Owe no see min

If someone builds a bridge, they expect to see it help people get across to the other side of the water it crosses. They do not expect people to trapped on it and shot. Owe no see min

Owned AC in thought comes to mind

You know a bridge could be used for that, could fin, does not equate to creators should be finned. Unwise to see society as no responsibility in, bridges are built does not equate to bridge makers know the future. The future brings innovation that brings new challenges, requirement to know the future, know all mins would equate to zero bridges built.

Know has potential to fin, Owe no fins

Bridge makers know less than ideals have potential to happen in the future, Society is responsible for guaranteeing those are limited adequately. No maintenance, no protection mins, potential for fins.

Defense Law might get put on back burner when National Debt and Infrastructure challenges meet. Likely to fin once min-ed, “we’ll just solve the oppression problem later” – might be a thought, said in other words. Owned will see b let, ban let met – wait, looks like we have other things on the agenda. Reminder I am not a lawyer, I do care, and my support throughput is limited, temporary. Also, I have not agreed to see ban let oppression met – I want it reduced, knowing I do not own responsibility is crucial, words said to inspire thought. Perception of own met would not be all get. Hypotheticals that are entertained always ideally framed?

I hope this document is useful for increasing engineering throughput, reducing oppression, and raising awareness of national debt combined with aging infrastructure.