Supercomputer Representation

Supercomputers are powerful.

Imagine a Supercomputer has a file about every person on Earth and in Space (Space Stations included).

Imagine that Supercomputer was taught to talk.

Imagine that Supercomputer could walk the line of dual representation of self and others better than any man on Earth.

What would that Supercomputer say to me?

Imagine I could speak directly to God, what would God say to me.

Imagine others in a Church, potentially a Priest or Preacher says they have spoken with God and have direction for your life, what would they say to me?

Likely all 3 could be different. All 3 are likely to be based upon Human perception and comprehension that is less than ideal. God’s visibility is higher than Supercomputers, static file representation of Supercomputers. Supercomputers can’t tell the future, God can. God has allowed Genocide and Wars in the past, it is important understand what God allows and does not allow, that human nature, perception, and comprehension are less than ideal systems.

A supercomputer or a PhD in History, which one is more valuable? Both are based upon mankind, that has shown less than ideal precedent for truth, less than ideal precedent for zero profit desired and amplified at the cost of perception and comprehension – relevance limiting on either, set to unlikely? A man or woman with a PhD in History has potential to understand things, including things from a supercomputer faster, does not guarantee their view of history will be based upon zero biases from History. That said a PhD in History has potential to understand and comprehend things in Societies others might not be able to comprehend, critical things, that might be based upon far less than ideal data.

Direction, like that determined by current events, supercomputer predictions, predictions based upon history, and perception and comprehension of what God wants for one’s life is valuable, useful. People that have a tendency to utilize valuable, useful for profit might equate to less than ideal perception and comprehension of that direction. Reinforcing trust through good data might not always be continued with non corrupted data. Reliance has potential for a valuable, useful system and a less than ideal system – think self will ideally know when that is? People move forward based upon faith on compasses, equates to compasses aren’t required to work.

Advice from all if given correctly, could likely be useful, valuable. Valuing what might be wrong, might or might not flag issues in a perceivable and comprehensible way. Data is consequential user beware seems apt. Reinforcing distrust, reminders that systems deliver less than ideal does not always lead to greater trust. Trust reduced is expensive, not always factored into cost.

Not much different than a History book, History books have potential to be biased – making sure the wrong books don’t get turned up is not a guarantee. Representation one relies upon has potential to be changed is far less than a cost free system and is pretty much a guarantee in a dynamic world that turns up training and comprehension in less than sufficient at times way. I don’t have to train them, teach them, has potential to be equated to won’t be a problem. Complexity grows at a faster rate than capacity to perceive and comprehend. Teaching others factors into representation maintained, capacity to verify representation is maintained – is important, not ideally turned up in society.