Sin and Evil are topics that are always on going, topics of discussion that have potential to lead to valuable change for society in perception, comprehension, and better assessment.
The Bible talks about not talking to homosexuals.
It also talks about the Golden Rule.
It also says knowing and not doing is sin James 4:17.
If someone has a High Voltage message, if they write High Voltage on a sign and someone that is homosexual sees it, are they talking to the homosexual?
A sign is not talking seems over attention to details and specifics matter.
Homosexuals need to be protected, society is far less than ideal homosexuality by default (thus society in constant sin seems apt James 4:17). Some sins greater than others get set, I am not sure that is the way God looks at things always. And greater sins matter.
God allowed genocide in WW2, Cambodia, and Rwanda. God knows that the Golden Rule matters. Infinite power that allows Genocide not set to breaking James 4:17?
If someone that you knew, cared about son, daughter, mother, father, brother, or sister were homosexual would you be able to protect them? Could never be set wrong by competing people in families? Homosexuality, and people set to Villain Level Contrast amps less than ideally by default. The Devil might like to use less than ideal perception and comprehension to make peoples lives worse, get people to judge, get people to go silent, get people to punish too far?
Homosexuality is a financial engine, people don’t always understand what they reinforce or how they reinforce it. Claims that requirement to not discriminate against sexual preference is enforced correctly or ideally seems unwise – corporations claim it, yet would you want your son or daughter forced next to someone that talks about and encourages homosexuality on a day to day basis, other reasons for letting go and firing, round about fixes likely to be turned up versus actually dealing with a PR problem.
Economics and People getting jobs could easily set someone to gay, and thus potentially less respectable, less worthy of hiring.
Non-ideals have potential to be turned up via medications, media, and technology that might lead to at the very least perception of gay and at the worst someone fueled into non-stop debauchery.
I listen to the part of The Bible that says Golden Rule matters, we have all fallen short of the glory of God over don’t talk to homosexuals. I believe High Voltage signs, safety messages matter for all people including homosexuals.
All that said if a gay man in appropriately grabbed my crotch, I might want to cut off their hand – extreme thought, not one I would actually want to carry through with. That said imagine if you are stuck in a government facility and have that happening on a daily or hourly basis – to say homosexuality does not have potential to spark blind rage would be wrong. It amplifies differently, and oppression is sometimes a factor might equate to greater divestment as a whole is useful at times.
All that said, current perceptions of homosexuality, what is homosexuality, and what is sin in society has been established less than ideally in society, with less than ideal agreement. That equates to some filled with blind rage, and some making away with giant promotions and top dollar accounting. Sin and Evil is in by design in society does not equate to finances and economic wealth has been distributed ideally, there is no need to help and better the poor that has gotten less than an ideal hand in life.
There is no requirement for anyone on Earth to read this document. I mean it to be helpful. I do believe in God yet I don’t comprehend The Bible ideally. In pursuit of greater knowledge I might deliver perception and comprehension less than ideally.
The Bible says Don’t Judge – is setting someone to Homosexual or Not Homosexual judging? Is it sin (James 4:17)? Inned is not feed min, could lead to life or death.
Its never a problem? No
It is what I would want for my family or friends? No
It could lead to early death, loss profit, wages, and being stuck on the street? Yes
There is reason to amplify false impressions to protect others? Yes
Could amplify with less than ideal comprehension? Yes
Could be set to Child Molester likely by default? Yes
Power might promise you can do this or that to show how encouraging of freedom they are while utilizing it as a way to consolidate power and oppression? Yes
Society including Jails without shower curtains amplify it by default, in my opinion? I don’t like it does not equate to doesn’t happen. Tax dollars might fund some things I am not trying to fund?
It is an uncomfortable topic, that potentially puts peoples lives on the line at times, thus is not always talked about, fully discussed? True.
Relevance limiting on what is and is not sin delivers less than ideally for some if not many parties? True.
I want to set it to no big deal, lingerie shops are likely less than ideal homosexuality out for women, yet we allow them. I am not sure I really want a society that can’t have lingerie shops does not equate to I think zero lingerie shops might equate to less homosexuality. Zero lingerie shops might also equate to inability to wear non modest clothing, non modest clothing that could save life in Hot Global Warmed areas. Golden Rule that less dying from heat stroke outweighs desire to ideally negate homosexuality factors into my thinking, likely does for much of the rest of society. I don’t think claiming sin is ideally out by design is a fair claim. Everyone to perceived as constantly sinning by leaving things in by design that are iffy might be harder for preachers does not equate to I think it is the less true value.
No children, less children that will turn into adults that will sin – is not set to the ideal value for a reason. Society is people, humans in by design, humanity in by design is less than ideal sin reduced. Telling a homosexual their sin matters more while society reinforces many other sins and homosexuality by default seems less than ideal. Talking about how bad homosexuals sins are might not lead to all money launders caught, talking about how bad money launders are might not be all homosexuals caught. Judging either worthy of being caught, left in oppressive jails, when society reinforces so many other sins including judging when told not to judge, seems unwise.
I am also of the opinion that holding strong opinions especially in a society with less-than-ideal amplification has potential to encourage the opposite. Someone that might want less homosexuality, just might reduce conversation around the topic. A big sign don’t push this button is unlikely to lead to zero button presses.
A man that knows society would be better with less sin yet doesn’t know how to deliver ideal direction based on that? Better to not be the judge of that? Factors into less know? Less know that could be sin, James 4:17?
If you don’t know there is a problem, then you are trained about a problem, then see a problem, is it sin not to fix the problem? is it sin to fix the problem less than ideally?
Without sin cast the first stone applies to homosexuality too, not sure adultery is a protected class in discrimination protection – though maybe should be
Choose what sins matter more?
Free Starter Diagram based upon Christ’s Teaching “without sin cast the first stone”
I would suggest not testing anyone with sexual assault or adultery 1000 times, 77 times might mean infinity to some – still not sure I would think it wise to test that far
Society and Governments Worldwide likely reinforce more than 1000 times daily, forgive Society and Governments? Only if it doesn’t happen again?
Levels matter I have less of a problem with strip clubs than people molested in oppressive government facilities, yet the two have potential to turn each other up in less-than-ideal ways. I wouldn’t know when I do visit (perception and comprehension, backrooms not always ideal visibility), claim to know when I haven’t?
My Tech Blog 