My Tech Blog

I provide allot of free content on this blog, these videos are not mine thus can’t give away its content for free. I provide them to raise awareness and potentially help expedite the release of hostages.

Imagine people are making an Ark to the future. The choices they make factor into how the Ark is built and who will have a ticket. Head starts matter into what people will have, the training they will have when they are on the Ark.

Jail delays conversation, communication building, resource building, and head starts for the future, including relationships. Jail seen as the anti-cupid, the way Power might reinforce Power by limiting future generations from head starts, obtaining solid footing?

Owe in see society amplifies LTIs (less-than-ideals), owe in see negate proximity is one of those LTIs that gets turned up for both good and LTI reasons. Current system design, how variables have been set, get, books that are on the shelf, not on the shelf gets set to sufficient yet in truth, in a world that is LTI sin out, not call it LTI? Owe no change tamed.

Society our society seems to turn down the following Bible quote, at least in my opinion

1 Corinthians 6:9-11 NKJV – Do you not know that the unrighteous – Bible Gateway

Called not to judge, yet in the letter that is pretty clear Judgment (or potentially assessment). To say we in society that invest in tax dollars or don’t invest in tax dollars don’t turn up any of those seems wrong. Nobody to inheritors of Kingdom of God feels LTI. LTI sin out, LTI sin amplified equates to no forward, all guilty, free from the law, not really?

Don’t judgers set to ideally assess the fin? Be Perfect and James 4:17, Knowing and not doing as a constant, non-dynamic system? Sin, ask for forgiveness, Perfect, then filled with 8 billion plus people that don’t ideally divest from LTIs, set to perfection, maintains perfection, re-amps perfection? No temptation in the combination, woe to the tempters? Golden Rule and James 4:17, claim perfection really ideal support for 8 billion plus other people? If I was a sinner would the world all 8 billion plus people be turned to not sinners as Golden Rule to set an ideal example for me?

Quote kind of gives feeling of owe in A, claim A, no real A at least in regards to our society. Clarity convoluted does not feel like all Golden Rule to me. Love doesn’t demand its own way, but if you do any of those, reinforce any of those, fuck off?
Without sin cast the first stone, forgiven amplified to think they get to judge, throw stones? Creative word play, English as a dynamic changing system not fully entertained? Pee a u will? Paul? See H you are C H? Church? Noah? No A H?

Imagine if that quote was read right before the Salem Witch Trials. Wash hands and then see if they float feels LTI. LTI sin out gets to judge based upon LTI comprehension, it’s not an all-ideal combination.

Imagine there are two people PartyA and PartyB. There are killings in the town and PartyB is put in Jail and the killings stop. Yet PartyA is actually the killer. Raying A factors into perception, perception of safety, and might be amplified less than ideally. The Devil might capitalize on win wins innocent in Jail, and danger still free hard to fully appreciate. See A thins fee A. Rayed may. Rayed may A’ed. A value reduces requirements for time and resources – profit cheddared. Golden Rule question someone’s A value in?

Imagine there is a number, number of dollars that could be put into saving a life. Realize this would likely be different for every country on Earth. Realize this number does not take into account the uniqueness of each individual person.

One of the problems with a number, cost on a life is it could inspire the idea that is trade-able, upgrade-able. I give $100 to CountryA will save X lives or I give $100 to CountryB will save Y lives.

Most people would likely pay enough to save one life, yet that number could be kept being amplified. If you give 10% you save X lives, if you give 50% you save Y lives. Equated to people could be made to give 90%, 100%. That number added could be set to a public registry, to public knowledge and people that gave less than 100% could be set to NBD to Devalue, Demat, no big deal to reduce value devalue their materials.

Some lives cost more than others to save, setting lives that are more expensive as less desirable to save is unwise.

I question whether to share the knowledge in this document. I have been oppressed and leveraged – I don’t like that that factors into my decision making around the document, has potential to bias my views. I am also sunburned which puts one in less of an ideal mood. That said being oppressed I don’t know how much publishing or not publishing factors into things – might equate to I publish regardless. De-mat is contested ground, less winning is not always ideal profit ideal protection. Hard to project ideally how this document might factor into value for others. Some might prefer it de-let, majorities might prefer de-let, allow de-let?

I know pain establishes value less than ideally, that said this document is a reminder that giving could save others lives, giving data to wrong hands could take them. This document also is a reminder that numbers around support and aid are valuable and less than ideally amplified, invested in. This document is also a reminder that ideal transparency could be set for all people on Earth might be a less than ideal system. Knowing transparency ideally invested in is problematic has implications. People with numbers might think they can judge, assess properly – temptation is not ideal value established and delivered. You gave to save lives A and not B, you gave to save lives B and not A? Not an ideal argument to allow. Ledger of doom meets you didn’t even think about country C?

