My Tech Blog

I provide allot of free content on this blog, these videos are not mine thus can’t give away its content for free. I provide them to raise awareness and potentially help expedite the release of hostages.

I have a Masters in Computer Engineering and had many jobs in IT and Software and I don’t think I have gotten a class on High Voltage Electricity during the time. Knowledge gets set to known, and technology, including High Voltage technology seems to be on the rise (solar, and portable inverters). Was going to put an Electrical Safety video here but search on YouTube doesn’t appear to be returning.

I wish the World was full of peace, capacity to prosper for all. Hasn’t really been that way during my lifetime. Others know things that factor into my protection that I do not. Problem is I am also required to know what I need to know to profit and protect family, friends, and self. I also know there is less than ideals that are in by design that are amplified.

I am not trying to die early, but if I were lost my future as a guarantee given some other outcome might likely not be true value added. World Events make future less than ideally known.

This World has not been all wins, negate mins, negate fins. People that protect me also like to profit – equates to wins might be minimized via less than ideals and I am unlikely to always know what factors in and when it factors in. I don’t want the people that protect me not to profit, I also don’t want to be limited from profiting.

No up pup-d (like a puppy)

Imagine there are two people both handcuffed to different sides of the room and a key is left in the middle of the room further than either have potential to reach.

Negate May does not establish ideal value.

The words may and may not have a lot of range that might change value.

I don’t want to sound patronizing, thus example choice matters.

I may go to the store, I may not go 200 mph on the Highway.

World leaders may not go to war, may make peace – it is sounds good, but will they listen to me? Trying to say may not drop bombs on little girls (like Vietnam poster), may find ways for international trade that equates to people with cancer are saved.

God could tell people that are against me (and I don’t know who that would be) where there is gold located at the bottom of the ocean. God may factors into reduced losses for self and enemy protected greater, isn’t that part of Christianity? My enemies insufficiently invested in might be part of the problem and God has the gold reserves as a known? Extract resources turn up heat, not something worthy of pondering as a potential problem? God of pay half, increase pressure, pay fourth, increase pressure not really God of an overfilling cup.

Money and Gold does not establish value ideally is part of the problem. Price gets set to end of cost, buy software does not equate to bug free software, software who’s full implications are known, have capacity to be known. We rely upon throughput in the system does not always equate to we challenge values set and get in the system. YouTube is nice, but do we go to their facilities, get a PhD in Computer Science and examine every line of code? Reliance is a less than ideal system. Excuse me if this sounds rude, I am potentially speaking to the audience like I would to another Computer Scientist. I have been both a whistleblower and outed from the industry on far less than ideal comprehension and communications – so someone that is trying to add value, is disallowed, thrown in jail, expect ideal value established and delivered in Silicon Valley? Negate (thought about using Fee or Claim here) we rely is ideal know, ideal oh. Claim would have inspired more thought, fee it, charge it does not always establish ideal value, negate seems apt.

Figured I would attach some encouragement to this post

Free Starter Image (outside of sanctions countries)

People need to understand the problems that they face not fully graced? Negate may factors into grace, may factors into grace. Ideally graced would be ideal, claims of ideal would not be ideally graced. Things like grace and forgiveness are powerful systems, worthy of turning up in advance, will can be iffed through resource reduction is a problem worthy of turning down. Will set potentially not always get when people are tired, worn down. Artists required to tell both sides of the story is not always nice, spiced light – giving each other grace and forgiveness is possible, iffy close to the line art is not test free potentially not always ideally divested from. Imagine you are a professional sports player, and you just lose a game and then someone shows up and says I want you to meet my new supermodel girlfriend. Know set to may not always ideal ray.

Fee-d thin not always free from future mins. See loss see wins claim it ideals fins? Appearance of a Yacht does not equate to having a Yacht, weigh no camera in? We see sets to A’s mins is less than ideal comprehend.

A couple days ago I think, before the eclipse there was a blind man walking on the bike path, potentially had blood around his eyes walking with a kerosene tank. I think I asked him how he was doing or if he needed some water (can’t really remember right now), he turned to me for a moment without speaking then turned and kept walking forward. Figured I would walk close to him because if he was a threat figured the tank might have blew up when he was near me.

I see a lot of odd things, I am tested a lot, I am also dependent upon video laws that make it harder to film in the city. The combination has potential to lead to strange things not always documented.

I kept walking forward, didn’t think much of it (been tested far more than once in my life). Easy to gauge what is going on and happening is not really true value added, combined with I invest in peace talks and world news it is hard for me to know what matters and what doesn’t. Eyes on world stage does not always equate to sufficient comprehension of what is happening in the city I live.

