
Diagram thoughts around We vs I as a useful word, system
LTI – Less Than Ideal
There is value in Diagrams, I don’t always know where it is, there is danger in diagrams, I don’t always know where it is – part of why I say Free Starter Diagram – a document that has potential to be improved upon, delivered from a man I’d, that might be seen as We’d, I’d say We’d do this, do that, like Peace, Not War. One man’s logic is value added, set to ideal would not be all humanization in.
An example of defending my reasoning. Time Costs factor into Know, Know factor into Time Costs. Reading books take time factor into Know, Know from one book might lead to another book (more Time Costs).
Defending my reasoning is an example of Complexity factors into Time Costs, Time Costs that are not always invested in. Increased time costs are not always profitable, thus know is profit based. Some teachers might feel the need to clarify all points, some might think there is greater learning in clarifying none. Bias all points based upon my comprehension might not be ideal value generated. Reduced Time Costs, desire to see how others might comprehend with less weighing in on reasoning – kind of like showing Art (others might see something different, and that could be vital). Version 1 potential for LTIs, alpha, not a beta, potentially useful potentially not production ready – combo might inspire less confidence which is not all good (software engineering terms used potentially might limit know of others).
How much would an app on We vs I on language be to the World? The diagram is not an app, not production ready, does not equate to low value.
Increasing weight of words, do we always inspire enough grace and forgiveness to go along with that? We all want to spend 24/7/365 in a Peace circle? We don’t want to make Peace? We fee-d harder to divest cheddared for writer? We’d all like to figure this out, so lets book the meeting room for 10 more hours? Couldn’t happen? We’ve got this covered, always said with all people on board? We weighed me.