Encoding Amplifies Less Than Ideally, or should I say Lend Thankful Infusion?
How value is perceived is LTI at times, factors into greater value and profit for some over others at times.
If I play the Chords C then A then B -> I am not telling someone to go get a cab, go away, yet society turns up backhanded, sideways encoding at times, and that in combination is LTI value established for all.
Letters were Added to notes to help Musicians Learn to play, increase memory, imagine if we had to memorize all the frequencies instead of notes. Letters were not added to musical notes because it ideals the English, or other languages based upon the same letters.
D A B? Do not let B?
F A C? Do not let C? (do not let see does not equate to blind, using this as a representation to prevent access to see a document, or something else type of thing)
F A AB? Friend AB Testing?
A D D? Subliminal math lessons?
Useful to ponder, there is a lot of different words for A-G unlikely to provide ideal comprehension, and people might use to flag things for good and bad, chords A D D might flag the stage to turn up the solo?
Encoding gets set to Free, mnemonics that help memory get set to Free
Please do not place encoded representations on my note and chord choice unless it helps stop oppression, increase peace, invests in more ideal Golden Rule Throughput for all – there are cases to apply less than ideal representation, limiting truth changing meaning is consequential in not always ideal ways
Same things could be added to colors
Red – A
Blue – B
Green – C
Yellow – D
Yellow Red Blue? De a ban, de a hurt? Stop a ban, stop a hurt
How about
A – Love B – Peace C – Forgiveness D – Defend E – Educate F – Friend G – Grace
Notes of music encoded to greater love, peace, forgiveness, and grace beats encoded to all musicians as villains, speaking sideways?
Apply notes to a 6 sided dice and roll to get a chord set?
A – 1 B – 2 C – 3 D – 4 E – 5 G – 6
2 5 1 3 2 is the roll
B E A C B
Be a see Peace?
Free Dice roll (image free outside of product designs, table, dice, blacklight etc.)
Free Starter Image
Representation is easily modifiable that represents value better for some more than others? What if I wanted to turn up doctors
A – CNS Central Nervous System B – Cardio C – Cancer Research D – Dental Care matters E – Ethics, RESEARCH ETHICS F – Fast Treatment G – Gastrointestinal
Be a see Research Ethics
Cardio Research Ethics CNS Cancer Research Research Ethics
Potential for a song,
Might heart nearly stopped when I saw what they were doing neurons firing all over my brain
My name is Jason, thus Friday the 13th, the horror movie that uses the name Jason has greater resonance with me for potential problems. Villain Level Contrast that affects self is likely to be viewed as greater significance than others.
My name is not Jack, thus Jack the Ripper, the horror story that uses the name Jack has less resonance with me for potential problems. Reduced time in critical thinking, thought, and surface area that equates to greater capacity to defend self, than others at times.
The combination is consequential, is likely to be somewhat common in the world. A lawyer that is required to defend their own case, or their own assets, or a lawyer that is required to defend others, others’ assets. Having a stake in the results matters, gets turned up less than ideally.
This should equate to an offset, offset for bias, and less than ideal value established that should factor into Protection, Peace, Grace, and Forgiveness.
Jack the Ripper a cool murder mystery and Jason, Friday the 13th something that might get me killed and reduce my potential for playing professional Hockey? Brilliant inconsistency always entertained? I don’t want people named Jack hurt, that said I and others likely invest greater in solving problems with contrast that affects self over others.
I provide the following as partial protection for self and reminder that CEOs and World Leaders sometimes get Shark Fins attached for the wrong reasons
Free Starter Image
You really want to elect a guy named Ivan? zero bias caused by names? Biases from History reinforced allowed to stand not always pretty.
Reinforcing how the Golden Rule amplifies LTI (less than ideally) factors into the Golden Rule (treating others how they wish to be treated) in my opinion. Capacity to claim value subtracted, or no capacity? may-ed?
Society does not in fins at A level, does not reduce fins at A level, does not change fins at A level
Man makes vampire art or posters about not hurting guys named Ivan?
Less women set to vampires, chained up in dark cells
Freedom is valuable, controlling and oppression not all value added
Combos in art likely might be harder for some people than others, I am ginger (had orange hair growing up), yet I don’t have a ginger mother, likely could be less than ideal value added for people with ginger mothers
Gingers need sunscreen not VLC (villain level contrast)? Less skin cancer, less oppression, and Golden Rule amps LTI > everybody wins?
