Writing and words are useful, might help reduce oppression in the world. Reading and time costs can be oppressive too.
If I don’t write anything, the reader might have less to read. Less to read might be just go about their day as normal. Yet I am providing philosophical and potentially religious thoughts on ethics and judgment.
There is value in less Judgment. Luke 6 from The Bible talks about less judgment being valuable how mercy will be given to the merciful. Yet the topic of ethics and judgment, justice has potential to change course of someone’s day from less thoughts about judgment, what is right and wrong, from status quo to thought and creative thoughts about judgment, justice, and ethics.
I am trying to be less momentum for Christ’s judge less? No. I think the world ideally divests from judgment in the right times in the right ways in ways that lead to ideal peace and all ideally supported? No.
The conversation has power, the conversation has weight, thus the conversation has momentum. Reason logic, ethics, and right choice over wrong choice are systems that rely upon good data, and since this world is far less than ideal relevance limiting out, truth amplified, and less miscommunication amplified is it wise to give momentum to the conversation at all?
I want to turn up better judgment, better ethics, less judgment, no judgment, less legalism, ideal legalism – sounds like topics of opposing forces, yet they factor into perception of justice, living in a more just world.
I don’t like the idea of one day being the leader that presides over the executioner, or being the executioner about to drop the axe of the guillotine one day. I would not wish that future upon others either. Thus I feel it necessary to invest in conventional and creative problem solving to enable self and future generations in more ideal ways.
If one was required to execute someone, they would basically be saying “Chew I see F”. The one executing would not be required to factor in all injustice in the system, be allowed to perfect the system before any executions take place, will be ideally enabled with time and resources, power and truth to deliver in ideal ways at ideal times. The one executing would be saying I am grade A, I will live on, and the one being executed is set to F (the one executing might not want to judge, might not truly think the other is F, yet set to F is less danger than allowing F to walk the streets).
The one doing the executing would not be required to divulge that the guillotine axe they sharpened was using an electric generator that increases Global Warming. Christ says “Without sin cast the first stone” yet we all profit from global warming to a certain extent, allow it to continue, yet kind of set it to no sin, no big deal, not worthy of factoring into without sin. This is the place where important theory does not deliver in practice. Pragmatism and throughput delivers over ideal, ideal required to be met, set to justice, set to sufficient justice.
Global Warming is the only example of less than ideal justice? Global Warming is the best example of less than ideal justice? No, but don’t have to factor that in, likely leads to don’t have to factor that in.
My Tech Blog 