This document available equates to the World has potential to make progress on it – and with people on the streets, saying progress doesn’t need to be made seems unwise.

---

Deathtolls on products. Imagine one makes a product and 1 out of 10,000 people are also associated with a suicide, a murder, some other heinous crime. Should the product be required to be removed from the market if it helps 9,999 people? Should the product be required to be removed if causation can’t be ideally determined? Combinations matter, not always ideally turned up. We know products, products in combinations LTI (less than ideal) and then we set a number that is sufficient. 1 out of 100,000 or 1 out of 1000, 1 out of 100? Numbers, what are the right level for numbers get set might be equated they get set sufficiently, ideally, with no bias.

We turn on light switches knowing there are children and adults electrocuted every year while not granting sufficient protection and accessibility to lessons on safety to those on the streets. Friend we all owe set to woe? Need a computer for that don’t have a computer for that set to sufficient safety notification? Own get to fin min-ed? Will say A’ed mins gets to set fins?

Is hearing about LTIs (less-than-ideal) really ideal Encouragement in? Encouragement matters is hard to fully appreciate, less Encouragement, Joy, and More Truth is not always greater Throughput – skepticism has potential to predetermine truth in less-than-ideal ways.

Golden Rule I don’t want to think about how I am a partial investor in electrocuting people every time I turn on the lights. I am anti-death penalty, factors into Golden Rule, I don’t want the Electric Chair used against myself, or loved ones, or anyone for that matter. Thus the words Never Say Die might be of greater value here. Weigh gets set to light, right, lift gets set to no gift.

World Governments likely are very familiar with sets of phrases. Particular sets of knowledge that might amplify less ideally for others in the world. They likely do not always provide that knowledge to others, withhold that knowledge and it is both useful for maintaining power, profit and potentially protecting people. World Governments own gems, gems that both profit people, reinforce less than ideal profit for all parties, and protect people via preventing others from having access to know. Speaking about a metaphorical gem as a document.

It protects people gets set to a win win. People don’t want people hurt, and maintains, reinforces current power, world order just kind of in by design. System as it stands mins my, mine as a thought – change is desirable, necessary, could always be set to desirable, necessary to over appreciation or under appreciation.

World Governments might have a report on who they do right by and who they don’t deliver ideally for – always published, with ideal clarity, ideal throughput? Statistics about what ethnicities die in prison and which ones do not, set to ideal know, ideal show? Rayed know does not ideal know, perception, and comprehension, ideal reduced relevance limiting. Wade a system based upon profit and wins ideals mins, ideals know?

Think a government if it found this document would publish out of Civic Duty? Which Government, at what time in History? Own presents mins in ideal ways? This isn’t Camelot (hyperbole about a perfect idealized city that delivers ideal justice and representation)? Own LTI value out equals LTI value in? LTI – less than ideal

We know the same. We should be payed the same. We should have the same health problems (speaking in hyperbole here, please don’t install health problems on others). Who gets the supermodel? Me. I called first and as we are all equal, I win. See it grays.

Might be a better way to say this that doesn’t polarize the reader, yet will it be as interesting?

We say we want equality, empathy yet that in fullness would be awful – I don’t want to have the health problems of 8 billion plus people even if I do get a Yacht (both sides of the coin installed all at once). I get all the PhDs and all the all-study hours required to get them?

This could all be an excuse to limit equality, fair treatment, better treatment, and better support. Humanization is important, has shown historic precedent for not being fully invested in.

The combination weighs less than ideally on the imagination of the writer.

Anyone that I included in the words we that did not wish to be included in the words we I apologize for, anyone that had nothing to do with the wrongs against me I apologize for grouping.

Something I thought of that is worthy of note, Societies have potential for Feeing at A-level against World Leaders and Military Families – can’t treat better than others might be champed is not a fully appreciated system. World Leaders in Solitary shouldn’t be allowed, equality not always an ideal system. Bias and hardships that factor into winners might not always be factored in?

People are turned up to appreciate reduced oppression, that authority is not all oppression out, and then they have the potential to be min-ed by authority of opposing parties, being min-ed they might fight back, and might be min-ed further, put in solitary, and solitary combined with fighting back might be less than ideal brain damage out. Solitary gets set to a win, a requirement to min, not sure I fully agree with that. B let gets set to met, then gets set to let. Be let or Ban let, doesn’t matter?

I provide allot of free content on this blog, these videos are not mine thus can’t give away its content for free. I provide them to raise awareness and potentially help expedite the release of hostages.

I have a Masters in Computer Engineering and had many jobs in IT and Software and I don’t think I have gotten a class on High Voltage Electricity during the time. Knowledge gets set to known, and technology, including High Voltage technology seems to be on the rise (solar, and portable inverters). Was going to put an Electrical Safety video here but search on YouTube doesn’t appear to be returning.