The following videos are not mine (I don’t own copyrights) I provide for reference
There was another video by a channel called psychotrip that had a video about vampires I figured would be useful as well, current can’t find it. Worthy of note videos that show Villain Level Contrast, might not be free of A B Testing, readily available to all parties they affect. Like my ginger drawings might be less than ideal LTI value established and delivered for women with orange hair in jail. Reinforced stereotypes with uphill battles? Would know in a world full of 8 billion plus people? (found the video, but removed due to current hostage situation – the old movie Speed could be put on sale on movie stores but given current situation, world events would not be in good taste, factors into comprehension limiting is likely not always entertained as good reason to give grace and forgiveness for the unknown, being under a certain level of oppression on top equates to this document should not be considered as ideal value out or ideal value in)
Current thought – A very valuable defense (from someone who is not a lawyer) could be that hypotheticals are not always shared. I go through a hypothetical I might see the power in it, the danger in it, the problems with sharing, the problems with not sharing does not always lead to sharing, requirement to amplify ideal comprehension for others. Golden Rule set to ideal value delivered when we limit comprehension of others based upon side effects, people that might misuse the data against self or others? Example I could do ActionA, but if I do ActionA people might think I am the Villain, if I defend DefendantA they might think I am involved when I am not, if I defend ReasoningA they might think I am involved with ReasoningA – variables that could be associated with a number of things and the idea of limiting surface area, reducing liability. Could amplify a certain way, does not always amplify a certain way, might factor into risk mitigation for some and not all. Some divest from situations for reasons they do not always make known. May set to is free is not always true under oppression, oppression in is not always known. People further away from awful, oppression is valuable in not always fully appreciated ways – reduced proximity is desirable at times, not always easy to ideally turn up, head starts matter.
Corporations potentially go through hypotheticals, hypotheticals that might be highly useful to individuals all over the world, yet desire to profit and NDAs likely prevent disclosure many times. Gets set to we row A see. People that might desire to reduce oppression, reduce obfuscation might have their hands tied at times? Right under reduced comprehension, reduced access to comprehension min-ed?
Leaders and CEOs might be challenged for good reasons at times, does not equate to their challengers always know ideal ways to challenge, the power in the words they speak for good and bad, are challenging from ideal comprehension. Potential to amplify less than ideal might lead to divesting in the first place is a potential reason Leaders and CEOs should give grace, forgiveness, and flexibility in advance. I know personally I have challenged based upon my own comprehension, not the comprehension of others – combination has potential for less than ideals. Leaders of Grace and Forgiveness that raise LTI comprehension to more ideal comprehension inspired? Might help make peace.
Some art looks more sexual than I would like – I appreciate beauty not always going for something sexual in art, potential to be perceived in a certain way has potential to be a bit jading. I make abstract art, getting to capitalize on the way things can be perceived is really not all fair value added. There is also good reason to reinforce, doesn’t look like that, even if looks like that. Class action against Architects for buildings prevented in advance? Dallas Ball and God is not all mushrooms out?
Hard to appreciate that enforcement of access to electronics and websites is less than ideal, less than ideally invested in. Less has potential to be more because protection is costly, far from ideally invested in. Perception of protected, will be private is a system that has the potential to not be maintained over time. Just because I might know to divest might not equate to others might know, have awareness and comprehension raised sufficiently. Should be a reason to factor in grace and forgiveness. Will see min-ed, strong brand are both systems subject to change, and the World is not all wars and oppression out. People will protect and invest in each other’s future value ideally seems unwise, dealing with problems of the day might not equate to ideal capacity to review, delete, and prevent historic data from being misused. Friend we A owe seems unwise.
Trying to add value as an artist might be more complicated than one would like. Look at the current landscape of art in a particular city, vs nation, vs the world? Balance matters gets established less than ideally? Be a dilutant, or count on others being a dilutant to balance out investments? If I invest in cute cat pictures will the world invest more or less – the world with more cute is not all value out, messages that are important, including safety messages equates to more cute might not always be more value added. Capacity to gauge correctly at least from where I am standing is impossible. No cute and encouragement not all good, less reminders of Electrical Safety and High Voltage kills is not all value added either (one of many important safety messages that amplifies less than ideally).
I am anti-death penalty and pro reducing oppression, I provide the following video (it is not free (I don’t own the copyrights) yet I provide for reference)
From my understanding there is some places in the world where people are still hung from cranes – I like Architecture and Engineering and oppression reinforced makes me sick to my stomach
Society generally makes decisions based upon current throughput is of greater importance than potential liability to fix problems for people potentially minimized by investment. We know Art, Music, and Movies has potential to inspire problems yet we might not always have sufficient capacity to invest in de-mins, de-minimization created by those that might be minimized by art. Encouragement and Enjoyment, Freedom outweighs protection and requirements for safety at times. Artists, Musicians, and Movie Makers set to don’t need the public’s help to reduce liabilities based upon content delivered seems unwise. People know Hearts should be protected, Villain Level Contrast is dangerous, yet Halloween and Vampire movies ideally reinforce that?
All value added to the phrase “Good evening” claimed is a defame. “I know what they said, I am kind of waiting for the fangs to pop out myself” – thought, not spoken. Language, linguistics is a neutral system?
