Society (including self) turns it up big time, doesn’t invest in fixing problems it invests in – does not equate to non-consequential. Leave it for future generations not all good. I am male I like women, but do I always turn down bikinis knowing lesbians might be at the beach? Reinforces straight for me.
I like beautiful women equated to lesbian reinforcer feels less than ideal. All women required to be nuns might not be ideal golden rule established and delivered. “but it might equate to less sin” (as a hypothetical, not actually said)
Golden Rule not delivered > potential for increasing lesbians?
“without sin cast the first stone” – Christ + Society including self less than ideals delivery of better, less sin for all?
Be Perfect – The Bible + this diagram?
All in combination really ideally ideal Golden Rule for me or others that are straight?
I don’t think it is fair to blame homosexuals for being homosexuals given what I have seen in society, I don’t ideally turn it down – jump in the middle of lesbians, Golden Rule in combination is difficult
Society does not A grays factors into seen as may. The small things might be more important to fix than the big things. Heavier to solve factors into Golden Rule not delivered at times. Everyone set to reinforce of bisexuality by paying or not paying tax dollars – who controls shower curtains in jails, a protected class? Jail to creates owe instead of A’s owe? The problem with justice, it is delivered less than ideally, less than ideally might be in need of justice. But since delivery from self would likely be less than ideal I might not want to invest. But those prison guards have been naughty, how naughty? extremely naughty – see punishment in a de-may. I don’t want to actually judge, not sure I am the best to assess.
Part of the problem with truth – Golden Rule valued > potential for sin. Those female prison guards better be on their best behavior “no flirting with the oppressors” (both hypotheticals not actually said)
raise comprehension, if the lines, wined (metaphor for enjoyable experience)
Reminder videos like this are not mine, I provide for reference and to raise awareness
I am searching for a video on allegations against UNRA yet my search is being limited, oppression factors into delivery of this document. Document containing the video not the video – wars, hostages, and starvations factor into the video provided thus one might conjecture that oppression factors into delivery in non-ideal ways as well, to what extent I can’t say fully – intelligence agencies are valuable.
I visited a library recently and the gun of Saddam Hussein was on display, it was pointed left – reinforces don’t shoot people.
Notes
Free Image – might need to check data, desire to provide quickly factors into delivery
Documents and hypotheticals have potential to inspire comprehension of complex ideas.
What is created today factors into examples available for use tomorrow and in the future. Examples don’t profit all parties ideally, knowing and acknowledging where they don’t profit all parties ideally factors into and facilitates capacity protect self and others on this day and in the future.
People that create the documents and examples do not have all knowledge of possible complexities and combinations – and are thus not always warned of potential problems. Conversation amplifies less than ideally, comprehension amplifies less than ideally.
How many examples of oppression are required for reducing oppression? Examples factor into capacity to protect self and others and amplify less than ideally. Freedom of speech, freedom in actions don’t always amplify ideally.
Derivative works and legalism amplifies less than ideally.
If a child paints a mountain, a mountain like I have painted should be equated to I want less mountains in the world painted, I want to block a child from painting mountains seems less than ideal. The combination is less than ideal in practice.
Artists want to be inspired. Artists want to be unique. Artists want to profit from their work, including work they inspire.
If I inspire Peace, would I rather say you can’t create a derivative work? Important to keep in mind that I providing free does not equate to all providing free. Law amplifies less than ideally and peace amplifies less than ideally in combination gets minimized.
Free Starter Image
If an old man paints a mountain, like I painted?
If a rival artists paints a mountain, like I painted?
If a fan paints a mountain, like I painted?
Would the artists rather not be inspiring? Claim investment in inspiring isn’t investment in moving neurons, creating derivative works?
Could lead to a quick copy paste, sold for millions while giving the artist, artist that might invest in food for the poor, better world peace to nothing. In combination it less than ideals. I provide free art, the world including the one I am a part of amplifies oppression – better requires acknowledgement there is a problem.
