Warning Christian value references – might be pertinent to international regulation
Exodus 20:16 KJV “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.”
Reminder I am not a lawyer, I do want people to see better days
Being an artist I know it is easier to turn up than one would think
Blood, suit, devil horns, and rattlesnake tail painted on
CFB – Cute Funny Beautiful factors into profit of which images are seen, people with back against wall might not always deliver truth in a way that ideally factors in profit of others, less accused equates to less potential for false witness likely not always pondered – society invests in partial truth on the common, not think it will be factored into testimonies without actually being factored into testimonies?
Easy to think people that aren’t lawyers or judges don’t factor into guilty or innocent verdicts. Like talents like art have no potential to add value, change the tide. I have a stake in that does not always equal feeling of I have ability to change that. I use the word stake like equity, share in the profits – not sure I see it in list of definitions.
STAKE Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com
Adding value from less-than-ideal comprehension of truth is likely to lead to ideal delivery of Exodus 20:16? I know there is injustice in the world injustice in the system, my particular examples might not ideally fit to other people’s situations. Does that equal I shouldn’t discuss my particular examples? Who’s it profit, me or others? Both and none of the above?
Would I paint a painting to help make peace? Likely, not sure I would always know what painting to paint. Inspiring artists has value.
Me against CFB in a heavy weight match? Not sure I can win that fight.
WordPress is going pretty slow today, hard to fully appreciate speed of a tech system factors into truth, words, and art provided on any given day. Too hard to search for it, chalk it up to a loss write this sentence instead. Price of one missing image from a document on comprehension? Slower network has potential to alter history.
Relevant data from Halloween always provided at a later date?
Guillotine on left side to not reinforce Right. Blood on the guillotine to not reinforce Right. Right referring to death penalty as useful, not right referring to Republicans. Drew the image around Halloween, with everything else going on refrained from providing. Candle represents a life (like Amber Light, painted an image with a candle in front of a tidal wave in past (like little girl running from bombs in Vietnam). Probably not all value added for people trying to blow out candles or put out cigarettes – helps stops a fire, associated with death not all ideal. Thoughts of Pontius Pilate and leaders being a dead man being in charge of executions (leveraged not always ideal value out).
Can’t claim I A value out, my hope is this diagram will be value added not subtracted for people
Painted the picture on a different day than diagram I think, around Halloween, trying to be festive in the right way not always simple. Some movie references in the image (that I don’t own the rights to).
Used Carry when meant Carrie Carrie (1976 film) – Wikipedia – of note don’t think I have actually seen the film, high school and practical jokes gone bad thought from image
Waco siege – Wikipedia, Jim Jones – Wikipedia
I sometimes use the word out to refer to output like in engineering, sometimes use the word out to refer to not a part of – might alter logic and comprehension dependent upon interpretation in a particular context.
Not ideal value out – you know like – not ideal value sent, output
Could be interpreted as – Not ideal value out – you know like – there needs to be less value added
One might be represented as we need to add less value, when intended as trying to add value but the value might need to be altered in ways to add more value. Both matter in context likely have potential to convolute meaning without trying to. Profession specific vocabulary likely amplifies as second nature, without trying to – hard to fully value the impact. Need to set right without full comprehension of context is possible.
I might say someone’s words are not ideal value out – might equate to I want them to add more value and might not equate to I want them speaking less. Easy to ideal comprehension on possible perceptions of discouragement – not adding enough value I should just be silent when that is not always what people are going for. Thinking better of others not always easy, desire to think my comprehension is sufficient for assessment factors into and facilitates engineering which might less than ideal more situations than previously thought.
I like songs, I listen to songs, I also realize the words of a song might be not ideal value out, might be less than ideal value added in certain contexts. “People aren’t always encouraging…”, “well you did say their words are not ideal value out…”
I don’t own the rights to the song, I do support telling others Never Say Die
It is not all give up, the future is hopeless. I don’t want people to give up or think the future is hopeless. Give up, the future is hopeless is not ideal value in, not ideal value out. Thus, Never Say Die, the future has hope, don’t give up seems apt.
