Getting a Storage Unit requires a valid ID. If you wind up homeless with an expired ID – our system might put an appointment to update a new ID a month and a half out. Combine that with they claim you can update your ID online (but don’t actually let you update your id online). Begs the question does the current system want people to break their back? Be required to backpack everything they own until their spine snaps in half.
Should a government that does this to their own people be allowed to police the World? Can’t deliver sufficient justice and throughput on a local level should not be trusted as has will have sufficient moral authority and clarity.
If our Allies want support, real support in the future, making sure our system maintains moral clarity facilitates that capacity. If your Ally, the system of your Ally turns corrupt – it will have less funding and support to support you, and you might have to come and fix the problem yourself (another problem not always value added).
Love, Golden Rule, and Delayed Fix? Precedent is prototypical? Stopped in advance has power.
Imagine a system robs you of justice, robs you of many hours of your life. Imagine you forgive that system, because it is the Christian thing to do – you apply forgiveness to an inanimate object not someone with feelings and concerns. Composed of many people and systems like computers and even structures like bridges and prisons – the combination of a system is not at itself a soul – souls and people might work on that system in ways to both make the system better and worse – should not be convoluted to the the system as a whole has a soul, will acknowledge its sin, fix its sin, and is worthy of being forgiven of its sin.
The individual people of a system can be forgiven? Yes. The individual people forgiven will lead to the sin no longer perpetrated, the injustice no longer facilitated? No. There is potential for scape goats, set to the problem is caused by this person or that person, this policy, or even natural disasters and external events.
Forgiving the system might remove your anger towards that system – there are positives and negatives. Positive – potential for less anger, less desire to corrupt it further, less desire to waste time on retribution based on less than ideal comprehension. Negative – once a system, a group of people, a corporation, or government wrongs you – you just choose to have grace, forgive it, move forward regardless does not always lead to the problem fixed, to the same problem prevented for others in the future. Worthy of note that a system unfixed has potential to bite oneself again in the future – easy to set systemic injustice to a fluke, a rare probability, lightning that won’t strike twice, statistic abnormality that does not have to be factored in on a normal basis.
Forgiveness and grace that facilitates problem unfixed (like an enabler of evil drug addiction) – forgiveness that is blind, and just says keep things as they are while injustice is continually perpetrated is not an ideal form of forgiveness, might be partially due to we convolute forgiving people and forgiving a system that might not be seen as a system in practice. Frankenstein, a system of nuts and bolts, policies and procedures – in combination the problem might not be viewed as systemic.
If a human is responsible, a human can be changed, can change their actions. Their actions are separate from causation and probabilities of others would be the natural implication – specific to the person not to the system.
If a system is responsible, then human specifics don’t fail to matter, they might make the situation better or worse. Systemic injustice to someone without cancer? Less of a problem. Systemic injustice to someone with cancer? More of a problem. Yet policies and procedures get set to are distributed fairly and equally, have equal efficacy, throughput, and acidity.
My Tech Blog 