Caution: thoughts on Christianity might be important to international regulations
Less Love
Less Love out less love in
Less Love in less love out
We don’t have to fix that gets turned up. We don’t always have the right words to fix things; we are sometimes waiting on a God that fails to deliver miracles and healing in a timely way.
What is the consequences of less love?
Mercy for the merciful – people that care less about each other will be ideally merciful? The combination has not potential to affect unrelated parties?
Generosity – give and you will have an overflowing cup? Or people given to are unlikely to be generous with others, with self so what is the use in giving anyways?
Less mercy and grace – less grace fueled and inspired by reduced generosity, hard to deliver ideal with no support inadequate access to resources. Will the combination ideal peace, ideal better use of engineering equipment like airplanes and vehicles – both of which have the potential to be used to transport bombs?
Less generosity – try a product or save your money, hard times around the corner. Less product testers of no consequence? Want others trying the product first, no value in second in line?
Does less love, mercy, and grace facilitate greater faith, greater trust? Are ones likely to be more generous that do not trust each other – people love their enemies have no problems giving financial support for people that aren’t aligned with their cause, their wellbeing?
Less support has no potential to generate sides, team colors, less than ideal capacity to divest from bandwagon appeal, false accusations?
What are the consequences of saying we don’t have to fix that? It sets no precedent, no historic precedent that might be used against self or others?
Luke 6 as a cup of misery for me to a cup of misery for you – or something better?
My Tech Blog 