In sometimes referred to as input – thus input and output has potential to be convoluted – both are a value to destination. Not ideal value out might refer to reduced throughput (like in a working sense), discouragement does not ideal value out (output, provided, delivered, sent). Give up the future is hopeless would not be ideal value in (input, heard, listened to, seen) for anyone – discouragement that leads to apathy is not ideal for people to hear.
Thinking better of others leads to thinking others will ideally comprehend what I say, yet I don’t always ideal value out even in a way I could likely comprehend out of context, read later. Not all people have experience in engineering gets equated to all people have same, greater comprehension and level of knowledge than I have – combination might not ideal value out. Reminder I am not any of the people on these videos – words under a picture might be comprehended as words of person on the video. Obvious to writer might not equate to obvious to reader. Obvious to writer might not equate to ideal comprehension which might lead to not ideal value out (sent, spoken, provided as right) by others. Thought of summary of paragraph is Diff A know.
What do I mean by diff A know? The person writing the document has A know about intent and context of document (theoretically, ideal is based upon input of others might not be all A). Diff abbreviation for Difference, like in engineering comparing one document to each other might sometimes be referred to as a Diff. Makes me think of shortened abbreviation DAK, might be wrongly interpreted as District Attorney K which sounds less than ideal being from the south in United States. Makes me think of Music Group KDA. Reminder I am not associated with the people on the video.
Makes me think of South Korea, tech giant Samsung always providing more and more amazing. Don’t want to associate them with a District Attorney K, easy to miscomprehend without trying to.
I am not trying to make others look psycho, looking psycho might facilitate sells?
Reminder not on the videos, don’t own the rights to, not associated with – trying to add value for others.
Beautiful voices intoxicating
I like the songs – desire to turn up defense law to help fight injustice not always as encouraging as one might like.
Reminder not on the video, don’t own the rights to, not associated with – trying to add value for others.
Not an all bad intro, reminder
Reminder not on the video, don’t own the rights to, not associated with – trying to add value for others.
I don’t have a dial or dashboard to know about how much injustice is in the world, still going on in society. I know Villain Level Contrast is real and I also like movies (probably wouldn’t like them with no Villains). Fighting against being set to a villain is real and requirement to protect oneself and others is not always as encouraging or simple as one would like.
I like movies, names of villains might profit some parties over others. Not sure it is possible to really ideal, my name set to a villain beats other’s names set to a villain. He is trying to get a date? His name is Fred, or Jason? Like Freddy Cougar? Like Friday the 13th Jason? My name is Jason – first impressions might not always lead to time to ideal comprehension, PR (Public Relations)
Reminder not on the following videos, don’t own the rights to, not associated with – like the videos and trying to add value for others.
Sales does not ideal truth, max profit does not ideal truth, ideal truth is not cost-effective factors into truth as less liquid (referring to liquidity as economic term, reminder I am not an economist or lawyer, trying to add value). Reminder this is thoughts and commentary not words from the video. Truth as an asset, an asset that is frozen is less useful.
Trials are interesting. No Trial in the papers, or Rudy Giuliani in the papers? Which one sells more? Which one is higher value, and for who? For example is less than ideal value added is hard to fully comprehend. I don’t know specifics of those trials and I also like interesting reads and papers. The combination might be seen as A’s value out, I don’t think the combination A’s value out for all parties in combination.
I like movies, including scary movies, I used Jason Friday the 13th for example because my name is tied to it – combination might not be ideal relevance raised for people name Fred or people named Jack (like Jack the Ripper). Being from the south and Caucasian, seeing racial injustice, makes me feel the need to turn up Defense Law, I would say it is an offset, would not claim it is an ideal offset, does not ideal value out does not equal not worth doing.
My Tech Blog 
One thought on “Thoughts on November 30th, 2024”