Counter argument money gets distributed to ideal hands, ideals world peace? I disagree with the counter argument. We want others to be successful, ideally invest in others being successful factors into Golden Rule.
I can’t say we ideal the solution. Money factors into who has capacity to protect their art and who does not. I want others to be successful and I don’t want my hands tied. Painted a yellow painting to I can’t use yellow in my paintings could amp and champ. Others Free and enabled factors into myself Free and enabled.
8 billion plus in the World, one day will be 16 billion likely – that is a lot of people to stop from painting mountains, a lot of requirements to invest in ideally unique. Thus, investing and freedom in uniqueness matters, recognition inspiring is not free of derivative works matters, recognizing that in practice it does not ideal, ideal money into right hands factors into reducing oppression, peace, including World Peace.
Complexity factors into uniqueness, requirements to turn up complexity for all, all’s contributions seen as an ideal system seems unwise. There is sin in it, potential for sin in it, we don’t know all the sin in it, gets set to it is sufficient and sufficiently ideal for all. Not all content for all people, and reminder one day one might be stuck under oppression having to see the same piece of art. Not all content for all people does not equate to not all content for all people amplifies ideally or by choice for all. Graffiti on prison walls minimized?
Parents or spouses could buy paintings and being authority might equate to others in a family don’t have rights to take down oppressive works. Artists can’t control oppression in their own lives many times, think they will be able to protect that ideally? Acknowledgement is a form of support, gets set to ideal support. I acknowledge some of my works have potential for oppression – negate I know how much in truth. Knowing more changes delivery is hard to fully appreciate – one doesn’t know something until they know it.
God might not want to destroy works that are less than ideal sin out, that said He might prefer people to be less oppressed in the process. What delivers results not always good or should not always factored into comprehension. Paying tax dollars as a work of art, invests in good and bad? Don’t rip it all up might get equated to process does not need be re-examined and reflected upon at times.
Also important to remember that some works might be ideal truth. A person that looks like this did that kind of thing. Other times works are stories, not a reflection upon real life at all. Potential for convolution not always consider, including in my own works. Tech companies and Hollywood might amplify unrealistic representations of people at times – sometimes people are set to villains, and that is not all good. Required to amplify representation that profits all parties in the world in ideal ways might be claimed but in practice is not delivered.
Imagine we are at peace with Russia. Someone creates an image of someone that looks like me that sounds Russian, or has Russian elements that invest in peace. And then World Events make that representation go south. World Peace factors into protection including that based upon representation already delivered is hard to fully appreciate – Godzilla released one month before 9/11 is a possible system. I like Godzilla, and on September 12, 2001 if that were the case I would think it would be in bad taste. 2024 might be far enough from 2001, but not from October 7th, 2023 hard to fully appreciate. People including artists are not always given ideal direction and has the potential to factor into mins, and as I want to amplify The Golden Rule, prevent people from being minimized I think it is worthy of note.
People that might make comments to protect others, might have knowledge there might be a problem, might not have ideal access to deliver feedback. Support that could be there, should be there limited?
Imagine you are trained one way of doing something 10 years ago. The knowledge sounds good and right, the knowledge also leads to results good results that profit yourself, family, friends, and nation.
Say you are taught electricity saves lives. Thus, you invest in it, you invest in systems that support it. Then you find out electricity is responsible for supporting corrupt power and is non-zero electrocutions out for a subset of society that doesn’t have access to Electrical Safety training videos. The Bible says “knowing and not doing” – James 4:17 is sin.
People that still want to use electricity after this new information are choosing actively not to factor in the new data as sin. It is not that they desire to sin, it is that they believe that the benefits outweigh the problems. The benefits outweigh the problems is not ideal sin out, is not ideal protection for all parties.
People factor in new data less than ideally is consequential. Imagine you find a drug that produces results including results that reinforce profit for some parties over others. Then 10 years later you find out that the Research Study was done with participants that were under oppression. Does society factor in the new data sufficiently? Benefits outweigh the risks for who?
