Reminder I give away a lot of free content on this blog, the book title is not mine to give freely
The book is called – THE SELFISHNESS OF OTHERS AN ESSAY ON THE FEAR OF NARCISSIM – KRISTEN DOMBEK
Thoughts after first chapter of book I am reading on Narcissism, thoughts might approximate a summary in certain regards
Kant’s apply morality to a universal choice amplifies less than ideally. Imagine if everyone in the world was driving cars, all the time. LTI systems IBD convolute determinism on moral clarity especially when scaled.
Is combating Narcissism possible in a world that gives, relies upon VLC (villain level contrast) but does not want to accept it, in a profit-based world that limits relevance when is desirable? Doctors set meaning on Narcissism to distinguish their work, their fine unquestionable work from the Narcissists (those with psychological problems) might give a feeling that is a bit less-than-ideal, potential for less-than-ideal oppression and leverage out for fellow doctors, as a reminder?
Narcissism, label of Narcissism, setting others to a villain for a system we all turn up is both in by design, consequential, and has potential to be leveraged and capitalized on by power in both ideal and non-ideal ways. And all this is written by someone that is trying to be above being a narcissist, hubris and still trying to profit.
AC LTI properties exist in others, not in self? Desire to thin A profit min? Air Conditioning or A (like in school grade), both definitions kind of reinforce each other.
Narcissists (that might include self more than self might like to admit) both desire others to be less narcissistic and profit (from not being called out for inconsistency) is a bit confounding. Rockstars call out Politicians, and Politicians call out Rockstars all while both profit and inflate the same system they aspire to want to limit.
High ground is important, maintenance has potential for a problem. Challenged is profitable, Not Challenged is profitable, claim it does not amplify LTI? I have to stop that, I don’t have to stop that both useful systems with varying time costs. Hour glasses are fragile, worthy of protecting.
The point on combating the problem might lead to the problem was noteworthy. Commendable, Exemplary, what all should aspire to?
Make all should be set to LTINO – less than ideal narcissists, narcissism out, might factor into less narcissism, LTIAoETC – less than ideal appreciators of extra time costs?
The Bible says don’t judge which is important, don’t judge might lead to less assessment, less assessment might lead to increased momentum for narcissism. Important to not judge, or not judge for right reasons? I am not going to assess that, leave it for someone else mentality?
There are exposed wires on telephone poles around the city, I am not in charge of that, not responsible for that, they might (would hope) they are not live wires, does not equate to seeing them like that, knowing what I know about Electrical Safety feels all good, feels all should. Assess less, converse less not always good, potential for not all real problems, that might truly tempt judgment out.
My Tech Blog 