A lot of homeless in the city, might just have been someone with a kerosene heater. African American man silenced with blood around his eyes and a tank, especially in the south is scary, hard to fully appreciate.

Over the summer I was repeatedly tested with reduced resources including food, then had tests like trying to make sure people knew potential high voltage dangers – the combination is heavy. Testing is useful common and has potential to increase liability, should have seen didn’t see type of stuff is heavy – like you spend hours examining a painting, then another image is added right when you get on stage. Can be used to remove people from CEO positions, positions of Authority.

Feels like people if the brain, if my health and memory through iffing my resources then try to rob me based upon responsibility and accountability that I am trying to invest adequately in. They might think they are inspired to do so based upon data they think is sound, but is not.

Make Peace swiftly – if someone was robbed of all their resources they might be a greater threat to society.

Someone might wrong me, someone might wrong me based upon what they perceive and comprehend to be good data, that does not require good data delivered, consistent data delivered, data comprehended adequately.

I know people get set to villain that don’t deserve to be, and that might factor into others getting set to villains that don’t deserve to be, when everyone really just wants the situation to get better.

See I might have better words and thus better perception, comprehension, and luck than other parties raising concerns on this. See that less adequate words and comprehension could get people hurt, deliver insufficiently. See language, increased capacity to deliver is both necessary and reduced commonly (lexing, puns, double meanings, multiple definitions). Not to mention education is a profit-based system is hard to fully appreciate the implications of.

I might be A level knowledge in certain directions, that far, far from guarantees capacity to comprehend all possible side effects in other directions. People might have data, good data that they are not required to amplify comprehension of to me. Sufficient access and amplification is not a requirement has implications. We all are working on excess levels of complexity, no requirement to amplify comprehension to each other in society could cause big problems. 8 billion plus people in the World, nobody has capacity to adequately process that information ideally alone, computer systems and summarization processes have potential to reduce details and increase bias.

A (like in school grade, 100%) proceed, move forward might be better set to have we guaranteed there is sufficient grace and mercy in the system, will the system acknowledge problems that are built in or not?

I provide allot of free content on this blog, these videos are not mine thus can’t give away its content for free. I provide them to raise awareness and potentially help expedite the release of hostages.

Our society turns up You May, Freedom for both good reason and in ways that potential leads to less-than-ideal value for all parties.

Imagine two people date each other yet they have both settled. This world is a scary place and the potential for planes flying into buildings calls into question the necessity of not settling.

Imagine you are talking to someone in a bar, you just met, having your first drink – honeymoon stage of honeymoons. The person is attractive, amazing, and you know their personality might equate to they wind up on the street in 20 years, or maybe you don’t know, comprehension and perception are far from ideal systems.

You might be thinking this may or may not work out, I may or may not date them, either of us can just walk away at either time with no problems, no strings attached, no losses to time, money, resources, or energy. That might amplify more ideally for self, yet might lead to the other person in prolonged in and out of bars, failed relationships. We can’t control other people, but can we project how our influence, interactions might influence their long term view on life, their ability to profit in the future? We love, We love freedom, but do We truly Love, Inspire the Golden Rule when we A may, set freedom to an ideal met? A may met set might be A may met get.

Alone I have drank in bars – shouldn’t be equated to any former dates fault, does not equate to the combination might not be useful to learn from. I don’t want other’s futures to amplify less ideally and I also know the pain, if affects me likely might affect others too. People trying to look out for me might represent A it doesn’t hurt, more manly, less manly not all defame free. May let see not always free – it is better for both parties (yet future LTIs?).

Save the future from a similar fate potentially possible.

I rely upon God to protect people that part ways from me, in ideal ways, yet I see people on the street hurting. Fee negate see might not be free, see might hurt wee seems apt. But there is still hope, easy to forget the future is a contested system, victory is possible, not always set in stone what victory is.

Free Starter Image, birds are free (God owns copyrights one would think, though I am not a lawyer, educational rules might apply), the engineering pieces might or might not be in public domain at this point, not sure if there are any rules about showing infrastructure in pictures.

A-ing Gods will for relationships, at least in many of my adult years seems less than ideal. People could be in the exact same circumstances and if God willed it likely vastly different results. Further I am one person out of 8 billion plus people, 1 story that is very dependent upon locality, World Events, and proximity to government (all in a way that I have reduced perception, comprehension, and visibility of, making claims and projections based upon determinism, that might be pre-determined at times might be less than ideal steel). There is an affect does not equate to I know how much, less deterministic results factors into likely gains and losses in problem solving capacity. Anyone’s results really free from being biased by systemic changes, problems, and additions? It will work in my favor, it is my job to make it work in my favor, what is it? I don’t know

Disclaimer – I am not a lawyer

Critical thinking, thought around why punishment mitigation happens has potential for useful.

