light at the end of the tunnel.
Closer proximity that is less than a true answer might give a darker feeling than limiting comprehension vastly initially? The pursuit of that 0.1 swing to the real value could be years of lost time. Yet not pursuing upselling to not the wisest path could enable many 2+2=4s in other directions in life.
Further Comprehension is Dynamic, 2+2=4 today can lead to 2+2=(3.9,4.1) tomorrow, the knowledge of had things settled to now need to check that is not always an ideal amplifier.
Man’s joy dependent on ideal comprehension is a time sink with potential for misery served until the time of death.
We like to think our ability to perceive and comprehend reality increases over time, yet sensors get harder to read, memory has the potential for amplifying less than ideal via distance from an event over time.
Need an Answer on Anything as Requirement for Walking forward in time is unwise
Front View Focus Matters. People on the road thinking about how they could have chosen this or that better in the past? Regret does not ideally enable future support and safety.
Life is a Limited Memory Limited Comprehension System that turns up Obfuscation on the common that requires one foot in front of the next and faith that fire and destruction won’t rain on the individual by default.
Children Walking should ideally be able to live without Bombs dropping overhead. Many cases Children can walk without having to worry about landmines. Many cases Children can walk without having to worry about beartraps.
A World that limits able to rely upon that to 100% is not all long term value amped.
There is some peace in death, less attached to a world that enables land mines that might rob children of hope and dreams.
Less Pain can be Inspired, far from a given in this world.
