Having to defend is a system that creates time losses, reduces throughput, and has the potential to pull names through the mud.
Requirement to Defend Null Costed High Potential for Problems.
Respect for the Rule of Law is Less than Ideally Amplified. Better Authority Possible, far from a given
Taking people to court has the potential to non ideally leverage Children in not fully appreciated ways
People in Trials are not working on All Knowns, easy to non ideally upsell it to less
Lengthy process with obfuscated curveballs that have the potential to change everything day to day
History has the potential for misuse
Pyramids, Vatican, Great Wall of China are still Amping Value
Negate Ideally
History is useful sets Precedent for Historic Precedent is both useful and not an ideal amplifier for future?
Imagine going back and being able to see legal documents surrounding a trial in Egyptian times
War, Famine, Drought, and Slavery are normal parts of life that factor into thought, syntax of sentences, precedent on how to make decisions.
Hypotheticals around systems from long ago are used many times because they are safer. More Confrontational to discuss Hypotheticals around current events.
The Imagination exercise is useful, a reminder that all those that were party to the trial eventually wound up dead is also a useful reminder. Life is but a vapor and legalism can limit life in non ideal ways. Sitting in court rooms not all appreciation for Phenomena in
My Tech Blog 