I wish the World was full of peace, capacity to prosper for all. Hasn’t really been that way during my lifetime. Others know things that factor into my protection that I do not. Problem is I am also required to know what I need to know to profit and protect family, friends, and self. I also know there is less than ideals that are in by design that are amplified.

I am not trying to die early, but if I were lost my future as a guarantee given some other outcome might likely not be true value added. World Events make future less than ideally known.

This World has not been all wins, negate mins, negate fins. People that protect me also like to profit – equates to wins might be minimized via less than ideals and I am unlikely to always know what factors in and when it factors in. I don’t want the people that protect me not to profit, I also don’t want to be limited from profiting.

No up pup-d (like a puppy)

Imagine there are two people both handcuffed to different sides of the room and a key is left in the middle of the room further than either have potential to reach.

Negate May does not establish ideal value.

The words may and may not have a lot of range that might change value.

I don’t want to sound patronizing, thus example choice matters.

I may go to the store, I may not go 200 mph on the Highway.

World leaders may not go to war, may make peace – it is sounds good, but will they listen to me? Trying to say may not drop bombs on little girls (like Vietnam poster), may find ways for international trade that equates to people with cancer are saved.

God could tell people that are against me (and I don’t know who that would be) where there is gold located at the bottom of the ocean. God may factors into reduced losses for self and enemy protected greater, isn’t that part of Christianity? My enemies insufficiently invested in might be part of the problem and God has the gold reserves as a known? Extract resources turn up heat, not something worthy of pondering as a potential problem? God of pay half, increase pressure, pay fourth, increase pressure not really God of an overfilling cup.

Money and Gold does not establish value ideally is part of the problem. Price gets set to end of cost, buy software does not equate to bug free software, software who’s full implications are known, have capacity to be known. We rely upon throughput in the system does not always equate to we challenge values set and get in the system. YouTube is nice, but do we go to their facilities, get a PhD in Computer Science and examine every line of code? Reliance is a less than ideal system. Excuse me if this sounds rude, I am potentially speaking to the audience like I would to another Computer Scientist. I have been both a whistleblower and outed from the industry on far less than ideal comprehension and communications – so someone that is trying to add value, is disallowed, thrown in jail, expect ideal value established and delivered in Silicon Valley? Negate (thought about using Fee or Claim here) we rely is ideal know, ideal oh. Claim would have inspired more thought, fee it, charge it does not always establish ideal value, negate seems apt.

Figured I would attach some encouragement to this post

Free Starter Image (outside of sanctions countries)

People need to understand the problems that they face not fully graced? Negate may factors into grace, may factors into grace. Ideally graced would be ideal, claims of ideal would not be ideally graced. Things like grace and forgiveness are powerful systems, worthy of turning up in advance, will can be iffed through resource reduction is a problem worthy of turning down. Will set potentially not always get when people are tired, worn down. Artists required to tell both sides of the story is not always nice, spiced light – giving each other grace and forgiveness is possible, iffy close to the line art is not test free potentially not always ideally divested from. Imagine you are a professional sports player, and you just lose a game and then someone shows up and says I want you to meet my new supermodel girlfriend. Know set to may not always ideal ray.

Fee-d thin not always free from future mins. See loss see wins claim it ideals fins? Appearance of a Yacht does not equate to having a Yacht, weigh no camera in? We see sets to A’s mins is less than ideal comprehend.

A couple days ago I think, before the eclipse there was a blind man walking on the bike path, potentially had blood around his eyes walking with a kerosene tank. I think I asked him how he was doing or if he needed some water (can’t really remember right now), he turned to me for a moment without speaking then turned and kept walking forward. Figured I would walk close to him because if he was a threat figured the tank might have blew up when he was near me.

I see a lot of odd things, I am tested a lot, I am also dependent upon video laws that make it harder to film in the city. The combination has potential to lead to strange things not always documented.

I kept walking forward, didn’t think much of it (been tested far more than once in my life). Easy to gauge what is going on and happening is not really true value added, combined with I invest in peace talks and world news it is hard for me to know what matters and what doesn’t. Eyes on world stage does not always equate to sufficient comprehension of what is happening in the city I live.

A lot of homeless in the city, might just have been someone with a kerosene heater. African American man silenced with blood around his eyes and a tank, especially in the south is scary, hard to fully appreciate.

Over the summer I was repeatedly tested with reduced resources including food, then had tests like trying to make sure people knew potential high voltage dangers – the combination is heavy. Testing is useful common and has potential to increase liability, should have seen didn’t see type of stuff is heavy – like you spend hours examining a painting, then another image is added right when you get on stage. Can be used to remove people from CEO positions, positions of Authority.

Feels like people if the brain, if my health and memory through iffing my resources then try to rob me based upon responsibility and accountability that I am trying to invest adequately in. They might think they are inspired to do so based upon data they think is sound, but is not.