Created a diagram dependent on news I have read – less access to network (higher cost from wifi charges vs normal land line) equates to reading vs watching (read not heard or watched matters).
I do not have ideal cybersecurity, feeling of ideal guarantee data I have been sent will be valid or trustworthy, right around an election that doesn’t feel all good, all fair value established and delivered. I also don’t want to contest election results as I know that has potential for other problems. Most people blessed and protected at end of day matters, F I know how to ideally turn that up. Proof readers matter, capacity to make tough decisions without intervention matters as well.
The diagram calls out some of the places where the diagram itself might be lacking in providing ideal value and Golden Rule to others. Drawing associations depedent upon data is value, value that is likely to deliver more or less value for some parties over others.
Making things a win win for all with no proof reader is not simple. 8 billion plus people claim it will ideal value for any party, let alone parties it is not trying to ideally value, ideally comprehend?
Make data cost too much, have to factor in too much will limit and stifle conversation – limited and stifled conversation might be seen as valuable is not all good. High voltage or not high voltage, talk about it don’t talk about it, my problem or someone else’s problem, talk about it or don’t talk about it?
People that are less than ideal altruism, less than ideal capacity to profit out set to can’t speak could be turned up. Less bombs dropping on my head has value, could be equated to I can’t speak about peace. Speaking about peace might ideal value more for me than others. If there are two parties A and B making peace, that might not ideal value added and subtracted for parties C, D, E… I don’t think the human mind really has ideal capacity to factor in all parties in a World full of 8 billion plus people, requirement to ideal Golden Rule for all parties and ideal perfection might lead to Worldwide silence. Worldwide silence in a world that has high voltage, dangers, risks does not seem like A perfection, A Golden Rule out.
Some will get access to the diagram before others, claim that ideals Golden Rule? Bible has quotes about not being double minded. I am single minded about World Peace (minus ifs on altruism – turned up partially by Bible quotes mind you), there are many other topics where I can see more than one side, seeing more than one side facilitates Golden Rule, appreciation for complexity and need for grace and mercy. Single minded as green light to any political party will ideal value out? Maybe I am incorrectly judging what single minded vs double minded is – Bible says don’t judge yet we are required on common to assess what is and what is not sin (I find the combination double minded to a certain regard – not all easy, not all lift).
Access to some not all parties, my cybersecurity has been messed with during election – others might have been too which might equate to injustice not fully described. Don’t really want a bar I like wrecked also don’t want people made examples of in a far less than ideally just environment. Want the new President and Administration protected, enabled. Nobody but self to factor in risk combined with F support wind. If what has been done to me has been done to others, F they have ideal access to comprehension, access to information to be truly liable – combination is not all good.
I am not the only one that sees things, I have a certain amount of comprehension based upon my eyes and ears. Others that comprehend might not acknowledge, drive real conversation – might just move forward without voicing concerns. Less real conversation might not be all parties protected. Problems less acknowledged might mitigate risk, might be useful, might be less personal risk, might be more personal profit. Carting people off in trains, mass deportation – combination doesn’t sound all ideal? F speak up is not all pretty.
Free Starter Diagram (outside of copyright names, corporations, product names – Three Links, Geek Bar, California Cherry, NFL, Blood Elves from WoW)

Notes from a previous day might shed light on some of thought
Thoughts November 7th, 2024
My comprehension was China was not all oppression out. China has given up on Taiwan or there is still leverage? Apple was making products in China – sounds like they have moved operations though my comprehension is vague and I know for a fact data that I have been provided has been less than ideal.
I like nice products and I also like employees treated right, less oppression Worldwide. Calling out Apple would be like pot calling the kettle black in certain cases, and yet not calling out injustice anywhere from any company might lead to greater levels of injustice. That said less funding for Apple might equate to less jobs, less people protected in China or whereever operations currently are. Trying to solve the problem might fan the problem, being a fan of Apple or other systems might lead to injustice allowed to continue. I really don’t know how to think about the issue, I don’t feel like the government including the FBI send me ideal information on the topic. Topics like AI and international security make the matter more complex, more complex in a way that is hard for me (someone with a Masters in Computer Engineering and years of experience to understand).
Get a new iPad feeling of greater computing power should be like a Jackpot, 777 – not is this product going to lead to oppressed workers in China, children being used for mineral gathering. F I want people in Silicon Valley or in China on the streets, F I know how words and actions, purchases or non-purchases truly affects things in Silicon Valley or China.
Church hasn’t really provided me ideal data on the matter – my opinion might be far from ideal, far from ideal comprehension. I want people safe, great products, and people less oppressed – F I know how to get there hopefully the new administration will make things better.
Definitely could use proofreader before posting – don’t want to start problems with China.