If a Government Worker, any worker that is Male, has more chance to listen to my message (a red haired male) or a beautiful woman, who would they rather listen to? Claim bias does not factor into support, support that might leave me looking more like a parking cone?
I can’t blame, should not be equated to fair, equal treatment, ideal justice and throughput delivered, delivered by default.
Who’s conversation is valued? Ideally known?
I am not the most oppressed person and I still want my voice heard, requirement to be oppressed the most to be heard is unwise for society to turn up, I also do not want others that are oppressed more than me to have less of a voice, less accessibility and many might being in Jail and Prisons all over the World likely do
Stage time factors into Readers, Brain Power, capitalization on Neurons, capitalization on Computer Cycles that shape the future
The combination is likely to lead to capacity of self, that is less than ideal comprehension to fee A (100%) in ideal ways? I don’t want to be a parking cone and I don’t want others to be a parking cone.
I less than ideally comprehend. I less than ideally invest time and effort in searching for, finding, and comprehending what is truth vs what is not truth. I am less than ideal relevance limiting out – I choose direction of conversation in ways that benefit me at times vs all parties on Earth.
I would prefer people’s words to line up with what they say is right and wrong. Yet comprehension of what Right and Wrong is, is changed based upon new knowledge, changes in information that happen on a daily, hourly basis.
If someone says something is right or wrong, that is not guaranteed to have forward throughput. Judging people as Hypocrites for changing their mind is unwise. Judging people as Hypocrites does not require Judger to factor in all relevant data and changes, all historic precedent that was wrongly set in the past.
I invest in less-than-ideal capacity to fix problems in the Truth as a known. I know Villain Level Contrast (VLC) is turned up in less-than-ideal ways by default, and the word Hypocrite throws fuel on that fire.
It is important to invest in more ideal Truth, Truth amplifying better in a way for all parties. Are people including self always willing to invest in that more ideally, will they know what actually needs to be changed in a World where so much truth is limited relevance limiting is included by default?
Call someone a Hypocrite unlikely to make the other person change (might in rare cases). Giving them grace and fostering more dialog is a better course of action. That said calling out inconsistencies factors into greater understanding for all, less mislead based on thought comprehension has been established ideally, equally between all parties.
Set Grade of A (100%) to can’t change direction, couldn’t have gotten something wrong to any human? I have confidence. I have confidence Electrical Safety training amplifies less than ideally by default, tests amplify less than ideally by default. I have confidence that looking at a metal object I can’t tell if it is magnetic from sight alone, I have confidence that looking at a metal object I can’t tell if it is high voltage by sight alone.
I am not the one on the following video. My life is less than ideal oppression reduced, less than ideal cybersecurity problems out, less than ideal visibility in, known. That said I still want society protected, not invest?
I do not own the following video, I provide allot of free content, yet this is not my content to give away. I have been robbed of cybersecurity, had search made more difficult at least from my impression – I said stuff on this vlog was free, and while that pertains to some content it does not pertain to all content, including the following
If I use the Word Hypocrite fee me for less than ideal comprehend, yes. Using the word Hypocrite has potential to flag for Judges, Assesses in way that profits own course of action, desires Truth, desires Truth established more ideally – letting position be known might open up self to attacks from others.
Hypocrite might be used as a word in a society that is perceived as corrupt. Yet corruption limits training, limits truth, and limits perception and comprehension of knowledge. Fair to call out others limited use of truth without acknowledging own truth is limited by same corruption, training instilled less than ideally by default?
Christ could establish truth more ideally? Christ should establish truth more ideally? Christ would establish truth more ideally? Church has enough throughput to establish truth more ideally? Prayer matters, Prayer that asks God for grace and better knowledge of Truth, wiser amplification of Truth for all parties matters – amplifier of Truth that knows the Golden Rule with ideal oversight. I might be an A (95%) even with my heart in the right place, claim to be close to Christ(1000%^infinity). Has capacity to deliver ideal truth to me and others but chooses not to yet still important to have Faith. Church required to sufficiently wind truth to all parties – it is better that they not know fully pondered as a reasonable choice from people that might desire profit?
A (100%) see inned feed less? A (100%) see inned feed more? I can do whatever the fuck I want until others stop sinning 100% might be a thought, does not equate to it is a wise one.
If the United Nations Arab Group called for Release of Hostages Immediately before their statements they would have more power. Reinforcement of Israeli and Jewish concerns don’t have to be heard is unacceptable. Leveraged into leaving Antisemitism in place is unlikely to lead to sufficient lasting Peace. Factors into less potential for problems with Iran in my opinion.
Imagine at a date far in the future a group of gunmen, originally on enemies side track down a man involved with a past war.
The gunmen take the apartment of the man and before they have the chance to shoot gun shots from inside the walls ring out, instantly killing the gun men.
Reciprocity for long past wars has potential to be turned up, turning down reciprocity in advance, increasing realization that people are known as protected, might be used for a trap might not always be known.
Saving Lives in advance, Peace reinforced not always zero cost
Cybersecurity problems have potential to lead to Air Gaped Computers. Air Gaped Computers is Not Ideal Know.
Network connections do not always profit creators sufficiently – access has been capitalized on in less than ideal ways. There is more reasons than are desirable at least from where I am sitting in the World to air gap computers, air gaped computers could lead less capacity to monitor.
I and most others might be likely to work on something that benefits all humanity while offline. Guarantee that for all? Divestment from Cybersecurity Oppression in advance is valuable in a comprehension raising way, and sadly a profit some corporations over other ways at times.
Game changing technology that is hidden might be released at a future point in time, know is a privilege that has potential to be turned down.
Feedback and communication factors into involvement in making technology which has shown historic precedent for benefiting less than all people equally better. Turning down trust is consequential.
Thinking about combined concepts is useful, enjoyable to entertain ideas
Active Listening Throughput
2x speed is unlikely to lead to ideal comprehension, 1x speed on videos might lead to belief comprehension is ideal
Peace Possible depends on voices heard, hostages released
All the countries that exist in the World likely have done something right. If Supercomputers had to generate a sentence for each country, what would that be?
Combined gains of humanity in an easily comprehendible format? Name the countries, or leave wisdom as anonymous?
What is seen as addictive matters. What someone is addicted to is not always the fault of the addict, yet addict as a label factors into perceived as a villain.
Something nice has potential to be addictive.
Safe streets are nice, potential for addictive. People that like safe streets set to addicts?
Writing is nice, improves communication, never seen as addictive? You got a problem not always versed?
Who sets bars factors into Villain Level Contrast and lack thereof.