We see we are A (A level knowledge, like a school grade, 100%). Training equates to feeling of dignity, respect, and privilege – one that is trained is given feeling of deserves respect, capacity to state right regardless of problems within that training.
Not all voices have to be respected – this is consequential, leads to dehumanization, gives grounds for slavery and oppression, gives ground for competitive systems like the Colosseum (fight to the death and violence, butchery establishes who is right and wrong, survival of the fittest pinned, all while failing to highlight those in power not always doing the fighting)
Belief equality is possible and will deliver in ideal ways – if everyone has same amount of money, that does not equate to everyone is happy, everyone is free of health problems, that there are no power dynamics in society. Belief without delivery might lead to unfair assumptions, and all not treated as an individual is not ideal fair, ideal equality delivered.
Belief good, a better society is something that ideally maintains itself, doesn’t require better work.
Belief that change, a system that is dynamic, known to be dynamic due to new innovation and changing ideas, landscapes due to wars and natural disasters, health problems like pandemics will change in ideal ways, ways that reinforce the good within the system. Man learns to fly, bombs soon follow.
Throughput based upon Oppression is useful, adequate, desirable, achieves sufficient results. Doesn’t have to be called slavery to reinforce non ideals in the system. Non ideals in the system reinforce highlight weakness, highlighting weakness is not always sufficient challenges reduced (for good reason many times). Aqueducts built by Roman Slaves equal more water for Citizens, Pyramids of Egypt reinforce perception of power and delivery – throughput based upon oppression is allowed to stand as the norm is consequential, if it reinforced in ideal ways we likely wouldn’t have had WW1 or WW2 this many years after Christ.
Income inequality – less capacity to deliver in society, less capacity to maintain own way of life drives wars at times. There have been many examples in history where current lifestyle is made and encouraged via less-than-ideal oppression out in history. People that have perception of have it good might equate to past results are a given – who really wants to reduce the power and mobility they have in society even if that loss produces better results for others. A boss walks in and says I am paying you all 25% going forward and giving the other 75% to the poor in society, those that deserve it more will be loved or hated? Imagine you have a hard time paying bills at 100% and are now given 25%. Everyone to 25% of plate to cure World Hunger could be claimed, might never get to The World, people are less than ideal corruption out at times, visibility and capacity to verify distribution is obfuscated far less than ideal, bosses (even if boss is self) are replaceable.