If there is a law that clearly states you cannot do ActionA. Then if you do ActionA, you might be punished. Clarity of laws, clear ground established factors into what people do and what people do not do, what is punished and what is not punished.

Punishment has potential to lead to Pain. Pain might be set to ideal value sometimes (which I don’t think is all good, should, or would), yet pain killers exist for a reason. Punishment generates Pain (sometimes), sometimes the two are synonymous, and Pain is diminished, reduced, and seen as less valuable to turn up for a reason. One reason is turning up pain or punishment on others is likely to turn it up on self, thus wiser to divest in advance. Punishment and Pain are both not all time cost free – wasted time and a society with reduced throughput as the result is less than ideal value established and delivered, injustice that might be worthy of punishment on its own merits.

A society that punishes less, has less than ideal capacity to punish at times is consequential, known might lead to better choices by all parties. It is hard to ideal, does not equate to hard to ideal is free of problems.

Pain receptors are important, people stop touching a hot stove because they feel pain – if they were on heavy pain killers they might not be able to tell before significant damage was done. We reduce pain and punishment in society for good reasons, because people in general are less than ideal sin out, less than ideal profit out, less than ideal oppression out, less than ideal reduced oppression in – less pain and punishment factors into peace, and peace is both desirable and useful. Punishment might lead to perception of human rights abuses, cost to litigate is not always desirable. Punishment not always free of pain for the punisher, free of time costs for the punisher, and time costs are valuable for both parties.

Clarity of laws equates to clear laws are more likely to be punished by authority. Iffy laws might be more likely to be punished by vigilante justice, or by reducing support, profit (things generally considered as a requirement by the Golden Rule – yet Golden Rule not always set to a requirement). Iffy ground is not usually synonymous with a strong brand, and strong brands have potential to stand through the storm at times when others do not – I agree this feels less fair, just how it is I least from my perspective. Gray area that is further from crossing the line might be more defendable through human laws – though human laws, legalism, and accounting set to ideal value by God seems unwise. This is all the perspective from someone that is not a lawyer.

Punishment and Pain are not always free from Power Struggles, Control, and High Ground. There are good reasons to divest in advance. Also potential for sexual implications – just because someone in Authority doesn’t mean punishment or pain that way does not equate to it might not amplify in the mind that way, potential for generation of less-than-ideal relationships.

A society that does not punish often might not be very familiar with the process, might be punishing in not fully appreciated ways (A-ed may let potential for not all theft out, theft is both wrong and punishing, owe is iffed ground which does not always make clarity ideal), and also might punish too much or too little (not very familiar with range) at least that is my opinion from someone that is not in the justice system, and not a lawyer.

I am saying in the previous paragraph, or at least trying to say The Justice system might appear more stable and just than it is, there is good reasons to turn its image up as stable and just, yet in practice might deliver less than ideally and that factors into potential for greater levels of risk, greater levels of risk in people going to parties, drinking at bars, taking drugs, and caught on camera. The system will protect you might be less than ideal protection, less than ideal risk mitigation invested in.

God is in the mix, don’t worry trust in God with less-than-ideal momentum for drinking trains of logic mix less than ideally. Combined with perception of reduced risk might lead to less-than-ideal results. Others might have likely do have better results than self at times. All said my case is unique, different – might be an outlier for both higher levels and lower levels is hard to fully appreciate 2001-2024 World Events a reminder World is less than ideal sin and oppression out, easy to paint choice as ideally deterministic. 1 person out of 8 billion plus people really enough of a statistic to claim grounds on anything? Small population test subject highly biased by both personal locality and world events?

Bikinis at the Beach and Top Shelf Whiskey have the same problem at times, people think they have A’ed may while potentially turning up things we both like and don’t like. We might not apply to you, it has taken years for me and still can’t claim I know everything I get wrong, yet generally I set decisions to right. 2+2 = 4 it is right, but should you teach that, would you teach that, will you make sure others have accessibility to lessons? Numbers are addictive, Vegas and Reno – even writing this to explain a perspective I know likely alarm bells and sirens, villain level contrast might be flashing in the mind of the reader, gambling, less deterministic trustworthy behavior.

I wonder if they ever have Math conventions in Vegas. CES counts or doesn’t count? Probably microchips in a lot of slot machines. Progress in Vegas, each pull of Slot Machine factors into Greater Cancer Research Supercomputers. Small contributions to Helps mend wind important to take into consideration. Cancer Research pub craws always all value out, always all value in?

Willing to take punishment is not sufficient ground to punish others.