I like Engineering and Space Travel. NASA and other Space Companies (SpaceX, BlueOrigin, Virgin Galatic) all have potential to claim they are progressing Humanity forward with their technology. Other companies have potential to accelerate their gains swiftly while my cybersecurity and capacity to purchases has been limited, altered, made harder to trust. Gains like Tech gains to more profitable and better experience for all is far from a given, and could be much more ideally turned up.
I might not be on the same level as NASA Engineers does not equate to being limited, made to feel like my investments and impact mean nothing feels good, or amplifies trust for all those that are allowed to profit and make progress in society. Progress including Technology gains seen as delivered and amplified for ideal parties, while protecting ideal parties over time, combined with a legal system that profits through intellectual property law wealthy parties feels like a less than ideal path forward for the future.
A system that says it wants gains, like Tech and Better Environmental Impact not held accountable to Fair and Equal Treatment is a less than sufficient path forward. Claims of desire to deliver better for all humanity by Governments, Government Agencies, and Companies not held accountable sets poor precedent for the future. What is allowed for the sake of Throughput factors into Historic Precedent for what is allowed for the sake of Throughput.
Are the laws in place, is the system reinforcing by words, choices, and actions the ideals it claims? Those trying to make the World a Better Place have potential to be attached to wrong parties, groups, and organizations for the purpose of silencing should not be equated to that attachment is always correct, ideal, sufficiently invested in with truth. Limiting voices that are anti-oppression by demonizing unfairly is consequential and factors into historic precedent, better to divest swiftly.
Less voices limited today factors into less voices limited tomorrow.
Gains are dependent upon a secure environment.
What factors into a Secure Environment
- Reliable Product Lines
- Reliability in what is said will be done, will be done
- Research Ethics – ethics not followed will hurt investors, raise concerns, inspire enemies
- Consistency – Logos that change everyday, product sets that change everyday potential for feeling of not the same, untrustworthy
- Less feeling of personally singled out, unfair treatment, assessment and judgment based upon clear perception and comprehension of truth, less obfuscation
- Physical Security factors into Device Security, Car Security, Bicycle Security
- Presence – one man guarding, or many that reaffirm and reinforce that security measures will be enforced. Capacity to challenge has potential to factor into Desire to challenge. Society mistreats one person, has potential to mistreat more.
- Communication, Active Listening not always turned up, Security and Safety messages required from a liability standpoint set to always adequately distributed not always true value added. There is High Voltage in Society, training people about Electrical Safety is set to already done, in by default. Message Throughput gets set to ideal when it is far less than ideal, self included.
- Safety, if an environment looks or feels unsafe, progress is less likely to be made, that is useful to some
- Less capacity to set to permanent value out. People that don’t think they will be valued if they add value are less likely to add value, more likely to depend on and amplify Teams, slowing as useful for some. Can’t get a fair shake or fair deal has potential to drive actions, actions that lead to a less secure environment and reduce gains, throughput. Inclusivity reduced equates to Conversation reduced yet gets set to ideal when it shouldn’t be.
- Requirement to Challenge in the open with adequately represented Truth. Being limited sideways without trials, not how I would wish to be treated.
My Tech Blog 