May 24th, 2026
Today is a Sunday, a Sabbath (at least to some people).
A Fee signal in is A Fee signal out? A Fee like a ball sitting at the top of a pyramid that can fall left A or fall right B. If you choose B, it is A, if you choose A, it is B – A Fee as in provoke a non ideal judgment, non ideal you get it wrong, whichever way you choose.
So if someone presents you with a loaded question, a false dichotomy – that forces you between a choice of A and B, when you really didn’t want to choose in the first place, you have an opportunity. You can re-amplify the same signal you get, A Fee in, A Fee is the input, the loaded question is the input, so do you return the same A Fee signal out, A Fee signal as output in response, in reaction to the initial A Fee?
If you choose not to amplify an equal and opposite response – people might think they can get away with repeatedly A Feeing you. It is like letting someone punch you, if they punch you, not punch back? Punching back might be robotic, let others control your output, based upon their input? Acknowledging their input by returning a similar hostile signal might be more dignity than they deserve – you are a heavy weight, let the wrong people ill-equipped in the ring?
If you do decide to return a loaded question for a question – there is a plus, it might teach them the experience – the user experience is less than ideal, not all sharp out, not all sanded in. Teaching people that might be engineers, that might be carpenters, that might be building products you care about one day that A Fee is not all good, might save bare metal connections with High Voltages – there is some pluses in reminding, not all pretty to do that.
Mercy for the Merciful – so if someone gives you a loaded question, an A Fee question – they are being unmerciful? Maybe. There are allot of iffy questions, not all questions that are iffy are made with ill intent, bad motives, extra ulterior motives. People like to profit, people that like to profit don’t always think about how their desire to profit might be factored in non-ideally, subconsciously. Just because you sit next to the ketchup and mustard (red and yellow) and someone asks you for your thoughts on China – doesn’t mean they are or aren’t trying to non-ideally group you (sympathizer or non-sympathizer, supports trade and world peace or doesn’t).
World of Cat and Class (Categorize and Classify) with A Fee permanent records, combined with cameras and surveillance states? The combination is all mercy? The combination is sufficient grace? The combination is likely to ideal truth, ideal numbers? There is no A Fee in even asking the questions? There is no A Fee in strategic ambiguity, de-risking claimed as still A-ing love?
People might get off on, like A Fee? People are forced into A Fee as useful in a World of AI, Supercomputers, and Typos, Narrative Control and Propaganda. It is IBD, in by design – doesn’t mean it is all good – yet IBD, in by design, if it has to be IBD, in by design then not like it, not find ways to make it more useful, serve better purposes?
My Tech Blog 