Imagine you are trained one way of doing something 10 years ago. The knowledge sounds good and right, the knowledge also leads to results good results that profit yourself, family, friends, and nation.
Say you are taught electricity saves lives. Thus, you invest in it, you invest in systems that support it. Then you find out electricity is responsible for supporting corrupt power and is non-zero electrocutions out for a subset of society that doesn’t have access to Electrical Safety training videos. The Bible says “knowing and not doing” – James 4:17 is sin.
People that still want to use electricity after this new information are choosing actively not to factor in the new data as sin. It is not that they desire to sin, it is that they believe that the benefits outweigh the problems. The benefits outweigh the problems is not ideal sin out, is not ideal protection for all parties.
People factor in new data less than ideally is consequential. Imagine you find a drug that produces results including results that reinforce profit for some parties over others. Then 10 years later you find out that the Research Study was done with participants that were under oppression. Does society factor in the new data sufficiently? Benefits outweigh the risks for who?
History doesn’t like change, doesn’t like to factor in new information is consequential. History and belief of how things have played out, information that is valid vs invalid factors into support, and changes differences are factored in less than ideally. People set to ideally desire to seek out truth, truth that might be consequential in judging sin vs not sin is not true value added. Factoring in new data and changes gets set to easy and light, won’t require heavy time costs.
Profit, less profitable, increased time costs equates to changes are factored in less than ideally less than sufficiently at times. Comprehension gets set to A, may-ed.
All parties including world leaders that profited from history set a certain way will factor in new information ideally, will raise concerns and awareness ideally? Historic precedent for yes or no?
Computers and cell phones have been less than ideal oppression out over time, yet before you use them people aren’t required to acknowledge how that has helped and hurt society over time. Complexity is greater than causation, profits some parties over others gets set to don’t have factor that in, minimized. I can’t see all the problems doesn’t mean they don’t exist and just because I can’t see all the problems does not equate to I don’t want profit, need support.
God will tell me where and when there are problems? Even if the Church profits from systems and tech that is less than ideal oppression out? People get to choose what they add a shark fin to, when they add a shark fin to it and the combinations amplifies less than ideally in practice.
Solitary confinement gets set to achieve results. Likely to factor in data and studies about brain damage sufficiently? Tax dollars reinforce that system. There are a lot that likely don’t know how it weighs on people, and even those that do might have had their brain damaged past the point of capacity to voice effectively.
Visibility amplifies less than ideally in good times. Society drugs instead of hears its’ problems at times factors into profit for some parties over others.
If past generations factored in better data more sufficiently I might not have some of the problems I have today, if we factor in better data more sufficiently today we might protect future generations from the same problems. If I am reading this in 2064 likely regardless if we tried to factor in data better there will still be problems to address in 2064 – if my health was better I might could say I tried to ideal, saying tried to ideal likely wouldn’t be full appreciation for reality is more than the sum of my own or others trying to help contributions, full appreciation for my knowledge, comprehension, and training is less than ideal. “you really need 10 PhDs to talk about that effectively” – humor to highlight even ideal as perceived might not be ideal.
My Tech Blog 