First, important disclaimer the writer of this document is not above the problems and solutions caused by Strong and Weak Brands, seen as perfect, seen as no potential for bias in thoughts might not lead to greater comprehension, investment in better.
Strong Brands have potential to lead to greater prosperity at times. Some of that is good and some of that is not all good in my opinion.
If I invest in Strong Brands, I reinforce Power as is, as worthy of maintaining in similar directions, in similar thought patterns, and similar problem solving. That is sometimes good, I like clean water to drink, I want others to have safe drinking water as well.
I also want to be an investor in The Golden Rule. If someone creates a new company their brand is not strong yet, might not have ideal support and oversight. Investing in, reinvesting in Strong Brands on the common might not always be ideal investment in innovation and support for others.
Weak Brand, like new companies won’t always have adequate support, think they will deliver ideally with less support? Competition is reinforced as a valuable system, winners get supported for a reason. Listen to a song that is all off-pitch, or one that is perfect tones? Expect singers to get to point they are generating support for self and others without investment, encouragement, love, and time?
There is reason to stay away from weak brands at times, might only have money to have an office on the wrong side of town. The wrong side of town where there is crime might not lead to ideal proximity to less drugs, and problems that are associated with drugs. Golden Rule I don’t want people to get stuck in a life they don’t want – Strong Brands, people protected matters, gets less than ideally turned up at times.
The combination has potential to turn up Strong Brands in less than ideal ways, requirements to have increased funding to have a sufficient location. Proximity to crime and a requirement to get a better location to survive? Combination is not all pretty and gets turned up on the common. Money is a system that factors into leverage, requirements for clean environments and nice clothes amplify for good reasons at time (respect for each other, sign of investment, appreciation for grace and less tests for others, homeless man in the boardroom with the CEO – might not always ideal support for all).
I like Rock Music, has potential for appreciation that nice clothes and reinforced power in similar directions does not always lead to ideals. Rock Music which capitalizes on Weak Brand dynamics has potential to be turned into a Strong Brand. Potential for not all good things in combination – drugs, sex, and rock and roll set to a Strong Brand has potential for problems. Music is not alcohol or drugs, say it has no similar properties affecting the brain?
Rock Music supports Freedom of Speech, a system that is a Strong Brand. Proximity to Strong Brands has potential to lead to Strong Brands. The World values less dehumanization, investment in songs and art over bombs might not get ideally turned up at times in our World.
My Tech Blog 