History doesn’t like change, doesn’t like to factor in new information is consequential. History and belief of how things have played out, information that is valid vs invalid factors into support, and changes differences are factored in less than ideally. People set to ideally desire to seek out truth, truth that might be consequential in judging sin vs not sin is not true value added. Factoring in new data and changes gets set to easy and light, won’t require heavy time costs.
Profit, less profitable, increased time costs equates to changes are factored in less than ideally less than sufficiently at times. Comprehension gets set to A, may-ed.
All parties including world leaders that profited from history set a certain way will factor in new information ideally, will raise concerns and awareness ideally? Historic precedent for yes or no?
Computers and cell phones have been less than ideal oppression out over time, yet before you use them people aren’t required to acknowledge how that has helped and hurt society over time. Complexity is greater than causation, profits some parties over others gets set to don’t have factor that in, minimized. I can’t see all the problems doesn’t mean they don’t exist and just because I can’t see all the problems does not equate to I don’t want profit, need support.
God will tell me where and when there are problems? Even if the Church profits from systems and tech that is less than ideal oppression out? People get to choose what they add a shark fin to, when they add a shark fin to it and the combinations amplifies less than ideally in practice.
Solitary confinement gets set to achieve results. Likely to factor in data and studies about brain damage sufficiently? Tax dollars reinforce that system. There are a lot that likely don’t know how it weighs on people, and even those that do might have had their brain damaged past the point of capacity to voice effectively.
Visibility amplifies less than ideally in good times. Society drugs instead of hears its’ problems at times factors into profit for some parties over others.
If past generations factored in better data more sufficiently I might not have some of the problems I have today, if we factor in better data more sufficiently today we might protect future generations from the same problems. If I am reading this in 2064 likely regardless if we tried to factor in data better there will still be problems to address in 2064 – if my health was better I might could say I tried to ideal, saying tried to ideal likely wouldn’t be full appreciation for reality is more than the sum of my own or others trying to help contributions, full appreciation for my knowledge, comprehension, and training is less than ideal. “you really need 10 PhDs to talk about that effectively” – humor to highlight even ideal as perceived might not be ideal.
People don’t want oppression to factor into them having children. Forced to be with someone that you are not attracted to is oppressive. People that know they are not attracted to one another, feel oppressed might be more likely to jump ship, not protect children due to convenience – harder and more stress does not ideal environments for children, and this world is far from ideal stability economically, socially, and less war has shown to not amplify sufficiently during my lifetime.
Thus children, and even relationships, from a reduced financial standpoint potentially under the leverage of oppression feels unwise to invest in. Belief and Faith in future factors into and facilitates planning and investments. The Bible says give and your cup will be overflowing – hasn’t been what I have seen in practice. There is truth to if you educate yourself, give time reading it helps educate factor into value you have later yet in our world even being well educated does not deliver ideal stability and reduced oppression.
Significant oppression factors into less births. Oppression from past limits births and relationships for many parties all over the world. I believe in God, I also believe God could invest in families better. 50% divorce rate and struggling to make ends meet is insufficient. Even discussion around the topic creates pressure, stress and that disincentives the whole process.
Less relationships, inclusivity and babies equates to less power – and that power gap is not usually seen until 20 years down the road. The combination is consequential – higher and protect the person that has children or the single person blocked from relationships and having children through harder economic, social, and oppression. Less than ideal throughput reinforces less than ideal throughput, hope, encouragement and reduced oppression.
Give a child to a world that does not do right by you? Golden Rule
Man required to be ideal sin out before Golden Rule to them matters? Investments in electricity, turning on lights equates to less than ideal electrocutions each year. Sin equates to don’t have to factor in is a consequential system of less-than-ideal distribution. Golden Rule requires loving people that are less than ideal sin out including people that don’t deliver on the Golden Rule.
My Tech Blog 