We are required on a personal level to minimize bad and maximize good.
Thinking that we A mins, minimization seems unwise.
If I have lights on, I am using Electricity. Could I have used a small LED flashlight to achieve the same result? Wasteful or not wasteful, capitalizing or not capitalizing on less-than-ideal value established and delivered? Convenience, ease of use, and experience factor into Encouragement, Encouragement not worthy of entertaining as vital?
The Bible has a requirement for perfection that I think has the potential to be paralyzing.
The road people drive to Church on, to work on, guaranteed to have zero oppression factored into the creation and installation? If I was going for perfection, I would ideally want my throughput not to be based upon oppression.
Finding out who built the roads, when the roads were built, what they were paid, if they were oppressed or not, likely to amplify ideal comprehension in combination? Perfection really possible?
Time is a resource, consider it used in perfect ways, helping A not helping B, helping B not helping A, and that is not all C delivered on.
Society has tendency towards, we A knows, knowledge, A mins, minimizations and that factors into High Ground, who gets to deliver laws, who gets to follow them, and who is broken by the system, the less-than-ideal value established in the system. Society doesn’t A know, A comprehend, and that factors into Society does not always A mins. Comprehension of law amplifies less than ideally is a profit based system. A case to be made that isn’t always made?
Tolerances too tight can reduce throughput, 4 ft wide door or could we get away with 2 ft wide door? Wider doors might be useful for greater throughput in fires, extra thoughts in decision making do not always ideal decision making.
Helps A and then B equates to perfection I think is not something we want to turn up by default. Be perfect, not perfect equates to sin (James 4:17), equates to man is always in sin, gives high ground for constant punishment? I would let you call out my imperfections, yet maybe should call out yours instead is likely a thought that might be turned up. We set each other to Villains from less-than-ideal High Ground? Time is a system with directional trajectories, punishment is one direction of time, encouragement and support is another.
The past seen as A’s owe, A’s know factors into capacity to punish. A thought, I am not a preacher, I am a Christian, that said I wouldn’t know if there were problems in the Church like Salem Witch trials. Divestment in advance might not always lead to ideal visibility and comprehension, prevention of zealous punishment. People from that time might have decided to divest as well, be in the crowd and realize shit is going south and unable to do anything about it?
As far as I can tell people don’t get punishment perfect, don’t get support and encouragement perfect, and as James 4:17 says
Golden Rule amplification is LTI (less-than-ideal) is consequential. Things do need to be corrected though, say a system of government keeps someone who sentence is supposed to be 1 year in Jail for 5 years? The system doesn’t get punished for oppression not ideal value established. I wouldn’t know if our system is doing that or not, was just an example, though even if the system is not holding people for excessive periods of time (which I think they are at times) there is likely potential for other oppression that if not addressed could be detrimental. Orange jump suits and hourglass of people’s lives thrown against the wall might not equate to sufficient Golden Rule.
World of CFB (cute funny beautiful) set to perfect, not set to perfect?
Free Starter Image
What God allows and does not allow is relevant. Allowed October 7th, 2023 this close after September 11th, 2001. Allowing Ukraine this close after Cold War. Allowed WW2 not far after the US Civil War. We have a tendency to think in the past, that is over, Salem Witch trials problem might be more likely than we a society of computers, and future tech might want to admit. Possibly something worthy of consideration for future engineers, God doesn’t seem to ideal oppression reduction reduced capacity to turn something meant to help people like a car into tanks. I created a gear, I meant it for good.
Engineers create components with teeth that might be less than ideal value for future at times? Should an engineer that creates a gear be set to perfect, or should the person taught don’t judge that judges be set to perfect? While I would not like to assess the perfection or imperfection of self, I would like to assess that gears have potential for value added and subtracted.
Man learns to fly, could have used it to feed the world – yet as history shows us? Imagine if we used all that explosive to excavate land for hydroponic skyscraper farms (not sure who had the idea originally, seems high value added for decreasing world hunger) instead of bombs, landmines? More useful, sustaining value not always entertained on World stage over war? Maybe when I am in Heaven God will let me know why He allows so much oppression in the world – kind of puts a big damper on engineering gains. Maybe all engineers just need degrees in international relations and peacemaking as well as an offset, hedging of the bet so to speak. Gear gets set to 100% of engineering and material cost, maybe 10% for gear, 90% for peacemaking required to let it be useful, less damaging?
As an engineer, artist, and blogger I have injected non-null non-zero amounts of complexity into the world. Less oppression in the world factors into complexity as value added instead of as value subtracted.
I provide allot of free content on this blog, these videos are not mine thus can’t give away its content for free. I provide them to raise awareness and potentially help expedite the release of hostages.
My Tech Blog 