I like bikinis and lingerie for women. The question is should I?
It is not all modesty. Less modesty turns up matters or it doesn’t?
Nudest colonies might actually be less of a problem – more gross might equal more early divests.
That said Texas is hot – requiring women to wear two sweaters in Texas summer could promote heat stroke – also not what I am going for.
Do investors in Global Warming bare any of the burden for turning up less modesty? True or False?
Investment in bikinis and lingerie tell Hollywood and other film producers what is and what is not sufficient. One might not like all of certain movies yet do we turn up some of what we don’t like when we turn up things we do like? The bad isn’t bad enough and we are going for a villain? Never amps?
Logic and Reason plus The Bible – treat others as you wish to be treated in combination of that? Don’t judge? That doesn’t amplify ideally. Don’t tempt? That does not amplify ideally. There is a balance not to be confused with I think society – including self – understand what that balance is or ideally gets it right.
Scarlet letter type society, witch burnings, Salem Witch Trials – combinations of don’t judge not sufficiently followed, and not the kind of society I want to turn up. Two sweater society and heat strokes no potential for hallucinations?
The problem hasn’t been ideally addressed, is unlikely to be ideally fixed – 2000 years since Christ is a long time, epic supercomputers and NASA all haven’t fixed the problems associated with the mins as of yet. Unlikely to be ideally fixed does not equate to the combinations are non-consequential. The combinations will be considered useful by both good and evil, people trying to run corporations, and people trying to gain and maintain power.
Unfixed – it is nice to think all things will be ideally addressed (all things possible through God, God works miracles) yet in truth miracles like parting the red sea are rare, not ideally invested in by a God that has claimed to already finish the work.
If people are in false belief that things are fixed that are not fixed – how might that factor into and facilitate power dynamics, who leads, who follows, and who sits on the street homeless and miserable?
Further society likes to turn up A is C owe. A is see you did X wrong so you deserve Y – they are just variables – math causes no problems. A is C owe without factoring in all of the above on this document?
Further we have real problems in the World – wars and people kidnapped on repeat – same horrible story turned up time and time again – we scream at the sky, yet maybe the sky has already divested from more miracles? We don’t ideally address and fix problems does not equate to we are ideally enabled to tackle and deliver peace and prosperity for all in advance? I would venture to say there is some truth in that.
The problems on this document factor into and facilitate how people view reason and logic, the value in reason and logic, the value in hard work, the value in giving up, the value in having hope or not having hope. They factor into inspiration and lack of inspiration, belief people have real capacity to change or don’t have real capacity to change.
Imagine you have a University and are trying to give a lecture as a professor yet your University is next to the beach, and there are beautiful women outside with bikinis on. Does it facilitate learning or is it a distraction, distraction that might not lead to cancer cured – cancer hasn’t been cured yet so it won’t be? A is try to block people for investment in love and future generations?
Not all investment in the nerdy research assistant librarian helping you finish the lab assignment? Your loss.
Further is it wise to comprehend the value in distraction? In might not be that big of a deal if you don’t have something important on the line – yet we do not all agree on what is important and what is not important at a given time.
Will this document given the topics it discusses turn up ideal support for your current problems in the World, for the problems of others you care about in the World? Communication might sometimes be seen as a discrete transaction – yet there is a time before the communication (including learning and comprehension of other topics), a time a non-null time that is invested in the communication, speaking, writing, listening, processing that will be invested in that communication, and time after that communication that might lead to more listening, processing, writing, and speaking.
This document might be translated – might be less than ideally comprehended, might be less than ideally processed – yet that might not factor in the reality that even the writer of the document does not fully comprehend the potential for good and evil in this document. One might venture to say that is possible via any document – given codes and double meanings have potential to be added to words in a day full of supercomputers. Another potential problem for a document is how likely is to get to intended parties and stay out of the hands that might use a document for the wrong purposes.
Each document is an investment in faith with the knowledge God does not seem to deliver miracles everyday or more than rare occurrences – at least from the perspective of this writer.
Imagine another life, another society, another world where this document is never provided, topics in it are never discussed. Is that the more ideal world?
My Tech Blog 